Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:16:56.839Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The 21st Century Land Grant Economist

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Adesoji O. Adelaja
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The land grant system is a value-added infrastructure, designed to extend the boundaries of traditional colleges and universities to bring science to bear on the pressing needs and problems of underserved citizens and communities. With supplemental resources to support mission-oriented research and outreach, the system has addressed a market failure in higher education. It has been a key asset in achieving for the United States a vibrant agricultural economy, a prominent position in world trade, significant rural development, healthy families and communities, and the increasingly sustainable natural resource base that are characteristic of “the great American Society.” This paper explores some of the recent challenges facing the land grant system, provides a framework for examining these challenges, and stresses the need for a new cadre of “land grant economists” to provide leadership as land grants struggle to identify new visions, missions, programs, and innovations that would serve as the bedrock of a new system. Selected areas of emerging opportunities for land grant intervention are also identified.

Keywords

economistsland grant system21st century
Type
Invited Presentation
Information
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review , Volume 32 , Issue 2 , October 2003 , pp. 159 - 170
Copyright
Copyright © 2003 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adelaja, A. (1997). “New Challenges Facing Agricultural Economics Departments in the 21st Century.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 26(1), 2–16.Google Scholar
Ballenger, N. (1996). “The National Research Council Report on the Colleges of Agriculture at the Land Grant Universities: Implications for the Northeast.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 25, 121–126.Google Scholar
Ballenger, N., and Kouadio, D. (1995). “The National Research Council of the Colleges of Agriculture at Land Grant Universities: Status and Thoughts for Agricultural Economists.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77, 1329–1336.Google Scholar
Cardon, B. P. (1985). “Challenges Facing Land-Grant Institutions.” In Research Perspectives: Proceedings of the Symposium on the Research Agenda for the State Agricultural Experiment Stations (pp. 31–34). Experiment Station Committee on Organization and Policy, Cooperative State Research Service, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Huffman, W. E., and Evenson, R. E. (1993). Science of Agriculture: A Long-Term Perspective. Ames: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Johnston, W. E. (1985). “The Alternative Funding of Agricultural Economics Research: The Experience of the Past Decade and Challenge to the Profession.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 67, 1256–1261.Google Scholar
Liska, B. J. (1988, February). “The Hatch Act and Funding for Food Science Research.” Food Technology, pp. 110–112.Google Scholar
National Research Council. (1995). Colleges of Agriculture at the Land Grant Universities: A Profile. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
National Research Council. (1996). Colleges of Agriculture at the Land Grant Universities: Public Service and Public Policy. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Rose-Ackerman, S., and Evenson, R. (1985). “The Political Economy of Agricultural Research and Extension: Grants, Votes, and Reapportionment.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 67, 1–14.Google Scholar
Schroeder, C. P. (1993, June). “A Land Grant Response.” In The Future of Agricultural Research and Extension: Policy Perspectives (pp. 29–35). Rural Policy Research Institute (RUPRI) Report, University of Missouri-Columbia.Google Scholar
Young, A. L. 1985. “Investment in Research: The Federal Government and the University System.” In Research Perspectives: Proceedings of the Symposium on the Research Agenda for the State Agricultural Experiment Stations (pp. 17–19). Experiment Station Committee on Organization and Policy, Cooperative State Research Service, Washington, DC.Google Scholar