Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T01:53:19.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ambient Returns: Creative Capital's Contribution to Local Manufacturing Competitiveness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Timothy R. Wojan
Affiliation:
Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D. C.
David A. McGranahan
Affiliation:
Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D. C.
Get access

Abstract

This paper addresses the possibility that competitive rural manufacturing is increasingly driven by quality-of-life factors required to attract highly skilled and creative workers. Recent findings that highly creative workers are drawn to amenity-rich rural areas provide the empirical leverage for testing anecdotal claims that these areas tend to contain small manufacturing bases that are more reliant on innovation. This contrasts with the cost advantage rationale of traditional rural manufacturing, an advantage that is eroding with increased globalization. The analysis provides the first empirical evidence that the start of entrepreneurial manufacturing plants and the adoption of advanced technologies and management practices are strongly associated with the local employment share in highly creative occupations.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © 2007 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Appelbaum, E., Bailey, T., Berg, P., and Kalleberg, A. L. 2000. Manufacturing Advantage: Why High-Performance Work Systems Pay Off Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.Google Scholar
Baldwin, J. R., Diverty, B., and Sabourin, D. 1995. “Technology Use and Industrial Transformation: Empirical Perspectives.” Analytical Studies Branch Research Paper Series No. 75, Micro-Economics Analysis Division, Statistics Canada, Ottawa, Ontario.Google Scholar
Barkley, D. L. 1988. “The Decentralization of High-Technology Manufacturing to Nonmetropolitan Areas.Growth and Change 19(1): 1330.Google Scholar
Barkley, D. L., Dahlgren, R.A., and Smith, S. M. 1988. “High-Technology Manufacturing in the Nonmetropolitan West: Gold or Just Glitter?American Journal of Agricultural Economics 70(3): 560571.Google Scholar
Barkley, D. L., and Keith, J. E. 1991. “The Locational Determinants of Western Nonmetro High Tech Manufacturers: An Econometric Analysis.Western Journal of Agricultural Economics 16(2): 331334.Google Scholar
Beyers, W. B., and Lindahl, D.P. 1996. “Lone Eagles and High Fliers in Rural Producer Services.Rural Development Perspectives 11(3): 210.Google Scholar
Dahl, M. S. 2004. “Embodied Knowledge Diffusion, Labor Mobility and Regional Dynamics: Do Social Factors Limit the Development Potential of Regions?” Paper presented at the DRUID Summer Conference on Industrial Dynamics, Innovation, and Development, Elsinore, Denmark, June 14-16.Google Scholar
Deller, S. C., Tsai, T., Marcouiller, D. W., and English, D. B. 2001. “The Role of Amenities and Quality of Life in Rural Economic Growth.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83(2): 352365.Google Scholar
Doeringer, P., Evans-Klock, C., and Terkla, D. 2004. “What Attracts High Performance Factories? Management Culture and Regional Advantage.Regional Science and Urban Economics 34(5): 591618.Google Scholar
Doms, Μ., Dunne, T., and Troske, K. 1997. “Workers, Wages, and Technology.Quarterly Journal of Economics 112(1): 253290.Google Scholar
Dosi, G., Pavitt, K., and Soete, L. 1990. The Economics of Technical Change and International Trade. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Florida, R. 2002. The Rise of the Creative Class: And How It's Transforming Work, Leisure, Community, and Everyday Life. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Fritsch, M. 1992. “Regional Differences in New Firm Formation: Evidence from West Germany.Regional Studies 26(3): 233241.Google Scholar
Fritsch, M., and Mueller, P. 2004. “Effects of New Business Formation on Regional Development Over Time.Regional Studies 38(8): 961975.Google Scholar
Gale, H. F. 1997. “Is There a Rural-Urban Technology Gap?” Agriculture Information Bulletin No. 736-01, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D. C. Google Scholar
Gale, H. F., McGranahan, D.A., Teixeira, R., and Greenberg, E. 1999. “Rural Competitiveness: Results of the 1996 Rural Manufacturing Survey.” Agricultural Economics Report No. 776, Economic Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D. C.Google Scholar
Gale, H. F., Wojan, T. R., and Olmsted, J. C. 2002. “Skills, Flexible Manufacturing Technology, and Work Organization.Industrial Relations 41(1): 4879.Google Scholar
Geroski, P.A. 1995. “What Do We Know about Entry?International Journal of Industrial Organization 13(4): 421440.Google Scholar
Glasmeier, A. K. 1991. The High-Tech Potential: Economic Development in Rural America. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy.Google Scholar
Goe, R. 2002. “Factors Associated with the Development of Nonmetropolitan Growth Nodes in Producer Services Industries, 1980-1990.Rural Sociology 67(3): 416441.Google Scholar
Gottlieb, P. 1994. “Amenities as Economic Development Tools: Is There Enough Evidence?Economic Development Quarterly 8(3): 270285.Google Scholar
Granger, M. D., and Blomquist, G. C. 1999. “Evaluating the Influence of Amenities on the Location of Manufacturing Establishments in Urban Areas.Urban Studies 36(11): 18591873.Google Scholar
Halstead, J. M., and Deller, S. C. 1997. “Public Infrastructure in Economic Development and Growth: Evidence from Rural Manufacturers.Journal of the Community Development Society 28(2): 97116.Google Scholar
Isserman, A. 2000. “Creating New Economic Opportunities: The Competitive Advantages of Rural America in the Next Century.” In Beyond Agriculture: New Policies for Rural America. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Kansas City. Available at www.kc.frb.org/PUBLICAT/beyond/beyondmain.htm.Google Scholar
Lambert, D. M., McNamara, K.T, and Garrett, M.I. 2006. “An Application of Spatial Poisson Models to Manufacturing Investment Location Analysis.Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 38(1): 105121.Google Scholar
Lazear, E. P. 2004. “Balanced Skills and Entrepreneurship.American Economic Review 94(2): 208211.Google Scholar
Lee, S. Y., Florida, R., and Acs, Z. J. 2004. “Creativity and Entrepreneurship: A Regional Analysis of New Firm Formation.Regional Studies 38(8): 879891.Google Scholar
McGranahan, D.A. 1999. Natural Amenities Drive Rural Population Change. AER No. 781, Economic Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D. C. Google Scholar
McGranahan, D.A. 2002. “Local Context and Advanced Technology Use by Small Independent Manufacturers in Rural Areas.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 84(5): 12371245.Google Scholar
McGranahan, D. A., and Wojan, T. R. 2007. “Recasting the Creative Class to Examine Growth Processes in Rural and Urban Counties.Regional Studies 41(2): 197216.Google Scholar
McMahon, R.G. P. 2001. “Deriving an Empirical Development Taxonomy for Manufacturing SMEs Using Data from Australia's Business Longitudinal Survey.Small Business Economics 17(3): 197212.Google Scholar
Miller, J. P. 1989. “The Product Cycle and High Technology Industry in Non-Metropolitan Areas, 1976-1980.The Review of Regional Studies 19(1): 112.Google Scholar
Murnane, R. J., and Levy, F. 1996. Teaching the New Basic Skills: Principles for Educating Children to Thrive in a Changing Economy. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
OECD. 1999. Cultivating Rural Amenities: An Economic Development Perspective. Paris: OECD Publications.Google Scholar
OECD. 2002. OECD Territorial Reviews: Siena, Italy. Paris: OECD Publications.Google Scholar
Pezzini, M., and Wojan, T. R. 2002. “Leveraging Amenities for Rural Development: Direction, Dialogue, and Negotiation.” In Exploring Policy Options for a New Rural America. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Kansas City. Available at www.kc.frb.org/Publicat/Exploring/RC01Pezz.pdf.Google Scholar
Piore, M., and Sabel, C. F. 1984. The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Roper, S. 2001. “Innovation, Networks and Plant Location: Some Evidence for Ireland.Regional Studies 35(3): 215228.Google Scholar
Salvesan, D., and Renski, H. 2002. “The Importance of Quality of Life in the Location Decisions of New Economy Firms.” Reviews of Economic Development Literature and Practice No. 15, Economic Development Administration, Washington, D. C. Google Scholar
Scott, A., and Storper, M. 1987. “High Technology Industry and Regional Development: A Theoretical Critique and Reconstruction.International Social Science Journal 39(112): 215232.Google Scholar
Shaiken, H., Hertzenberg, S., and Kuhn, S. 1986. “The Work Process under More Flexible Production.Industrial Relations 25(2): 167183.Google Scholar
Smith, E.D. 1989. “Reflections on Human Resources in the Strategy of Rural Economic Development.The Review of Regional Studies 19(1): 1323.Google Scholar
Taylor, M. 1986. “The Product-Cycle Model: A Critique.Environment and Planning A 18(6): 751761.Google Scholar
Tolbert, C. M., and Sizer, M. 1996. “U. S. Commuting Zones and Labor Market Areas: A 1990 Update.” Staff Paper No. AGES-9614, Rural Economy Division, Economic Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D. C.Google Scholar
Wojan, T. R. 1996. “Structural and Macroeconomic Explanations of Rurla/Urban Income Divergence.” Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Wojan, T. R. 2001. “Do Meta-Standards Help Pave the Rural High Road? Firm Strategies Surrounding ISO 9000 Certification.” Contractor Paper No. 01-04, TVA Rural Studies, Lexington, KY. Available at www.rural.org/publications/Wo[-]jan01-04.pdf.Google Scholar
Wojan, T. R., and Lackey, S. B. 2000. “Manufacturing Specialization in the Southeast: Rural Necessity, Rural Possibility or Rural Vestige?Review of Regional Studies 30(2): 167188.Google Scholar