Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T01:36:02.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The perspectives of people with dementia on day and respite services: a qualitative interview study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2019

Emma O’ Shea ,
Eamon O’ Shea ,
Suzanne Timmons  and
Kate Irving
Emma O’ Shea*
Affiliation:
School of Nursing and Human Sciences, Dublin City University, Dublin, Republic of Ireland
Eamon O’ Shea
Affiliation:
Irish Centre for Social Gerontology, National University of Ireland, Galway, Republic of Ireland
Suzanne Timmons
Affiliation:
Centre for Gerontology and Rehabilitation, University College Cork, Cork, Republic of Ireland
Kate Irving
Affiliation:
School of Nursing and Human Sciences, Dublin City University, Dublin, Republic of Ireland
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Respite services have traditionally been viewed as services for carers mainly. Perhaps as a result, the perspectives of people with dementia have been largely ignored. In this study, we consider these perspectives in relation to day and respite services, and contextualise them in light of Kitwood's prediction that person-centred care would be adopted only superficially by such services. Convenience sampling was employed and semi-structured interviews were conducted with six community-dwelling people with dementia. A thematic analysis was conducted and four themes were identified: ‘acceptability of service characteristics’, ‘meaningful engagement’, ‘personhood’ and ‘narrative citizenship’. The findings suggest that day services were more acceptable than residential respite, though some people would prefer home-based models, if available. ‘Meaningful’ engagement must be individually defined; however purposeful and reciprocal activity was commonly invoked as meaningful. ‘Personhood’ and ‘narrative citizenship’ were quintessential markers of quality care; while some people experienced personhood being bestowed upon them, others reported distinct instances of malignant social psychology, discrimination and stigma. In conclusion, an implementation gap may still persist regarding person-centred care in some respite services, based on the perspectives of people with dementia. Delivering the vision for care outlined here would require greater flexibility in service provision, more resources and more one-on-one staff–client time. The fundamental shift in thinking required by some staff relies on us supporting them to develop a greater self- and shared cultural-awareness around dementia.

Keywords

dementiarespitereciprocityacceptabilitypersonhoodnarrative citizenship
Type
Article
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 40 , Issue 10 , October 2020 , pp. 2215 - 2237
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baldwin, C (2008) Narrative(,) citizenship and dementia: the personal and the political. Journal of Aging Studies 22, 222–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beattie, A, Daker-White, G, Gilliard, J and Means, R (2004) ‘How can they tell?’A qualitative study of the views of younger people about their dementia and dementia care services. Health & Social Care in the Community 12, 359–368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brataas, HV, Bjugan, H, Wille, T and Hellzen, O (2010) Experiences of day care and collaboration among people with mild dementia. Journal of Clinical Nursing 19, 2839–2848.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Braun, V and Clarke, V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantley, C, Woodhouse, J and Smith, M (2005) Listen to Us: Involving People with Dementia in Planning and Developing Services. Newcastle UK: Dementia North, Northumbria University.Google Scholar
Dewing, J (2007) Participatory research: a method for process consent with persons who have dementia. Dementia 6, 11–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, EH (1993) Childhood and Society. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Fontana, A and Prokos, AH (2007) The Interview: From Formal to Postmodern. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gilleard, C and Higgs, P (2010) Aging without agency: theorizing the fourth age. Aging & Mental Health 14, 121–128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hammersley, M (1995) Theory and evidence in qualitative research. Quality and Quantity 29, 55–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, A, Radel, J, McDowd, JM and Sabata, D (2016) Perspectives of people with dementia about meaningful activities: a synthesis. American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease & Other Dementias 31, 115–123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Higgs, P and Gilleard, C (2014) Frailty, abjection and the ‘othering’ of the fourth age. Health Sociology Review 23, 10–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Josselson, R (2013) Interviewing for Qualitative Inquiry: A Relational Approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Keady, J and Nolan, M (1997) Raising the profile of younger people with dementia. Mental Health Nursing 17, 7–11.Google Scholar
Kirkley, C, Bamford, C, Poole, M, Arksey, H, Hughes, J and Bond, J (2011) The impact of organisational culture on the delivery of person-centred care in services providing respite care and short breaks for people with dementia. Health & Social Care in the Community 19, 438–448.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kitwood, T (1990) The dialectics of dementia: with particular reference to Alzheimer's disease. Ageing & Society 10, 177–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitwood, T (1995) Cultures of care: tradition and change. In Benson, S. & Kitwood, T.The New Culture of Dementia Care. London: Hawker Publications, pp. 7–11.Google Scholar
Kitwood, T (1997) Dementia Reconsidered: The Person Comes First. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Kitwood, T (1998) Professional and moral development for care work: some observations on the process. Journal of Moral Education 27, 401–411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kitwood, T and Bredin, K (1992) Towards a theory of dementia care: personhood and well-being. Ageing & Society 12, 269–287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lloyd, V, Gatherer, A and Kalsy, S (2006) Conducting qualitative interview research with people with expressive language difficulties. Qualitative Health Research 16, 1386–1404.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maayan, N, Soares-Weiser, K and Lee, H (2014) Respite care for people with dementia and their carers. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 1, CD004396. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004396.pub3.Google Scholar
McColgan, G (2005) A place to sit: resistance strategies used to create privacy and home by people with dementia. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 34, 410–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, G and Agnelli, J (2015) Person-centred care for people with dementia: Kitwood reconsidered. Nursing Standard 30, 7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murphy, K, Jordan, F, Hunter, A, Cooney, A and Casey, D (2015) Articulating the strategies for maximising the inclusion of people with dementia in qualitative research studies. Dementia 14, 800–824.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Older People's Commissioner for Wales (2018) Rethinking Respite. Cardiff: Older People's Commissioner for Wales.Google Scholar
O’ Shea, E, Keogh, F and Heneghan, C (2018) Post-diagnostic Support for People with Dementia and Their Carers. Centre for Economic and Social Research on Dementia. NUI, Galway.Google Scholar
O'Shea, E, Cahill, S, Pierce, M, Rees, G, Irving, K, Keogh, F, Carney, P, Pierse, T and Hennelly, N (2017 a) Developing and Implementing Dementia Policy in Ireland. Centre for Economic and Social Research on Dementia. NUI, Galway.Google Scholar
O'Shea, E, Timmons, S, O'Shea, E, Fox, S and Irving, K (2017 b) Key stakeholders’ experiences of respite services for people with dementia and their perspectives on respite service development: a qualitative systematic review. BMC Geriatrics 17, 282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Shea, E, Timmons, S, O'Shea, E, Fox, S and Irving, K (2017 c) Respite in dementia: an evolutionary concept analysis. Dementia.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pipon-Young, FE, Lee, KM, Jones, F and Guss, R (2012) I'm not all gone, I can still speak: the experiences of younger people with dementia. An action research study. Dementia 11, 597–616.Google Scholar
Reed, J, Cantley, C, Clarke, CL and Stanley, D (2002) Services for younger people with dementia: problems with differentiating needs on the basis of age. Dementia 1, 95–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rokstad, AMM, McCabe, L, Robertson, JM, Strandenæs, MG, Tretteteig, S and Vatne, S (2017) Day care for people with dementia: a qualitative study comparing experiences from Norway and Scotland. Dementia.Google ScholarPubMed
Strandenæs, MG, Lund, Aand Rokstad, AMM (2018) Experiences of attending day care services designed for people with dementia: a qualitative study with individual interviews. Aging & Mental Health 22, 764–772.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tong, A, Sainsbury, P and Craig, J (2007) Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 19, 349–357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Urquhart, C (2012) Grounded Theory for Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Vandepitte, S, Van Den Noortgate, N, Putman, K, Verhaeghe, S, Verdonck, C and Annemans, L (2016) Effectiveness of respite care in supporting informal caregivers of persons with dementia: a systematic review. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 31, 1277–1288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Villar, F (2012) Successful ageing and development: the contribution of generativity in older age. Ageing & Society 32, 1087–1105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Health Organization (2017) Draft Global Action Plan on the Public Health Response to Dementia. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar