Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T14:36:58.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Older people's realisation of generativity in a changing society: the case of Hong Kong

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2008

SHEUNG-TAK CHENG ,
WAI CHAN  and
ALFRED C. M. CHAN
SHEUNG-TAK CHENG
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Social Studies, City University of Hong Kong.
WAI CHAN
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Social Studies, City University of Hong Kong.
ALFRED C. M. CHAN
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Social Studies, City University of Hong Kong.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Generativity refers to activities that help to establish and guide the next generation. This paper explores the nature of generative concern among older people and how it manifests itself in an era of rapid social and technological changes that have produced wide generation gaps. Eight focus groups were conducted with 51 women and 20 men who were recruited from social centres in Hong Kong on the basis of age, socio-economic status, and level of participation in the centres. The discussions were transcribed verbatim and analysed using grounded-theory principles. The elders frequently referred to the superior educational level and technological knowledge of their offspring, as well as the differences in values and lifestyles between the generations, which they thought had made their own knowledge and wisdom obsolete. They had concerns about social and technological changes, however, and they aroused a sense of urgency to protect the younger generation from contemporary evils, while many considered that passing on moral and behavioural codes nowadays was the most important generative role. Although they wanted to help, their efforts were often criticised. In order to maintain harmonious relationships and to avoid conflicts with their offspring, many participants adopted passive generative roles. Attempts to stabilise the generative self by redefining generativity were also observed. The final section of the paper discusses the implications of the findings for the maintenance of the generative self in personal situations of declining resources.

Keywords

generativityagencycommunionsocial changeselderlyChinese
Type
Research Article
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 28 , Issue 5 , July 2008 , pp. 609 - 627
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aboderin, I. 2004. Modernisation and ageing theory revisited: current explanations of recent developing world and historical Western shifts in material family support for older people. Ageing & Society, 24, 1, 29–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baltes, P. B. and Baltes, M. M. 1990. Psychological perspectives on successful aging: the model of selective optimization with compensation. In Baltes, P. B. and Baltes, M. M. (eds), Successful Aging: Perspectives from the Behavioral Sciences. Cambridge University Press, New York, 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandtstädter, J. and Greve, W. 1994. The aging self: stabilizing and protective processes. Developmental Review, 14, 1, 52–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cattell, M. G. 1994. ‘Nowadays it isn't easy to advise the young’: grandmothers and granddaughters among the Abaluyia of Kenya. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 9, 2, 157–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Census and Statistics Department 2002. Hong Kong 2001 Population Census Main Report. Volumes I and II, Census and Statistics Department, Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Cheng, S.-T. and Chan, A. C. M. 2006. Filial piety and psychological well-being in well older Chinese. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 61B, 5, P262–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, S.-T., Chan, A. C. M. and Phillips, D. R. 2004. Quality of life in old age: an investigation of well older persons in Hong Kong. Journal of Community Psychology, 32, 3, 309–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cicirelli, V. G. 1992. Attachment and obligation as daughters' motives for caregiving behavior and subsequent effect on subjective burden. Psychology and Aging, 8, 2, 144–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de St Aubin, E. 2004. The propagation of genes and memes: generativity through culture in Japan and the United States. In de St Aubin, E., McAdams, D. P. and Kim, T.-C. (eds), The Generative Society: Caring for Future Generations. American Psychological Association, Washington DC, 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diehl, M., Owen, S. K. and Youngblade, L. M. 2004. Agency and communion attributes in adults' spontaneous self-representations. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28, 1, 1–15.Google Scholar
Erikson, E. H. 1963. Childhood and Society. Second edition, Norton, New York. (First published 1950.)Google Scholar
Erikson, E. H. 1982. The Life Cycle Completed. Norton, New York.Google Scholar
Erikson, K. 2004. Reflections on generativity and society: a sociologist's perspective. In de St Aubin, E., McAdams, D. P. and Kim, T.-C. (eds), The Generative Society: Caring for Future Generations. American Psychological Association, Washington DC, 51–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleeson, W. 2001. Judgments of one's own overall contribution to the welfare of others. In Rossi, A. S. (ed.), Caring and Doing for Others: Social Responsibility in the Domains of Family, Work, and Community. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 75–96.Google Scholar
Grossbaum, M. F. and Bates, G. W. 2002. Correlates of psychological well-being at midlife: the role of generativity, agency and communion, and narrative themes. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26, 2, 120–7.Google Scholar
Heckhausen, J. and Schulz, R. 1995. A life-span theory of control. Psychological Review, 102, 2, 284–304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keyes, C. L. M. and Ryff, C. D. 1998. Generativity in adult lives: social structural contours and quality of life consequences. In McAdams, D. P. and de St Aubin, E. (eds) Generativity and Adult Development: How and Why We Care for the Next Generation. American Psychological Association, Washington DC, 227–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotre, J. 1984. Outliving the Self: How We Live on in Future Generations. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland.Google Scholar
Mansfield, E. D. and McAdams, D. P. 1996. Generativity and themes of agency and communion in adult autobiography. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 7, 721–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markus, H. R. and Kitayama, S. 1991. Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 2, 224–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdams, D. P. 1985. Power, Intimacy, and the Life Story: Personological Inquiries into Identity. Guilford, New York.Google Scholar
McAdams, D. P. and de St Aubin, E. 1992. A theory of generativity and its assessment through self-report, behavioural acts, and narrative themes in autobiography. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 6, 1003–15.Google Scholar
McAdams, D. P., de St Aubin, E. and Logan, R. L. 1993. Generativity among young, midlife, and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 8, 2, 221–30.Google Scholar
McAdams, D. P., Hart, H. M. and Maruna, S. 1998. The anatomy of generativity. In McAdams, D. P. and de St Aubin, E. (eds), Generativity and Adult Development: How and Why We Care for the Next Generation. American Psychological Association, Washington DC, 7–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, B. E. and Stewart, A. J. 1996. Antecedents and contexts of generativity motivation at midlife. Psychology and Aging, 11, 1, 21–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rossi, A. S. 2001. Domains and dimensions of social responsibility: a sociodemographic profile. In Rossi, A. S. (ed.), Caring and Doing for Others: Social Responsibility in the Domains of Family, Work, and Community. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 97–134.Google Scholar
Sheldon, K. M. and Kasser, T. 2001. Getting older, getting better? Personal strivings and psychological maturity across the life span. Developmental Psychology, 37, 4, 491–501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snyder, M. and Clary, E. G. 2003. Volunteerism and the generative society. In de St Aubin, E., McAdams, D. P. and Kim, T.-C. (eds), The Generative Society: Caring for Future Generations. American Psychological Association, Washington DC, 221–37.Google Scholar
Stein, C. H. and Mankowski, E. S. 2004. Asking, witnessing, interpreting, knowing: conducting qualitative research in community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 33, 1–2, 21–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stewart, A. J. and Vandewater, E. A. 1998. The course of generativity. In McAdams, D. P. and de St Aubin, E. (eds), Generativity and Adult Development: How and Why We Care for the Next Generation. American Psychological Association, Washington DC, 75–100.Google Scholar
Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Second edition, Sage, Thousand Oaks, California.Google Scholar
United Nations 2005. World Population Prospects: The 2004 Revision. United Nations, New York.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, S. 2003. Focus group. In Smith, J. A. (eds), Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods. Sage, London, 184–204.Google Scholar
Yang, C. 1988. Familism and development: an examination of the role of family in contemporary China mainland, Hong Kong and Taiwan. In Sinha, D. and Kao, H. S. R. (eds), Social Values and Development: Asian Perspectives. Sage, Thousand Oaks, California, 93–123.Google Scholar