Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T00:20:17.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Retirement lifestyles in a niche housing market: park-home living in England

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2010

MARK BEVAN
MARK BEVAN*
Affiliation:
Centre for Housing Policy, University of York, York, UK.
*
Address for correspondence: Mark Bevan, Centre for Housing Policy, University of York, YorkYO10 5DD, UKE-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Park homes are a small, niche sector of the United Kingdom housing market. This paper reports a study of 40 residents of park-homes that focused on their motivations for choosing this form of accommodation, and on their views about and experiences of park-home living. Whilst the sector has long provided a low-cost housing option for people of all ages, in recent years it has increasingly aligned itself as a lifestyle choice for older people. Despite their diverse reasons for moving to park homes, most respondents reported very positive experiences of park-home living and shared similar views about the benefits, but there were a few dissenting voices. Two conceptual frameworks are used to help understand the experiences of the respondents. ‘Elective belonging’ offers a way of contextualising the narratives that people articulate about their lifestyle choices and that affirm their sense of biographical continuity even having moved to new locations. This notion also helps frame some of the tensions that arise among the residents. The second framework, ‘biographical disruption’, is a way of framing the stories that the respondents told when their lives had not followed the anticipated trajectory and by which they coped and made sense of the circumstances which soured their chosen lifestyle.

Keywords

retirement lifestylespark homeselective belongingbiographical disruption
Type
Research Article
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 30 , Issue 6 , August 2010 , pp. 965 - 985
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allan, G. and Phillipson, C. 2008. Community studies today: urban perspectives. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11, 2, 163–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, C. 2008. Housing Market Renewal and Social Class. Routledge, Abingdon, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkeley Hanover, Consulting 2002. Economics of the Park Homes Industry. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, London.Google Scholar
Bevan, M. 2007. Residential Mobile Homes in Scotland. Scottish Government, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Biggs, S., Bernard, M. and Kingston, P. 2000. Lifestyles of belief: narrative and culture in a retirement community. Ageing & Society, 20, 6, 649–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bury, M. 1982. Chronic illness as biographical disruption. Sociology of Health and Illness, 4, 2, 167–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chaudhury, H. and Rowles, G. 2005. Between the shores of recollection and imagination: self, aging and home. In Rowles, G. and Chaudhury, H. (eds), Home and Identity in Late Life. Springer Publishing Company, New York, 3–20.Google Scholar
Clapham, D. 2005. The Meaning of Housing: A Pathways Approach. Policy, Bristol, UK.Google Scholar
Clough, R., Leamy, M., Miller, V. and Bright, L. 2004. Housing Decisions in Later Life. Palgrave, Basingstoke, UK.Google Scholar
Delanty, G. 2003. Community. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) 2008 a. A New Approach for Resolving Disputes and to Proceedings Relating to Park Homes Under the Mobile Homes Act 1983 (as Amended): A Consultation Paper. DCLG, London.Google Scholar
Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) 2008 b. Park Homes: Key Facts and Figures. DCLG, London. Available online at http://www.communities.gov.uk/housing/rentingandletting/parkhomes [Accessed 3 February 2010].Google Scholar
Dupuis, A. and Thorns, D. 1998. Home, home ownership and the search for ontological security. Sociological Review, 46, 1, 24–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, M. and Harding, E. 2006. Building Our Futures: Meeting the Housing Needs of an Ageing Population. International Longevity Centre, London.Google Scholar
Fisk, M. 1999. Our Future Homes. Housing and the Inclusion of Older People in 2025. Help the Aged, London.Google Scholar
Ford, J., Burrows, R. and Nettleton, S. 2001. Home Ownership in a Risk Society: A Social Analysis of Mortgage Arrears and Possessions. Policy Press, Bristol, UK.Google Scholar
Fry, C. 1977. The community as a commodity: the age graded case. Human Organisation, 36, 2, 115–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fry, C. 1979. Structural conditions affecting community formation among the aged: two examples from Arizona. Anthropological Quarterly. Special issue, The Ethnography of Old Age, 52, 7–17.Google Scholar
Gamliel, T. and Hazan, H. 2006. The meaning of stigma: identity construction in two old-age institutions. Ageing & Society, 26, 3, 355–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, A. 1979. Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis. Macmillan, Basingstoke, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiscock, R., Kearns, A., Macintyre, S. and Ellaway, A. 2001. Ontological security and psycho-social benefits from the home: qualitative evidence on issues of tenure. Housing, Theory and Society, 18, 1/2, 50–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurley, A. 2001. Diners, Bowling Alleys and Trailer Parks: Chasing the American Dream in the Postwar Consumer Culture. Basic, New York.Google Scholar
Johnson, S. 1971. Idle Haven: Community Building Among the Working Class Retired. University of California Press, Berkeley, California.Google Scholar
Laws, G. 1997. Spatiality and age relations. In Jamieson, A., Harper, S. and Victor, C. (eds), Critical Approaches to Ageing and Later Life. Open University Press, Buckingham, UK, 90–100.Google Scholar
Marsh, A., Forrest, R., Kennett, P., Niner, P. and Cowan, D. 2000. Harassment and Unlawful Eviction of Private Rented Sector Tenants and Park-home Residents. Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, London.Google Scholar
Massey, D. 2005. For Space. Sage, London.Google Scholar
McHugh, K. 2003. Three faces of ageism: society, image, and place. Ageing & Society, 23, 2, 165–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, J. 2008. Emotional attachment to home and security for permanent residents in caravan parks in Melbourne. Journal of Sociology, 44, 3, 219–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niner, P. and Hedges, A. 1992. The Mobile Homes Survey. Department of the Environment, London.Google Scholar
Peace, S., Holland, C. and Kellaher, L. 2006. Growing Older: Environment and Identity in Later Life. Open University Press, Maidenhead, UK.Google Scholar
Phillips, J., Bernard, M., Biggs, S. and Kingston, P. 2001. Retirement communities in Britain: a ‘third way’ for the third age? In Peace, S. and Holland, C. (eds), Inclusive Housing in an Ageing Society. Policy, Bristol, UK, 189–214.Google Scholar
Phillipson, C. 2007. The ‘elected’ and the ‘excluded’: sociological perspectives on the experience of place and community in old age. Ageing & Society, 27, 3, 321–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravetz, A. and Turkington, R. 1995. The Place of Home: English Domestic Environments 1914–2000. Spon, London.Google Scholar
Riessman, C. 2008. Narrative Methods for the Human Sciences. Sage, London.Google Scholar
Ross, J. 1977. Old People, New Lives: Community Creation in a Retirement Residence. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Rubenstein, R. and de Medeiros, K. 2005. Home, self and identity. In Rowles, G. and Chaudhury, H. (eds), Home and Identity in Late Life. Springer Publishing Company, New York, 47–62.Google Scholar
Saunders, P. 1990. A Nation of Home Owners. Unwin, London.Google Scholar
Savage, M. 2008. Histories, belongings, communities. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11, 2, 151–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savage, M., Bagnell, G. and Longhurst, R. 2005. Globalization and Belonging. Sage, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, S., Easterlow, D. and Munro, M. 2004. Housing for health: does the market work? Environment and Planning A, 36, 4, 579–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, S., Searle, B. and Cook, N. 2007. Banking on Housing: Spending the Home. Final project report to the ESRC, Department of Geography, University of Durham, UK. Available online at http://www.esrcsocietytoday.ac.uk/ [Accessed 1 June 2009].Google Scholar
Streib, G., Folts, E. and La Greca, A. 1985. Autonomy, power and decision-making in thirty-six retirement communities. The Gerontologist, 25, 403–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sullivan, D. 1985. Ties that bind: differentials between seasonal and permanent migrants to retirement communities. Research on Aging, 7, 235–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van den Hoonaard, D. 2002. Life on the margins of a Florida retirement community: the experience of snowbirds, newcomers, and widowed persons. Research on Aging, 24, 1, 50–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, S. 2000. Chronic illness as biographical disruption or biographical disruption as chronic illness? Reflections on a core concept. Sociology of Health and Illness, 22, 1, 40–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar