Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:41:50.593Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Allocatable Fixed Inputs and Jointness in Agricultural Production: More Implications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Samuel Asunka
Affiliation:
Agricultural economics, Texas A&M University
C. Richard Shumway
Affiliation:
Agricultural economics, Texas A&M University

Abstract

The presence of allocatable fixed inputs may cause truly joint technologies to appear nonjoint in the short run as well as truly nonjoint technologies to appear joint. This paper demonstrates theoretically why this can happen and then documents that it actually occurs in a significant way in aggregate U.S. agricultural production. A simple testing procedure is used that requires no data on input allocations. The important finding is that failure to reject true (apparent) nonjointness does not justify modeling short-run (long-run) supply independent of alternative output prices.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ball, V. E. 1988. “Modeling Supply Response in a Multiproduct Framework.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 70 (November): 813–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, R.G., and Just, R.E. 1989. “Estimating Multioutput Technologies.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 71 (November): 980–95.Google Scholar
Just, R. E., Zilberman, D., and Hochman, E. 1983. “Estimation of Multicrop Production Functions.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 65 (November): 770–80.Google Scholar
Just, R. E., Zilberman, D., Hochman, E., and Bar-Shira, Z. 1990. “Input Allocation in Multicrop Systems.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72 (February): 200–09.Google Scholar
Lau, L. J. 1972. “Profit Functions of Technologies with Multiple Inputs and Outputs.Review of Economics and Statistics 54 (August): 281–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leathers, H. 1991. “Allocable Fixed Inputs as a Cause of Joint Production: A Cost Function Approach.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73 (November): 1083–90.Google Scholar
Lim, H., and Shumway, C. R. 1996. “Technical Change and Model Specification: U.S. Agricultural Production.” Working Paper, Texas A&M University.Google Scholar
Lopez, R. E. 1984. “Estimating Substitution and Expansion Effects Using a Profit Function Framework.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66 (August): 358–67.Google Scholar
Moschini, G. 1989. “Normal Inputs and Joint Production with Allocatable Fixed Factors.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 71 (November): 1021–24.Google Scholar
Ray, S. C. 1982. “A Translog Cost Function Analysis of U.S. Agriculture.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 64 (August): 490–98.Google Scholar
Sakai, Y. 1974. “Substitution and Expansion Effects in Production Theory: The Case of Joint Production.Journal of Economic Theory 9 (November): 255–74.Google Scholar
Shumway, C. R. 1983. “Supply, Demand, and Technology in a Multiproduct Industry: Texas Field Crops.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 65 (November): 748–60.Google Scholar
Shumway, C. R. 1988. “Estimation of Multicrop Production Functions: Comment.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 70 (August): 729–32.Google Scholar
Shumway, C. R., Pope, R. D., and Nash, E. K. 1984. “Allocatable Fixed Inputs and Jointness in Agricultural Production: Implications for Economic Modeling.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66 (February): 7278.Google Scholar
Shumway, C. R., Pope, R. D., and Nash, E. K. 1988. “Allocatable Fixed Inputs and Jointness in Agricultural Production: Implications for Economic Modeling: Reply.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 70 (November): 950–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, R. D. 1983. “Multiple Input, Multiple Output Production Choices and Technology in the U.S. Wheat Region.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 65 (February): 4556.Google Scholar