Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T03:20:25.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Intergenerational Transfers and Public Expenditure on the Elderly in Modern Britain1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2008

Paul Johnson  and
Jane Falkingham
Jane Falkingham
Affiliation:
Department of Economic History, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London WCaA 2AE.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the United States, much attention has recently been directed to the issue of whether the welfare system has become over-generous to the retired population, at the expense of families with children. The proportion of the US elderly population living in poverty has fallen significantly in the last fifteen years while the number of poor children has increased rapidly, and it has been suggested that this lack of investment in the next generation of workers may have disastrous longterm consequences for the U.S. economy. This paper considers whether similar trends are evident in Britain. It reviews data on the poverty and income of the elderly population, and finds little unequivocal evidence of relative economic gain over the last two decades, although it is clear that many children have suffered from the recent rise in unemployment-induced poverty. It also looks at direct public expenditure on the elderly through both the pension and the health and personal social services systems, and finds no evidence of a transfer of public resources away from children and towards the elderly population. The paper concludes that the British welfare state has been remarkably neutral in its allocation of resources between generations, and that, in the British context, any discussion of inter-generational conflict for welfare resources establishes a false dichotomy, because economic inequality within broad age groups is much greater than inequality between age groups.

Type
Research Article
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , June 1988 , pp. 129 - 146
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

2 Hewitt, P.A Broken Promise. Americans for Generational Equity, Washington D.C., 1986.Google Scholar

3 Age Concern (1986).

4 For a review of this literature see Aaron, H., The Economic Effects of Social Security (Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C., 1982).Google Scholar

5 Falkingham, J.Britain's ageing population; the engine behind increasing dependency? Journal of Social Policy, 01 1988.Google Scholar

6 Fifty Years of Social Security. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington D.C., 1985.Google Scholar

7 Preston, S.Children and the elderly: divergent paths for America's dependents, Demography, 21, 4 (1984), 435–457.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed An abridged version also appeared in Scientific American (12 1984).Google Scholar

8 Preston, , Children and the elderly, pp. 451–452.Google ScholarIbid.

9 Binney, E. A. and Estes, C. L.The retreat of the state and its transfer of responsibility: the intergenerational war, International Journal of Health Services, 18, 1 (1988), 83–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

10 Easterlin, R. A.The new age structure of poverty in America: permanent or transient?, Population and Development Review 13, 2 (1987), 195–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

11 Thomson, D.Selfish Generations: The ageing of the Welfare State. Wellington (forthcoming, 1988).Google Scholar

12 Abel Smith, B. and Townsend, P.The Poor and the Poorest. London, 1965.Google ScholarFiegehen, G. C., Lansley, P. S. and Smith, A. D.Poverty and Progress in Britain 1953–73. Cambridge, 1977.Google ScholarTownsend, P.Poverty in the U.K. Penguin, Harmonds-worth, 1979.Google Scholar

13 Fiegehen, et al. , p. 69;Google ScholarSocial Trends (1973), pp. 108–109;Google ScholarBerthoud, Richard and Brown, Joan, Poverty and the Development of Anti-Poverty Policy in the United Kingdom (Heinemann, London, 1981), p. 35.Google Scholar

14 Social Trends (1980)Google Scholar, Annual Abstract of Statistics (1980).Google Scholar

15 Annual Abstract of Statistics (1988), pp. 60–62.Google Scholar

16 Ibid.

17 Easterlin, , p. 206op. cit.Google Scholar

18 Fiegehen, G. C.Income after retirement, Social Trends (1986), pp. 13–18.Google Scholar

19 Abrams, M.Changes in the life-styles of the elderly, 1959–82. In Social Trends (1984), pp. 11–16.Google Scholar

20 Thomson, D. ‘Incomes in Old Age – Rising or Falling?’, unpublished paper (01 1987), p., 27.Google Scholar See also his ‘The overpaid elderly?’, New Society (7 03 1986).Google Scholar

21 British Labour Statistics Historical Abstract 1886–1968 (HMSO, London 1971), 206–7;Google ScholarSocial Trends (1988), p. 68.Google Scholar

22 1951Census, Social Trends (1988), p. 36.Google Scholar

23 Fiegehen, , p. 15.Google Scholar

24 Dale, A., Evandrou, M. and Arber, S.The household structure of the elderly population in Britain. Ageing and Society 7 (1987), 37–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

25 Population, Pension Costs and Pensioners' Incomes (DHSS, HMSO 1984), pp. 17–18;Google ScholarGilbert, Nigel et al. , ‘Resources in old age: ageing and the life course, forthcoming in Margot, Jeffreys (ed.), As Britain Ages (London, 1989).Google Scholar

26 For the years since 1983 this information has been presented in diagrammatic form, which does not allow appropriate disaggregation of per capita expenditure between these different services. The relevant figures for 1974–83 can be found in successive annual issues of the Government Expenditure Plans, vol. II from 1977 (Cmnd 6721–II) to 1985 (Cmnd 9428–II).