Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T20:47:16.984Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction: Special Issue on Ageing, Biography and Practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2018

Jan-Erik Ruth  and
Gary M. Kenyon
Jan-Erik Ruth
Affiliation:
Department of Social Policy, 00014 University of Helsinki, Finland
Gary M. Kenyon
Affiliation:
Gerontology Programme, St Thomas University, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada E3B 5G3
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The experiences of maturing and ageing constitute a rather unexplored field within Gerontology. The ‘inner’ aspects of ageing have been left relatively untouched by researchers, largely out of methodological considerations. The ‘outer’ aspect of ageing, or ageing defined as behaviour, has been considered more fruitful due to its consistency with criteria for science created by logical positivism. Psychogerontologists in particular have been mesmerized by this research paradigm. However, this trend has also, for some time now, been criticized for underestimating the perceptions of the reality upon which we form our reasons for action (Runyan 1982; Carr 1986). Further, there are exceptions to this main stream of research. For example, the German psychogerontologist Thomae created a theory of ageing in 1970 based on the perceptual, evaluative and meaning – giving processes within the individual (Thomae 1970). In a series of studies (The BOLSA studies), he has been able to lend support to most of his theoretical claims (see Kruse and Schmitz-Schertzer 1995). Also the Canadian gerontologists Reker and Wong (1988) belong to the group of pioneers advocating the importance of personal meaning in successful ageing.

Type
Research Article
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 16 , Issue 6: Special Issue: Ageing, Biography and Practice , November 1996 , pp. 653 - 657
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bertaux, D. (ed) 1981. Biography and Society: the Life History Approach in The Social Sciences. Sage, Beverly Hills, California.Google Scholar
Bertaux, D. and Kohli, M. 1984. The lifestory approach: a continental view. Annual Review of Sociology, 10, 215–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birren, J. E., Kenyon, G., Ruth, J.-E., Schroots, J. J. F. and Svensson, (eds). 1996. Aging and Biography: Explorations in Adult Development. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. 1986. Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruner, J. 1990. Acts of Meaning. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Carr, D. 1986. Time, Narrative and History. University of Indiana Press, Bloomington.Google Scholar
Coleman, P. 1986. Ageing and Reminiscence Processes. Social and Clinical Implications. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, H. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Prentice Hall, Engelwood Cliffs, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Glaser, B. and Strauss, A. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine, Chicago.Google Scholar
Gubrium, J. 1986. Oldtimers and Alzheimer’s: The Descriptive Organization of Senility. JAI Press, Greenwich Connecticut.Google Scholar
Gubrium, J. 1993. Speaking of life: Horizons of Meaning for Nursing Home Residents. Aldine de Gruyter, New York.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. L. 1976. That was your life: a biographical approach to later life. In Munnichs, J. M. A. and van den Heuvel, W. J. A. (eds) Dependency and Interdependency in Old Age. Mārtiņus Nijhoff, Hague, 147–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, S. R. 1986. The Ageless Self: Sources of Meaning in Late Life. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.Google Scholar
Kenyon, G., Birren, J. E. and Schroots, J. J. F. (eds) 1991. Metaphors of Aging in Science and the Humanities. Springer Publishing Co, New York.Google Scholar
Kruse, A. and Schmitz-Scherzer, R. (eds) 1995. Psychologie der Lebensalter. Steinkops Verlag, Damstadt.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, , 1961. Children of Sanchez: Autobiography of a Mexican Family. Random House, New York.Google Scholar
Reker, G. and Wong, P. 1988. Aging as an individual process: towards a theory of personal meaning. In Birren, J. E. and Bengtson, V. (eds) Emergent Theories of Aging. Springer, New York, 214–246.Google Scholar
Runyan, W. M. 1982. Life histories and Psychobiography: Explorations in Theory and Method. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Ruth, J.-E. Personality. In Birren, J. E. (ed) Encyclopedia of Gerontology. Academic Press. San Diego, California.Google Scholar
Ruth, J.-E. and Kenyon, G. 1996. Biography in adult development and aging. In Birren, J. E., Kenyon, G., Ruth, J.-E., Schroots, J. J.-F. and Svensson, T. (eds) Aging and biography: Explorations in Adult Development. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Ryff, C. D. 1984. Personality development from the inside: the subjective experience of change in adulthood and aging. In Baltes, P. and Brim, O. (eds). Life-Span Development and Behavior 6, 243–279.Google Scholar
Schutz, A. 1967. The Phenomenology of the Social World. Northwestern University Press. Evanston, Illinois.Google Scholar
Thomas, W. and Znaniecki, F. (1918-1920) (1966). The Polish Peasant in Europe and America. Monograph of an Immigrant Group. (5 vols) The Gorham Press, Boston, Massachusets.Google Scholar
Thomae, H. 1970. Theory of aging and cognitive theory of personality. Human Development, 12, 1-16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitbourne, S. 1986. The Me I Know: A Study of Adult Identity. Springer Verlag, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar