Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:54:05.517Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dominant and Competing Paradigms in Gerontology: Towards a Political Economy of Ageing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2008

Carroll L. Estes
Affiliation:
Professor and Chair, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, California, U.S.A.
James H. Swan
Affiliation:
Assistant Research Sociologist, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco.
Lenore E. Gerard
Affiliation:
Associate in Research, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco.

Abstract

The origins and influence of social science perspectives have conditioned theoretical and empirical developments in the field of gerontology. Yet little systematic examination has been afforded to the role of social science in the production of gerontological knowledge in providing the underlying rationale for American social policy for the aged. This paper examines the dominant U.S. social science perspectives or paradigms and discusses the reasons for their centrality in American gerontological thought. The paper concludes with a proposal for an alternative line of inquiry — a political economy of ageing — which takes as problematic the effects of social history, the world economy, capitalism and social class on the ageing process and the aged and the policy interventions designed for them.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

1 Gouldner, A. W., The Coming Crisis in Western Sociology, New York, Basic, 1970.Google Scholar

2 Berger, P. L., and Luckmann, T., The Social Construction of Reality, New York, Doubleday, 1966.Google Scholar

3 Estes, C. L., The Aging Enterprise, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 1979.Google Scholar

4 Estes, C. L., ‘Political Gerontology’, Transaction Society, 15, 07 / 08 1978, 4349.Google Scholar

5 Estes, C. L., ‘Toward a Sociology of Political Gerontology’, Sociological Symposium, 26, Spring 1979, 127.Google Scholar

6 Estes, C. L., and Freeman, H. E., ‘Strategies in the Design of Intervention’, in Binstock, R. H. and Shanas, E. (Ed.), Handbook of Aging and the Social Sciences, New York, Van Nostrand, 1976.Google Scholar

7 Marshall, V. W., and Tindale, J. A., Notes for a Radical Gerontology. Paper presented at Gerontological Society, Louisville, Ky., 1975.Google Scholar

8 McAdam, D., ‘Coping with Aging or Combatting Agism?’ Paper presented at the Gerontological Society, San Diego, 11 23, 1980.Google Scholar

9 Dowd, J., Stratification Among the Aged, Monterey, California, Brooks/Cole, 1980.Google Scholar

10 Levin, J., and Levin, W. C., Ageism: Prejudice and Discrimination Against the Elderly, Belmont, California, 1980.Google Scholar

11 Campbell, A., Converse, P., Miller, W., and Stokes, D., The American Voter, New York, John Wiley, 1960.Google Scholar

12 Binstock, R. H., ‘Interest-Group Liberalism and the Politics of Aging’, Gerontologist, 12, 1972, 265280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

13 Pinner, A., Jacobs, P., and Selznick, P., Old Age and Political Behavior: A Case Study, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1959.Google Scholar

14 Putnam, K., Old Age Politics in California, Stanford, Stanford University, 1970.Google Scholar

15 Messinger, S. L., ‘Organizational Transformation: A Case Study of a Declining Social Movement’, American Soc. Review, 20, 1955, 310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

16 Pratt, H. J., The Politics of Old Age, Chicago, University of Chicago, 1976.Google Scholar

17 Hudson, R. B., and Binstock, R., ‘Political Systems and Aging’, op. cit.Google Scholar See also, Hudson, R. B. (Ed.), The Aging in Politics: Process and Policy, Springfield, Illinois, Thomas, 1981.Google Scholar

18 Estes, C. L., ‘Strategies in the Design of Intervention’, op. cit.Google Scholar

19 Walton, J., ‘Urban Political Economy’, Comparative Urban Research, 7, I, 1979, p. 9.Google Scholar

20 Walton, J., ‘Economic Crisis and Urban Austerity: Issues in Research and Policy in the 1980’s’, paper presented at the Conference on Economic Crisis and Urban Austerity, Columbia University, New York, 05 21–24, 1980.Google Scholar

21 Walker, A., ‘The Social Creation of Poverty and Dependency in Old Age’, Journal of Social Policy, 9, 1980, 4975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

22 Henretta, J., and Campbell, R., ‘Status Attainment and Status Maintenance: A Case Study of Stratification in Old Age’, Amer. Social. Review, 41, 1976, 981992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

23 Samuelson, R. J., ‘Benefit Programs for the Elderly — Off Limits to Federal Budget’, National Journal, 10 3, 1981.Google Scholar

24 Baum, M., and Baum, R. C., Growing Old, New York, Prentice-Hall, 1980.Google Scholar

25 This is not to say that structure must be seen as totally determining the individual as simply the victim of social forces. Our purpose, in this paper, however, is to argue against the totally individualistic approaches which have dominated gerontology.

26 Townsend, P., ‘The Structured Dependency of the Elderly: A Creation of Social Policy in the Twentieth Century’, Ageing and Society, 1, I, 1981, 528, p. 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

27 Walker, A., op. cit., 1980.Google Scholar

28 Walker, A., ‘Towards a Political Economy of Old Age’, Ageing and Society, 1, I, 1981, 7394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

29 Townsend, P., ‘The Structured Dependency of the Elderly…’, op. cit., 1981.Google Scholar

30 Townsend, P., The Last Refuge, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1962.Google Scholar

31 Townsend, P., Poverty in the United Kingdom, Harmondsworth, Middlesex, Penguin Books, 1979.Google Scholar

32 Townsend, P., and Wedderburn, D., The Aged in the Welfare State, London, Bell, 1965.Google Scholar

33 Myles, J. F., ‘The Aged and the Welfare State: An Essay in Political Demography’, paper presented at the International Sociological Association, Research Committee on Ageing, Paris, 07 8–9, 1981.Google Scholar

34 Myles, J. F., ‘The Aged, the State, and the Structure of Inequality’, in Harp, J., and Hofley, J. (Ed.), Structural Inequality in Canada, Toronto, Prentice-Hall, 1980, pp. 317342.Google Scholar

35 Myles, J. F., ‘Income Inequality and Status Maintenance’, Research on Aging, 1981, 123141.Google Scholar

36 Guillemard, A. M., ‘Retirement as a Social Process, Its Differential Effects Upon Behavior’, communication presented to the 8th World Congress of Sociology, Toronto, Canada, 08 21, 1974.Google Scholar

37 Guillemard, A. M., ‘A Critical Analysis of Governmental Policies on Aging from a Marxist Sociological Perspective: The Case of France’, Paris, France: Center for the Study of Social Movements, 10 1977.Google Scholar

38 Guillemard, A. M., ‘The Making of Old Age Policy in France’, in Guillemard, A. M. (Ed.), Old Age and the Welfare State, New York, Sage, International Sociological forthcoming, 1982.Google Scholar

39 Dowd, J., op. cit.Google Scholar

40 Estes, C. E., The Aging Enterprise, op. cit.Google Scholar

41 Evans, L., and Williamson, J., ‘Social Security and Social Control’, Generations, Winter, 1981, 1820.Google Scholar

42 Olson, L., Public Policy and Aging, forthcoming, 1982.Google Scholar

43 Tussing, A., ‘The Dual Welfare System’, in Horowitz, L., and Levy, C. (Eds.), Social Realities, New York, Harper and Row, 1971.Google Scholar

44 Ginsberg, N., Class, Capital and Social Policy, London, Macmillan, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

45 O'Connor, J., The Fiscal Crisis of the State, New York, St. Martin's, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

46 Gough, I., The Political Economy of the Welfare State, London, Macmillan Press, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

47 Kelman, S. (Ed.), ‘Special Section on Political Economy of Health’, International Journal of Health Services, 5 (4), 1975, 535642.Google Scholar

48 Renaud, M., ‘On the Structural Constraints to State Intervention in Health’, International Journal of Health Services, 5, 1975, 559571.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

49 Review of Radical Political Economics, ‘Special Issue on the Political Economy of Health’, 9, Spring 1977.

50 Alford, R., ‘The Political Economy of Health Care: Dynamics Without Change’, Politics and Society, 2, Winter 1972, 127164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

51 Lichtman, R., ‘The Political Economy of Medical Care’, in Dreitzel, H. P. (Ed.), The Social Organization of Health, New York, pp. 265290.Google Scholar

52 Navarro, V., Medicine Under Capitalism, New York, Prodist, 1976.Google Scholar

53 Navarro, V., Health and Medical Care in the U.S.: A Critical Analysis, New York, Baywood, 1973.Google Scholar

54 Dowd, J., op. cit., pp. 2122.Google Scholar

55 Estes, C., The Aging Enterprise, op. cit.Google Scholar

56 Guillemard, A., ‘Retirement as a Social Process…’, op. cit.Google Scholar, and ‘A Critical Analysis of Governmental Policies on Aging From a Marxist Perspective …’, op. cit.

57 Walker, A., ‘Towards a Political Economy of Old Age’, op. cit.Google Scholar

58 Orshansky, M., ‘Poverty Among America's Aged’, testimony before the U.S. House Select Committee on Aging, Washington, D.C., 08 9, 1978.Google Scholar

59 Crad, S., and Foster, K., ‘Income of the Population Aged 55 and Older, 1976’, Social Security Bulletin, 42, 1979, 1632.Google Scholar

60 Abbott, J., ‘Socioeconomic Characteristics of the Elderly: Some Black-White Differences’, Social Security Bulletin, 40, 1977, 1642.Google ScholarPubMed

61 Giddens, A., The Class Structure of the Advanced Societies, New York, Harper and Row, 1975.Google Scholar

62 Dowd, J., op. cit.Google Scholar

63 Atchley, R. C., ‘Social Class and Aging’, Generations, Winter 1981, 1617: 34.Google Scholar

64 Estes, C. L., The Aging Enterprise, op. cit.Google Scholar

65 Dowd, J., op. cit.Google Scholar

66 Guillemard, A. M., op. cit., 1974, 1977.Google Scholar

67 Townsend, P., ‘The Structured Dependency of the Elderly’, op. cit.Google Scholar

68 Walker, A., ‘Towards a Political Economy of Old Age’, op. cit.Google Scholar

70 Wright, E. O., Class, Crisis and the State, London, Verso, 1978.Google Scholar

71 Wright, E. O., ‘Intellectuals and the Class Structure’, in Walker, P. (Ed.), Between Labor and Capital, Boston, South End, 1979, p. 191.Google Scholar

72 Wright, E. O., ‘Varieties of Marxist Conceptions of Class Structure’, Politics and Society, Vol. 9, 3, 1980, pp. 323370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

73 Ehrenreich, B., and , J., ‘The Professional-Managerial Class’Google Scholar, in Walker, P. (Ed.), Between Labor and Capital, op. cit., p. 5.Google Scholar

74 Poulantzas, N., Classes in Contemporary Capitalism, London, New Left Books, 1975.Google Scholar

75 Wright, E. O., ‘Varieties of Marxist Conceptions of Class Structure’, op. cit.Google Scholar

76 Wright, E. O., Class, Crisis, and The State, op. cit.Google Scholar

77 Wright, E. O., ‘Intellectuals and the Class Structure’, op. cit., p. 74.Google Scholar

78 Poulantzas, N., op. cit.Google Scholar

79 See, for example, Guillemard, A. M., ‘Retirement as a Social Process…’, op. cit.Google Scholar, and ‘A Critical Analysis of Governmental Policies…’, op. cit., where these categories are employed in an analysis of class and age.

80 Ehrenreich, B., Ehrenreich, J., op. cit.Google Scholar

81 See Szymanski, A.; Cohen, J., and Howard, D.; Noble, D., and Schaeffer, R., and Weinstein, J., in Walker, P. (Ed.), Between Labor and Capital, op. cit.Google Scholar

82 Ehrenreich, B., and , J., op. cit., p. 11.Google Scholar

83 Estes, C. L., The Aging Enterprise, op. cit., p. 2.Google Scholar

84 Sjoberg, G., Brymer, R. A., and Farris, B., ‘Bureaucracy and the Lower Class’, Sociology and Social Research, 50, 1966, 325334.Google Scholar

85 Estes, C. L., The Aging Enterprise, op. cit., pp. 2426.Google Scholar

86 Ibid., pp. 2–3.

87 Guillemard, A. M., ‘Retirement as a Social Process…’, op. cit.Google Scholar

88 Nelson, G., ‘Perspective on Social Need and Social Services to the Aged’, Social Services Review, 1982, forthcoming.Google Scholar

89 Olson, L., op. cit.Google Scholar

90 Estes, C., op. cit.Google Scholar