Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T03:41:14.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Public Appeal of Sheltered Housing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2008

Catherine Thompson  and
Patrick West
Catherine Thompson
Affiliation:
MRC Medical Sociology Unit, Institute of Medical Sociology, Westburn Road, Aberdeen.
Patrick West
Affiliation:
MRC Medical Sociology Unit, Institute of Medical Sociology, Westburn Road, Aberdeen.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the light of the shortfall in provision of sheltered housing in the UK and recent cricticisms of this form of care, this paper examines its public appeal both in terms of its popularity relative to other care arrangements and the ideas and images associated with it. Using questionnaire data about preferred and projected care arrangements, idealised solutions are compared with actual arrangements made by a group of predominantly old and disabled persons. The contrast suggests that some of the features which characterize sheltered housing as an idealised solution may be achieved in other settings. The implications for the emphasis that sheltered housing should receive in planning for the frail elderly are discussed, particularly in the light of recent international trends to encourage a policy of ‘staying put’.

Type
Research Article
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 4 , Issue 3 , September 1984 , pp. 305 - 326
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

1 Goldberg, E. M. and Connelly, N.The Effectiveness of Social Care for the Elderly. Heinemann, London, 1982, p. 189.Google Scholar

2 Wheeler, R.Staying put: a new development in policy. Ageing and Society, 2, 3, (1982), 299–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3 Butler, A. Housing and the elderly: an overview. In Taylor, R. and Illsley, R. (eds). Individual Choice and Enabling Structures. Proceedings of a Workshop convened by the Health and Safety Directorate of EEC (forthcoming).Google Scholar

4 Wirz, H. M. Sheltered housing. In Lishman, J. (ed.). Research Highlights No. 3: Developing Services for the Elderly. University of Aberdeen, Social Work Department, 1982, 87–102.Google Scholar

5 Wheeler, , (op. cit.) notes that in 1979, 250,000 retired people in the UK were on the waiting list for local authority sheltered housing alone.Google Scholar

6 Isaacs, B., Livingstone, M. and Neville, Y.Survival of the Unfittest. A Study of Geriatric Patients in Glasgow. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London and Boston, 1972.Google Scholar

7 Wirz, H. M., op. cit. p. 100.Google Scholar

8 Butler, A., Oldman, C. and Greve, J.Sheltered Housing for the Elderly. Policy Practice and the Consumer. George Allen and Unwin, London, 1983.Google Scholar

9 Rosow, L., Social Integration of the Aged. Free Press, New York, 1967.Google Scholar

10 Lawton, M. P. and Yaffe, S.Mortality, morbidity and voluntary change of residence by older people. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (1970), 821–31.Google ScholarPubMedSchulz, R. and Bremner, G.Relocation of the aged: a review of theoretical analysis. Journal of Gerontology 32, 3 (1977), 323–333.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

11 Butler, A. and Tinker, A. Integration or segregation: housing in later life. In Elderly People in the Community: Their Service Needs. DHSS, HMSO, London, 1983.Google ScholarBytheway, W. R. and James, L.The Allocation of Sheltered Housing. Medical Sociology Unit, University of Swansea, 1978.Google Scholar

12 Goldberg, E. M. and Connelly, N.op. cit.Google Scholar

13 Robson, P.Profiles of the Elderly: 7, Their Housing, vol. 5, Age Concern, London, 1980.Google Scholar

14 Boldy, D.A study of the wardens of grouped dwellings for the elderly. Social and Economic Administration, 10 (1976), 59–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarBoldy, D., Abel, P. and Carter, K.The Elderly in Grouped Dwellings: A Profile. University of Exeter, Institute of Biometry and Community Medicine, 1973.Google Scholar

15 Goldberg, E. M. and Connelly, N., op. cit. p. 199.Google Scholar

16 Wheeler, R.op. cit.Google Scholar

17 Wheeler R. ibid.

18 Butler, et al. 1983, op. cit.Google Scholar

19 Doron, A.Social Services for the Aged in Eight Countries. Brookdale Institute of Gerontology, Jerusalem, 1979.Google Scholar

20 Goldberg, E. M. and Connelly, N.op. cit.Google Scholar

21 Rose, E. A.Housing for the Aged, Saxon House, Farnborough, 1978.Google Scholar

22 Wirz, H. M.op. cit.Google Scholar

23 Butler, A. and Oldman, C.The design and siting of sheltered housing: the consumers view, Housing, 16, 10 (1980), 18–20.Google Scholar

24 Lawton, M. P.Environment and Aging. Brooks/Cole, California, 1980.Google ScholarPubMed

25 Shaw, I.Consumer opinion and social policy: a research review, Journal of Social Policy 5, 1 (1976), 19–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

26 Lawton, M. P. 1980, op. cit.Google Scholar

27 Cf. Porter, M. and Macintyre, S. What is, must be best: a research note on consumer or deferential responses to antenatal care provision. Revised version of paper presented at 7th International Congress on Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Dublin, 09 1983.Google Scholar

28 Butler, A. and Tinker, A.op. cit.Google Scholar

29 Abrams, M.Beyond Three Score Years and Ten: A First Report on a Survey of the Elderly. Age Concern, Mitcham, Surrey, 1978.Google Scholar

30 Hunter, D., personal communication, Department of Community Medicine, Aberdeen University.Google Scholar

31 See West, P., Dalley, G., Thompson, C., Brown, S., Hewitt, A., Illsley, R. and Kelman, H.Social responsibility for the care of dependency groups. International Journal for Rehabilitation Research 6, 4 (1983), 506–507.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMedWest, P., Illsley, R. and Kelman, H.Public preferences for the care of dependency groups. Social Science and Medicine 18, 4 (1984), 284–295.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

32 Thompson, C. A survey of arthritis and rheumatism out-patients. Report prepared for the Scottish Home and Health Department, 10 1983.Google Scholar

33 This study is part of a programme of research which also includes the survey of public attitudes, the background to which is outlined in West, P. et al. 1983 op. cit.Google Scholar

34 West, P. et al. 1984, op. cit.Google Scholar

35 Wood, P. The challenge of arthritis and rheumatism. A Report on Problems and Progress in Health Care for Rheumatic disorders. London, British League for Rheumatism and Arthritis, 1977.Google Scholar

36 Taylor, R. and Ford, G.Inequalities in old age. Ageing and Society, 3, 2 (1983), 153–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

37 The definition of restricting and non-restricting chronic illness followed the earlier question format used in the General Household Survey, viz. The General Household Survey 1972, HMSO, London, 1975.Google Scholar

38 For example, the headline ‘The prisoner: she's locked in at night because there's no other way’ (Evening Express, 14 Feb. 1984).

39 Wheeler, R.op. cit.Google Scholar

40 Conservative Party Election Manifesto, London, 1983.

41 Franey, R.Hard Times. The Tories and Disability. Disability Alliance, London, 1983.Google Scholar

42 Butler, A. In Taylor, R. and Illsley, R.op. cit.Google Scholar