Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T04:46:23.918Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Family Costs of Looking After Handicapped Elderly Relatives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2008

Muriel Nissel
Affiliation:
Policy Studies Institute, 1–2 Castle Lane, London SW1E 6DR, England.

Abstract

This article is principally concerned with the measurement and evaluation of the cost of the time which families devote to the care of handicapped elderly relatives living with them. One way of measuring the contribution is by means of time diaries which document the amount of time given to caring activities throughout the 24 hours of the day. How this was done in a small pilot study, carried out in Oxfordshire, England, is described. It is preceded by a brief general discussion of some of the factors which determine time use and by a description of the empirical findings from a few of the existing surveys. Some broad estimates of the indirect financial costs involved are offered, including an estimate using a different approach based on the loss of opportunity suffered by women who are prevented from undertaking paid work.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

1 Nissel, M. and Bonnerjea, L.Family Care of the Handicapped Elderly: Who Pays? Policy Studies Institute, London, 1982.Google Scholar

2 Abrams, Mark. Beyond Three Score Tears and Ten, a second report on a survey of the elderly. Age Concern, Mitcham, 1980.Google Scholar

3 Little, Virginia C.An overview of research using the time budget methodology to study age related behaviour. Ageing and Society, 4, 1 (03 1984), 000–000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4 Moss, M. S. and Lawton, M. P.Time budgets of older people: a window on four life styles. Journal of Gerontology, 17, 1 (1982).Google Scholar

5 Linder, Staffan B.The Harried Leisure Class. Columbia University Press, New York, 1970.Google Scholar

6 Hirsch, Fred. Social Limits to Growth. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 1977.Google Scholar

7 Robinson, John P.Changes in Americans' Use of Time: 1965–1975. Cleveland State University, 1977.Google Scholar

8 Gershuny, J. I.Time Budget Research in the United Kingdom, Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex, Brighton, 1983.Google Scholar

9 Szalai, A.The Use of Time. Mouton, The Hague, 1972.Google Scholar

10 Robinson, John P., Converse, Philip and Szalai, A. Everyday life in twelve countries. In Szalai, (ed.), The Use of Time. Mouton, The Hague, 1972.Google Scholar

11 Office of Population Censuses and Surveys, London, and General Register Office, Edinburgh, . Guide to Census Reports, Great Britain, 1801–1966. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London, 1977.Google Scholar

12 Stafford, Frank and Duncan, Greg J.The Use of Time & Technology by Households in the United States. Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1979.Google Scholar

13 Gershuny, J. P.op. cit.Google Scholar

14 Szalai, A.op. tit.Google Scholar

15 Young, Michael and Willmott, Peter. The Symmetrical Family, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 1973.Google Scholar

16 Gershuny, J. I.op. cit.Google Scholar

17 Derow, Elian. The Work of Parents: Child Care Time and Costs, unpub. Policy Studies Institute, London, 1981.Google Scholar