Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-21T21:22:49.186Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Everyday discrimination in the neighbourhood: what a ‘doing’ perspective on age and ethnicity can offer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2018

ANNA WANKA ,
LAURA WIESBÖCK ,
BRIGITTE ALLEX ,
ELISABETH ANNE-SOPHIE MAYRHUBER ,
ARNE ARNBERGER ,
RENATE EDER ,
RUTH KUTALEK ,
PETER WALLNER ,
HANS-PETER HUTTER  and
FRANZ KOLLAND
ANNA WANKA*
Affiliation:
DFG-funded Research Training Group ‘Doing Transitions’, Goethe University, Frankfurt on the Main, Germany.
LAURA WIESBÖCK
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, University of Vienna, Austria.
BRIGITTE ALLEX
Affiliation:
Institute of Landscape Development, Recreation and Conservation Planning, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria.
ELISABETH ANNE-SOPHIE MAYRHUBER
Affiliation:
Unit Medical Anthropology and Global Health, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
ARNE ARNBERGER
Affiliation:
Institute of Landscape Development, Recreation and Conservation Planning, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria.
RENATE EDER
Affiliation:
Institute of Landscape Development, Recreation and Conservation Planning, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria.
RUTH KUTALEK
Affiliation:
Unit Medical Anthropology and Global Health, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
PETER WALLNER
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Health, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
HANS-PETER HUTTER
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Health, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
FRANZ KOLLAND
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, University of Vienna, Austria.
*
Address for correspondence: Anna Wanka, DFG-funded Research Training Group ‘Doing Transitions’, Goethe University, Frankfurt on the Main, Dantestraße 9, Germany E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Despite the fact that urbanisation, population ageing and international migration constitute major societal developments of our time, little attention has been paid to studying them together in a comprehensive manner. In this paper, we argue that, when treating age and ethnicity as practical processes for addressing and identifying with social groups, it is necessary to do so from a ‘doing’ perspective. The question we ask focuses on which social memberships are made relevant or irrelevant in residential environments and how that relevance or irrelevance is established. Drawing upon a quantitative study among individuals of Turkish migrant origin living in Vienna, Austria, we find that it is rather common for the respondents to have been assigned to multiple intersecting social groups and that they were treated unfairly in their own neighbourhoods. However, such ascriptions do not necessarily correspond to objective categorisations of research or subjective identifications. Hence, the discrimination that is present in a neighbourhood does not necessarily lead to decreased place attachment or a diminishing sense of home. In fact, we find that the ‘satisfaction paradox’ is quite common in environmental gerontology and that it may actually intersect with the ‘immigration paradox’. Applying processual intersectionality is not only fruitful for research, it can also improve the conceptualisation of age-friendly cities.

Keywords

ethnicityintersectionalitydoing differenceolder migrantsneighbourhoodenvironmental gerontologysocial exclusion
Type
Article
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 39 , Issue 9 , September 2019 , pp. 2133 - 2158
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bajekal, M., Blane, D., Grewal, I., Karlsen, S. and Nazroo, J. 2004. Ethnic differences in influences on quality of life at older ages: a quantitative analysis. Ageing & Society, 24, 5, 709–28.Google Scholar
Bălţătescu, S. 2014. Unhappier, but more satisfied: social comparison and the paradox of the immigrant satisfaction. SSRN Electronic Journal.Google Scholar
Barker, J. 1984. Black and Asian Old People in Britain. Age Concern, London.Google Scholar
Barth, F. (ed.) 1998. Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Culture Difference. Waveland Press, Long Grove, Illinois.Google Scholar
Baykara-Krumme, H., Schimany, P. and Motel-Klingebiel, A. (eds) 2012. Viele Welten des Alterns. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, Germany.Google Scholar
Becker, G. 2003. Meanings of place and displacement in three groups of older immigrants. Journal of Aging Studies, 17, 2, 129–49.Google Scholar
Berry, S., Lee, M. and Griffiths, S. 1981. Report of a Survey of West Indian Pensioners in Nottingham. Social Services Department, Nottingham County Council, Nottingham, UK.Google Scholar
Bhalla, A. and Blakemore, K. 1981 Elders of the Ethnic Minority Groups. All Faiths for One Race, Birmingham, UK.Google Scholar
Biffl, G. 2003. Socio-economic determinants of health and identification of vulnerable groups in the context of migration: the case of Austria. WIFO Working Paper 206, Österreichisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Vienna.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 2010. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Brandtstaedter, J. and Greve, W. 1994. The aging self: stabilizing and protective processes. Developmental Review, 14, 1, 52–80.10.1006/drev.1994.1003Google Scholar
Buffel, T. and Phillipson, C. 2011. Experiences of place among older migrants living in inner-city neighbourhoods in Belgium and England. Diversité urbaine, 11, 1, 13–37.Google Scholar
Buffel, T., Phillipson, C. and Scharf, T. 2012. Ageing in urban environments: developing ‘age-friendly’ cities. Critical Social Policy, 3, 24, 597–617.10.1177/0261018311430457Google Scholar
Burns, V. F., Lavoie, J.-P. and Rose, D. 2012. Revisiting the role of neighbourhood change in social exclusion and inclusion of older people. Journal of Aging Research, 2012, 1–12. doi: 10.1155/2012/148287.Google Scholar
Buse, C., Nettleton, S., Martin, D. and Twigg, J. 2017. Imagined bodies: architects and their constructions of later life. Ageing & Society, 37, 7, 1435–57.10.1017/S0144686X16000362Google Scholar
Butler, J. 2004. Undoing Gender. Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
Calvo, R., Carr, D. C. and Matz-Costa, C. 2017. Another paradox? The life satisfaction of older hispanic immigrants in the United States. Journal of Aging and Health, 29, 1, 3–24.Google Scholar
Cheshire, J. and O'Brian, O. 2012. Lives on the line: mapping life expectancy along the London Tube network. Environment and Planning A, 44, 7, 1525–8.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, K. 1989. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: a black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. The University of Chicago Legal Forum, 140, 139–67.Google Scholar
Cumming, E. and Henry, W. E. 1979. Growing Old. Arno Press, New York.Google Scholar
Dowd, J. J. and Bengtson, V. L. 1978. Aging in minority populations: an examination of the double jeopardy hypothesis. Journal of Gerontology, 33, 3, 427–36.Google Scholar
Ehrkamp, P. 2005. Placing identities: transnational practices and local attachments of Turkish immigrants in Germany. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 31, 2, 345–64.10.1080/1369183042000339963Google Scholar
Essed, P. 1991. Understanding Everyday Racism: An Interdisciplinary Theory. Sage, Newbury Park, California.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2012. Special Eurobarometer 393. TNS OPINION & SOCIAL, Brussels.Google Scholar
GBK III/7. 2006. Senat III der GleichbehandlungskommissionGutachten gemäß § 11 Abs. 1 GBK/GAW-Gesetz – GBK III/7. Available online at https://www.bmb.gv.at/frauen/gleichbehandlungskommissionen/gleichbehandlungskommission/gbk_iii_7_26915.pdf?5oc6i2 [Accessed 29 September 2017].Google Scholar
Goffman, E. 1966. Behavior in Public Places: Notes on the Social Organization of Gatherings. The Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
Golant, S. M. 2011. The quest for residential normalcy by older adults: relocation but one pathway. Journal of Aging Studies, 25, 3, 193–205.Google Scholar
Golant, S. M. 2015. Residential normalcy and the enriched coping repertoires of successfully aging older adults. The Gerontologist, 55, 1, 70–82.Google Scholar
Haeussermann, H. and Siebel, W. 2000. Wohnverhaeltnisse und Ungleichheit. In Harth, A., Scheller, G. and Tessin, W. (eds), Stadt und soziale Ungleichheit. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, Germany, 120–40.Google Scholar
Handler, S. 2014. An Alternative Age-friendly Handbook. The University of Manchester Library, Manchester, UK.Google Scholar
Havighurst, R. J. 1961. Successful aging. The Gerontologist, 1, 1, 8–13.Google Scholar
Hirschauer, S. 2014. Un/doing differences. The contingency of social belonging. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 43, 3, 170–9.Google Scholar
Isaac, H. 1975. Idols of the Tribe: Group Identity and Political Change. Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
Kahana, E. 1982. A congruence model of person–environment interaction. In Lawton, M. P., Windley, B. C. and Byerts, T. O. (eds), Aging and the Environment: Theoretical Approaches. Garland Publishing, New York, 97–120.Google Scholar
Karlsen, S. and Nazroo, J. Y. 2002. Relation between racial discrimination, social class, and health among ethnic minority groups. American Journal of Public Health, 92, 4, 624–31.Google Scholar
Karlson, S., Becares, L. and Roth, M. 2012. Understanding the influence of ethnicity and health. In Craig, G., Atkin, K., Chattoo, S. and Flynn, R. (eds), Understanding ‘Race’ and Ethnicity: Theory, History, Policy and Practice. Policy Press, Bristol, UK, 15–32.Google Scholar
Kearns, E. M., Betus, A. and Lemieux, A. 2017. Why do some terrorist attacks receive more media attention than others? SSRN Electronic Journal. Available online at https://ssrn.com/abstract=2928138 [Accessed 29 September 2017].Google Scholar
Keim, R. and Neef, R. 2000. Ausgrenzung und Milieu: Über die Lebensbewaeltigung von Bewohnerinnen und Bewohnern staedtischer Problemgebiete. In Harth, A., Scheller, G. and Tessin, W. (eds), Stadt und Soziale Ungleichheit, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, Germany, 248–73.Google Scholar
Kennedy, M. and Leonard, P. 2001. Dealing with Neighborhood Change: A Primer on Gentrification and Policy Choices. Brookings Institution, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Klinenberg, E. 2002. Heatwave: A Social Autopsy of Disaster in Chicago. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.10.7208/chicago/9780226026718.001.0001Google Scholar
Koceva, M. M., Brandmueller, T., Lupu, I., Oennerfors, Å., Corselli-Nordblad, L., Coyette, C., Johansson, A., Strandell, H., Wolff, P. and Europäische Kommission (eds) 2016. Urban Europe: Statistics on Cities, Towns and Suburbs. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
Kytir, J. 2008. Demografische Entwicklung. In Hoerl, J., Kolland, F. and Majce, G. (eds), Hochaltrigkeit in Österreich. Eine Bestandsaufnahme. Bundesministerium für Soziales und Konsumentenschutz, Vienna, 45–74.Google Scholar
Landrine, H., Klonoff, E. A., Corral, I., Fernandez, S. and Roesch, S. 2006. Conceptualizing and measuring ethnic discrimination in health research. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 29, 1, 79–94.Google Scholar
Lawton, M. P. and Nahemow, L. 1973. Ecology and the aging process. In Eisdorfer, C. and Lawton, M. P. (eds), The Psychology of Adult Development and Aging. American Psychological Association, Washington DC, 619–74.Google Scholar
Loew, M., Steets, S. and Stoetzer, S. 2007. Einfuehrung in die Stadt- und Raumsoziologie. Budrich, Opladen, Germany.Google Scholar
Lui, C.-W., Everingham, J.-A., Warburton, J., Cuthill, M. and Bartlett, H. 2009. What makes a community age-friendly: a review of international literature. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 28, 116–21.Google Scholar
Magee, W., Fong, E. and Wilkes, R. 2008. Neighbourhood ethnic concentration and discrimination. Journal of Social Policy, 37, 37–61.Google Scholar
Mayrhuber, E. A.-S., Dückers, M. L. A., Wallner, P., Arnberger, A., Allex, B., Wiesböck, L., Wanka, A., Kolland, F., Eder, R., Hutter, H-P. and Kutalek, R. Vulnerability to heatwaves and implications for public health interventions – a scoping review. In press.Google Scholar
McCann, M., Grundy, E. and O'Reilly, D. 2014. Urban and rural differences in risk of admission to a care home: a census-based follow-up study. Health and Place, 30, 171–6.Google Scholar
Merriam Webster Dictionary n.d. Discrimination. Available online at https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/discrimination [Accessed 29 September 2017].Google Scholar
Norman, A. 1985. Triple Jeopardy: Growing Old in a Second Homeland. Centre for Policy on Ageing, London.Google Scholar
Ogg, J. 2005. Heat Wave. The Young Foundation, London.Google Scholar
Palmberger, M. 2017. Social ties and embeddedness in old age: older Turkish labour migrants in Vienna. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 43, 2, 235–49.10.1080/1369183X.2016.1238907Google Scholar
Rowles, G. D. 1978. Prisoners of Space? Exploring the Geographical Experience of Older People. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
Rowles, G. D. and Watkins, J. F. 2003. History, habit, heart and hearth: on making spaces into places. In Schaie, K. W., Wahl, H.-W., Mollenkopf, H. and Oswald, F. (eds), Aging Independently: Living Arrangements and Mobility, Springer, New York, 77–96.Google Scholar
Savage, M., Warde, A. and Ward, K. 2003. Urban Sociology, Capitalism and Modernity. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, UK.Google Scholar
Scharf, T. 2002. Growing Older in Socially Deprived Areas: Social Exclusion in Later Life. Help the Aged, London.Google Scholar
Scharf, T., Phillipson, C. and Smith, A. E. 2005. Social exclusion of older people in deprived urban communities of England. European Journal of Ageing, 2, 2, 76–87.Google Scholar
Schatzki, T. R. 1996. Social Practices: A Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and the Social. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Statistik Austria, Kommission für Migrations- und Integrationsforschung der Oesterreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 2013. Migration and Integration. Zahlen, Daten, Indikatoren, Vienna.Google Scholar
Staunæs, D. 2003. Where have all the subjects gone? Bringing together the concepts of intersectionality and subjectification. NORA – Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 11, 2, 101–10.10.1080/08038740310002950Google Scholar
Torres, S. 2015. Expanding the gerontological imagination on ethnicity: conceptual and theoretical perspectives. Ageing & Society, 35, 5, 935–60.Google Scholar
United Nations 2015. World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision. ST/ESA/SER.A/366, Population Division, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations, New York.Google Scholar
van der Greft, S., Musterd, S. and Thissen, F. 2016. Residential dynamics and neighbourhood conditions of older migrants and native Dutch older adults in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Ageing & Society, 36, 1, 189–218.Google Scholar
Wahl, H.-W. 2015. Theories of environmental influences on aging and behavior. In Pachana, N. A. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Geropsychology, Springer Singapore, Singapore, 1–8.Google Scholar
Wahl, H.-W. and Weisman, G. D. 2003. Environmental gerontology at the beginning of the new millennium: reflections on its historical, empirical, and theoretical development. The Gerontologist, 43, 5, 616–27.Google Scholar
Walker, A. 2010. Ageing and quality of life in Europe. In Dannefer, D. and Phillipson, C. (eds), The Sage Handbook of Social Gerontology. Sage, London, 573–86.Google Scholar
Walsh, K., Scharf, T. and Keating, N. 2017. Social exclusion of older persons: a scoping review and conceptual framework. European Journal of Ageing, 14, 1, 81–98.Google Scholar
Warnes, A. M., Friedrich, K., Kellaher, L. and Torres, S. 2004. The diversity and welfare of older migrants in Europe. Ageing & Society, 24, 3, 307–26.Google Scholar
Weiss, R. 2003. Macht Migration Krank? Eine Transdisziplinäre Analyse der Gesundheit von Migrantinnen und Migranten. Seismo, Zurich.Google Scholar
West, C. and Fenstermaker, S. 1995. Doing difference. Gender and Society, 9, 1, 8–37.Google Scholar
West, C. and Zimmerman, D. H. 1987. Doing gender. Gender and Society, 1, 2, 125–51.Google Scholar
Wiles, J. L., Leibing, A., Guberman, N., Reeve, J. and Allen, R. E. S. 2012. The meaning of ‘aging in place’ to older people. The Gerontologist, 52, 3, 357–66.Google Scholar
Williams, D. R., Neighbors, H. W. and Jackson, J. S. 2003. Racial/ethnic discrimination and health: findings from community studies. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 2, 200–8.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (WHO) 2007. Global Age-friendly Cities: A Guide. WHO, Geneva.Google Scholar