Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T23:11:53.210Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Generational conflict, consumption and the ageing welfare state in the United Kingdom

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 August 2010

PAUL HIGGS  and
CHRIS GILLEARD
PAUL HIGGS*
Affiliation:
Division of Research Strategy, University College London, UK.
CHRIS GILLEARD
Affiliation:
Division of Research Strategy, University College London, UK.
*
Address for correspondence: Paul Higgs, Division of Research Strategy, University College London, Charles Bell House, 67–73 Riding House Street, London W1W 7EY, UK. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The British welfare state is over 60 years old. Those who were born, grew up and who are now growing old within its ambit are a distinctive generation. They have enjoyed healthier childhoods with better education than previous populations living in Britain. That they have done well under the welfare state is accepted, but some critics have argued that these advantages are at the expense of younger cohorts. The very success of this ‘welfare generation’ is perceived as undermining the future viability of the welfare state, and some argue that the current levels of income and wealth enjoyed by older cohorts can only be sustained by cutbacks in entitlements for younger cohorts. This will lead to a growing ‘generational fracture’ over welfare policy. This paper challenges this position, arguing that both younger and older groups find themselves working out their circumstances in conditions determined more by the contingencies of the market than by social policy.

Keywords

welfare stategenerational conflictconsumercontingency
Type
Forum
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 30 , Issue 8 , November 2010 , pp. 1439 - 1451
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albertini, M., Kohli, M. and Vogel, C. 2007. Intergenerational transfers of time and money in European families: common patterns, different regimes. Journal of European Social Policy, 17, 4, 319–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annetts, J., Law, A., McNeish, W. and Mooney, G. 2009. Understanding Social Welfare Movements. Policy Press, Bristol, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Attias-Donfut, C. 2000. Cultural and economic transfers between generations: one aspect of age integration. The Gerontologist, 40, 3, 270–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Auerbach, L., Kotlikoff, L. J. and Leibfritz, W. 1999. Generational Accounting Around the World. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauman, Z. 2007. Liquid Times: Living in an Age of Uncertainty. Polity, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Beck, U. 2000. The Brave New World of Work. Polity, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Beck, U. 2007. Beyond class and nation: reframing social inequalities in a globalizing world. British Journal of Sociology, 58, 4, 679–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonin, H. 2009. 15 years of pension reform in Germany: old successes and new threats. Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance, 34, 4, 548–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cahill, K. E., Giandrea, M. D. and Quinn, M. F. 2008. A Micro-level Analysis of Recent Trends in Labour Force Participation Rates among Older Workers. Boston College Working Paper 2008-08, Center for Retirement Research, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Carvel, J. 2007. Councils turn backs on care for older people. The Guardian, 22 November.Google Scholar
Chakravarty, S. and Weisman, C. 1988. Consuming our children. Forbes Magazine 14, 222–32.Google Scholar
Chauvel, L. 2006. Générations sociales, perspectives de vie et soutenabilité du régime de protection sociale [Social generations: perspectives on the viability and sustainability of social protection]. In Palier, B., Hall, P. and Culpepper, P. (eds), La France en Mutation 1980–2005 [Changing France, 1980–2005]. Presses de la Fondation Nationale des Sciences Politiques, Paris, 157–96.Google Scholar
Clark, G. 2006. The UK occupational pension system in crisis. In Pemberton, H., Thane, P. and Whiteside, N. (eds), Britain's Pension Crisis: History and Policy. Oxford University Press for The British Academy, Oxford, 145–68.Google Scholar
Costa, D. 1998. The Evolution of Retirement. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department of Health 2007. Putting People First: A Shared Vision and Commitment to the Transformation of Adult Social Care. Department of Health, London.Google Scholar
Disney, R. 1996. Can We Afford to Grow Older? MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. 2002. Towards the good society, once again. In Esping-Andersen, G. (ed.), Why We Need a New Welfare State. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. 2009. The Incomplete Revolution: Adapting to Women's New Roles. Polity, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Furlong, A. and Cartmel, F. 1997. Young People and Social Change: Individualization and Risk in Late Modernity. Open University Press, Buckingham, UK.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. 1994. Beyond Left and Right: The Future of Radical Politics. Polity, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gilleard, C. and Higgs, P. 1998. Older people as users and consumers of health care: a third age rhetoric for a fourth age reality. Ageing & Society, 18, 2, 233–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilleard, C. and Higgs, P. 2005. Contexts of Ageing: Class, Cohort and Community. Polity, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gilleard, C. and Higgs, P. 2009. The power of silver: age and identity politics in the 21st century. Journal of Aging and Social Policy, 21, 3, 277–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilleard, C., Hyde, M. and Higgs, P. 2007. Communication and community in the third age: the impact of internet and cell phone use on the attachment to place in later life in England. Journal of Gerontology B: Social Sciences, 62, 4, S276–83.Google Scholar
Gokhale, J. and Kotlikoff, L. J. 1999. Generational justice and generational accounting. In Williamson, J. B., Watts-Roy, D. and Kingson, E. R. (eds), The Generational Equity Debate. Columbia University Press, New York, 75–86.Google Scholar
Goldthorpe, J. and Mills, C. 2008. Trends in intergenerational class mobility in modern Britain: evidence from national surveys, 1972–2005. National Institute Economic Review, 205, 1, 83–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harkin, J. and Huber, J. 2004. Eternal Youths: How the Babyboomers are Having their Time Again. Demos, London.Google Scholar
Heath, A. and Payne, C. 1999. 20th Century Trends in Social Mobility in Britain. CREST Working Paper 70, Department of Sociology, University of Oxford, Oxford. Available online at http://www.crest.ox.ac.uk/papers/p70.pdf [Accessed 5 May 2010].Google Scholar
Higgs, P., Hyde, M., Gilleard, C., Victor, C., Wiggins, R. and Jones, I. R. 2009. From passive to active consumers? Later life consumption in the UK from 1968–2005. Sociological Review, 57, 1, 102–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, I. R., Hyde, M., Victor, C., Wiggins, D., Gilleard, C. and Higgs, P. 2008. Ageing in a Consumer Society: From Passive to Active Consumption in Britain. Policy Press, Bristol, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohli, M. 1999. Private and public transfers between generations: linking the family and the state. European Societies, 1, 81–104.Google Scholar
Kohli, M. 2004. Intergenerational transfers and inheritance: a comparative view. In Silverstein, M. and Schaie, K. W. (eds), Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics. Volume 24, Springer, New York, 266–89.Google Scholar
Kohli, M. and Albertini, M. 2009. Childlessness and inter-generational transfers: what is at stake? Ageing & Society, 29, 8, 1173–83.Google Scholar
Kuhnle, S. 1999. Survival of the European Welfare State. ARENA Working Paper 99/19, Oslo, Norway.Google Scholar
Laczko, F. and Phillipson, C. 1991. Changing Work and Retirement. Open University Press, Buckingham, UK.Google Scholar
Lloyd, J. 2008. Navigating the Age of Inheritance. National Care Fund Working Groups Report, International Longevity Centre, London. Available online at http://www.ilcuk.org.uk/files/pdf_pdf_92.pdf [Accessed 26 March 2010].Google Scholar
Lund, B. 2004. Housing policy: coming in from the cold. In Ellison, M., Bauld, L. and Powell, M. (eds), Social Policy Review 16. Policy Press, Bristol, UK, 13–28.Google Scholar
Mannheim, K. 1997. The problem of generation. In Hardy, M. A. (ed.), Studying Aging and Social Change. Sage, London, 22–65.Google Scholar
Moffat, S. and Higgs, P. 2007. Charity or entitlement? Generational habitus and the welfare state among older people in North East England. Social Policy and Administration, 41, 5, 449–64.Google Scholar
Musgrave, R. 1986. Public Finance in a Democratic Society, ii, Fiscal Doctrine, Growth and Institutions. New York University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Myles, J. 2002. A new social contract for the elderly? In Esping-Andersen, G. (ed.), Why We Need a New Welfare State. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 130–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) 2001. Ageing and Income: Financial Resources and Retirement in 9 OECD Countries. OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
Preston, S. H. 1984. Children and the elderly: divergent paths for America's dependents. Demography, 21, 4, 435–57.Google Scholar
Ransome, P. 2005. Work, Consumption and Culture: Affluence and Social Change in the Twenty-first Century. Sage, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sefton, T., Hills, J. and Sutherland, H. 2009. Poverty, inequality and redistribution. In Hills, J., Sefton, T. and Sutherland, H. (eds), Towards a More Equal Society: Poverty, Inequality and Policy Since 1997. Policy Press, Bristol, UK, 21–46.Google Scholar
Strangleman, T. 2007. The nostalgia for permanence at work? The end of work and its commentators. Sociological Review, 55, 1, 81–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, P. 2004. New risks and social change. In Taylor-Gooby, P. (ed.), New Risks, New Welfare: The Transformation of the European Welfare State. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, D. 1989. The welfare state and generation conflict: winners and losers. In Johnson, P., Conrad, C. and Thomson, D. (eds), Workers Versus Pensioners: Intergenerational Justice in an Ageing World. Manchester University Press, Manchester, UK, 33–56.Google Scholar
Turner, B. S. 1989. Ageing, politics and sociological theory. British Journal of Sociology, 40, 4, 588–606.Google Scholar
Walker, A. 1990. The benefits of old age: age discrimination and social security. In McEwen, E. (ed.), Age: The Unrecognised Discrimination. Age Concern England, London, 58–70.Google Scholar
Walker, A. 2002. A strategy for active ageing. International Social Security Review, 55, 1, 121–40.Google Scholar
Walker, A. 2009. Commentary: The emergence and application of active agency in Europe. Journal of Aging and Social Policy, 21, 1, 75–93.Google Scholar
Walker, R. and Wiseman, M. 2003. Making welfare work: UK activation policies under New Labour. International Social Security Review, 56, 1, 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willetts, D. 2010. The Pinch: How the Baby Boomers Took their Children's Future—and Why They Should Give it Back. Atlantic, London.Google Scholar
Williamson, J., MacNamara, T. and Howling, S. 2003. Generational equity, generational interdependence, and the framing of the debate over social security reform. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 30, 3, 3–14.Google Scholar
World Bank 1994. Averting the Old Age Crisis. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
World Health Organisation (WHO) 2002. Active Ageing: A Policy Framework. WHO, Geneva.Google Scholar
Zinn, J. 2004. Health, risk and uncertainty in the life course: a typology of biographical certainty constructions. Social Theory and Health, 2, 3, 199–221.Google Scholar