Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T11:49:29.983Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparing older adult and child protection policy in the United States of America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 September 2019

Peiyi Lu  and
Mack Shelley Open the ORCID record for Mack Shelley [Opens in a new window]
Peiyi Lu
Affiliation:
Gerontology Program, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA
Mack Shelley*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Compared with policy related to child abuse, older adult protection policy developed later and made slower progress in the United States of America. Few studies have addressed older adult protection policy. This paper compares the two policies and provides implications about how to improve older adult protection policy by emulating child protection policy. The Dimensions of Choice Framework was utilised to illuminate the differences between child protection and older adult protection policies (i.e. allocation, provisions, delivery and finance), while Advocacy Coalition Framework theory was used to explain why these differences exist (i.e. the contentions between ally and opposite coalitions). The Dimensions of Choice Framework refined the descriptive comparison of the two policies while the Advocacy Coalition Framework unfolded the efforts and struggles between advocacy coalitions that result in policy changes; and the conceptual combination further provides a cross-disciplinary link between social work and public policy studies. Findings indicated that, compared to child protection policy, older adult protection policy lacked federal legislative and administrative direction, well-developed diagnosis and evaluation tools, a national data system, sufficient federal funds and a comprehensive response mechanism. This was the case because older adult protection advocates presented a more controversial argument regarding the role of government intervention in protecting victims while respecting individual autonomy, lower public and government awareness, and weaker efforts from ally coalitions.

Keywords

older adult abusechild abuseprotection policyDimensions of Choice FrameworkAdvocacy Coalition Framework
Type
Article
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 41 , Issue 2 , February 2021 , pp. 273 - 293
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acierno, R, Hernandez, MA, Amstadter, AB, Resnick, HS, Steve, K, Muzzy, W and Kilpatrick, DG (2010) Prevalence and correlates of emotional, physical, sexual, and financial abuse and potential neglect in the United States: the National Elder Mistreatment Study. American Journal of Public Health 100, 292–297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Administration for Children & Families (2010) Fourth National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect (NIS-4): Report to Congress. Washington, DC: Administration for Children & Families, US Department of Health & Human Services. Available at https://www.acf.hhs.gov/opre/resource/fourth-national-incidence-study-of-child-abuse-and-neglect-nis-4-report-to.Google Scholar
Alber, J (1995) A framework for the comparative study of social services. Journal of European Social Policy 5, 131–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Psychological Association (2017) Elder Abuse and Neglect: In Search of Solutions. Available at http://www.apa.org/pi/aging/resources/guides/elder-abuse.aspx.Google Scholar
Berrick, J (2011) Trends and issues in the US child welfare system. In Gilbert, N, Patron, N and Skivenes, M (eds), Child Protection Systems: International Trends and Orientations. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 17–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Center of Excellence on Elder Abuse & Neglect (2017) Advocacy and Policy Change. Available at http://www.centeronelderabuse.org/Advocacy_and_Policy_Change.asp.Google Scholar
Child Welfare Information Gateway (2006) Working with the Courts in Child Protection. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, Children's Bureau.Google Scholar
Child Welfare Information Gateway (2013) How the Child Welfare System Works. Available at https://www.childwelfare.gov/pubs/factsheets/cpswork/.Google Scholar
Child Welfare Information Gateway (2016) Definitions of Child Abuse and Neglect. Available at https://www.childwelfare.gov/pubPDFs/define.pdf.Google Scholar
Children's Bureau (2017) Child Mistreatment 2015. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
Cohen, M (2011) Screening tools for the identification of elder abuse. Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management 18, 261–270.Google Scholar
Committee on Child Maltreatment Research, Policy, and Practice for the Next Decade: Phase II, Board on Children, Youth, and Families, Committee on Law and Justice, Institute of Medicine and National Research Council (Committee on Child Maltreatment Research) (2014) New Directions in Child Abuse and Neglect Research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Connell-Carrick, K and Scannapieco, M (2008) Adult protective services: state of the workforce and worker development. Gerontology & Geriatrics Education 29, 189–206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conrad, KJ, Iris, M, Ridings, JW, Langley, K and Wilber, KH (2010) Self-report measure of financial exploitation of older adults. The Gerontologist 50, 758–773.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooper, C, Selwood, A and Livingston, G (2008) The prevalence of elder abuse and neglect: a systematic review. Age and Ageing 37, 151–160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daly, JM and Jogerst, G (2003) Statute definitions of elder abuse. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect 13, 39–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denyer, D and Tranfield, D (2006) Using qualitative research synthesis to build an actionable knowledge base. Management Decision 44, 213–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dong, X (2012) Culture diversity and elder abuse: implications for research, education, and policy. Generations 36, 40–42.Google Scholar
Dong, X (2013) Elder abuse: research, practice, and health policy. The 2012 GSA Maxwell Pollack award lecture. The Gerontologist 54, 153–162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dong, X (2015) Elder abuse: systematic review and implications for practice. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 63, 1214–1238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dong, X and Simon, MA (2011) Enhancing national policy and programs to address elder abuse. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 305, 2460–2461.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eggers, WD and O'Leary, J (2009) If We Can Put a Man on the Moon…: Getting Big Things Done in Government. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
Faulkner, LR (1982) Mandating the reporting of suspected cases of elder abuse: an inappropriate, ineffective and ageist response to the abuse of older adults. Family Law Quarterly 16, 69–91.Google Scholar
Fulmer, T, Guadagno, L and Connolly, MT (2004) Progress in elder abuse screening and assessment instruments. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 52, 297–304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gallione, C, Dal Molin, A, Cristina, FV, Ferns, H, Mattioli, M and Suardi, B (2017) Screening tools for identification of elder abuse: a systematic review. Journal of Clinical Nursing 26, 2154–2176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilbert, N and Terrell, P (2002) Dimensions of Social Welfare Policy. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Imbody, B and Vandsburger, E (2011) Elder abuse and neglect: assessment tools, interventions, and recommendations for effective service provision. Educational Gerontology 37, 634–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, SL (2017) Adult protective services and victim services: a review of the literature to increase understanding between these two fields. Aggression and Violent Behavior 34, 214–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins-Smith, H, Nohrstedt, D, Weible, CM and Sabatier, PA (2014) The advocacy coalition framework: foundations, evolution, and ongoing research. In Sabatier, PA and Weible, CM (eds), Theories of the Policy Process. Philadelphia, PA: Westview Press, pp. 183–224.Google Scholar
Jud, A, Fegert, JM and Finkelhor, D (2016) On the incidence and prevalence of child maltreatment: a research agenda. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health 10, 17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karger, HJ and Stoesz, D (2018) American Social Welfare Policy: A Pluralist Approach. New York, NY: Pearson.Google Scholar
Lachs, MS and Pillemer, K (1995) Abuse and neglect of elderly persons. New England Journal of Medicine 332, 437–443.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lachs, MS and Pillemer, K (2004) Elder abuse. The Lancet 364, 1263–1272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lachs, MS, Williams, CS, O'Brien, S and Pillemer, KA (2002) Adult protective service use and nursing home placement. The Gerontologist 42, 734–739.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laumann, EO, Leitsch, SA and Waite, LJ (2008) Elder mistreatment in the United States: Prevalence estimates from a nationally representative study. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 63, S248–S254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Macolini, RM (1995) Elder abuse policy: considerations in research and legislation. Behavioral Sciences & the Law 13, 349–363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mixson, PM (2010) Public policy, elder abuse, and adult protective services: the struggle for coherence. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect 22, 16–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moody, HR and Sasser, JR (2018) Should older people be protected from bad choices? In Moody, HR and Sasser, JR (eds), Aging Concepts and Controversies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 125–134.Google Scholar
Myers, JE (2006) Child Protection in America: Past, Present, and Future. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, JE (2008) A short history of child protection in America. Family Law Quarterly 42, 449–464.Google Scholar
National APS Resource Center (2012) Adult Protection Service in 2012: Increasingly Vulnerable. Washington, DC: National Association of States United for Aging and Disabilities.Google Scholar
National Child Abuse Coalition (2017) Our Members Are Leaders in the Field of Protecting Vulnerable Children. Available at https://nationalchildabusecoalition.org/members/.Google Scholar
National Committee for the Prevention of Elder Abuse (2017) What is Elder Abuse? Available at http://www.preventelderabuse.org/elderabuse/.Google Scholar
National Council on Aging (2018) Elder Abuse Facts. Available at https://www.ncoa.org/public-policy-action/elder-justice/elder-abuse-facts/.Google Scholar
Pacolet, J, Bouten, R, Lanoye, H and Versieck, K (1999) Social Protection for Dependency in Old Age in the 15 EU Member States and Norway. Synthesis Report. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
Phelan, A (2013) International Perspectives on Elder Abuse. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabiner, DJ, Brown, D and O'Keeffe, J (2005) Financial exploitation of older persons: policy issues and recommendations for addressing them. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect 16, 65–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez, MA, Wallace, SP, Woolf, NH and Mangione, CM (2006) Mandatory reporting of elder abuse: between a rock and a hard place. Annals of Family Medicine 4, 403–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rostgaard, T and Fridberg, T (1998) Caring for Children and Older People – A Comparison of European Policies and Practices. Copenhagen, Denmark: SFI-Det Nationale Forskningscenter for Velfærd.Google Scholar
Sabatier, PA (1988) An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sciences 21, 129–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabatier, PA and Weible, CM (2006) A guide to the advocacy coalition framework. In Fischer, F and Miller, GJ (eds), Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics, and Methods. Boca Raton, FL: Routledge, pp. 149–162.Google Scholar
Shapiro, I, DaSilva, B, Reich, D and Kogan, R (2016) Funding for housing, health, and social services block grants has fallen markedly over time. Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. Available at https://www.cbpp.org/sites/default/files/atoms/files/11-19-15bud.pdfGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, M, Angelelli, JJ and Parrott, TM (2001) Changing attitudes toward aging policy in the United States during the 1980s and 1990s: a cohort analysis. Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 56B, S36–S43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, J and Benson, WF (2017) Adult protective services and the Long-term Care Ombudsman Program. In Dong, X (ed.), Elder Abuse: Research, Practice and Policy. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, pp. 317–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sosulski, MR and Lawrence, C (2008) Mixing methods for full-strength results: two welfare studies. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 2, 121–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiegel, LA (2017) Elder abuse victims’ access to justice: roles of the civil, criminal, and judicial systems in preventing, detecting, and remedying elder abuse. In Dong, X (ed.), Elder Abuse: Research, Practice and Policy. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, pp. 343–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stith, SM, Liu, T, Davies, LC, Boykin, EL, Alder, MC, Harris, JM, Som, A, McPherson, M and Dees, J (2009) Risk factors in child maltreatment: a meta-analytic review of the literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior 14, 13–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, B (2014) The Countries That Will Be Most Impacted by Aging Population. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
Teaster, PB, Wangmo, T and Anetzberger, GJ (2010) A glass half full: the dubious history of elder abuse policy. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect 22, 6–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tong, A, Flemming, K, McInnes, E, Oliver, S and Craig, J (2012) Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ. BMC Medical Research Methodology 12, 181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trickett, PK and McBride-Chang, C (1995) The developmental impact of different forms of child abuse and neglect. Developmental Review 15, 311–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
US Census Bureau (2017) Facts for Features: Older Americans Month: May 2017. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau.Google Scholar
Wei, GS and Herbers, JE (2004) Reporting elder abuse: a medical, legal, and ethical overview. Journal of the American Medical Women's Association 59, 248–254.Google ScholarPubMed
Weible, CM, Sabatier, PA, Jenkins-Smith, HC, Nohrstedt, D, Henry, AD and DeLeon, P (2011) A quarter century of the advocacy coalition framework: an introduction to the special issue. Policy Studies Journal 39, 349–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, DA (2003) Elder abuse intervention: lessons from child abuse and domestic violence initiatives. In National Research Council (ed.), Elder Mistreatment: Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation in an Aging America. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, pp. 501–525.Google Scholar
Wood, E and Quinn, MJ (2017) Guardianship systems. In Dong, X (ed.), Elder Abuse: Research, Practice and Policy. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, pp. 363–386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood, E, Teaster, P and Cassidy, J (2017) Restoration of Rights in Adult Guardianship. Washington, DC: American Bar Association Commission on Law and Aging.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (2018) Elder Abuse. Available at https://www.who.int/ageing/projects/elder_abuse/en/.Google Scholar
Yaffe, MJ, Wolfson, C, Lithwick, M and Weiss, D (2008) Development and validation of a tool to improve physician identification of elder abuse: the Elder Abuse Suspicion Index (EASI)©. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect 20, 276–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar