Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T15:30:22.972Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Continuity and change in older adults' perceptions of out-of-home mobility over ten years: a qualitative–quantitative approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2011

HEIDRUN MOLLENKOPF ,
ANNETTE HIEBER  and
HANS-WERNER WAHL
HEIDRUN MOLLENKOPF
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological Ageing Research, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
ANNETTE HIEBER
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological Ageing Research, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
HANS-WERNER WAHL*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological Ageing Research, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
*
Address for correspondence: Hans-Werner Wahl, Department of Psychological Ageing Research, Heidelberg University, Bergheimer Str. 20, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This research report starts from the assumption that a solely geriatric and transport-related view of out-of-home mobility needs to be extended to incorporate other aspects of perceived and experienced mobility. In particular, our goal is to understand better the stability and change in people's perceptions of out-of-home mobility over ten years. We concentrate on: (a) the subjective meaning of mobility over time, including perceived changes in mobility and perceived reasons for change; (b) trends in satisfaction with various mobility domains; and (c) a case-oriented exploration of inter-individual variation over time. A qualitative–quantitative data-analytic approach was applied to data collected from 82 participants on three occasions over ten years in 1995, 2000 and 2005. The mean age of the sample in 2005 was 75.2 years. The results indicate overall stability in the meaning attached to mobility between 1995 and 2005, while the perceived changes point to major losses in the array of mobility experiences and decreasing satisfaction with mobility opportunities, out-of-home leisure activities and travelling, but in contrast satisfaction with public transport increased. Case studies exemplified the reasons for the pronounced variation in satisfaction with mobility dynamics over time. In conclusion, the findings confirm that out-of-home mobility remains of utmost importance when people move from late midlife into old age.

Keywords

out-of-home mobilityageingmeaningsatisfactionlongitudinal perspective
Type
Articles
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 31 , Issue 5: Wellbeing, Independence and Mobility , July 2011 , pp. 782 - 802
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alsnih, R. and Hensher, D. A. 2003. The mobility and accessibility expectations of seniors in an ageing population. Transportation Research A: Policy and Practice, 37, 10, 903–16.Google Scholar
Avlund, K., Kreiner, S. and Schultz-Larsen, K. 1993. Construct validation and the Rasch model: functional ability of healthy elderly people. Scandinavian Journal of Social Medicine, 21, 3, 233–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baltes, P. B. 2006. Human dignity and the limits of life. Daedalus, 135, 1, 32–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banister, D. and Bowling, A. 2004. Quality of life for the elderly: the transport dimension. Transport Policy, 11, 2, 105–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biggs, S. 2005. Beyond appearances: perspectives on identity in later life and some implications for method. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 60B, 3, S118–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandtstädter, J. and Rothermund, K. 2002. The life course dynamics of goal pursuit and goal adjustment: a two-process framework. Developmental Review, 22, 2, 117–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Centre d'études sur les réseaux, les transports, l'urbanisme et les constructions publiques (CERTU) 2001. La mobilité des personnes âgées – Analyse des enquêtes ménages déplacements [The Mobility of Older People: Analysis of Household Displacements]. Rapport d'étude, CERTU, Lyon, France.Google Scholar
Cobb, R. W. and Coughlin, J. F. 2004. Transportation policy for an aging society: keeping older Americans on the move. In Transportation Research Board (TRB), Transportation in an Aging Society: A Decade of Experience. TRB, Washington DC, 275–89.Google Scholar
Coughlin, J. 2001. Transportation and Older Persons: Perceptions and Preferences. AARP, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Daatland, S. O. and Biggs, S. (eds)2006. Aging and Diversity. Policy Press, London.Google Scholar
Diehl, M. and Wahl, H.-W. 2010. Awareness of age-related change: examination of a (mostly) unexplored concept. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 65B, 3, 340–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Easterlin, R. A. 2003. Explaining happiness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 100, 11176–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
European Conference of Ministers of Transport (ECMT) 2000. Transport and Aging of the Population. Report of the 112th Roundtable on Transport Economics, Paris, 19–20 November 1998. OECD, Paris, France.Google Scholar
Farquhar, M. 1995. Elderly people's definitions of quality of life. Social Science and Medicine, 41, 10, 1439–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernández-Ballesteros, R., Zamarrón, M. D. and Ruíz, M. A. 2001. The contribution of socio-demographic and psychosocial factors to life satisfaction. Ageing & Society, 21, 1, 25–43.Google Scholar
Gabriel, Z. and Bowling, A. 2004. Quality of life from the perspectives of older people. Ageing & Society, 24, 5, 675–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guralnik, J. M., Ferruccia, L., Pieper, C. F., Leveillea, S. G., Markides, K. S., Ostird, G. V., Studenskie, S., Berkman, L. F. and Wallace, R. B. 2000. Lower extremity function and subsequent disability. Consistency across studies, predictive models, and value of gait speed alone compared with the Short Physical Performance Battery. Journals of Gerontology Series A: Medical Sciences, 55, M221–31.Google Scholar
Handy, S., Weston, L. and Mokhtarian, P. L. 2005. Driving by choice or necessity? Transportation Research A, 39, 2, 183–203.Google Scholar
Heikkinen, E. 1998. Background, design and methods of the Evergreen Project. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 6, 1, 106–20.Google Scholar
Heikkinen, E., Berg, S., Schroll, M., Steen, B. and Viidik, A. (eds)1997. Functional Status, Health and Aging: The Nora Study. Facts, Research and Interventions in Geriatrics 1997. Serdi, Paris.Google Scholar
Heikkinen, E., Era, P., Jokela, J., Jylhä, M., Lyra, A. and Pohjolainen, P. 1992. Socio-economic and life-style factors as modulators of health and functional capacity with age. In Schroots, J. J. F. (ed.), Ageing, Health and Competence. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 65–86.Google Scholar
Holland, C., Kellaher, L., Peace, S., Scharf, T., Breeze, E., Gow, J. and Gilhooly, M. 2005. Getting out and about. In Walker, A. (ed.), Understanding Quality of Life in Old Age. Open University Press, Maidenhead, UK, 49–63.Google Scholar
Ketcham, C. J. and Stelmach, G. E. 2001. Age-related declines in motor control. In Birren, J. E. and Schaie, K. W. (eds), Handbook of the Psychology of Aging. Fifth edition, Academic Press, San Diego, California, 313–48.Google Scholar
Marottoli, R., Mendes de Leon, C. F., Glass, T. A., Williams, C. S., Cooney, L. M., Berkman, L. and Tinetti, M. E. 1997. Driving cessation and increased depressive symptoms: prospective evidence from the New Haven EPESE. Journal of the American Geriatric Society, 45, 2, 202–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marottoli, R., Mendes de Leon, C. F., Glass, T. A., Williams, C. S., Cooney, L. M. and Berkman, L. 2000. Consequences of driving cessation: decreased out-of-home activity levels. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 55B, 6, 334–40.Google Scholar
Mayring, P. 2003. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Grundlagen und Techniken [Qualitative Content Analysis: Basics and Methods]. Eighth edition, Beltz, Weinheim, Basel, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Mokhtarian, P. L. 2005. Travel as a desired end, not just a means. Transportation Research A: Policy and Practice, 39, 1, 93–6.Google Scholar
Mollenkopf, H. and Flaschenträger, P. 2001. Erhaltung von Mobilität im Alter [Maintaining Mobility in Old Age]. Schriftenreihe des Bundesministeriums für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend, Band 197, Kohlhammer, Stuttgart, Germany.Google Scholar
Mollenkopf, H., Baas, S., Kaspar, R., Oswald, F. and Wahl, H.-W. 2006. Outdoor mobility in late life: persons, environments and society. In Wahl, H.-W., Brenner, H., Mollenkopf, H., Rothenbacher, D. and Rott, C. (eds), The Many Faces of Health, Competence and Well-being in Old Age: Integrating Epidemiological, Psychological and Social Perspectives. Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mollenkopf, H., Marcellini, F., Ruoppila, I., Baas, S., Ciarrocchi, S., Hirsiaho, N., Kohan, D. and Principi, A. 2003. The MOBILATE Follow-up Study 1995–2000. Enhancing Outdoor Mobility in Later Life: Personal Coping, Environmental Resources, and Technical Support. Research Report 14, German Centre for Research on Ageing, Heidelberg, Germany.Google Scholar
Mollenkopf, H., Marcellini, F., Ruoppila, I., Széman, Z., Tacken, M., Kaspar, R. and Wahl, H.-W. 2002. The role of driving in maintaining mobility in later life: a European view. Gerontechnology, 4, 2, 231–50.Google Scholar
Mollenkopf, H., Marcellini, F., Ruoppila, I., Széman, Z., Tacken, M. and Wahl, H.-W. 2004 a. Social and behavioural science perspectives on out-of-home mobility in later life: findings from the European project MOBILATE. European Journal of Ageing, 1, 1, 45–53.Google Scholar
Mollenkopf, H., Marcellini, F., Ruoppila, I. and Tacken, M. (eds)2004 b. Ageing and Outdoor Mobility: A European Study. IOS Press, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Mollenkopf, H., Marcellini, F., Ruoppila, I., Széman, Z. and Tacken, M. (eds)2005. Enhancing Mobility in Later Life – Personal Coping, Environmental Resources, and Technical Support. The Out-of-home Mobility of Older Adults in Urban and Rural Regions of Five European Countries. IOS Press, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
O'Neill, D. and Dobbs, B. 2004. Age-related disease, mobility, and driving. In Transportation Research Board (TRB), Transportation in an Aging Society: A Decade of Experience. TRB, Washington DC, 56–66.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) 2001. Ageing and Transport: Mobility Needs and Safety Issues. OECD, Paris. Available online at http://oecdpublications.gfi-nb.com/cgi-bin/OECDBookShop.storefront/655091789/ [Accessed June 2010].Google Scholar
Rosenbloom, S. 2001. Sustainability and automobility among the elderly: an international assessment. Transportation, 28, 4, 375–408.Google Scholar
Rosenbloom, S. 2004. Mobility of the elderly: good news and bad news. In Transportation Research Board (TRB), Transportation in an Aging Society: A Decade of Experience. TRB, Washington DC, 3–21.Google Scholar
Schaie, K. W. 2003. Mobility for what? In Schaie, K. W., Wahl, H.-W., Mollenkopf, H. and Oswald, F. (eds), Aging Independently: Living Arrangements and Mobility. Springer Publishing Company, New York, 18–27.Google Scholar
Smith, J. and Baltes, P. B. 1999. Trends and profiles of psychological functioning in very old age. In Baltes, P. B. and Mayer, K. U. (eds), The Berlin Aging Study. Aging from 70 to 100. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 197–226.Google Scholar
Staudinger, U. M. 2000. Viele Gründe sprechen dagegen, und trotzdem geht es vielen Menschen gut: Das Paradox des subjektiven Wohlbefindens [There are many reasons against it, but many people still feel well: the paradox of subjective well-being]. Psychologische Rundschau, 51, 2, 185–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Transportation Research Board (TRB) 2004. Transportation in an Aging Society: A Decade of Experience. TRB, Washington DC.Google Scholar
US Department of Transportation 2003. Safe Mobility for a Maturing Society: Challenges and Opportunities. US Department of Transportation, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Veenhoven, R. 1996. Developments in satisfaction research. Social Indicators Research, 37, 1, 1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wahl, H.-W., Mollenkopf, H., Oswald, F. and Claus, C. 2007. Environmental aspects of quality of life in old age: conceptual and empirical issues. In Mollenkopf, H. and Walker, A. (eds), Quality of Life in Old Age: International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives. Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 101–22.Google Scholar
Wolinsky, F. D., Stump, T. E., Callahan, C. M. and Johnson, R. J. 1996. Consistency and change in functional status among older adults over time. Journal of Aging and Health, 8, 2, 155–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zapf, W. and Habich, R. (eds)1996. Wohlfahrtsentwicklung im vereinten Deutschland [Welfare Development in the United Germany]. Sigma, Berlin.Google Scholar
Ziegler, F. and Schwanen, T. 2011. ‘I like to go out to be energised by different people’: an exploratory analysis of mobility and wellbeing in later life. Ageing & Society (in press).Google Scholar