Article contents
Dominant and Competing Paradigms in Gerontology: Towards a Political Economy of Ageing
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 November 2008
Abstract
The origins and influence of social science perspectives have conditioned theoretical and empirical developments in the field of gerontology. Yet little systematic examination has been afforded to the role of social science in the production of gerontological knowledge in providing the underlying rationale for American social policy for the aged. This paper examines the dominant U.S. social science perspectives or paradigms and discusses the reasons for their centrality in American gerontological thought. The paper concludes with a proposal for an alternative line of inquiry — a political economy of ageing — which takes as problematic the effects of social history, the world economy, capitalism and social class on the ageing process and the aged and the policy interventions designed for them.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982
References
NOTES
1 Gouldner, A. W., The Coming Crisis in Western Sociology, New York, Basic, 1970.Google Scholar
2 Berger, P. L., and Luckmann, T., The Social Construction of Reality, New York, Doubleday, 1966.Google Scholar
3 Estes, C. L., The Aging Enterprise, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 1979.Google Scholar
4 Estes, C. L., ‘Political Gerontology’, Transaction Society, 15, 07 / 08 1978, 43–49.Google Scholar
5 Estes, C. L., ‘Toward a Sociology of Political Gerontology’, Sociological Symposium, 26, Spring 1979, 1–27.Google Scholar
6 Estes, C. L., and Freeman, H. E., ‘Strategies in the Design of Intervention’, in Binstock, R. H. and Shanas, E. (Ed.), Handbook of Aging and the Social Sciences, New York, Van Nostrand, 1976.Google Scholar
7 Marshall, V. W., and Tindale, J. A., Notes for a Radical Gerontology. Paper presented at Gerontological Society, Louisville, Ky., 1975.Google Scholar
8 McAdam, D., ‘Coping with Aging or Combatting Agism?’ Paper presented at the Gerontological Society, San Diego, 11 23, 1980.Google Scholar
9 Dowd, J., Stratification Among the Aged, Monterey, California, Brooks/Cole, 1980.Google Scholar
10 Levin, J., and Levin, W. C., Ageism: Prejudice and Discrimination Against the Elderly, Belmont, California, 1980.Google Scholar
11 Campbell, A., Converse, P., Miller, W., and Stokes, D., The American Voter, New York, John Wiley, 1960.Google Scholar
12 Binstock, R. H., ‘Interest-Group Liberalism and the Politics of Aging’, Gerontologist, 12, 1972, 265–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13 Pinner, A., Jacobs, P., and Selznick, P., Old Age and Political Behavior: A Case Study, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1959.Google Scholar
14 Putnam, K., Old Age Politics in California, Stanford, Stanford University, 1970.Google Scholar
15 Messinger, S. L., ‘Organizational Transformation: A Case Study of a Declining Social Movement’, American Soc. Review, 20, 1955, 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16 Pratt, H. J., The Politics of Old Age, Chicago, University of Chicago, 1976.Google Scholar
17 Hudson, R. B., and Binstock, R., ‘Political Systems and Aging’, op. cit.Google Scholar See also, Hudson, R. B. (Ed.), The Aging in Politics: Process and Policy, Springfield, Illinois, Thomas, 1981.Google Scholar
18 Estes, C. L., ‘Strategies in the Design of Intervention’, op. cit.Google Scholar
19 Walton, J., ‘Urban Political Economy’, Comparative Urban Research, 7, I, 1979, p. 9.Google Scholar
20 Walton, J., ‘Economic Crisis and Urban Austerity: Issues in Research and Policy in the 1980’s’, paper presented at the Conference on Economic Crisis and Urban Austerity, Columbia University, New York, 05 21–24, 1980.Google Scholar
21 Walker, A., ‘The Social Creation of Poverty and Dependency in Old Age’, Journal of Social Policy, 9, 1980, 49–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22 Henretta, J., and Campbell, R., ‘Status Attainment and Status Maintenance: A Case Study of Stratification in Old Age’, Amer. Social. Review, 41, 1976, 981–992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23 Samuelson, R. J., ‘Benefit Programs for the Elderly — Off Limits to Federal Budget’, National Journal, 10 3, 1981.Google Scholar
24 Baum, M., and Baum, R. C., Growing Old, New York, Prentice-Hall, 1980.Google Scholar
25 This is not to say that structure must be seen as totally determining the individual as simply the victim of social forces. Our purpose, in this paper, however, is to argue against the totally individualistic approaches which have dominated gerontology.
26 Townsend, P., ‘The Structured Dependency of the Elderly: A Creation of Social Policy in the Twentieth Century’, Ageing and Society, 1, I, 1981, 5–28, p. 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27 Walker, A., op. cit., 1980.Google Scholar
28 Walker, A., ‘Towards a Political Economy of Old Age’, Ageing and Society, 1, I, 1981, 73–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29 Townsend, P., ‘The Structured Dependency of the Elderly…’, op. cit., 1981.Google Scholar
30 Townsend, P., The Last Refuge, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1962.Google Scholar
31 Townsend, P., Poverty in the United Kingdom, Harmondsworth, Middlesex, Penguin Books, 1979.Google Scholar
32 Townsend, P., and Wedderburn, D., The Aged in the Welfare State, London, Bell, 1965.Google Scholar
33 Myles, J. F., ‘The Aged and the Welfare State: An Essay in Political Demography’, paper presented at the International Sociological Association, Research Committee on Ageing, Paris, 07 8–9, 1981.Google Scholar
34 Myles, J. F., ‘The Aged, the State, and the Structure of Inequality’, in Harp, J., and Hofley, J. (Ed.), Structural Inequality in Canada, Toronto, Prentice-Hall, 1980, pp. 317–342.Google Scholar
35 Myles, J. F., ‘Income Inequality and Status Maintenance’, Research on Aging, 1981, 123–141.Google Scholar
36 Guillemard, A. M., ‘Retirement as a Social Process, Its Differential Effects Upon Behavior’, communication presented to the 8th World Congress of Sociology, Toronto, Canada, 08 21, 1974.Google Scholar
37 Guillemard, A. M., ‘A Critical Analysis of Governmental Policies on Aging from a Marxist Sociological Perspective: The Case of France’, Paris, France: Center for the Study of Social Movements, 10 1977.Google Scholar
38 Guillemard, A. M., ‘The Making of Old Age Policy in France’, in Guillemard, A. M. (Ed.), Old Age and the Welfare State, New York, Sage, International Sociological forthcoming, 1982.Google Scholar
39 Dowd, J., op. cit.Google Scholar
40 Estes, C. E., The Aging Enterprise, op. cit.Google Scholar
41 Evans, L., and Williamson, J., ‘Social Security and Social Control’, Generations, Winter, 1981, 18–20.Google Scholar
42 Olson, L., Public Policy and Aging, forthcoming, 1982.Google Scholar
43 Tussing, A., ‘The Dual Welfare System’, in Horowitz, L., and Levy, C. (Eds.), Social Realities, New York, Harper and Row, 1971.Google Scholar
44 Ginsberg, N., Class, Capital and Social Policy, London, Macmillan, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
45 O'Connor, J., The Fiscal Crisis of the State, New York, St. Martin's, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
46 Gough, I., The Political Economy of the Welfare State, London, Macmillan Press, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
47 Kelman, S. (Ed.), ‘Special Section on Political Economy of Health’, International Journal of Health Services, 5 (4), 1975, 535–642.Google Scholar
48 Renaud, M., ‘On the Structural Constraints to State Intervention in Health’, International Journal of Health Services, 5, 1975, 559–571.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
49 Review of Radical Political Economics, ‘Special Issue on the Political Economy of Health’, 9, Spring 1977.
50 Alford, R., ‘The Political Economy of Health Care: Dynamics Without Change’, Politics and Society, 2, Winter 1972, 127–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
51 Lichtman, R., ‘The Political Economy of Medical Care’, in Dreitzel, H. P. (Ed.), The Social Organization of Health, New York, pp. 265–290.Google Scholar
52 Navarro, V., Medicine Under Capitalism, New York, Prodist, 1976.Google Scholar
53 Navarro, V., Health and Medical Care in the U.S.: A Critical Analysis, New York, Baywood, 1973.Google Scholar
54 Dowd, J., op. cit., pp. 21–22.Google Scholar
55 Estes, C., The Aging Enterprise, op. cit.Google Scholar
56 Guillemard, A., ‘Retirement as a Social Process…’, op. cit.Google Scholar, and ‘A Critical Analysis of Governmental Policies on Aging From a Marxist Perspective …’, op. cit.
57 Walker, A., ‘Towards a Political Economy of Old Age’, op. cit.Google Scholar
58 Orshansky, M., ‘Poverty Among America's Aged’, testimony before the U.S. House Select Committee on Aging, Washington, D.C., 08 9, 1978.Google Scholar
59 Crad, S., and Foster, K., ‘Income of the Population Aged 55 and Older, 1976’, Social Security Bulletin, 42, 1979, 16–32.Google Scholar
60 Abbott, J., ‘Socioeconomic Characteristics of the Elderly: Some Black-White Differences’, Social Security Bulletin, 40, 1977, 16–42.Google ScholarPubMed
61 Giddens, A., The Class Structure of the Advanced Societies, New York, Harper and Row, 1975.Google Scholar
62 Dowd, J., op. cit.Google Scholar
63 Atchley, R. C., ‘Social Class and Aging’, Generations, Winter 1981, 16–17: 34.Google Scholar
64 Estes, C. L., The Aging Enterprise, op. cit.Google Scholar
65 Dowd, J., op. cit.Google Scholar
66 Guillemard, A. M., op. cit., 1974, 1977.Google Scholar
67 Townsend, P., ‘The Structured Dependency of the Elderly’, op. cit.Google Scholar
68 Walker, A., ‘Towards a Political Economy of Old Age’, op. cit.Google Scholar
69 Ibid.
70 Wright, E. O., Class, Crisis and the State, London, Verso, 1978.Google Scholar
71 Wright, E. O., ‘Intellectuals and the Class Structure’, in Walker, P. (Ed.), Between Labor and Capital, Boston, South End, 1979, p. 191.Google Scholar
72 Wright, E. O., ‘Varieties of Marxist Conceptions of Class Structure’, Politics and Society, Vol. 9, 3, 1980, pp. 323–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
73 Ehrenreich, B., and , J., ‘The Professional-Managerial Class’Google Scholar, in Walker, P. (Ed.), Between Labor and Capital, op. cit., p. 5.Google Scholar
74 Poulantzas, N., Classes in Contemporary Capitalism, London, New Left Books, 1975.Google Scholar
75 Wright, E. O., ‘Varieties of Marxist Conceptions of Class Structure’, op. cit.Google Scholar
76 Wright, E. O., Class, Crisis, and The State, op. cit.Google Scholar
77 Wright, E. O., ‘Intellectuals and the Class Structure’, op. cit., p. 74.Google Scholar
78 Poulantzas, N., op. cit.Google Scholar
79 See, for example, Guillemard, A. M., ‘Retirement as a Social Process…’, op. cit.Google Scholar, and ‘A Critical Analysis of Governmental Policies…’, op. cit., where these categories are employed in an analysis of class and age.
80 Ehrenreich, B., Ehrenreich, J., op. cit.Google Scholar
81 See Szymanski, A.; Cohen, J., and Howard, D.; Noble, D., and Schaeffer, R., and Weinstein, J., in Walker, P. (Ed.), Between Labor and Capital, op. cit.Google Scholar
82 Ehrenreich, B., and , J., op. cit., p. 11.Google Scholar
83 Estes, C. L., The Aging Enterprise, op. cit., p. 2.Google Scholar
84 Sjoberg, G., Brymer, R. A., and Farris, B., ‘Bureaucracy and the Lower Class’, Sociology and Social Research, 50, 1966, 325–334.Google Scholar
85 Estes, C. L., The Aging Enterprise, op. cit., pp. 24–26.Google Scholar
86 Ibid., pp. 2–3.
87 Guillemard, A. M., ‘Retirement as a Social Process…’, op. cit.Google Scholar
88 Nelson, G., ‘Perspective on Social Need and Social Services to the Aged’, Social Services Review, 1982, forthcoming.Google Scholar
89 Olson, L., op. cit.Google Scholar
90 Estes, C., op. cit.Google Scholar
- 61
- Cited by