Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T18:57:49.304Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The influence of the welfare state on the number of young old persons

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2009

KATHRIN KOMP ,
THEO VAN TILBURG  and
MARJOLEIN BROESE VAN GROENOU
KATHRIN KOMP*
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, VU University Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
THEO VAN TILBURG
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, VU University Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
MARJOLEIN BROESE VAN GROENOU
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, VU University Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
*
Address for correspondence: Kathrin Komp, Department of Sociology, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1081, 1081HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Many current discussions of welfare state reforms focus on the ‘young old’, a group now generally perceived as healthy people past retirement age without a legal responsibility for dependent persons in need of care. For the welfare state, they constitute a resource whose activities are hard to steer. This article focuses on the influence of the welfare state on the number of ‘young old’ people. It describes different ways in which the welfare state influences the number of young old persons, and investigates whether variations in the regulations for the ages of normal, early and late retirement are the prime cause. The paper also estimates the share of the young old among those aged 50–90 years in 10 European countries in 2004 using comparable survey data. These shares ranged between 36 and 49 per cent for men and between 35 and 52 per cent for women. High shares were found in continental European countries, and low shares in Scandinavian countries and the United Kingdom. The shares in southern European countries varied among the countries and by gender. To explain the variations in the share, country differences in retirement regulations proved helpful but insufficient. When the overall influence of the welfare state on the share of young old persons in the population was analysed, a country-characteristic pattern emerged.

Keywords

young oldwelfare stateinternational comparisonretirement regulations
Type
Research Article
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 29 , Issue 4 , May 2009 , pp. 609 - 624
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Börsch-Supan, A. and Jürges, H. (eds) 2005. The Survey of Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe: Methodology. Mannheim Research Institute for the Economics of Aging, Mannheim, Germany.Google Scholar
Bussemaker, J. and van Kersbergen, K. 1999. Contemporary social-capitalist welfare states and gender inequality. In Sainsbury, D. (ed.), Gender and Welfare State Regimes. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 15–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, D. C. 2005. Changing the culture of aging: a social capital framework for gerontology. Hallym International Journal of Aging, 7, 1, 81–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childress, J. F., Faden, R. R., Gaare, R. D., Gostin, L. O., Kahn, J., Bonnie, R. J., Kass, N. E., Mastroianni, A. C., Moreno, J. D. and Nieburg, P. 2002. Public health ethics: mapping the terrain. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 30, 2, 170–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chou, K.-L. and Chi, I. 2002. Successful aging among the young-old, old-old, and oldest-old Chinese. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 54, 1, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ebbinghaus, B. 2000. Any way out of ‘exit from work’? Reversing the entrenchment pathways of early retirement. In Scharpf, F. W. and Schmidt, V. A. (eds), Welfare and Work in the Open Economy. Volume 2, Diverse Responses to Common Challenges in Twelve Countries. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 511–53.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G., Gallie, D., Hemerick, A. and Myles, J. 2002. Why We Need a New Welfare State. Oxford University Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Commission 2005. Social Protection in the Member States of the European Union, of the European Economic Area and in Switzerland. Situation on 1 May 2004. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
European Commission 2006. Long-term Care. MISSOC Info Bulletin 2/2006, European Commissions, Brussels. Available online at http://ec.europa.eu/employment_social/spsi/missoc_info_en.htm#02/2006 [Accessed 12 February 2008].Google Scholar
Eurostat 2008. Population by Sex and Age on 1 January of Each Year. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg. Available online at http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page?_pageid=0,1136184,0_45572595&_dad=portal&_schema=PORTAL [Accessed 18 February 2008].Google Scholar
Evers, A. 1993. The welfare mix approach: understanding the pluralism of welfare systems. In Evers, A. and Svetlik, I. (eds), Balancing Pluralism: New Welfare Mixes in Care for the Elderly. Ashgate, Aldershot, Hampshire, 3–31.Google Scholar
Gilleard, C. and Higgs, P. 2002. The third age: class, cohort or generation? Ageing & Society, 22, 3, 369–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guillemard, A.-M. 1989. The trend towards early labour force withdrawal and the reorganisation of the life course: a cross-national analysis. In Johnson, P., Conrad, C. and Thomson, D. (eds), Workers Versus Pensioners: Intergenerational Justice in an Ageing World. Manchester University Press, Manchester, UK, 164–80.Google Scholar
Guillén, A. M. and Matsaganis, M. 2000. Testing the ‘social dumping’ hypothesis in southern Europe: welfare policies in Greece and Spain during the last 20 years. Journal of European Social Policy, 10, 2, 120–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hank, K. and Stuck, S. 2008. Ehrenamt, Netzwerkhilfe und Pflege in Europa [Volunteering, social support and care in Europe]. In Erlinghagen, M. and Hank, K. (eds), Produktives Altern und informelle Arbeit in modernen Gesellschaften [Productive Ageing and Informal Work in Modern Societies]. VS Verlag, Wiesbaden, Germany, 27–50.Google Scholar
James, J. B. and Wink, P. 2007. The Crown of Life: Dynamics of the Early Postretirement Period. Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics 26, Springer Publishing Company, New York.Google Scholar
Katz, S. 1983. Assessing self-maintenance: activities of daily living, mobility, and instrumental activities of daily living. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 31, 12, 721–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaufmann, F.-X. 2003. Varianten des Wohlfahrtsstaats. Der deutsche Sozialstaat im internationalen Vergleich [Variants of the Welfare State: The German Welfare State by International Comparison]. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Krause, E. L. 2007. Fertility politics as ‘social viagra’: reproducing boundaries, social cohesion, and modernity in Italy. American Anthropologist, 109, 2, 350–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laslett, P. 1996. A Fresh Map of Life: The Emergence of the Third Age. Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hampshire.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leibfried, S. 1992. Towards a European welfare state? On integrating poverty regimes into the European Community. In Ferge, Z. and Kolberg, J. E. (eds), Social Policy in a Changing Europe. Campus Verlag, Frankfurt, 245–79.Google Scholar
Midwinter, E. 2005. How many people are there in the third age? Ageing & Society, 25, 1, 9–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minicuci, N., Noale, M., Pluijm, S. M. F., Zunzunegui, M. V., Blumstein, T., Deeg, D. J. H., Bardage, C. and Jylhä, M. 2004. Disability-free life expectancy: a cross-national comparison of six longitudinal studies on aging: the CLESA project. European Journal of Ageing, 1, 1, 37–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neugarten, B. L. 1974. Age groups in American society and the rise of the young old. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 415, 1, 187–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) 2005 a. Ageing and Employment Policies: Austria. OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 2005 b. Ageing and Employment Policies: Denmark. OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 2005 c. Ageing and Employment Policies: France. OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 2005 d. Ageing and Employment Policies: Netherlands. OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 2005 e. Long-term Care for Older People. OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 2005 f. Pensions at a Glance. OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 2006. Ageing and Employment Policies: Live Longer, Work Longer. OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
Orloff, A. S. 1993. Gender and the social rights of citizenship: the comparative analysis of gender relations and welfare states. American Sociological Review, 58, 3, 303–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfau-Effinger, B. 2004. Development and Culture of Welfare States and Women's Employment in Europe. Ashgate, Aldershot, Hampshire.Google Scholar
Sainsbury, D. 1999. Gender, policy regimes, and politics. In Sainsbury, D. (ed.), Gender and Welfare State Regimes. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 245–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schils, T. 2005. Early Retirement Patterns in Europe: A Comparative Panel Study. Doctoral Dissertation, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tilburg. Dutch University Press, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Townsend, P. 1981. The structured dependency of the elderly: a creation of social policy in the twentieth century. Ageing & Society, 1, 1, 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trifiletti, R. 1999. Southern European welfare regimes and the worsening position of women. Journal of European Social Policy, 9, 1, 49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warnes, A. M. 1993. Being old, old people and the burdens of burden. Ageing & Society, 13, 3, 297–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar