Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T00:36:51.889Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Performance of Compliance Measures and Instruments for Nitrate Nonpoint Pollution Control Under Uncertainty and Alternative Agricultural Commodity Policy Regimes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Nii Adote Abrahams
Affiliation:
School of Business Administration, Missouri Southern State College, Joplin, MO
James S. Shortle
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
Get access

Abstract

Following Weitzman (1974), there is ample theoretical literature indicating that choice of pollution control instruments under conditions of uncertainty will affect the expected net benefits that can be realized from environmental protection. However, there is little empirical research on the ex ante efficiency of alternative instruments for controlling water, or other types of pollution, under uncertainty about costs and benefits. Using a simulation model that incorporates various sources of uncertainty, the ex ante efficiency of price and quantity controls applied to two alternative policy targets, fertilizer application rates and estimated excess nitrogen applications, are examined under varying assumptions about agricultural income support policies. Results indicate price instruments outperform quantity instruments. A tax on excess nitrogen substantially outperforms a fertilizer tax in the scenario with support programs, while the ranking is reversed in the scenario without support programs.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abler, D. G., and Shortle, J. S. (1992). “Environmental and Farm Commodity Policy Linkages in the U.S. and the E.C.European Review of Agricultural Economics 19, 197217.Google Scholar
Abler, D. G., and Shortle, J. S. (1995). “Technology as an Agricultural Pollution Control Policy.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77, 847858.Google Scholar
Abrahams, N. A. (1996). “The Design of Environmental Policy Under Uncertainty and the Value of Information.” Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.Google Scholar
Adar, Z., and Griffin, J. M. (1976). “Uncertainty and the Choice of Pollution Control Instruments.” In Oates, W. E. (ed.), The Economics of the Environment (pp. 132142). International Library of Critical Writings in Economics, Vol. 20, Aidershot, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Baumol, W., and Oates, W. (1988). The Theory of Environmental Policy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Braden, J., and Segerson, K. (1993). “Information Problems in the Design of Nonpoint Source Pollution Policy.” In Russell, C. S. and Shogren, J. F. (eds.), Theory, Modeling, and Experience in the Management of Nonpoint Source Pollution (pp. 136). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Gardner, B. L. (1987). The Economics of Agricultural Policies. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Gardner, B. L. (1992). “Changing Economic Perspectives on the Farm Problem.” Journal of Economic Literature 30, 62101.Google Scholar
Griffin, R., and Bromley, D. (1982). “Agricultural Runoff as a Nonpoint Externality.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 64, 547552.Google Scholar
Hanley, N. (2001). “Policy on Agricultural Pollution in the European Union.” In Shortle, J. and Abler, D. (eds.), Environmental Policies for Agricultural Pollution Control (pp. 51162). Wallingford, UK: CAB International.Google Scholar
Hayami, Y., and Ruttan, V. W. (1985). Agricultural Development: An International Perspective. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Helfand, G. E., and House, B. W. (1995). “Nonpoint Source Pollution.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77, 10241032.Google Scholar
Horan, R. D., and Shortle, J. (2001). “Environmental Instruments for Agriculture.” In Shortle, J. and Abler, D. (eds.), Environmental Policies for Agricultural Pollution Control (pp. 1966). Wallingford, UK: CAB International.Google Scholar
Horan, R. D., Shortle, J., and Abler, D. (1999). “Green Payments for Nonpoint Pollution Control.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81(5), 12101215.Google Scholar
Howitt, R. E., Ward, K. B., and Msangi, S. M. (1999). “CALVIN Report: Statewide Water Model Schematics.” Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California, Davis.Google Scholar
Huang, W.-Y., and LeBlanc, M. (1994). “Market-Based Incentives for Addressing Non-Point Water Quality Problems: A Residual Nitrogen Tax Approach.” Review of Agricultural Economics 16, 427440.Google Scholar
Johnson, S. L., Adams, R. M., and Perry, G. M. (1991). “The On-Farm Costs of Reducing Groundwater Pollution.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73, 10631073.Google Scholar
Just, R. E., Heuth, D. L., and Schmitz, A. (1992). Applied Welfare Economics and Public Policy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Kaneda, H. (1982). “Specification of Production Functions for Analyzing Technical Change and Factor Inputs in Agricultural Development.” Journal of Development Economics 11, 97108.Google Scholar
Kolstad, C. D. (1986). “Empirical Properties of Economic Incentives and Command-and-Control Regulations for Air Pollution Control.” Land Economics 62, 250268.Google Scholar
Lichtenberg, E., and Zilberman, D. (1986). “The Welfare Economics of Price Supports in U.S. Agriculture.” American Economic Review 76, 11351141.Google Scholar
Malcomson, J. M. (1978). “Prices vs. Quantities: A Critical Note on the Use of Approximations.” Review of Economic Studies 45(1), 203207.Google Scholar
National Research Council. (1993). Soil and Water Quality: An Agenda for Agriculture. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Peck, S. C., and Teisberg, T. J. (1993). “The Importance of Nonlinearities in Global Warming Damage Costs.” In Darmstadter, J. and Toman, M. A. (eds.), Assessing Surprises and Nonlinearities in Greenhouse Warming: Proceedings of an Interdisciplinary Workshop (pp. 90102). Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
Quiroga, R. E., Konyar, K., and McCormick, I. (1992). “The U.S. Agricultural Resources Model (USARM): Data Construction and Updating Procedures.” Mimeo, USDA/ERS/RTD, Washington, DC. Google Scholar
Ribaudo, M. (2001). “Nonpoint Source Policy in the USA.” In Shortle, J. and Abler, D. (eds.), Environmental Policies for Agricultural Pollution Control (pp. 123150). Wallingford, UK: CAB International.Google Scholar
Roth, K., and Jury, W. A. (1993). “Modeling the Transport of Solutes to Ground Water Using Transfer Functions.” Journal of Environmental Quality 22, 487493.Google Scholar
Sato, K. (1967). “A Two-Level Constant-Elasticity-of-Substitution Production Function.” Review of Economic Studies 34, 201218.Google Scholar
Segerson, K. (1988). “Uncertainty and Incentives for Nonpoint Pollution Control.” Journal of Environmental and Economic Management 15, 8798.Google Scholar
Shortle, J., and Abler, D. (1997). “Nonpoint Pollution.” In Folmer, H. and Tietenberg, T. (eds.), International Yearbook of Environmental and Natural Resource Economics (pp. 114155). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Shortle, J., and Abler, D. (1999). “Agriculture and the Environment.” In van den Bergh, J. (ed.), Handbook of Environmental and Resource Economics (pp. 159176). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Shortle, J. S., and Dunn, J. W. (1986). “The Relative Efficiency of Agricultural Source Water Pollution Control Policies.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 68, 668677.Google Scholar
Shortle, J. S., and Laughland, A. (1994). “Impacts of Taxes to Reduce Agrichemical Use When Farm Policy Is Endogenous.” Journal of Agricultural Economics 45, 314.Google Scholar
Smith, K. V. (1992). “Environmental Costing for Agriculture: Will It Be Standard Fare in the Farm Bill of 2000?American Journal of Agricultural Economics 74, 10761088.Google Scholar
Stavins, R. N. (1996). “Correlated Uncertainty and Policy Instrument Choice.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 30, 218232.Google Scholar
Stevens, B. K. (1988). “Fiscal Implications of Effluent Charges and Input Taxes.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 15, 285296.Google Scholar
Stroud, A. H., and Secrest, D. (1966). Gaussian Quadrature Formulas. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Swinton, S. M., and Clark, D. S. (1994). “Farm-Level Evaluation of Alternative Policy Approaches to Reduce Nitrogen Leaching from Midwest Agriculture.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 24, 6674.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2000). “National Water Quality Inventory: 1998 Report to Congress.” USEPA, Washington, DC. Online. Available at http://www.epa.gov/305b/98report. [Accessed July 6, 2000.]Google Scholar
Wietzman, M. L. (1974). “Prices and Quantities.” Review of Economic Studies 41, 477491.Google Scholar
Wu, J. (2000). “Input Substitution and Pollution Control Under Uncertainty and Firm Heterogeneity.” Journal of Public Economic Theory 2(2), 273288.Google Scholar
Wu, J., and Babcock, B. A. (2001). “Spatial Heterogeneity and the Choice of Instruments to Control Nonpoint Pollution.” Environmental and Resource Economics 18, 173192.Google Scholar
Xepapadeas, A. (1991). “Environmental Policy Under Imperfect Information: Incentives and Moral Hazard.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 20, 113126.Google Scholar
Xepapadeas, A. (1995). “Observability and the Choice of Instrument Mix in the Control of Externalities.” Journal of Public Economics 56, 485498.Google Scholar
Yohe, G. W. (1978). “Towards a General Comparison of Price Controls and Quantity Controls Under Uncertainty.” Review of Economic Studies 45(2), 229238.Google Scholar