Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T20:19:00.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Let me grow old and senile in peace: Norwegian newspaper accounts of voice and agency with dementia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 December 2017

MAARJA SIINER
MAARJA SIINER*
Affiliation:
Center for Multilingualism in Society across the Lifespan, University of Oslo, Norway.
*
Address for correspondence: Maarja Siiner, Æblestien 2, 2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study analyses the remaking of dementia as a social and cultural phenomenon in the public media discourse in a welfare state Norway. A content analysis was carried out of articles on dementia published in Norwegian paper media from 1995 to 2015. The study combined the tools from quantitative corpus analyses and qualitative critical discourse analyses, making it possible to detect and interpret diachronic changes in the dementia discourse. Although the main focus in Norwegian dementia discourse has changed from the disease to the personhood, the agents defining what it means to live well with dementia continued to be predominantly institutional: non-governmental organisations, municipalities, health-care institutions and politicians. An analysis of the uses of the politically incorrect Norwegian term for dementia, ‘senility’, revealed that this term offered an alternative to the institutionalised dementia discourse and functioned as an unconventional and therapeutic-free space where older people and persons with dementia could use humour to subvert these norms and power relations.

Keywords

dementiasenilityageingcorpus-assisted discourse studiescritical discourse analysisNorwaymediahumour
Type
Article
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 39 , Issue 5 , May 2019 , pp. 977 - 997
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adelswärd, V. 1989. Laughter and dialogue: the social significance of laughter in institutional discourse. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 12, 2, 107–36.Google Scholar
Baker, P. 2005. Public Discourses of Gay Men. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Baker, P. 2010. Sociolinguistics and Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, UK.Google Scholar
Baker, P., Gabrielator, C., Khosravinik, M., Krzyzanowski, M., McEnery, T. and Wodak, R. 2008. A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press. Discourse and Society, 19, 3, 273–306.Google Scholar
Baker, P. and McEnery, A. 2005. A corpus-based approach to discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in UN and newspaper texts. Language and Politics, 4, 2, 197–226.Google Scholar
Baker, P. and McEnery, A. 2015. Introduction. In Baker, P. and McEnery, T. (eds), Corpora and Discourse Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 1–19.Google Scholar
Ballenger, J. F. 2006. Self, Senility, and Alzheimer's Disease in Modern America. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland.Google Scholar
Basu, S. 2007. ‘A little discourse Pro & Con’: levelling laughter and its Puritan criticism. International Review of Social History, 52, S15, 95–113.Google Scholar
Bauman, Z. 1992. Mortality, Immortality and Other Life Strategies. Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Beard, R. L. 2004. Advocating voice: organisational, historical and social milieux of the Alzheimer's disease movement. Sociology of Health & Illness, 26, 6, 797–819.Google Scholar
Behuniak, S. 2011. The living dead? Construction of people with Alzheimer's disease as zombies. Ageing & Society, 31, 1, 70–92.Google Scholar
Camaj, L. 2014. The media in transitional democracies. International Journal of Press-Politics, 19, 4, 510–4.Google Scholar
Carpentier, N. 2016. Beyond the ladder of participation: an analytical toolkit for the critcial analysis of participatory media processes. Javnost: The Public, 23, 1, 70–88.Google Scholar
Clarke, J. 2006. The case of the missing person: Alzheimer's Disease in mass print magazines 1991–2001. Health Communication, 19, 3, 269–76.Google Scholar
Cohen, L. 2006. Introduction. Thinking about dementia. In Leibing, A. and Cohen, L. (eds), Thinking About Dementia. Culture, Loss and the Anthropology of Senility. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, New Jersey, 1–19.Google Scholar
Commisso, E. 2015. The zero-degree of dementia. Thinking the gap between subject and substance. In Swinnen, A. and Schweda, M. (eds), Popularizing Dementia. Public Expressions and Representations of Forgetfulness. Verlag, 377–402.Google Scholar
Daatland, S. 2009. Om aldersforskning og psykologi: om å generalisere og individualisere. In Nygård, A. M., Utne, T. E., Anfinnsen, E. and Eek, A. (eds), D'er ofte godt som dei gamle talar – Gamle under lupen- bidrag til forståelsen av aldring. Aldring og Helse, Tønsberg, Norway, 43–52.Google Scholar
Davies, C. E. 2010. Joking as boundary negotiation among ‘good old boys’: ‘white trash’ as a social category at the bottom of the Southern working class in Alabama. Humour, 23, 2, 179–200.Google Scholar
Doyle, C. J., Dunt, D. R., Pirkis, J., Dare, A., Day, S. and Wijesundara, B. S. 2012. Media reports on dementia. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 31, 2, 96–101.Google Scholar
Engedal, K. 2009. Demens i et historisk perspektiv – fra oldtiden til Alzheimers tid. In Nygård, A. M., Utne, T. E., Anfinnsen, E. and Eek, A. (eds), D'er ofte godt som dei gamle talar – Gamle under lupen- bidrag til forståelsen av aldring. Aldring og Helse, Tønsberg, Norway, 1–12.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. 1989. Language and Power. Longman, London.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. 2000. New Labour, New Language? Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. and Wodak, R. 1997. Critical discourse analysis. In van Dijk, T. A. (ed.), Discourse as Social Interaction. Sage, London, 258–84.Google Scholar
Fitzsimmons-Doolan, S. 2015. Applying corpus linguistics to language policy. In Hult, F. and Johnson, D. C. (eds), Research Methods in Language Policy and Planning. Wiley Blackwell, Oxford, 107–17.Google Scholar
Flowerdew, L. 2005. The argument for using English specialized corpora to understand academic and professional language. In Connor, U. and Upton, T. (eds). Discourse in the Professions: Perspectives from Corpus Linguistics. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, 11–33.Google Scholar
Fox, P. J. 2000. The role of the concept of Alzheimer Disease in the development of the Alzheimer's Association in US. In Whitehouse, P. J., Maurer, K. and Ballenger, J. F. (eds), Concepts of Alzheimer Disease. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 209–33.Google Scholar
Gjøra, L. 2011. Svart på Hvitt. Norske avisers fremstilling av personer med demens. Master of Public Health, Nordiska Högskolan för folkhälsovetenskap, Göteborg.Google Scholar
Gramsci, A. 1971. Selections from the Prison Notebooks. Lawrence and Wishart, London.Google Scholar
Habib, R. 2008. Humor and disagreement: identity construction and cross-cultural enrichment. Journal of Pragmatics, 40, 6, 1117–45.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. and Marra, M. 2002. Over the edge? Subversive humor between colleagues and friends. International Journal of Humor Research, 15, 1, 65–87.Google Scholar
Holstein, M. 2000. Aging, culture and the framing of Alzheimer Disease. In Whitehouse, P. J., Maurer, K. and Ballenger, J. F. (eds), Concepts of Alzheimer Disease. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 158–80.Google Scholar
Hughes, J. 2011. Thinking Through Dementia. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hunt, D. and Harvey, K. 2015. Health communication and corpus linguistics. In Baker, P. and McEnery, T. (eds), Corpora and Discourse Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 134–54.Google Scholar
Kaufman, S. R. 2006. Dementia – near-death and ‘life itself’. In Leibing, A. and Cohen, L. (eds), Thinking About Dementia. Culture, Loss and the Anthropology of Senility. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, New Jersey, 23–42.Google Scholar
Kessler, E. M. and Schwendler, C. 2012. Giving dementia a face. Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 67B, 2, 261–70.Google Scholar
Kinzer, A. and Suhr, J. A. 2016. Dementia worry and its relationship to dementia exposure, psychological factors, and subjective memory concerns. Applied Neuropsychological Adult, 23, 3, 196–204.Google Scholar
Kirkevold, M. and Brodtkorb, K. 2008. Geriatrisk sykepleie. Gyldendal Akademisk, Oslo.Google Scholar
Kirkman, A. M. 2006. Dementia in the news: the media coverage of Alzheimer's disease. Australasian Journal of Ageing, 25, 2, 74–9.Google Scholar
Koteyko, N. 2014. Language and Politics in Post-Soviet Russia. Palgrave Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
Leibing, A. 2006. Divided gazes: Alzheimer's Disease, the person within and death in life. In Leibing, A. and Cohen, L. (eds), Thinking About Dementia. Culture, Loss and the Anthropology of Senility. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, New Jersey, 240–68.Google Scholar
Lyman, K. 1989. Stress in the work of dementia care: a comparison of eight Alzheimer's day care centers. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, Ann Arbor, Michigan.Google Scholar
Magnussen, J., Vrangbæk, K., Saltmann, R. and Martimussen, P. 2009. Introduction: The Nordic model of healthcare. In Magnussen, J., Vrangbæk, K. and Saltmann, R. (eds), Nordic Health Care Systems. Recent reforms and Current Policy Challenges McGraw-Hill Education: Open University Press, Maidenhead, UK, 3–21.Google Scholar
McCreaddie, M. 2010. Harsh humour: a therapeutic discourse. Health & Social Care in the Community, 18, 6, 633–42.Google Scholar
Mehlman, J. 1972. The ‘floating signifier’: from Lévi-Strauss to Lacan. In French Freud: Structural Studies in Psychoanalysis. Yale French Studies, 48, 10–37.Google Scholar
Nygård, A. M. 2006. Fra alderssløv til person med demens. In Krüger, R. E. (ed.), Evige utfordringer – Helsetjenester og omsorg for eldre. Aldring og Helse, Tønsberg, Norway, 17–32.Google Scholar
Partington, A. 2004. Corpora and discourse: a most congruous beat. In Partington, A., Morley, J. and Haarman, L. (eds), Corpora and Discourse. Peter Lang, Bern, 11–20.Google Scholar
Partington, A. 2010. Modern dischronic corpus-assisted discourse studies on UK newspapers: an overview of the problem. Corpora, 5, 2, 83–108.Google Scholar
Partington, A., Duguid, A. and Taylor, C. 2013. Patterns and Meanings in Discourse. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Regjeringen 1995. Handlingsplan for eldreomsorgen – Trygghet – respekt – kvalitet [Action Plan for the Future Elderly Care: Safety, Respect, Quality]. Stortingsmelding 50 (1996–1997). Available online at https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/st-meld-nr-50_1996-97/id191307/ [Accessed 23 April 2017].Google Scholar
Regjeringen 2010. Demensplan 2015. Den gode dagen. Available online at https://www.regjeringen.no/globalassets/upload/HOD/Vedlegg/Omsorgsplan_2015/Demensplan2015.pdf [Accessed 23 April 2017].Google Scholar
Regjeringen 2013. Fremtidens primærhelsetjeneste, nærheten og omsorg [The Future Primary Care – Closeness and Solicitude]. Stortingsmelding 26 (2014–2015). Available online at https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/meld.-st.-26-2014-2015/id2409890/sec1 [Accessed 2 November 2017].Google Scholar
Regjeringen 2015. Demensplan 2020. Et mer demensvennlig samfunn. Available online at https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/demensplan-2020/id2465117/ [Accessed 23 April 2017].Google Scholar
Rowe, J. and Kahn, R. 1998. Successful Aging. Random House, New York.Google Scholar
Stubbs, M. 2007. On texts, corpora and models of language. In Hoey, M. (ed.), Text, Discourse and Corpora. Continuum, London, 127–62.Google Scholar
Swinnen, A. and Schweda, M. 2015. Popularizing dementia. Public expressions and representations of forgetfulness. In Swinnen, A. and Schweda, M. (eds), Popularizing Dementia. Public Expressions and Representations. transcript Verlag, Bielefeld, Germany, 9–42.Google Scholar
Van Gorp, B. and Vercruysse, T. 2012. Frames and counter-frames giving meaning to dementia. A framing analysis of media content. Social Science and Medicine, 74, 8, 1274–81.Google Scholar
Vidje, G. 2013. The Nordic Welfare Model. Nordic Centre for Welfare and Social Issues, Norden, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Wodak, R. 2001. Preface. Critical discourse analysis. Folia Linguistica, 35, 1/2, 1–10.Google Scholar
Wodak, R. and Meyer, M. 2009. Critical discourse analysis: history, agenda, theory and methodology. In Wodak, R. and Meyer, M. (eds), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. Sage, London, 1–33.Google Scholar
Zeiling, H. 2013. Dementia as a cultural metaphor. The Gerontologist, 54, 2, 258–67.Google Scholar