Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:37:50.410Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The trade-off between home-ownership and pensions: individual and institutional determinants of old-age poverty

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2008

CAROLINE DEWILDE  and
PETER RAEYMAECKERS
CAROLINE DEWILDE*
Affiliation:
Research Unit on Poverty, Social Exclusion and the City (OASeS), University of Antwerp, Belgium.
PETER RAEYMAECKERS
Affiliation:
Research Unit on Poverty, Social Exclusion and the City (OASeS), University of Antwerp, Belgium.
*
Address for correspondence: Caroline Dewilde, Research Unit on Poverty, Social Exclusion and the City (OASeS), Department of Sociology, Sint-Jacobstraat 2 (M237), 2000 Antwerp, Belgium. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article reports an analysis of European Community Household Panel (ECHP) data to test the hypothesis suggested by Kemeny (1981) and Castles (1998) of a trade-off between the extent of home-ownership and the generosity of old-age pensions. To this end, we evaluate the impact of a range of both pensions arrangements and housing policies on the risk of poverty in old age. The most important analytical innovation is the inclusion of social housing provision as an important policy alternative to the encouragement of home-ownership. Although we found substantial empirical support for the trade-off hypothesis, the findings raise several issues for discussion and further research. Firstly, we found that neither generous pensions nor high ownership rates had the strongest poverty-reducing potential, for this was most strongly associated with the provision of social housing for older people. Furthermore, the analysis identified a group of older people who are faced with a double disadvantage, in the sense that in high home-ownership countries, those who did not possess their own homes also tended to receive low pension benefits. Although this effect arises at least partly as a result of selection – the larger the ownership sector, the more selective the group of people who do not own their homes – the high poverty risk among ‘non-owners’ was apparently not countered by the pension system.

Keywords

housing policypensionsold-age povertycumulative deprivationcomparative welfare state research
Type
Research Article
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 28 , Issue 6 , June 2008 , pp. 805 - 830
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agresti, A. 1990. Categorical Data Analysis. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Allison, P. D. 2005. Fixed Effects Regression Methods for Longitudinal Data Using SAS. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina.Google Scholar
Barlow, J. and Duncan, S. 1994. Success and Failure in Housing Provision: European Systems Compared. Pergamon, Oxford.Google Scholar
Behr, A., Bellgardt, E. and Rendtel, U. 2005. Extent and determinants of panel attrition in the European Community Household Panel. European Sociological Review, 21, 5, 489–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boelhouwer, P., Doling, J., Elsinga, M. and Ford, J. 2004. Playing Snakes and Ladders: Gains and Losses for Home-owners. OSIS Project Report, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England.Google Scholar
Bonoli, G. 1997. Classifying welfare states: a two-dimension approach. Journal of Social Policy, 26, 3, 351–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, D. 2005. The welfare state and relative poverty in rich western democracies, 1967–1997. Social Forces, 83, 4, 1329–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castles, F. G. 1998. The really big trade-off: home-ownership and the welfare state in the new world and the old. Acta Politica, 33, 1, 5–19.Google Scholar
Castles, F. G. and Ferrera, M. 1996. Home-ownership and the welfare state: is Southern Europe different? South European Society and Politics, 1, 2, 163–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conley, D. and Gifford, B. 2006. Home-ownership, social insurance, and the welfare state. Sociological Forum, 21, 1, 55–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies Withers, S. 1998. Linking household transitions and housing transitions: a longitudinal analysis of renters. Environment and Planning A, 30, 4, 615–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennis, I. and Guio, A.-C. 2004. Poverty and social exclusion in the EU. Statistics in Focus, 16/2004.Google Scholar
Dewilde, C. 2004. The multidimensional measurement of poverty in Belgium and Britain: a categorical approach. Social Indicators Research, 68, 3, 331–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewilde, C. 2007. Individual and institutional determinants of multidimensional poverty: a European comparison. Social Indicators Research. DOI 10.1007/s11205-007-9106-6.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Polity, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. 1999. Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies. Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Commission 2001. Mutual Information System on Social Protection in the Member States of the European Union (MISSOC): Social Protection in the Member States of the European Union. Situation on 1 January 2001 and Evolution. Unit V/E/2, Directorate-General for Employment, Industrial Relations and Social Affairs, Brussels.Google Scholar
Eurostat 2003. European Community Household Longitudinal Panel Users' Database Manual. Version for Waves 1 to 8 and Survey Years 1994 to 2001. Document PAN 168/2003–12, Publications of the European Commissions, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
Fahey, T. 2003. Is there a trade-off between pensions and home-ownership? An exploration of the Irish case. Journal of European Social Policy, 13, 2, 159–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fahey, T., Nolan, B. and Maître, B. 2004. Housing expenditures and income poverty in EU Countries. Journal of Social Policy, 33, 3, 437–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrera, M. 1996. The ‘southern model’ of welfare in social Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 6, 1, 17–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fritzell, J. 1991. The gap between market rewards and economic wellbeing in modern societies. European Sociological Review, 7, 1, 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodin, R. E., Headey, B., Muffels, R. and Dirven, H.-J. 1999. The Real Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagenaars, A., de Vos, K. and Zaidi, M. A. 1994. Poverty Statistics in the Late 1980s: Research Based on Micro-data. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
Hancock, R. 1998. Can housing wealth alleviate poverty among Britain's older population? Fiscal Studies, 19, 3, 249–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harloe, M. 1995. The People's Home? Social Rented Housing in Europe and America. Blackwell, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedström, P. and Ringen, S. 1987. Age and Income in contemporary society: a research note. Journal of Social Policy, 16, 2, 227–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, J. S. C. M. and Reitsma, A. A. 2002. De zorg voor het wonen. Volkshuisvesting en verzorgingsstaat in Nederland en België [Caring for Housing. Public Housing and the Welfare State in The Netherlands and Belgium]. Delft University Press, Delft, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Kangas, O. and Palme, J. 2000. Does social policy matter? Poverty cycles in OECD countries. International Journal of Health Services, 30, 2, 335–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kangas, O. and Ritakallio, V.-M. 1998. Different methods, different results? Approaches to multidimensional poverty. In Andreß, H.-J. (ed.) Empirical Poverty Research in a Comparative Perspective. Ashgate, Aldershot, Hampshire, 167–204.Google Scholar
Kemeny, J. 1981. The Myth of Home Ownership. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Kemeny, J. 1995. From Public Housing to the Social Market: Rental Policy Strategies in Comparative Perspective. Routledge, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendig, H. L. 1990. Comparative perspectives on housing, aging, and social structure. In Binstock, R. H. and George, L. K. (eds) Handbook of Aging and the Social Sciences. Academic, San Diego, California, 288–306.Google Scholar
Kenworthy, L. 1999. Do social-welfare policies reduce poverty? A cross-national assessment. Social Forces, 77, 3, 1119–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kittel, B. 2006. A crazy methodology? On the limits of macro-quantitative social science research. International Sociology, 21, 5, 647–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurz, K. and Blossfeld, H.-P. 2004. Home Ownership and Social Inequality in Comparative Perspective. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leather, P. 1990. The potential and implications of home equity release in old age. Housing Studies, 5, 1, 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muffels, R. and Fouarge, D. 2004. The role of European welfare states in explaining resources deprivation. Social Indicators Research, 68, 3, 299–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) 2005. Pensions at a Glance: Public Policies across OECD Countries. OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
Piachaud, D. 1987. Problems in the definition and measurement of poverty. Journal of Social Policy, 16, 2, 147–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringen, S. 1988. Direct and indirect measures of poverty. Journal of Social Policy, 17, 3, 351–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritakallio, V.-M. 2003. The importance of housing costs in cross-national comparisons of welfare (state) outcomes. International Social Security Review, 56, 2, 81–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, D. (ed.) 2000. Researching Social and Economic Change: The Uses of Household Panel Studies. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Saunders, P. and Adelman, L. 2004. Resources, Deprivation and Exclusion Approaches to Measuring Wellbeing: A Comparative Study of Australia and Britain. Paper presented at the 28th General Conference of the International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, Cork, August 22–28.Google Scholar
Scruggs, L. and Allan, J. P. 2006. The material consequences of welfare states, benefit generosity and absolute poverty in 16 OECD countries. Comparative Political Studies, 39, 7, 880–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stier, H. 2006. Conceptualization and Measurements of Institutional Contexts: A Review. Paper presented at the second workshop on the ‘Social and Economic Consequences of Divorce’, Cologne, 3–4 November.Google Scholar
Torgersen, U. 1987. Housing: the wobbly pillar under the welfare state. In Turner, B., Kemeny, J. and Lundqvist, L. J. (eds) Between State and Market: Housing in the Post-Industrial Era. Almqvist and Wiksell, Göteborg, Sweden, 116–26.Google Scholar
Tsakloglou, P. and Papadopoulos, F. 2002. Aggregate level and determining factors of social exclusion in twelve European countries. Journal of European Social Policy, 12, 3, 211–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uunk, W. 2004. The economic consequences of divorce for women in the European Union: the impact of welfare state arrangements. European Journal of Population, 20, 251–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Lippe, T. and van Dijk, L. 2002. Comparative research on women's employment. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 221–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Schors, A., Alessie, R. J. M. and Mastrogiacomo, M. 2007. Home and mortgage ownership of the Dutch elderly: explaining cohort, time and age effects. De Economist, 155, 99–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Voorhis, R. A. 2002. Different types of welfare states? A methodological deconstruction of comparative research. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 29, 4, 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, D. 2003. Sample attrition between waves 1 and 5 in the European Community Household Panel. European Sociological Review, 19, 4, 361–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whelan, B. and Whelan, C. 1995. In what sense is poverty multidimensional? In Room, G. (ed.) Beyond the Threshold: The Measurement and Analysis of Social Exclusion. Policy Press, Bristol, Avon, 29–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whelan, C. T., Layte, R. and Maître, B. 2002. Multiple deprivation and persistent poverty in the European Union. Journal of European Social Policy, 12, 2, 91–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whelan, C. T., Layte, R. and Maître, B. 2004. Understanding the mismatch between income poverty and deprivation: a dynamic comparative analysis. European Sociological Review, 20, 4, 287–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiteford, P. 1995. The use of replacement rates in international comparisons of benefit systems. International Social Security Review, 48, 2, 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiteford, P. and Whitehouse, E. 2006. Pension challenges and pension reforms in OECD countries. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 22, 1, 78–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar