Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T13:54:45.924Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tradeoff between Economies of Size in Treatment and Diseconomies of Distribution for Rural Water Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Richard N. Boisvert  and
Todd M. Schmit
Richard N. Boisvert
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural, Resource, and Managerial Economics, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.
Todd M. Schmit
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural, Resource, and Managerial Economics, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper outlines a method to determine the tradeoff between economies of size in water treatment and diseconomies of distribution. Cost equations are estimated for several treatment technologies and distribution extensions. Empirical results are used to identify optimal system size where average total costs are minimized. Regardless of treatment, most costs are due to distribution. As water systems expand service territories, only in the most densely populated areas would remaining economies of size in treatment outweigh the diseconomies in distribution.

Type
Articles
Information
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , October 1997 , pp. 237 - 246
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Water Works Association (AWWA). 1992. “Water Industry Data Base: Utility Profiles.” Denver: AWWA.Google Scholar
Boisvert, R.N., and Schmit, T.M. 1996a. “Distribution of Community Water Systems across the United States with Emphasis on Size, Water Production, Ownership, and Treatment.” R.B. 96-17. Department of Agricultural, Resource, and Managerial Economics, Cornell University. October.Google Scholar
Boisvert, R.N., and Schmit, T.M. 1996b. “Economies of Size in Water Treatment vs. Diseconomies of Dispersion for Small Public Water Systems.” W.P. 96-15. Department of Agricultural, Resource, and Managerial Economics, Cornell University. November.Google Scholar
Boisvert, R.N., Tsao, L., and Schmit, T.M. 1996. “The Implications of Economies of Scale and Size in Providing Additional Treatment for Small Community Water Systems.” Unpublished report to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Department of Agricultural, Resource, and Managerial Economics, Cornell University. February.Google Scholar
Christensen, L.R., and Greene, W.H. 1976. “Economies of Scale in U.S. Electric Power Generation.” Journal of Political Economy 84: 655–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, R.M., and Stevie, R.G. 1981. “A Water Supply Model Incorporating Spatial Variables.” Land Economics 57: 18–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dajani, J., and Gemmell, R. 1973. “Economic Guidelines for Public Utilities Planning.” Journal of the Urban Planning and Development Division 99: 171–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engineering News-Record (ENR). 1995. “Construction Cost Index History, 1907-1995.” Engineering News-Record 234: 80.Google Scholar
Ford, L., and Warford, L. 1969. “Cost Functions for the Water Industry.” Journal of Industrial Economics 18: 53–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. 1993. “Very Small Systems Best Available Technology Cost Document,” Draft report prepared for the Drinking Water Technology Branch, Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Schmit, T.M., and Boisvert, R.N. 1996. “Rural Utilities Service's Water and Waste Disposal Loan and Grant Program and Its Contribution to Small Public Water System Improvements in New York State.” R.B. 96-18. Department of Agricultural, Resource, and Managerial Economics, Cornell University. October.Google Scholar
U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO). Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division. 1995. “Rural Development: USDA's Approach to Funding Water and Sewer Projects.” GAO/RCED-95-258. Washington, D.C. September.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Office of Water. 1993a. “Technical and Economic Capacity of States and Public Water Systems to Implement Drinking Water Regulations.” Report to Congress. EPA 810-R-93-001. Washington, D.C. September.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Office of Water. 1993b. “Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS-II) Data Element Dictionary.” EPA 812-B-93-003. Washington, D.C. January.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Research and Development. 1994. “Drinking Water Treatment for Small Communities: A Focus on EPA's Research.” EPA 640-K-94-003. Washington, D.C. May.Google Scholar