Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T14:53:58.720Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How Greenhouse Gas Emission Policy and Industry Pressure Could Affect Producer Selection of Rice Cultivars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Brandon R. McFadden ,
L. Lanier Nalley  and
Michael P. Popp
Brandon R. McFadden*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics at Oklahoma State University
L. Lanier Nalley
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics at University of Arkansas
Michael P. Popp
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics at University of Arkansas
*
Corresponding Author: Department of Agricultural Economics, 423 Ag Hall, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, Phone 479.420.5662, Email [email protected].
Get access

Abstract

This study estimates how potential carbon policies targeted at reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions could affect selection of rice cultivars by conducting a life cycle assessment of GHG emissions and estimating the carbon sequestered for fourteen commonly sown rice cultivars across Arkansas. Market-oriented carbon-offset credits based on additionality likely would be insufficient to convince producers to change cultivars; nonetheless, there may be upstream pressure as food retailers strive to lower their overall carbon footprints. Given their higher yield per unit of GHG emission, hybrid rice cultivars appear to be positioned to respond to industry demand.

Keywords

additionalitycap and tradecarbon offsetcarbon policyrice
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review , Volume 42 , Issue 2 , August 2013 , pp. 325 - 348
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Babcock, B.A. 1992. “The Effects of Uncertainty on Optimal Nitrogen Applications.” Review of Agricultural Economics 14(2): 271–280.Google Scholar
Beckman, J., Hertel, T.W., and Tyner, W.E. 2009. “Why Previous Estimates of the Cost of Climate Mitigation Are Likely Too Low.” Working paper 54, Global Trade Analysis Project, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.Google Scholar
Bennett, D. 2011. “California Rice Project to Strengthen Carbon Credit Market?” Western Farm Press, June 30.Google Scholar
Bouwman, A.F. 1996. “Direct Emission of Nitrous Oxide from Agricultural Soils.” Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 46(1): 53–70.Google Scholar
Brennan, J.P. 1984. “Measuring the Contribution of New Varieties to Increasing Wheat Yields.” Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics 53(3): 175–195.Google Scholar
Brye, K. 2010. Soil Science Professor, Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville. Personal communication.Google Scholar
Changsheng, L., Frolking, S., Xiao, X., Moore, B. III, Boles, S., Qiu, J., Huang, Y., Salas, W., and Sass, R. 2005. “Modeling Impacts of Farming Management Alternatives on CO2, CH4, and N2O Emissions: A Case Study for Water Management of Rice Agriculture of China.” Global Biochemical Cycles 19(3): 1–10.Google Scholar
Changsheng, L., Mosier, A., Wassmann, R., Cai, Z., Zheng, X., Huang, Y., Tsuruta, H., Boonjawat, J., and Lantin, R. 2004. “Modeling Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Rice-based Production Systems: Sensitivity and Upscaling.” Global Biogeochemical Cycles 18(1): 1–19.Google Scholar
Childs, N., and Baldwin, K. 2010. “Rice Outlook.” Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC. Available at http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/current/RCS/RCS-11-10-2010.pdf (accessed December 1, 2010).Google Scholar
Del Grosso, S.J., Mosier, A.R., Parton, W.J., and Ojima, D.S. 2005. “DAYCENT Model Analysis of Past and Contemporary Soil N2O and Net Greenhouse Gas Flux for Major Crops in the USA.” Soil and Tillage Research 83(1): 9–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Economic Research Service. 2010. Rice Yearbook 2010. ERS, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC. Available at http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/MannUsda/viewStaticPage.do?url=http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/ers/./89001/2010/index.html (accessed August 14, 2011).Google Scholar
Environmental Protection Agency. 2007. “Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990–2005.” EPA 430-R-07-002, EPA, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Environmental Protection Agency. 2009. Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990–2007. EPA 430-R-09-004, EPA, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Environmental Protection Agency. 2011. Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990–2009. EPA 430-R-11-005, EPA, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Huijbregts, M., Norris, G., Bretz, R., Ciroth, A., Maurice, B., von Bahr, B., Weidema, B., and de Beaufort, A. 2001. “Framework for Modeling Data Uncertainty in Life Cycle Inventories.” The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 6(3): 127–132.Google Scholar
International Rice Research Institute. 2011. “Rice Basics: Rice and Poverty” web page. IRRI, Los Baños, Philippines. Available at http://irri.org/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&layout=item&id=9081&lang=en#poverty (accessed August 15, 2011).Google Scholar
Kellogg's. 2010. “2010 Corporate Responsibility Report.” Kellogg's, Battle Creek, MI. Available at http://kelloggcorporateresponsibility.com/environment/11.html (accessed August 29, 2011).Google Scholar
Lal, R. 2004. “Carbon Emission from Farm Operations.” Environment International 30(7): 981–990.Google Scholar
Lloyd, S.M., and Ries, R. 2007. “Characterizing, Propagating, and Analyzing Uncertainty in Life-Cycle Assessment: A Survey of Quantitative Approaches.” Journal of Industrial Ecology 11(1): 161–179.Google Scholar
McCarl, B.A. 2007. “Biofuels and Legislation Linking Biofuel Supply and Demand Using the FASOMGHG Model.” Presented at Duke University, Nicolas Institute Conference, Economic Modeling of Federal Climate Proposals: Advancing Model Transparency and Technology Policy Development, Washington DC.Google Scholar
McCarl, B.A., and Schneider, U.A. 2000. “U.S. Agriculture's Role in a Greenhouse-Gas-Emission Mitigation World: An Economic Perspective.” Review of Agricultural Economics 22(1): 134–159.Google Scholar
Nalley, L., Barkley, A., Watkins, B., and Hignight, J. 2009. “Enhancing Farm Profitability through Portfolio Analysis: The Case of Spatial Rice Variety Selection.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 41(3): 641–652.Google Scholar
Nalley, L., and Popp, M. 2010. “Modeling the Effects of Cap and Trade and a Carbon Offset Policy on Crop Allocations and Farm Income.” Selected paper presented at the American Agricultural Economics Association meeting, Denver. Available at http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/60931/2/Nalley_Popp.pdf (accessed February 1, 2011).Google Scholar
Nalley, L., Popp, M., and Fortin, C. 2011. “The Impact of Reducing Green House Gas Emissions in Crop Agriculture: A Spatial and Production Level Analysis.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 40(1): 1–10.Google Scholar
Nalley, L., Popp, M., Niederman, Z., Brye, K., and Matlock, M. 2012. “How Potential Carbon Policies Could Affect Where and How Cotton Is Produced in the United States.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 41(2): 215–231.Google Scholar
Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory. 2011. CENTURY 4 DayCent Century Model. NREL, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO. Available at www.nrel.colostate.edu/projects/century (accessed April 5, 2011).Google Scholar
Norman, R., and Moldenhauer, K. 2009. Rice Research Studies. Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture, Fayetteville, AR.Google Scholar
Outlaw, J.L., Richardson, J.W., Bryant, H.L., Raulston, J.M., Knapeck, G.M., Herbst, B.K., Ribera, L.A., and Anderson, D.P. 2009. “Economic Implications of the EPA Analysis of the Cap and Trade Provisions of H.R. 2454 for U.S. Representative Farms.” Research Paper 09–2, Agricultural and Food Policy Center, Texas A&M University.Google Scholar
Palisade Corporation. 2009. @Risk 5.0, Risk Analysis and Simulation Add-in for Microsoft Excel. Ithaca, NY: Palisade Corporation.Google Scholar
Popp, M., Nalley, L., Fortin, C., Smith, A., and Brye, K. 2011. “Estimating Net Carbon Emissions and Agricultural Response to Potential Carbon Offset Policies.” Agronomy Journal 103(4): 1132–1143.Google Scholar
Post, W.M., Izaurralde, R.C., Jastrow, J.D., McCarl, B.A., Amonette, J.E., Bailey, V.L., Jardine, P.M., West, T.O., and Zhou, J. 2004. “Enhancement of Carbon Sequestration in U.S. Soils.” Bioscience 54(10): 895–908.Google Scholar
Prince, S.D., Haskett, J., Steininger, M., Strand, H., and Wright, R. 2001. “Net Primary Production of U.S. Midwest Croplands from Agricultural Harvest Yield Data.” Ecological Applications 11(4): 1194–1205.Google Scholar
Reilly, J., and Paltsev, S. 2009. “The Outlook for Energy Alternatives.” Invited Paper of the Transition to Bioeconomy: Global Trade and Policy Issues Conference, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Ridgwell, A., Singarayer, J.S., Hetherington, A.M., and Valdes, P. 2009. “Tackling Regional Climate Change by Leaf Albedo Bio-geoengineering.” Current Biology 19(2): 146–150.Google Scholar
Schneider, U.A., McCarl, B.A., and Schmid, E. 2007. “Agricultural Sector Analysis on Greenhouse Gas Mitigation in U.S. Agriculture and Forestry.” Agricultural Systems 94(2): 128–140.Google Scholar
Shivrain, V., Burgos, N., Agrama, H., Lawton-Raugh, A., Lu, B., Sales, M., Boyett, V., Gealy, D., and Moldenhauer, K. 2010. “Genetic Diversity of Weedy Red Rice (Oryza sativa) in Arkansas, USA.” Weed Research 50(4): 289–302.Google Scholar
SimaPro 7.1 Life Cycle Assessment (software). 2009. Pré Consultants, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Slaton, N. 2001. Rice Production Handbook. Little Rock, AK: The University of Arkansas Cooperative Extension Service.Google Scholar
Smith, K.A., McTaggart, I.P., and Tsuruta, H. 1997. “Emissions of N2O and NO Associated with Nitrogen Fertilization in Intensive Agriculture and the Potential for Mitigation.” Soil Use and Management 13(4): 296–304.Google Scholar
Snyder, C.S., Bruulsema, T.W., Jensen, T.L., and Fixen, P.E. 2009. “Review of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Crop Production Systems and Fertilizer Management Effects.” Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 133(3/4): 247–266.Google Scholar
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. 2008. Kyoto Protocol Reference Manual: On Accounting of Emissions and Assigned Amount. UNFCCC, Bonn, Germany. Available at http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/publications/08_unfccc_kp_ref_manual.pdf (accessed 08/06/2011).Google Scholar
University of Arkansas Cooperative Extension Service. 2008. “2008 Estimating Costs of Production—Rice.” UACES, Little Rock, AK. Available at www.aragriculture.org/crops/rice/budgets/2008/default.htm (accessed November 1, 2010).Google Scholar
University of Arkansas Cooperative Extension Service. 2010. “Arkansas Rice Performance Trials (ARPT), Rice Data for 1996–2009.” UACES, Little Rock, AK. Available at www.aragriculture.org/crops/rice/PerfTrials/default.htm (accessed November 1, 2010).Google Scholar
Virmani, S., Sun, Z., Mou, T., Jauhar Ali, A., and Mao, C. 2003. Two-line Hybrid Rice Breeding Manual. Los Baños, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute.Google Scholar
Wal-Mart. 2010. “Sustainability Index” web page. Available at http://walmartstores.com/sustainability/9292.aspx (accessed August 29, 2011).Google Scholar
Yanai, J., Sawamoto, T., Oe, T., Kusa, K., Yamakawa, K., Sakamoto, K., Naganawa, T., Inubushi, K., Hatano, R., and Kosaki, T. 2003. “Spatial Variability of Nitrous Oxide Emissions and Their Soil-related Determining Factors in an Agricultural Field.” Journal of Environmental Quality 32(6): 1965–1977.Google Scholar