Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T04:51:14.542Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How important are state transfers for reducing poverty rates in later life?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 July 2015

DEBORA PRICE ,
KAREN GLASER ,
JAY GINN  and
MALCOLM NICHOLLS
DEBORA PRICE*
Affiliation:
Institute of Gerontology, Department of Social Science, Health & Medicine, King's College London, UK.
KAREN GLASER
Affiliation:
Institute of Gerontology, Department of Social Science, Health & Medicine, King's College London, UK.
JAY GINN
Affiliation:
Institute of Gerontology, Department of Social Science, Health & Medicine, King's College London, UK.
MALCOLM NICHOLLS
Affiliation:
Department for Work and Pensions, London, UK. Institute of Gerontology, School of Social Science and Public Policy, King's College London, UK.
*
Address for correspondence: Debora Price, Institute of Gerontology, Department of Social Science, Health and Medicine, King's College London, Strand, London WC2R 2LS, UK E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Financial welfare in later life is of prime concern as the funding of pensions and care rises up policy agendas. In this context, work and family histories are well known to impact on late-life income, generally reducing state and private pensions for women. In a political context where benefits are under threat as part of the retrenchment of the welfare state, we consider two key questions. First, how do state pension and benefit transfers interact with work and family histories to reduce poverty risks in later life? Second, who is kept out of poverty by state benefits and transfers? Using data from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing, we examine how work, family and health histories are associated with poverty in later life and estimate how far and in what ways state pensions, income support and disability benefits play a mediating role. We conclude that state support is key to maintaining incomes above official poverty lines for substantial numbers whose work, family and health histories would otherwise have led to their incomes falling below these lines. While disability benefits are designed to compensate for the additional costs of disability, it is likely that many in receipt experience poverty (even though they are not captured in official poverty statistics); even more so for those incurring the costs of disability but not in receipt of these benefits.

Keywords

povertylifecourseolder peoplestate benefitsdisability benefitsEnglish Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA)pensions
Type
Articles
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 36 , Issue 9 , October 2016 , pp. 1794 - 1825
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arber, S. and Ginn, J. (eds) 2004. Ageing and Gender: Diversity and Change. The Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Banks, J., Breeze, E., Lessof, C. and Nazroo, J. 2008. Living in the 21st Century: Older People in England. The 2006 English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. Institute of Fiscal Studies, London.Google Scholar
Banks, J., Lessof, C., Nazroo, J., Rogers, N., Stafford, M. and Steptoe, A. (eds) 2010. Financial Circumstances, Health and Well-being of the Older Population in England: The 2008 English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (Wave 4). The Institute for Fiscal Studies, London.Google Scholar
Bardasi, E. and Jenkins, S. 2002. Income in Later Life: Work History Matters. An Analysis for Britain Using the BHPS. Institute for Social and Econonic Research, University of Essex, Colchester, UK.Google Scholar
Bardasi, E., Jenkins, S. P. and Rigg, J. A. 2002. Retirement and the income of older people: a British perspective. Ageing & Society, 22, 2, 131–59.Google Scholar
Barker, K. 2014. Commission on the Future of Health and Social Care in England. A New Settlement for Health and Social Care. Interim Report. The King's Fund, London.Google Scholar
Barton, A. and Riley, K. (eds) 2012. Income Related Benefits: Estimates of Take-up in 2009–2010. Department for Work and Pensions, London.Google Scholar
Bennett, F. and Daly, M. 2014. Poverty Through a Gender Lens: Evidence and Policy Review on Gender and Poverty. Department of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford, Oxford.Google Scholar
Berthoud, R. 2009. The impact of disability benefits, a feasibility study. Working Paper 58, Department for Work and Pensions, London.Google Scholar
Blekesaune, M., Bryan, M. and Taylor, M. 2008. Life-course events and later-life employment. Research Report 502, Department for Work and Pensions, London.Google Scholar
Collins, D., Neville, C., Thornby, M. and Patel, R. 2009. Investigation of the gaps in individuals’ National Insurance records. Working Paper 61, Department for Work and Pensions, London.Google Scholar
Cribb, J., Hood, A., Joyce, R. and Phillips, D. 2013. Living Standards, Poverty and Inequality in the UK. Institute for Fiscal Studies, London.Google Scholar
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) 2009. The Pensioners' Income Series 2007–8. Department for Work and Pensions, London. Available online at http://research.dwp.gov.uk/asd/asd6/Press_Release_0708.pdf [Accessed 16 January 2010].Google Scholar
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) 2014 a. Households Below Average Income. An Analysis of the Income Distribution 1994/95–2012/13, July 2014 (United Kingdom). Department for Work and Pensions, London.Google Scholar
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) 2014 b. Quarterly Statistical Summary. First Release. Department for Work and Pensions, London.Google Scholar
Dethier, J.-J., Pestieau, P. and Ali, R. 2010. Universal minimum old age pensions: impact on poverty and fiscal cost in 18 Latin American countries. Policy Research Working Paper 5292, The World Bank, Washington DC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dilnot, A., Warner, N. and Williams, J. 2011. Fairer Care Funding: The Report of the Commission on Funding of Care and Support. Commission on Funding of Care and Support, London.Google Scholar
Eurostat 2009. Living Conditions in Europe: Data 2003–6. European Commission, Brussels.Google Scholar
Evandrou, M. and Glaser, K. 2003. Combining work and family life: the pension penalty of caring. Ageing & Society, 23, 5, 583–601.Google Scholar
Fiszbein, A., Schady, N., Ferreira, F. H. G., Grosh, M., Keleher, N., Olinto, P. and Skoufias, E. 2009. Conditional Cash Transfers: Reducing Present and Future Poverty. The World Bank, Washington DC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frericks, P., Maier, R. and De Graaf, W. 2006. Shifting the pension mix: consequences for Dutch and Danish Women. Social Policy & Administration, 40, 5, 475–92.Google Scholar
Ginn, J. 2003. Gender, Pensions and the Lifecourse. The Policy Press, Bristol, UK.Google Scholar
Ginn, J. and Arber, S. 1996. Patterns of employment, gender and pensions: the effect of work history on older women's non-state pensions. Work, Employment & Society, 10, 3, 469–90.Google Scholar
Ginn, J. and Arber, S. 2002. Degrees of freedom: can graduate women avoid the motherhood gap in pensions? Sociological Research Online, 7, 2. Available online at http://www.socresonline.org.uk/7/2/ginn.html.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginn, J. and MacIntyre, K. 2013. UK pension reforms: is gender still an issue? Social Policy and Society, 12, 1, 91–103.Google Scholar
Ginn, J. and Price, D. 2002. Do divorced women catch up in pension building? Child and Family Law Quarterly, 14, 2, 157–73.Google Scholar
Glaser, K., Nicholls, M., Stuchbury, R., Price, D. and Gjonca, E. 2009 a. Life Course Influences on Poverty and Social Exclusion in Later Life: A Secondary Analysis. Equalities and Human Rights Commission, London.Google Scholar
Glaser, K., Price, D., Willis, R., Stuchbury, R. and Nicholls, M. 2009 b. Life Course Influences and Well-being in Later Life: A Review. Equalities and Human Rights Commission, London.Google Scholar
Gugushvili, D. and Hirsch, D. 2014. Means-testing or Universalism: What Strategies Best Address Poverty? Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.Google Scholar
Hancock, R., Morciano, M. and Pudney, S. 2012. Attendance Allowance and Disability Living Allowance claimants in the older population: is there a difference in their economic circumstances? Journal of Poverty and Social Justice, 20, 2, 191–206.Google Scholar
Hancock, R. and Pudney, S. 2013. Assessing the distributional impact of reforms to disability benefits for older people in the UK: implications of alternative measures of income and disability costs. Ageing & Society, 34, 2, 232–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House of Commons 2010. House of Commons Health Committee. Social Care. Third Report of Session 2009–2010. Volume II, Oral and Written Evidence. The Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
HM Government 2012. Caring for Our Future: Progress Report on Funding Reform. The Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Humphries, R. 2013. Paying for Social Care. Beyond Dilnot. The King's Fund, London.Google Scholar
Humphries, R., Forder, J. and Fernandez, J.-L. 2010. Securing Good Care for More People: Options for Reform. The King's Fund, London.Google Scholar
Jeffersona, T. 2009. Women and retirement pensions: a research review. Feminist Economics, 15, 4, 115–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leitner, S. 2001. Sex and gender discrimination within EU pension systems. Journal of European Social Policy, 11, 2, 99–115.Google Scholar
Lloyd, J. 2013. Independence Allowance. Developing a New Vision for Attendance Allowance in England. The Strategic Society Centre, London.Google Scholar
Meyer, T. and Bridgen, P. 2008. Class, gender and chance: the social division of welfare and occupational pensions in the United Kingdom. Ageing & Society, 28, 3, 353–81.Google Scholar
Mkandawire, T. 2005. Targeting and Universalism in Poverty Reduction. United Nations Research Institute for Social Development, Geneva.Google Scholar
Morciano, M. and Hancock, R. 2014. Disability costs and equivalence scales in the older population in Great Britain. Review of Income and Wealth. doi: 10.1111/roiw.12108.Google Scholar
Office for National Statistics 2013. Compendium of UK Statistics: Population and Migration. Office for National Statistics, London.Google Scholar
Pensions Commission 2004. Pensions – Challenges and Choices. The First Report of the Pensions Commission. The Stationery Office, Norwich, UK.Google Scholar
Pensions Commission 2005. A New Pension Settlement for the Twenty-first century. The Second Report of the Pensions Commission. The Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Pensions Policy Institute 2014. The Pensions Primer: A Guide to the UK Pension System. Pensions Policy Institute, London.Google Scholar
Price, D. 2006 a. Gender and generational continuity: breadwinners, caregivers and pension provision in the UK. International Journal of Ageing and Later Life, 1, 2, 31–66.Google Scholar
Price, D. 2006 b. The poverty of older people in the UK. Journal of Social Work Practice: Psychotherapeutic Approaches in Health, Welfare and the Community, 20, 3, 251–66.Google Scholar
Price, D. 2006 c. Why are older women in the UK poor? Quality in Ageing and Older Adults, 7, 2, 23–32.Google Scholar
Price, D. 2008. Measuring the Poverty of Older People: A Critical Review. Report of an ESRC Public Sector Placement Fellowship, Institute of Gerontology, King's College London, London.Google Scholar
Price, D. and Livsey, L. 2013. Financing later life – pensions, care, housing equity and the new politics of old age. In Ramia, G., Farmsworth, K. and Irving, Z. (eds), Social Policy Review 25: Analysis and Debate in Social Policy, 2013. The Policy Press, Bristol, UK, 67–88.Google Scholar
Pudney, S. 2009. Participation in disability benefit programmes: a partial identification analysis of the British Attendance Allowance system. ISER Working Paper 2009–19, University of Essex, Institute for Social and Economic Research, Colchester, UK.Google Scholar
Radford, L., Taylor, L. and Wilkie, C. 2012. Pension Credit eligible non-recipients: barriers to claiming. Department for Work and Pensions Research Report 819, Department for Work and Pensions, London.Google Scholar
Sefton, T., Evandrou, M. and Falkingham, J. 2011. Family ties: women's work and family histories and their association with incomes in later life in the UK. Journal of Social Policy, 40, 1, 41–69.Google Scholar
Tesluic, E., Pop, L., Grosh, M. and Yemtsov, R. 2014. Income Support for the Poorest: A Review of Experience in Eastern Europe and Central Asia. The World Bank, Washington DC.Google Scholar
The Conservative Party 2010. The Conservative Older People Manifesto 2010. An Invitation to Older People. The Conservative Party, London.Google Scholar
Walker, R., Heaver, C. and McKay, S. 2000. Building up pension rights. DWP Research Report 114, Department for Work and Pensions, London.Google Scholar
Wanless, D., Forder, J. and Fernandez, J.-L. 2006. Securing Good Care for Older People: Taking a Long-term View. The King's Fund, London.Google Scholar
Zaidi, A. 2006. Poverty of Elderly People in EU 25. European Centre for Social Welfare Policy and Research, Vienna.Google Scholar