Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T20:00:25.269Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Safe passage of goods and self during residential relocation in later life

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2011

DAVID J. EKERDT ,
MARK LUBORSKY  and
CATHERINE LYSACK
DAVID J. EKERDT*
Affiliation:
Gerontology Center, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA.
MARK LUBORSKY
Affiliation:
Institute of Gerontology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
CATHERINE LYSACK
Affiliation:
Institute of Gerontology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
*
Address for correspondence: David J. Ekerdt, Gerontology Center, University of Kansas, 1000 Sunnyside Ave., Room 3090, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Techniques of possession research among older people tend to accentuate their prizing of things and their use of special dispositions to achieve the protection or ‘safe passage’ of things as they transfer to a new owner. Such efforts on behalf of possessions may also be undertaken to perpetuate the self. To study the care of things and self in a wider context, we examined older people's repertoire of disposition strategies during episodes of household relocation and downsizing. We analysed the narratives of persons in 75 households in the Midwestern United States of America. People indeed told stories about the safe passage of cherished possessions – their initiative to place things, appreciation by new owners, and attempts to project the values or memory of the giver. Such accounts of special placements, however, dotted rather than dominated recollections of the move. More commonly, large quantities of items were passed via non-specific offers of possessions to others who may volunteer to take them. This allowed people to nonetheless express satisfaction that their possessions had found appreciative owners. Even though our interviews did not disclose extensive attempts at self-transmission, whole-house downsizing may affirm the self in another way: as conscientious about the care of things. Such affirmation of the present self as accomplished and responsible can be seen as a positive adaptation to the narrowing life world.

Keywords

giftslegacylater lifepossessionsresidential relocationself
Type
Articles
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 32 , Issue 5 , July 2012 , pp. 833 - 850
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Belk, R. W. 1988. Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 2, 139–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callero, P. L. 2003. The sociology of the self. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 115–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carstensen, L. L. 2006. The influence of a sense of time on human development. Science 312, 5782, 1913–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Csikszentmihalyi, M. and Rochberg-Halton, E. 1981. The Meaning of Things: Domestic Symbols and the Self. Cambridge University Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curasi, C. F., Price, L. L. and Arnould, E. J. 2004. How individuals’ cherished possessions become families’ inalienable wealth. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 3, 609–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekerdt, D. J. 2009. Dispossession: the tenacity of things. In Jones, I. R., Higgs, P. and Ekerdt, D. J. (eds), Consumption and Generational Change: The Rise of Consumer Lifestyles and the Transformation of Later Life. Transaction Books, Piscataway, New Jersey, 63–78.Google Scholar
Ekerdt, D. J. and Sergeant, J. F. 2006. Family things: attending the household disbandment of older adults. Journal of Aging Studies, 20, 3, 193–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ekerdt, D. J., Sergeant, J. F., Dingel, M. and Bowen, M. E. 2004. Household disbandment in later life. Journals of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 59B, 5, S265–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gosling, S. D., Craik, K. H., Martin, N. R. and Pryor, M. R. 2005. The Personal Living Space Cue Inventory: an analysis and evaluation. Environment and Behavior, 37, 5, 683–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregson, N., Metcalfe, A. and Crewe, L. 2007. Moving things along: the conduits and practices of divestment in consumption. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 32, 2, 187–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gubrium, J. F. and Holstein, J. A. 2000. The self in a world of going concerns. Symbolic Interaction, 23, 95–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrmann, G. 1997. Gift or commodity: what changes hands in the U.S. garage sale? American Ethnologist, 24, 4, 910–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hetherington, K. 2004. Second-handedness: consumption, disposal and absent presence. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 22, 1, 157–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, E. G. and Rowles, G. D. 2005. Leaving a legacy: toward a typology. Journal of Aging Studies, 19, 3, 327–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamptner, N. L. 1989. Personal possessions and their meanings in old age. In Spacapan, S. and Oskamp, S. (eds), The Social Psychology of Aging. Sage, Newbury Park, California, 165–96.Google Scholar
Kleine, S. S. and Baker, S. M. 2004. An integrative review of material possession attachment. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 1. Available online at http://www.amsreview.org/articles/kleine01-2004.pdf [Accessed 11 May 2011].Google Scholar
Kroger, J. and Adair, V. 2008. Symbolic meanings of valued personal objects in identity transitions of late adulthood. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 8, 1, 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lastovicka, J. L. and Fernandez, K. V. 2005. Three paths to disposition: the movement of meaningful possessions to strangers. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 4, 813–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luborsky, M. R. 1994. Identifying themes and patterns. In Gubrium, J. and Sankar, A. (eds), Qualitative Methods in Aging Research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, California, 189–210.Google Scholar
Luborsky, M. R., Lysack, C. L. and Van Nuil, J. 2011. Refashioning one's place in time: Stories of household downsizing in later life. Journal of Aging Studies, 25, 243–252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marcoux, J.-S. 2001. The ‘casser maison’ ritual: constructing the self by emptying the home. Journal of Material Culture, 6, 2, 213–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, V. W. 1975. Age and awareness of finitude in developmental gerontology. Omega, 6, 2, 113–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsiske, M., Lang, F. R., Baltes, P. B. and Baltes, M. M. 1995. Selective optimization with compensation: life-span perspectives on successful human development. In Dixon, R. A. and Bäckman, L. (eds), Compensating for Psychological Deficits and Declines: Managing Losses and Promoting Gains. Erlbaum, Mahway, New Jersey, 35–79.Google Scholar
Marx, J. I., Solomon, J. C. and Miller, L. Q. 2004. Gift wrapping ourselves: the final gift exchange. Journals of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 59B, 5, S274–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCracken, G. 1987. Culture and consumption among the elderly: three research objectives in an emerging field. Ageing & Society, 7, 2, 203–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCrac-bolken, G. 1988. Culture and Consumption: New Approaches to the Symbolic Character of Consumer Goods and Activities. University of Indiana Press, Bloomington, Indiana.Google Scholar
Morris, B. R. 1992. Reducing inventory: divestiture of personal possessions. Journal of Women and Aging, 4, 2, 79–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, L. L., Arnould, E. J. and Curasi, C. F. 2000. Older consumers’ disposition of special possessions. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 2, 179–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roster, C. A. 2001. Letting go: the process and meaning of dispossession in the lives of consumers. In Gilley, M. C. and Meyers-Levy, J. (eds), Advances in Consumer Research. Volume 28, Association for Consumer Research, Provo, Utah, 425–30.Google Scholar
Sergeant, J. F. and Ekerdt, D. J. 2008. Motives for residential mobility in later life: post-move perspectives of elders and family members. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 66, 2, 131–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sergeant, J. F., Ekerdt, D. J. and Chapin, R. 2008. Measurement of late-life residential relocation: why are rates for such a manifest event so varied? Journals of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 63B, 2, S92–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, G. V. and Ekerdt, D. J. 2011. Confronting the material convoy in later life. Sociological Inquiry, 81. doi:10.1111/j.1475-682X.2011.00378.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stum, M. S. 1999. ‘I just want to be fair’: interpersonal justice in intergenerational transfers of non-titled property. Family Relations, 48, 2, 159–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stum, M. S. 2000. Families and inheritance decisions: examining non-titled property transfers. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 21, 2, 177–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unruh, D. R. 1983. Death and personal history: strategies of identity preservation. Social Problems, 30, 3, 340–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, R. S. and Bass, S. A. 2002. Challenges of the Third Age: Meaning and Purpose in Later Life. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Young, M. M. and Wallendorf, M. 1989. ‘Ashes to ashes, dust to dust’: conceptualizing consumer disposition of possessions. In Childers, T. L., Bagozzi, R. P. and Peter, J. P. (eds), Proceedings of the American Marketing Association Winter Educators Conference. American Marketing Association, Chicago, 33–9.Google Scholar