Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:04:12.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Understanding financial elder abuse in families: the potential of routine activities theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2007

DEBORAH SETTERLUND ,
CHERYL TILSE ,
JILL WILSON ,
ANNE-LOUISE MCCAWLEY  and
LINDA ROSENMAN
DEBORAH SETTERLUND
Affiliation:
School of Social Work and Applied Human Sciences, University of Queensland, Australia.
CHERYL TILSE*
Affiliation:
School of Social Work and Applied Human Sciences, University of Queensland, Australia.
JILL WILSON
Affiliation:
School of Social Work and Applied Human Sciences, University of Queensland, Australia.
ANNE-LOUISE MCCAWLEY
Affiliation:
School of Social Work and Applied Human Sciences, University of Queensland, Australia.
LINDA ROSENMAN
Affiliation:
School of Social Work and Applied Human Sciences, University of Queensland, Australia.
*
Address for correspondence: Cheryl Tilse, School of Social Work and Applied Human Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to stimulate theoretical thought about financial elder abuse within families, by exploring the potential of ‘routine activities theory’ for raising our understanding of, and response to, its occurrences. Research into financial elder abuse, defined as the illegal or improper use of a person's finances or property by another person, has tended to emphasise the abusive event and the associated risk factors. ‘Routine activities theory’, in contrast, directs attention more to developing prevention strategies that focus on everyday activities and hence seek to reduce the opportunities for illegal activity. The authors' research programme on the broad topic of money management and older people in Australia has conceptualised financial elder abuse as one possible outcome of the family management of older people's assets. This paper reports an application of routine activities theory to in-depth data of the asset-management practices and experiences of 81 family members who were assisting 86 older people. The paper concludes that the theory contributes to our understanding of how and why financial abuse occurs in families. It makes clear the distorting influence of a sense of entitlement and the preventive importance of both capable guardians, to oversee family-asset management and be alert to mismanagement, and the need for improved financial awareness, skills and probity in the community in connection with this common task of assisting older people to manage their financial assets.

Keywords

financial elder abusefamily careasset managementroutine activities theory
Type
Research Article
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 27 , Issue 4 , July 2007 , pp. 599 - 614
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Age Concern Auckland 1999. Current and Future Implications for the Older Population with the Enduring Power of Attorney. Report compiled for Age Concern Auckland and Auckland Elder Abuse Advisory Network, Age Concern, Auckland, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Arksey, H., Corden, A., Glendinning, C. and Hirst, M. 2006. Carers and the Management of Financial Assets in Later Life. Research Works 2006-2, Social Policy Research Unit, University of York, York, England.Google Scholar
Biggs, S., Phillipson, C. and Kingston, P. 1995. Elder Abuse in Perspective. Open University Press, Buckingham.Google Scholar
Boldy, D., Horner, B., Crouchley, K. and Davey, M. 2005. Addressing elder abuse: Western Australia case study. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 24, 1, 3–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brogden, M. and Nijhar, P. 2000. Crime, Abuse and the Elderly. Willan, Cullompton, Devon.Google Scholar
Brownwell, P. and Wolden, A. 2002. Elder abuse intervention strategies: social service or criminal justice? Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 40, 1/2, 83–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, N., Kulick, D. and Mayer, J. 1999. Financial exploitation of elders: analysis of risk factors based on county adult protective services data. Journal of Elder Abuse and Neglect, 10, 3/4, 39–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, L. and Felson, M. 1979. Social change and crime rate trends: a routine activities approach. American Sociological Review, 44, August, 588–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doerner, W. and Lab, S. 2002. Victimology. Third edition, Anderson, Cincinnati, Ohio.Google Scholar
Elder Abuse Prevention Unit Queensland 2005. Annual Report 2005. Elder Abuse Prevention Unit Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.Google Scholar
Fattah, E. 1993. Victimisation and fear of crime among the elderly: a possible link? Paper presented at a conference on ‘Crime and Older People’, Australian Institute of Criminology, Adelaide, 23–25 February.Google Scholar
Fattah, E. 1997. Criminology: Past, Present and Future: A Critical Overview. Macmillan, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felson, M. 2002. Crime and Everyday Life. Third edition, Sage, Thousand Oaks, California.Google Scholar
Gordon, R. and Brill, D. 2001. The abuse and neglect of the elderly. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 24, 2–3, 183–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, D. and Benson, M. 2006. The Maltreatment of Patients in Nursing Homes. Haworth, New York.Google Scholar
Keating, N., Fast, J., Frederick, J., Cranswick, K. and Perrier, C. 1999. Eldercare in Canada: Context, Content and Consequences. Statistics Canada, Ottawa.Google Scholar
Kendig, H. 2000. Family change and family bonding in Australia. In Liu, W. and Kendig, H. (eds), Who Should Care for the Elderly? An East-West Value Divide. Singapore University Press, Singapore, 107–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurrle, S., Sadler, P. and Cameron, I. 1992. Patterns of elder abuse. Medical Journal of Australia, 157, 10, 673–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Langan, J. and Means, R. 1996. Financial management and elderly people with dementia in the UK: as much a question of confusion as abuse? Ageing & Society, 16, 3, 287–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law Reform Commission 2003. Law and the Elderly. Consultation Paper LRC CP 23-2003, June, Law Reform Commission, Dublin, Ireland.Google Scholar
Lock, C. (ed.) 1996. Confronting Abuse: The Way Forward. The South Australian Elder Abuse Protection Program. Papers and proceedings from a conference organised by the New South Wales Advisory Committee on Abuse of Older People in Their Homes, Wesley Centre, Sydney, 2–3 May.Google Scholar
Lush, D. 1998. Taking liberties: enduring powers of attorney and financial abuse. Solicitors Journal, September 11, 808–9.Google Scholar
Malks, B., Buckmaster, J. and Cunningham, L. 2003. Combating elder financial abuse: a multi-disciplinary approach to a growing problem. Journal of Elder Abuse and Neglect, 15, 3/4, 55–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mannon, J. 1997. Domestic and intimate violence: an application of routine activities theory. Aggression and Violent Behaviours, 2, 1, 9–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathis, E. 1994. Policing the guardians: combating guardianship and power of attorney fraud. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 1–4.Google Scholar
McCallum, J. 1993. Elder abuse: the ‘new’ social problem? Modern Medicine of Australia, September, 74–83.Google Scholar
McCawley, A., Tilse, C., Wilson, J., Rosenman, L. and Setterlund, D. 2006. Access to assets: older people with impaired capacity and financial abuse. Journal of Adult Protection, 8, 2, 20–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCreadie, C. 2002. A review of research outcomes in elder abuse. Journal of Adult Protection, 4, 2, 3–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millward, C, 1998. Family Relationships and Intergenerational Exchange in Later Life. Working Paper 15, Australian Institute of Family Studies, Melbourne, Victoria. Available online at http://www.aifs.gov.au/ [Accessed 2 January 2007].Google Scholar
Nerenberg, L. 2000. Forgotten victims of financial abuse: facing the challenge. Journal of Elder Abuse and Neglect, 12, 2, 49–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podnieks, E. 1992. National survey on abuse of elderly in Canada. Journal of Elder Abuse and Neglect, 4, 1–2, 5–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, G. and Fox, C. 1997. The Massachusetts Bank reporting project: an edge against elder financial exploitation. Journal of Elder Abuse and Neglect, 8, 4, 59–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabiner, D., O'Keefe, J. and Brown, D. 2004. A conceptual framework of financial exploitation of older persons. Journal of Elder Abuse and Neglect, 16, 2, 53–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Setterlund, D., Tilse, C. and Wilson, J. 1999. Substitute Decision Making and Older People. Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice 139, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra.Google Scholar
Smith, R. 1999. Fraud and Financial Abuse of Older People. Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice 132, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra.Google Scholar
Spencer, C. 1995. Diminishing Returns: Financial Decision Making and Financial Abuse among Seniors in British Columbia (Canada): Preliminary Results from a Province-wide Study. Gerontology Research Centre, Simon Fraser University, British Columbia.Google Scholar
Steinmetz, S. 1980. Duty Bound: Elder Abuse and Family Care. Sage, Newbury Park, California.Google Scholar
Tilse, C., Wilson, J., Setterlund, D. and Rosenman, L. 2005 a. Older people's assets: a contested site. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 24, Supplement, S51–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilse, C., Setterlund, D., Wilson, J. and Rosenman, L. 2005 b. Minding the money: a growing responsibility for informal carers. Ageing & Society, 25, 2, 215–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, R. 2000. The nature and scope of elder abuse. Generations, 24, 2, Summer, 6–12.Google Scholar