Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:31:36.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Agriculture in an Ecosystems Framework

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Marcel Aillery ,
Jim Hrubovcak ,
Carol Kramer-LeBlanc ,
Robbin Shoemaker  and
Abebayehu Tegene
Marcel Aillery
Affiliation:
Economic Research Service, USDA
Jim Hrubovcak
Affiliation:
Economic Research Service, USDA
Carol Kramer-LeBlanc
Affiliation:
Economic Research Service, USDA
Robbin Shoemaker
Affiliation:
Economic Research Service, USDA
Abebayehu Tegene
Affiliation:
Economic Research Service, USDA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

By broadening the definition of an ecosystem to include economic activities, can we better characterize the interactions and relationships among agricultural activities and important indicators of ecological system health? This paper addresses research approaches for assessing the role of agriculture in an ecosystems context. Environmental regulation and resource management policies have heightened the interest in understanding interactions among agricultural activities and the natural resource base, including the impacts of agriculture on environmental quality and the impacts on agriculture of ecosystem restoration efforts. What are the most meaningful indicators of environmental quality? Which agricultural practices and policies should be considered, along with which nonagricultural resource uses? Finally, does the evolving thinking about ecosystems permit us to link agricultural practices and policies more directly and meaningfully to conceptions of sustainability, of both natural and socioeconomic systems? This paper presents a brief synopsis of ecosystem management, drawing from several recent governmental initiatives. It then provides an overview of the economics of ecosystem management from the perspective of the role of agriculture; discusses two specific cases, the Pacific Northwest and South Florida; and concludes with a discussion of promising economic approaches, data needs, and caveats to those engaged in policy analysis involving ecosystem restoration.

Type
Invited Presentations
Information
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , October 1996 , pp. 101 - 117
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aillery, M., Bertels, P., Cooper, J., Moore, M., Vogel, S., and Weinberg, M. 1996. “Salmon Recovery in the Pacific Northwest: Agricultural and Other Economic Effects.” Natural Resources and Environment Division, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. AER-727. February.Google Scholar
Bingham, G., Bishop, R., Brody, M., Bromley, D., Clark, E., Cooper, W., Costanza, R., Hale, T., Hayden, G., Keller, S., Norgaard, R., Norton, B., Payne, J., Russell, C., and Suter, G. 1995. “Issues in Ecosystem Valuation: Improving Information for Decision Making.” Ecological Economics 14: 73–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bockstael, N., Costanza, R., Strand, I., Boyton, W., and Wainger, L. 1995. “Ecological Economic Modeling and Valuation of Ecosystems.” Ecological Economics 14: 143–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dart, Bob. 1995. “Food-Supply Revolution Likely in New Farm Bill.” Palm Beach Post. June 26.Google Scholar
Douglas, Marjory Stoneman. 1988. The Everglades: River of Grass. Sarasota, Fla.: Pineapple Press.Google Scholar
Hartwick, J. 1990. “Natural Resources, National Accounting and Economic Depreciation.” Journal of Public Economics 3: 291–304.Google Scholar
Hazen and Sawyer. 1992. Evaluation of the Economic Impact from Implementing the Marjory Stoneman Douglas Everglades Restoration Act and U.S. versus SFWMD Settlement Agreement: Final Report. South Florida Water Management District Contract No. C-3172. July 31.Google Scholar
Herfindahl, O.C., and Kneese, A.V. 1974. Economic Theory of Natural Resources. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
Hrubovcak, James, LeBlanc, Michael and Eakin, Kelly. 1994. Accounting for the Environment in Agriculture. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Technical Bulletin.Google Scholar
Interagency Ecosystem Management Task Force. 1995. The Ecosystem Approach: Healthy Ecosystems and Sustainable Economies. Vol. 2, Implementation Issues. Washington, D.C.: GPO. November.Google Scholar
King, D.M., Bohlen, C.C., and Crossion, P.R. 1995. “Natural Resource Accounting and Sustainable Watershed Management: With Illustration for the Upper Mississippi River Watershed.” Paper prepared for the President's Council on Sustainable Development. Photocopy.Google Scholar
Mäler, K. 1991. “National Accounts and Environmental Accounts.” Environmental and Resource Economics 1: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Northwest Power Planning Council. 1992. Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program: Strategy for Salmon—Volume II. Portland, Ore. October.Google Scholar
Porter, Douglas R. and Salvesen, David A., eds. 1995. Collaborative Planning for Wetlands and Wildlife: Issues and Examples. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.Google Scholar
President's Council on Sustainable Development. 1996. Sustainable America: A New Consensus. Washington, D.C.: GPO. February.Google Scholar
Reisner, Marc, and Bates, Sarah. 1990. Overtapped Oasis: Reform or Revolution for Western Water. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.Google Scholar
Snell, Rand, and Boggess, Bill. 1994. “Everglades Case Study: Water, Agricultural and Environmental Policy Issues.” Paper prepared for the Congressional Office of Technology Assessment.Google Scholar
Solow, R. 1986. “On the Intertemporal Allocation of Resources.” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 2: 141–56.Google Scholar
Solow, R. 1992. “An Almost Practical Step towards Sustainability.” An invited lecture on the Fortieth Anniversary of Resources for the Future. Washington, D.C. Monograph.Google Scholar
South Florida Water Management District. Florida Department of Environmental Protection. 1995a. Everglades Program Implementation. Program Management Plan. Revision 1. November 9.Google Scholar
South Florida Water Management District. Florida Department of Environmental Protection. 1995b. South Florida Ecosystem Restoration Plan. November.Google Scholar
Stone, J.A., and Legg, D.E. 1992. “Agriculture and the Everglades.” Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, May-June: 207–15.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census. 1994. 1992 Census of Agriculture. Vol. 1, parts 12, 37, and 47. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. General Accounting Office. 1994. Ecosystem Management: Additional Actions Needed to Adequately Test a Promising Approach. GAO/RCED-94-111. Washington, D.C. August.Google Scholar
World Commission on Environment and Development (Brundtland Commission). 1987. Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar