Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T00:06:28.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How Elderly People Rank-Order the Quality Characteristics of Home Services

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2008

Per Gunnar Edebalk ,
Gillis Samuelsson  and
Bengt Ingvad
Per Gunnar Edebalk
Affiliation:
School of Social Work, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Gillis Samuelsson
Affiliation:
Gerontology Research Center, Karl XII gatan 1, S-222 20 Lund, Sweden.
Bengt Ingvad
Affiliation:
Gerontology Research Center, Karl XII gatan 1, S-222 20 Lund, Sweden.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Various studies have dealt more or less directly with qualitative questions concerning social services provided in the home. While as a result of such studies the general characteristics of home services of importance to elderly people are quite well known, this is not the case regarding the relative importance assigned to such characteristics. Personal interviews using the ‘Multiattribute Utility Technology’ (MAUT) were used. This procedure organises the attributes in a ‘tree’ structure for comparing the relative importance & ranking of different quality attributes. A random sample of 180 receivers of home-help services aged 65 to 95 and living in a rural, small town and city area were interviewed. The interviewed persons were asked to rank-order according to personal importance each grouping of quality attributes. The relative values of the different qualities were determined, using a scale with a range from 0 to 100 points. Continuity, especially Staff Continuity, was the most important quality attribute together with Suitability and Personal Relation. Availability and Influence were the least important quality attributes. The characteristics studied had largely the same relative importance for all older people, irrespective of category.

Keywords

Quality attributeshome-help servicesrank-orderconsumer perspective
Type
Research Article
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , March 1995 , pp. 83 - 102
Copyright
Copyright Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Applebaum, R. and Phillips, P. 1990. Assuring the Quality of In-Home Care: The Other Challenge for Long-Term Care. The Gerontologist, 30, 4.Google Scholar
Brun, C, Fagerstedt, B., Sternberg, J. and Eliasson, R. 1984. Att arbeta inom äldreomsorgen, att vara pensionär och att möta varandra. Stockholms socialförvaltning, FoU-byrån.Google Scholar
Ds, Fi 1987:6. Kvalitetsutvecklingen inom den kommunala äldreomsorgen 1970–1980. Rapport till expertgruppen för studier i offentlig ekonomi. Liber, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Edebalk, P. G., Ingvad, B. and Samuelsson, G. 1989. Kvalitet i social hemtjänst – några svenska erfarenheter. Rapport nr III:4, Gerontologiskt Centrum, Lund.Google Scholar
Edebalk, P. G., Ingvad, B., Samuelsson, G. and Lannerheim, L. 1990. Kvalitetsegenskaper inom hemtjänsten och deras relativa betydelse – en pilot studie. Rapport nr IV:4, Gerontologiskt Centrum, Lund.Google Scholar
Edwards, W. and Newman, J. R. 1982. Multiattribute Evaluation. A Sage University Paper, Series 07–26. Sage, Beverly Hills.Google Scholar
Gough, R. Hemhjälp till gamla. 1987. Forskningsrapport nr 54. Arbetslivscentrum, Stockholm.Google Scholar
sjukvård, Göteborgs, Göteborg, Socialtjäanst & Stadskansli, Göteborgs, Göteborgsstudien 1988: Äldrestudien, delrapporter. Göteborg.Google Scholar
Hunt, M. E. and Ross, L. E. 1990. Naturally occurring retirement communities: A multiattribute examination of desirability factors. The Gerontologist, vol. 30, No. 5.Google Scholar
Ingvad, B. 1992. Utvärdering av en metod för kvalitetsmätning i hemtjänsten. B-rapport VI: 3, Gerontologiskt Centrum, Lund.Google Scholar
Lund, U. 1992. Vård och omsorg i eget boende på äldre dar. Dissertation Linköping University.Google Scholar
Lundberg, L. 1986. Livet inom hemtjänsten. Uppsala.Google Scholar
Marascuilo, L. A. and McSweeney, M. 1977. Nonparametric and Distribution-free Methods for the Social Sciences. Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont.Google Scholar
Oldby, B. 1989. Vårdkvalitet i vårdsamverkan. Pedagogiska institutionen vid Stockholms universitet. Forskningsrapport nr 45.Google Scholar
Phillips, P., Applebaum, R. and Atchley, S. 1989. Assuring the Quality of Home-Delivered Longterm Care. The Ohio Quality Assurance Project. Home Health Care Services Quarterly, 1.Google Scholar
Samuelsson, G., Edebalk, P. G. and Ingvad, B. 1993. A method of ranking different quality attributes in home help services – in a consumer perspective. B-Rapport VII:4, Gerontologiskt Centrum, Lund.Google Scholar
SCB, 1982. Swedish socioeconomic classification (SEI). Reports on Statistical Coordination 4, p.4.Google Scholar
Sjöbeck, B. 1991. Pensionärers förväntningar på och bedömningar av hemtjänst. Kvalitet ur brukarperspektiv. Gerontologia, 3.Google Scholar
Socialstyrelsen redovisar 1988:7 Personalförsörjningen inom hemtjänsten. Allmänna Förlaget, Stockholm.Google Scholar
SOU 1987:21 Äldreomsorg i utveckling. Stockholm.Google Scholar
Ström, P. 1990. Kontinuitet och kvalitet i hemtjänsten. SoS-rapport 1990:29.Google Scholar
Szebehely, M. and Eliasson, R. 1991. Hemtjänsten i Sverige – myter och statistik. Nordiskt Socialt Arbete, 1.Google Scholar
Thomas, A. 1986. Vardagsvanor och ritualer. Om några gamla människors möte med hemservice. FoU-byrån, Stockholms socialförvaltning, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Thulin, A. B. 1986. Vasastan-projektet – en studie av personalomsättningen bland vårdbiträden i socialdistrikt I. FoU-byrån, Stockholms socialförvaltning, Stockholm.Google Scholar