Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T10:19:36.537Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mobility and out-of-home activities of older people living in suburban environments: ‘Because I'm a driver, I don't have a problem'

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2014

ELISABETH ZEITLER  and
LAURIE BUYS
ELISABETH ZEITLER*
Affiliation:
Creative Industries, School of Design, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
LAURIE BUYS
Affiliation:
Creative Industries, School of Design, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
*
Address for correspondence: Elisabeth Zeitler, Creative Industries, School of Design, Queensland University of Technology, Gardens Point Campus, 2 George Street, GPO Box 2434, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Governments are challenged by the need to ensure that ageing populations stay active and engaged as they age. Therefore, it is critical to investigate the role of mobility in older people's engagement in out-of-home activities, and to identify the experiences they have within their communities. This research investigates the use of transportation by older people and its implications for their out-of-home activities within suburban environments. The qualitative, mixed-method approach employs data collection methods which include a daily travel diary (including a questionnaire), Global Positioning System (GPS) tracking and semi-structured interviews with older people living in suburban environments in Brisbane, Australia. Results show that older people are mobile throughout the city, and their car provides them with that opportunity to access desired destinations. This ability to drive allows older people to live independently and to assist others who do not drive, particularly where transport alternatives are not as accessible. The ability to transport goods and other people is a significant advantage of the private car over other transport options. People with no access to private transportation who live in low-density environments are disadvantaged when it comes to participation within the community. Further research is needed to better understand the relationship between transportation and participation within the community environment, to assist policy makers and city and transportation planners to develop strategies for age-friendly environments within the community.

Keywords

mobilityolder peopleout-of-home activityparticipationGlobal Positioning System (GPS)
Type
Articles
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 35 , Issue 4 , April 2015 , pp. 785 - 808
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, G. and Rottunda, S. 2006. Older adults’ perspectives on driving cessation. Journal of Aging Studies, 20, 3, 227–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alsnih, R. and Hensher, D. A. 2003. The mobility and accessibility expectations of seniors in an aging population. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 37, 10, 903–916.Google Scholar
Australian Bureau of Statistics 2006. Population Projections, Australia, 2004 to 2101, Reissue. Available online at http://www.ausstats.abs.gov.au/ausstats/subscriber.nsf/0/73D26920772F929ECA25718C001518FB/$File/32220_2004%20to%202101reissue.pdf [Accessed 1 September 2009].Google Scholar
Australian Bureau of Statistics 2010. National Regional Profile: Brisbane (C) (Local Government Area). Available online at http://www.abs.gov.au/websitedbs/D3310114.nsf/home/home?opendocument#from-banner=GT [Accessed 14 March 2011].Google Scholar
Banister, D. and Bowling, A. 2004. Quality of life for the elderly: the transport dimension. Transport Policy, 11, 2, 105–115.Google Scholar
Broome, K., McKenna, K., Fleming, J. and Worrall, L. 2009. Bus use and older people: a literature review applying the person–environment–occupation model in macro practice. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 16, 1, 3–12.Google Scholar
Burkhardt, J. E. 2003. Critical measures of transit service quality in the eyes of older travelers. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1835, 1, 84–92.Google Scholar
Charlton, J. L., Oxley, J., Fildes, B., Oxley, P., Newstead, S., Koppel, S. and O'Hare, M. 2006. Characteristics of older drivers who adopt self-regulatory driving behaviours. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 9, 5, 363–373.Google Scholar
Commonwealth of Australia 2010. State of Australian Cities 2010. Australian Government Infrastructure Australia: Major Cities Unit. Available online at http://www.infrastructure.gov.au/infrastructure/mcu/soac_files/MCU_SOAC.pdf [Accessed 12 August 2011].Google Scholar
Creswell, J. W. and Miller, D. L. 2000. Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39, 3, 124–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodson, J. and Sipe, N. 2007. Oil vulnerability in the Australian city: assessing socioeconomic risks from higher urban fuel prices. Urban Studies, 44, 1, 37–62.Google Scholar
Frignani, M. Z., Auld, J., Mohammadian, A., Williams, C. and Nelson, P. 2010. Urban travel route and activity choice survey: internet-based prompted-recall activity travel survey using global positioning system data. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2183, 19–28.Google Scholar
Google 2010. Google Earth 5.0. Available online at http://earth.google.com/intl/en/download-earth.html [Accessed 6 January 2010].Google Scholar
Hjorthol, R. J., Levin, L. and Sirén, A. 2010. Mobility in different generations of older persons: the development of daily travel in different cohorts in Denmark, Norway and Sweden. Journal of Transport Geography, 18, 5, 624–633.Google Scholar
Jones, P., Drury, R. and McBeath, J. 2011. Using GPS-enabled mobile computing to augment qualitative interviewing: two case studies. Field Methods, 23, 2, 173–187.Google Scholar
Langford, J., Fitzharris, M., Newstead, S. and Koppel, S. 2004. Some consequences of different older driver licensing procedures in Australia. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 36, 6, 993–1001.Google Scholar
Li, F., Fisher, K. J., Brownson, R. C. and Bosworth, M. 2005. Multilevel modelling of built environment characteristics related to neighbourhood walking activity in older adults. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 59, 7, 558–564.Google Scholar
Lord, S., Després, C. and Ramadier, T. 2011. When mobility makes sense: a qualitative and longitudinal study of the daily mobility of the elderly. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31, 1, 52–61.Google Scholar
Lord, S., Joerin, F. and Thériault, M. 2009. Daily mobility of aging and elderly suburbanites: trips, aspirations and meanings of mobility/La mobilité quotidienne de banlieusards vieillissants et âgés: déplacements, aspirations et significations de la mobilité. The Canadian Geographer, 53, 3, 357–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maoh, H., Kanaroglou, P., Scott, D., Paez, A. and Newbold, B. 2009. IMPACT: an integrated GIS-based model for simulating the consequences of demographic changes and population ageing on transportation. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 33, 3, 200–210.Google Scholar
Marottoli, R. A., Mendes de Leon, C. F., Glass, T. A. and Williams, C. S. 1997. Driving cessation and increased depressive symptoms: prospective evidence from the New Haven EPESE. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 45, 2, 202–6.Google Scholar
Marottoli, R. A., Mendes de Leon, C. F., Glass, T. A., Williams, C. S., Cooney, L. M. Jr. and Berkman, L. F. 2000. Consequences of driving cessation: decreased out-of-home activity levels. Journals of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 55B, 6, 334–340.Google Scholar
McCray, T. and Brais, N. 2007. Exploring the role of transportation in fostering social exclusion: the use of GIS to support qualitative data. Networks and Spatial Economics, 7, 4, 397–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metz, D. H. 2000. Mobility of older people and their quality of life. Transport Policy, 7, 2, 149–152.Google Scholar
Mollenkopf, H., Hieber, A. and Wahl, H.-W. 2011. Continuity and change in older adults’ perceptions of out-of-home mobility over ten years: a qualitative–quantitative approach. Ageing & Society, 31, 5, 782–802.Google Scholar
Musselwhite, C. and Haddad, H. 2010. Mobility, accessibility and quality of later life. Quality in Ageing and Older Adults, 11, 1, 25–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsberg, D. and Winters, M. 2005. Ageing in Place: Intergenerational and Intrafamilial Housing Transfers and Shifts in Later Life. Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute. Available online at http://www.ahuri.edu.au/publications/projects/p70223 [Accessed 1 Septemeber 2011].Google Scholar
Oswald, F., Wahl, H.-W., Voss, E., Schilling, O., Freytag, T., Auslander, G., Shoval, N., Heinik, J. and Landau, R. 2010. The use of tracking technologies for the analysis of outdoor mobility in the face of dementia: first steps into a project and some illustrative findings from Germany. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 24, 1, 55–73.Google Scholar
Páez, A., Mercado, R. G., Farber, S., Morency, C. and Roorda, M. 2009. Mobility and Social Exclusion in Canadian Communities: An Empirical Investigation of opportunity Access and Deprivation from the Perspective of Vulnerable Groups. Human Resources and Social Development Canada. Available online at http://www.science.mcmaster.ca/geo/faculty/paez/HRSDC_Final_Report_v1.2.pdf [Accessed 26 November 2012].Google Scholar
Peel, N., Westmoreland, J. and Steinberg, M. 2002. Transport safety for older people: a study of their experiences, perceptions and management needs. International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion, 9, 1, 19–24.Google Scholar
Plouffe, L. and Kalache, A. 2010. Towards global age-friendly cities: determining urban features that promote Active Aging. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 87, 5, 733–739.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
QSR International 2010. NVivo 9. QSR International, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
Ragland, D. R., Satariano, W. A. and MacLeod, K. E. 2005. Driving cessation and increased depressive symptoms. Journals of Gerontology: Medical Sciences, 60A, 3, 399–403.Google Scholar
Randolph, B. 2004. The changing Australian city: new patterns, new policies and new research needs. Urban Policy and Research, 22, 4, 481–493.Google Scholar
Randolph, B. 2006. Delivering the compact city in Australia: current trends and future implications. Urban Policy and Research, 24, 4, 473–490.Google Scholar
Rosenbloom, S. 2001. Sustainability and automobility among the elderly: an international assessment. Transportation, 28, 4, 375–408.Google Scholar
Rosenbloom, S. 2009. Meeting transportation needs in an aging-friendly community. Generations – Journal of the American Society on Ageing, 33, 2, 33–43.Google Scholar
Ross, L. A., Anstey, K. J., Kiely, K. M., Windsor, T. D., Byles, J. E., Luszcz, M. A. and Mitchell, P. 2009. Older drivers in Australia: trends in driving status and cognitive and visual impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 57, 10, 1868–1873.Google Scholar
Rush, K. L., Watts, W. E. and Stanbury, J. 2011. Mobility adaptations of older adults: a secondary analysis. Clinical Nursing Research, 20, 1, 81–100.Google Scholar
Scharlach, A. E. 2009. Creating aging-friendly communities. Generations, 33, 2, 5–11.Google Scholar
Shoval, N., Auslander, G., Cohen-Shalom, K., Isaacson, M., Landau, R. and Heinik, J. 2010. What can we learn about the mobility of the elderly in the GPS era? Journal of Transport Geography, 18, 5, 603–612.Google Scholar
Shoval, N., Auslander, G., Freytag, T., Landau, R., Oswald, F., Seidl, U., Wahl, H.-W., Werner, S. and Heinik, J. 2008. The use of advanced tracking technologies for the analysis of mobility in Alzheimer's disease and related cognitive diseases. BMC Geriatrics, 8, 7, 1–12.Google Scholar
Shoval, N., Wahl, H.-W., Auslander, G., Isaacson, M., Oswald, F., Edry, T., Landau, R. and Heinik, J. 2011. Use of the global positioning system to measure the out-of-home mobility of older adults with differing cognitive functioning. Ageing & Society, 31, 5, 849–869.Google Scholar
The Population Experts 2012. Welcome to Brisbane LGA Community Profile. Available online at http://profile.id.com.au/Default.aspx?id=327&pg=260&gid=1090&type=enum [Accessed 27 November 2012].Google Scholar
Webber, S. C., Porter, M. M. and Menec, V. H. 2010. Mobility in older adults: a comprehensive framework. Gerontologist, 50, 4, 443–450.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization 2002. Active Ageing: A Policy Framework. World Health Organization, Geneva. Available online at http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2002/WHO_NMH_NPH_02.8.pdf [Accessed 1 March 2009].Google Scholar
World Health Organization 2007. Global Age-friendly Cities: A Guide. World Health Organization, Geneva. Available online at http://www.who.int/ageing/publications/Global_age_friendly_cities_Guide_English.pdf [Accessed 1 March 2009].Google Scholar
Zeitler, E., Buys, L., Aird, R. and Miller, E. 2012. Mobility and active ageing in suburban environments: findings from in-depth interviews and person-based GPS tracking. Current Gerontology and Geriatrics Research, 1–10.Google Scholar