Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T04:18:07.533Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Emerging Political Power of the Elderly in Britain 1908–1948

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2008

Andrew Blaikie
Affiliation:
Birkbeck College Centre for Extra Mural Studies, University of London, 26 Russell Square, London WC1B 5DQ.

Abstract

Despite major shifts in the position of older people in British society during the first half of the twentieth century, accounts of the emergence of retirement pensions have ignored the role of old age pressure groups, preferring arguments which emphasise structured dependency rather than human agency. By contrast, this paper examines the political campaigns mounted by two groups – one claiming to speak on behalf of older people, the other composed of older people themselves. The failure of both groups to influence major policy decisions relates not to the passivity or ‘silent suffering’ of older people, or to ‘generational equity’ criteria which privileged younger, unemployed workers, but to the inadequacies of their different styles of campaigning. While the National Conference, in the decade after 1916, focused their moral invective around notions of thrift which failed to arouse or articulate the needs of all but the most ‘respectable aged Britishers’, the uncompromising, combative approach of the National Federation during the critical years leading up to the Beveridge legislation incurred the disdain of policymakers. In the intervening years, trade union activity was underlain by mixed motives. While the historical specificity of the movements and debates that are discussed is significant, the generationally specific lifetime experiences of the older people in question to some extent determined their character.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

1 The Times, 17 Jan. 1921; National Conference on Old Age Pensions Reports and Pamphlets [hereafter NCOAP R & P], 1 Oct. 1921, p. 2; NCOAP, Review of Ten Tears' Progress, n.d. [1927], pp. 11–12.

2 I wish to record my thanks to John Macnicol for providing the text on which these introductory remarks are based. The research for this paper was conducted as part of a joint project supported by the ESRC (Grant No. GO1 250016).

3 Whiteley, P. and Winyard, S.Influencing social policy: the effectiveness of the poverty lobby. Journal of Social Policy, 12, 1 (1983), 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4 Hay, R.Employers and social policy in Britain: the evolution of welfare legislation, 1905–14. Social History, 4 (01 1977), 435–55 (p. 455).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5 Crenson, M. A.The Un-politics of Air Pollution: a Study of Non-decisionmaking in the Cities. The Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore and London, 1971, p. 65.Google Scholar

6 Whiteley, and Winyard, , loc. cit. p. 12.Google Scholar

7 Bachrach, P. and Baratz, M. S.Power and Poverty. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1970.Google Scholar See also Lukes, S.Power: a Radical View, Macmillan, London and Basingstoke, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8 Williams, P. M. [Thane], ‘The development of old age pensions policy in Great Britain, 1878–1925, unpublished PhD thesis, University of London, 1970.Google ScholarThane, P. ‘Non-contributory versus Insurance Pensions, 1878–1908, in Thane, P. (ed.), The Origins of British Social Policy Croom Helm, London, 1978, pp. 84106.Google Scholar

9 Marwick, A.The Deluge: British Society and the First World War. Bodley Head, London, 1965.Google Scholar

10 House of Commons Debates (Hansard) [hereafter H of C Deb], LXVI, col. 640 (10 Sep. 1914).

11 H of C Deb, LXXII, col. 1406 (24 Jun. 1915).

12 Williams, , op cit. p. 321n.Google Scholar

13 H of C Deb, LXXXVIII, col. 1054 (25 Jan. 1916); LXXXI, cols. 36 (21 Mar. 1916), 2210 (18 Apr. 1916), 2334 (9 Apr. 1916); LXXXII, cols. 120–1 (4 May 1916), 2563–64, 2576 (30 May 1916); LXXXIV, col. 277 (11 July 1916).

14 NCOAP R & P, 1 07 1916, p. 1; 24 Feb. 1917, p. 2; 8 Aug. 1917, p. 4.

15 NCOAP R & P, 1 Jul. 1916, pp. 1–2.

16 NCOAP R & P, 19 Aug. 1916, p. 2; 18 Oct. 1924, p. 2.

17 NCOAP R & P, 18 Oct 1924, p. 2.

18 NCOAP R & P, 4 Nov. 1922, p. 5; 1 July 1916, p. 2; 23 Feb. 1918, p. 2.

19 NCOAP R & P, 19 Aug. 1916, p. 3; J. Longstaff Dennison, Plain Facts. Old Age Pensions As They Are and As They Ought to Be, n.d. [c. 1919], p. 11.

20 NCOAP R & P, 3 Oct. 1920, p. 6; 19 Nov. 1916.

21 NCOAP R & P, 24 Feb. 1917, p. 5; 4 Jan. 1922, p. 6; 24 Feb. 1917, p. 5; 4 Nov. 1922, p. 5.

22 NCOAP R & P, 1 Dec. 1923, p. 2; 3 Oct. 1920, p. 1; 19 Aug. 1916, p. 4; H of C Deb, XCI, cols. 669–70 (8 Mar. 1917).

23 Departmental Committee on Old Age Pensions, Minutes of Evidence, Parliamentary Papers (1919), Vol. 27 [hereafter PP 1919, Mins. of Evid.]; Williams, , op. cit. ch. 13 (pp. 339373)Google Scholar provides detailed coverage.

24 PP 1919, Mins. of Evid., Qs 2710–14, p. 108; Qs 1565–66, p. 65.

25 Ibid. Qs 1467–70, pp. 61–2.

26 NCOAP, Review of Ten Years' Progress, pp. 8–12.

27 NCOAP R & P, 4 Nov. 1922, p. 5.

28 NCOAP R & P, 18 Oct. 1924, pp. 3, 6–7 cites names of candidates from whom pledge cards had been received. NCOAP, Review of Ten Years' Progress, p. 3. Dad's Parliamentary Companion, no. 102 (1925).

29 Williams, , op. cit. pp. 407–13.Google Scholar

30 PP 1919, Mins. of Evid., Q. 1282, p. 55. NCOAP R & P, 16 May 1925, p. 6, NCOAP, Facts and Figures, revised edn., 1926, p. 2. Beveridge, William H., Insurance for All and Everything, Daily News, London, 1924.Google Scholar Lesser also noted that, ‘There is no reason why State-help should be denied self-help and we believe in the co-operation of the two’.

31 NCOAP R & P, 1 Dec. 1923, p. 4; 19 Aug. 1916, p. 1; 23 Feb. 1918, p. 5.

32 NCOAP R & P, 3 Oct. 1920, p. 5; 1 Dec. 1923, p. 2.

33 Baldwin's 1924 election address, cited in NCOAP R & P, 18 Oct. 1924, p. 4. Williams, , op. cit. pp. 412, 452.Google Scholar

34 NCOAP R & P, 21 Nov. 1925, p. 3; 16 May 1925, p. 6. Review of Ten Years' Progress, pp. 3–4.

35 PP 1919, Mins. of Evid., Q. 1112, p. 49.

36 NCOAP R & P, 19 Aug. 1916, p. 2; 18 Aug. 1917, p. 4; 23 Feb. 1918, p. 5, J. Cairns, President of the Northumberland Aged Miners' Homes Association contended that the pension should be available at much lower ages since ‘many people were old at 50’.

37 Phillipson, C. The emergence of retirement, University of Durham Working Papers in Sociology, no. 14 (1977), pp. 22–3.Google Scholar Chamberlain, N. 9 July 1924, PRO PIN 1/4, cited in Riddle, S. M. Age, obsolescence and unemployment, Older men in the British industrial system, 1920–1939. A research note. Ageing and Society, 4, 4 (Dec. 1984), 517–522. H of C Deb, 286, cols. 419–74.

38 Hannington, W.Ten Lean Years. An Examination of the Record of the National Government in the Field of Unemployment. Gollancz, London, 1940, p. 7.Google ScholarTUC Annual Reports, 53 (Cardiff, , 1921), p. 337.Google ScholarPhillipson, , op. cit. p. 14.Google Scholar

39 Macnicol, J. and Blaikie, A. The politics of retirement, 1908–48. In Jefferys, M. (ed.), Growing Old in the Twentieth Century. Routledge, London, 1989, pp. 2142.Google Scholar

40 TUC Annual Reports, 60 (Swansea, , 1928), p. 488.Google Scholar

41 PP 1919, Mins. of Evid., pp. 159–70, Q. 1563, pp. 64–5. TUC Annual Reports, 58 (Bournemouth, , 1926), p. 171Google Scholar; 60 (Swansea, , 1928), p. 488.Google Scholar

42 TUC Annual Reports, 60 (Swansea, , 1928), p. 488Google Scholar; 66 (Weymouth, , 1934), p. 340.Google Scholar

43 TUC Annual Reports, 67 (Margate, 1935), pp. 129–32; 75 (Southport, , 1943), pp. 240–1Google Scholar; 69 (Norwich, , 1937), pp. 126, 331–41Google Scholar; 61 (Plymouth, , 1936), p. 130.Google Scholar

44 H of C Deb, 326, cols. 2409–10 (22 July 1937); 331, cols. 847–48 (8 Feb. 1938); 347, col. 445 (10 May 1939), 1189 (16 May 1939); 349, cols. 912–14 (3 July 1939); 355. col. 1018 (12 Dec. 1939).

45 Roebuck, J.When does old age begin? Journal of Social History, 12, 3 (1979), 416–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar (p. 424), Deacon, A., Thank you, God, for the Means Test man. New Society (25 06 1981), pp. 519–20.Google ScholarThe Times, 19 Aug. 1940.

46 Reported in The Pensioner, Oct. 1940 [this newspaper was printed monthly from Feb. 1940].

47 Birtles, J. C.The Ties That Bind, n.d. [unpaginated].Google Scholar

48 Ibid.The Pensioner, Feb. 1940; Mar. 1940; Apr. 1940; May 1940; Feb. 1941.

49 The Pensioner, Sep. 1940; Mar. 1941; June 1942; Aug. 1942; May 1944; Nov. 1942, Birtles, op. cit.

50 The Pensioner, Feb. 1940. Longstaff, Dennison, op. cit. p. 1.Google Scholar

51 The Pensioner, Nov. 1942; Sep. 1941; Jan. 1942; Nov. 1940; Oct. 1942; Apr. 1940; Dec. 1947; Mar. 1940; Jan. 1943; Oct. 1943; Jan. 1947; Mar. 1947; May 1947; July 1940; Feb. 1940; May 1942; June 1942; Aug. 1943; May 1944. Birtles, op. cit., notes that, ‘To get first-hand knowlege the Daily Express deputed one of their staff to go out and for a week try to live on ten shillings. Each day he reported loss of weight … [he] acknowledged it was the most trying week of his life, and had borrowed three shillings and sixpence from the following week's allowance.’

52 Means, R. and Smith, R.The Development of Welfare Services for Elderly People. Croom Helm, London, 1985, pp. 6970.Google Scholar

53 The Pensioner, Apr. 1940; Oct. 1942; Mar. 1942; Sep. 1942; Mar. 1940; Feb. 1940.

54 The Pensioner, Feb. 1941.

55 The Pensioner, June 1940; May 1941; Dec. 1941; Jan. 1941; May 1941; Mar. 1941; Apr. 1941; Sep. 1941; Aug. 1943. NFOAPA Headquarters, Blackburn: local press cuttings and campaign leaflets (1945).

56 Carradice, D. and Stanfield, C.Justice for the Old Folk, Independent Labour Party, London, 1943.Google ScholarThe Pensioner, Sep. 1943; Sep. 1942; May 1944; Feb. 1945; Sep. 1946; Oct. 1948. H of C Deb, 380, cols. 1671–2 (31 May 1942); 393, cols. 671–3 (3 Nov. 1943).

57 The Pensioner, Mar. 1942; June 1942. Means and Smith, op. cit. p. 70.

58 The Pensioner, Jan. 1943; Feb. 1943; May 1942.

59 Melling, G., The Federation Story, n.d. [1952], p. 8.Google Scholar

60 Williams, , op. cit.Google Scholar, concludes that, ‘Each step in legislation was a compromise response to several competing intra- and extra-Parliamentary pressures’ (p. 457). Amongst these were intellectual and ‘high political’ debates over population trends and social insurance which have not been discussed here. Although an increasingly collectivist official consciousness, coupled with a more coherent Labour presence after 1918 seems to have been significant, moral sincerity or political will need to be disentangled from financial expediency. Pratt, H. J.Old age associations in national politics, Annals Amer. Acad. of Polit. & Soc. Science, 415 (09 1974), 106–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar, comments that, ‘In marked contrast to the old age groups of an earlier period, the elderly in recent years have coalesced behind groups with a high level of political rationality and internal organisational discipline.… helping to give shape and focus to widespread latent sentiments in the old age population’ (p. 106).

61 Means, and Smith, , op. cit. p. 110.Google Scholar

62 Hannah, L.Inventing Retirement: the Development of Occupational Pensions Policy in Britain. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

62 TUC Annual Reports, 75 (Southport, 1943), p. 240.

63 Williams, , op. cit. p. 322Google Scholar, notes that the campaign to remove penalties on thrift was conducted ‘in the name of the Friendly Societies’, while Lesser himself commented that ‘the National Conference was really originated by thrift societies’ (PP 1919, Mins. of Evid., Q. 1565, p. 65). Econometric evidence suggests that state pensions did result in working-class savings, but there was a decline in assets held in friendly societies, specifically from 1916 to 1921. See Johnson, P. Self-help versus state-help: Old Age Pensions and personal savings in Great Britain, 1906–1937. Explorations in Economic History, Oct. 1984, 329–50 and idem, Saving and Spending. The Working-Class Economy in Britain, 1870–1939, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1985, pp. 207–9, 215.

65 Branson, N. and Heinemann, M.Britain in the Nineteen Thirties. Weidenfeld &Nicolson, London, 1971, pp. 226–67.Google Scholar

66 TUC Annual Reports, 72 (Southport, 1940), p. 354. The Pensioner, June 1942; Dec. 1943.

67 Williams, , op. cit. p. 466.Google ScholarThe Pensioner, May 1940.