Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T11:55:21.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Analysis of Policy Alternatives to the Dairy Price Support Program

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Harry M. Kaiser
Harry M. Kaiser*
Affiliation:
Cornell University
Get access

Abstract

This paper investigates the impacts of alternative federal dairy policies on the U.S. dairy sector. In addition to the current dairy price support program, five alternatives are investigated: (1) immediate deregulation, (2) gradual deregulation, (3) target price-deficiency payment program without supply control, (4) target price-deficiency payment program with supply control, and (5) mandatory supply control. An econometric model of the national dairy industry is used to simulate quarterly equilibrium price and quantity values at the farm and wholesale levels for each policy over the period 1980–90. Consumers are better off under both immediate and gradual deregulation, as well as the target price-deficiency payment scenarios because prices are lower, enabling them to consume more dairy products. Farmers, as a group, are better off under the two target price-deficiency payment program and supply control scenarios, where milk prices and producer surplus are highest.

Type
Articles
Information
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , October 1994 , pp. 158 - 170
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bausell, C.W. Jr., Belsley, D.A., and Smith, S.L. “An Analysis of 1980s Dairy Programs and Some Policy Implications.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 74 (1992): 605–16.Google Scholar
Blaylock, J. Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. Compiled the generic and branded advertising data from Leading National Advertisers, Inc. 1975-90.Google Scholar
Blaylock, J.R., and Blisard, W.N. “Effects of Advertising on the Demand for Cheese, January 1982-June 1989.” USDA Staff Paper No. AGES 9055, 1990.Google Scholar
Bureau of Economic Statistics, Inc., Economic Statistics Bureau of Washington, D.C., Handbook of Basic Economic Statistics. Washington, D.C., Selected Issues. 1975-90.Google Scholar
Cox, T. “A Quarterly Database for the Analysis of the U.S. Dairy Sector, 1970-90.” Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Wisconsin, May 1992.Google Scholar
Dixon, B.L., Susanto, D., and Berry, C.R. “Supply Impact of the Milk Diversion and Dairy Termination Programs.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73 (1991): 634–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doran, H.E., and Quilkey, J.J. “Harmonic Analysis of Seasonal Data: Some Important Properties.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 54 (1972): 646–51.Google Scholar
Kaiser, H.M., Forker, O.D., Lenz, J., and Sun, C.H. “Evaluating Generic Dairy Advertising Impacts on Retail, Wholesale, and Farm Milk Markets.” Journal of Agricultural Economics Research 44 (1994): 3–17.Google Scholar
LaFrance, J.T., and de Gorter, H. “Regulation in a Dynamic Market: the U.S. Dairy Industry.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 67 (1985): 821–32.Google Scholar
Liu, D.J., Kaiser, H.M., Mount, T.D., and Forker, O.D. “Modeling the U.S. Dairy Sector with Government Intervention.” Western Journal of Agricultural Economics 16 (1991): 360–73.Google Scholar
Phlips, L. Applied Consumption Analysis. New York: North-Holland, 1983.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, Federal Milk Order Market Statistics. Washington, D.C., Selected Issues. 1975-90.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service. 1989-90 Dairy Price Support Program. ASCS Fact Sheet, 1990.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Dairy Situation and Outlook. Washington D.C., Selected Issues. 1975-90.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service, Agricultural Prices. Washington D.C., Selected Issues. 1975-90.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service, Cold Storage. Washington, D.C., Selected Issues. 1975-90.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service, Dairy Products Annual Summary. Washington D.C., Selected Issues. 1975-90 Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Index. Washington D.C., Selected Issues. 1975-90.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Employment and Earnings. Washington, D.C., Selected Issues. 1975-90.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Producer Price Index (and Wholesale Price Index). Washington, D.C., Selected Issues. 1975–90.Google Scholar
Ward, R.W., and Dixon, B.L. “Effectiveness of Fluid Milk Advertising Since the Dairy and Tobacco Adjustment Act of 1983.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 71 (1989): 730–40.Google Scholar