Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T13:24:24.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Architecture and the Swedish welfare state: three architectural competitions that innovated space for dependent and frail older people

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2014

JONAS E. ANDERSSON
JONAS E. ANDERSSON*
Affiliation:
School of Architecture, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
*
Address for correspondence: Jonas E. Andersson, School of Architecture, Royal Institute of Technology, KTH, Stockholm, Sweden. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In 2012, three architectural competitions were held as part of the strategic programme ‘Living Well, Growing Old’, launched by the Swedish government in 2010. The intention was to use the innovative quality of the architectural competition in order to conceive future-oriented built environments for the ageing Swedish society. In Sweden, several architectural competitions with a focus on space for dependent and frail older people have been organised over the past century. Architectural design has been incorporated into reforms for social care of older people. This study focuses on the relationship between architecture and socio-political visions in three architectural competitions, realised in 1907, 1948 and 1979. The study demonstrates that architectural competitions within this field are more than a list of functional and spatial requirements for architects to respect. Instead, they are socio-political statements that define spatial frameworks within an ideological view on how ethically to provide care for dependent and frail older people in a welfare regime.

Keywords

architectureresidential homeswelfare regimessocio-political reforms
Type
Articles
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 35 , Issue 4 , April 2015 , pp. 837 - 864
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramson, M. and Niedomysl, T. 2008. Äldre personers flyttningar och boendepreferenser [Older Persons’ Housing Preferences and Changes of Housing]. Äldreboendedelegationen, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Andersson, J. E. 2011. Architecture and Ageing. On the Interaction Between Frail Older People and the Built Environment. Department of Architecture and the Built Environments, School of Architecture, Royal Institute of Technology, KTH, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Andrews, G. J. 2005. Residential homes. From distribution in space to the elements of place. In Andrews, G. J. and Philips, D. R. (eds), Ageing and Place. Perspectives, Policy, Practice. Routledge, London, 61–78.Google Scholar
Asklund, L. 1967. ‘Dom sitter och dom ligger’, angående vården på ålderdomshemmen [‘They Are Sitting Down or Lying Down’. On Care and Caring in the Old People's Homes]. Sveriges Radios Förlag AB, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Berge, A. 2007. Sjukvårdens underklass: sjukvården i den kommunala fattigvården 1910–1950 [Medicine for the Lower Classes: Medical Services as Offered by the Municipal Poor Relief Aid 1910–1950]. Boréa Bokförlag, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Bergh, A. 1996. Vad döljs bakom ‘hemlikhetens vind’ [What is hidden on the ‘attic of homelikeness’]. In Gaunt, D. and Lantz, G. (eds), Hemmet i vården, vården i hemmet [The Home Environment in a Care Perspective, Care Services in the Home Environment]. Liber Förlag i samarbete med Ersta vård-etiska institutet, Stockholm, 121–35.Google Scholar
Bloxham Zettersten, G. 2007. Political Behaviour and Architectonic Vision: Two Swedish/Danish Processes in Contemporary Public Architecture. Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1980. The production of belief: contribution to an economy of symbolic goods. Media, Culture and Society, 1980, 2, 3, 261–93.Google Scholar
Brodin, H. 2005. Does Anybody Care? Public and Private Responsibilities in Swedish Eldercare 1940–2000. Studies in Economic History, University of Umeå, Umeå, Sweden.Google Scholar
Brummett, B. 2010. Techniques of Close Reading. Sage, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Buttimer, A. 1980. Home, reach, and the sense of place. In Buttimer, A. and Seamon, D. (eds), The Human Experience of Space and Place. Croom Helm, London, 166–86.Google Scholar
Callon, M. 2001. Actor Network Theory. In Smelser, N. J. and Baltes, P. B. (eds), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. Pergamon, Oxford, 62–6. ISBN 9780080430768, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/03168-5. (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B0080430767031685)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darke, J. 1984. The primary generator and the design process. In Cross, N. (ed.), Developments in Design Methodology. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 175–88.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Frampton, K. 1982. Modern Architecture. A Critical History. Thames and Hudson, London.Google Scholar
Gaunt, D. 1995. Ivar Lo, de radikala pensionärerna och striden mot ålderdomshemsfrågan 1949 [Ivar Lo, the radical pensioners and the battle against the expansion of new old people's homes in 1949]. Socialvetenskaplig tidskrift, 4, 2, 370–89.Google Scholar
Gaunt, D. 1996. Hemvård istället för vårdhem [Care services in the home environment instead of nursing homes]. In Gaunt, D. and Lantz, G. (eds), Hemmet i vården, vården i hemmet [The Home Environment in a Care Perspective, Care Services in the Home Environment]. Liber Förlag i samarbete med Ersta vård-etiska institutet, Stockholm, 39–64.Google Scholar
Gaunt, D. 1999. Från Brantings soldater till folkhemmets paria [From Branting's soldiers to the outcasts of the Swedish Welfare State]. In Sveriges Pensionärsförbund – kommunistiskt, borgerligt, opolitiskt? 1939–1999 – sextio år av varierad framtoning [Swedish Pensioners’ Association: Communists, Conservatists, Unpolitical? Sixty Years with a Shifting Image, 1939–1999]. SPF Förlag, Stockholm, 6–79.Google Scholar
Göransson, V. and Sundbärg, G. 1933. Ålderdomshem i Sverige [Old people's homes in Sweden]. Byggmästaren, 26, 133–41.Google Scholar
Grenier, A. M. 2005. The contextual and social locations of older women's experiences of disability and decline. Journal of Aging Studies, 19, 2, 131–46.Google Scholar
Hansson, M. 1989. Bo bra på sjukhem. Förbättringar av befintliga långvårdsbyggnader [Living Well in a Nursing Home. Refurbishments of Existing Buildings for Long-term Care]. Sjukvårdens Planerings- och Rationaliseringsinstitut (SPRI), Stockholm.Google Scholar
Hedin, M. 2002. Ett liberalt dilemma – Ernst Beckman, Emilia Broomé, G.H. von Koch och den sociala frågan 1880–1930 [A Liberal Dilemma: Ernst Beckman, Emilia Broomé, G.H. von Koch and the Social Matter, 1880–1930]. Department for History, Stockholm University, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Höjer, K. 1952. Svensk socialpolitisk historia [Swedish Socio-political History]. PA Nordstedt & Söners förlag, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Johansson, B. and Andersson, G. 1979. Ålderdomshem eller servicehus: en jämförelse mellan personer som bor på ålderdomshem och servicehus [Old People's Homes or Housing with Services: A Comparative Study of Residents in an Old People's Home and in a Residence with Services]. Institutet för gerontologi, Jönköping, Sweden.Google Scholar
Johansson, R. 2000. Ett bra fall är ett steg framåt. Om fallstudier, historiska studier och historiska fallstudier [A good case is a step forward. On case studies, historical studies and historical case studies]. Nordisk Arkitekturforskning [Nordic Journal of Architectural Research], 13, 1/2, 65–71.Google Scholar
Jönsson, H. 2001. Det moderna åldrandet. Pensionärsorganisationernas bilder av äldre 1941–1995 [The Modern Ageing Process. The Representation of Older People by Interest Organizations 1941–1995]. Faculty of Social Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.Google Scholar
Koch von, G. 1937. Fattigvård och barnavård 1919–1937. En översikt [Poor Relief Aid and Children Care, 1919–1937. An Overview]. Kungl. Socialstyrelsen, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Küller, R. 1991. Familiar design helps dementia patients to cope. In Preisler, W. F. E., Vischer, J. C. and White, E. T. (eds), Design Intervention: Towards a More Human Architecture. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 255–68.Google Scholar
Kungl. Socialstyrelsen 1948. Program för idétävling om förslag till ålderdomshem, utlyst av Kungl. Socialstyrelsen [Competition Programme for the Architectural Competition Concerning Ideas for New Old People's Homes, Announced by the Royal Swedish Board for Health and Social Welfare]. Kungl. Socialstyrelsen, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Kungl. Socialstyrelsen 1949. Prisnämndens utlåtande rörande idétävling om förslag till ålderdomshem [The Prize Committee's Report on the Architectural Competition Concerning Ideas for New Old People's Homes]. Kungl. Socialstyrelsen, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Kungl. Socialstyrelsen 1950. Idéförslag till ålderdomshem. De 12 belönade förslagen med smärre modifikationer i 30 blad [Idea Solutions for Old People's Homes. The 12 Rewarded Proposals with Minor Adjustments in 30 Sheets]. Kungl. Socialstyrelsen, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Kungl. Socialstyrelsen 1955. De kommunala ålderdomshemmens uppgifter [The Tasks of the Municipal Old People's Homes]. Kungl. Socialstyrelsen, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Kungl. Socialstyrelsen 1965. Ansvaret för ålderdomshemmen [The Responsibility for the Old People's Home]. Kungl. Socialstyrelsen, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Kungl. Socialstyrelsen 1967. De kommunala ålderdomshemmens uppgifter och verksamhet [The Activities and Tasks for the Municipal Old People's Homes]. Kungl. Socialstyrelsen, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Lapierre, S., Bouffard, L. and Bastin, E. 1997. Personal goals and subjective well-being in later life. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 45, 4, 287–303.Google Scholar
Laws, G. 1997. Spatiality and age relations. In Jamieson, A., Harper, S. and Victor, C. (eds), Critical Approaches to Ageing and Later Life. Open University Press, Buckingham, UK, 90–101.Google Scholar
Lidmar, K. 1980. Från ålderdomshem till servicehus. Sammanfattning av en studie [From the Old People's Home to Housing with Services. An Overview of the Study]. Socialstyrelsen, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Lidmar, K. 1981. Från ålderdomshem till servicehus. Ett historiskt perspektiv [From the Old People's Home to Housing with Services. A Historical Perspective]. Kungl. Socialstyrelsen, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Lipstadt, H. 2011. Experimenting with the experimental tradition 1989–2009: on competitions and architecture research. In Rönn, M. K. R. and Andersson, J. (eds), The Architectural Competition. Research Inquiries and Experiences. Axl Books, Stockholm, 37–71.Google Scholar
Lo-Johansson, I. 1949. Ålderdom [Old Age]. Veckotidningen VI/ KF:s bokförlag, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Lo-Johansson, I. 1952. Ålderdoms-Sverige. En stridsskrift [Old Age – Sweden. A Pamphlet]. Alb. Bonniers förlag, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Lo-Johansson, I. 1966. Analfabeten [The Illiterate]. Alb. Bonniers förlag, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Lundquist, L. 1997. Fattigvårdsfolket. Ett nätverk i den sociala frågan 1900–1920 [The Poor Relief People: A Network in Social Policy 1900–1920]. Lund University Press, Lund, Sweden.Google Scholar
Mangematin, V. and Callon, M. 1995. Technological competition, strategies of the firms and the choice of the first users: the case of road guidance technologies. Research Policy, 24, 3, 441–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsden, J. and Kaplan, R. 1999. Communicating homeyness from the outside. Elderly people's perceptions of assisted living. In Schwarz, B. and Brent, R. (eds), Aging, Autonomy and Architecture. Advances in Assisted Living. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, 207–28.Google Scholar
Martinson, H. 1935. Nässlorna blomma [Flowering Nettles]. Alb. Bonniers förlag, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Milligan, C. 2009. There's No Place Like Home: Place and Care in an Ageing Society. Ashgate, Farnham, UK.Google Scholar
Nirje, B. 1992. The normalization principle and its human management implications. In Nirje, B. (ed.), The Normalization Principle Papers. Centre for Handicap Research, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden, 18–25.Google Scholar
Östnäs, A. 1984. Arkitekterna och deras yrkesutveckling i Sverige [The Architects and Their Professional Development in Sweden]. Faculty of Architecture, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.Google Scholar
Pallasmaa, J. 2001. Space, place, memory and imagination. The temporal dimension of existential space. In Treib, M. (ed.), Spatial Recall. Memory in Architecture and Landscape. Routledge, London, 16–41.Google Scholar
Pauli, E. 1906. Fattigvård och folkuppfostran, föredrag hållet vid kongressen för fattigvård och folkförsäkring den 6 oktober 1906 [Poor Relief Aid and the Education of Common People. Presentation Held at the Congress for Poor Relief Aid and Social Insurance, 6 October 1906]. Centralförbundets för socialt arbete (CSA) fattigvårdskommitté, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Pensionärsundersökningen 1977. Pensionär 75, en kartläggning med framtidsaspekter [Pensioner 75, a Survey of Future-oriented Aspects]. SOU 1977:98, Statens Offentliga Utredningar [Swedish Government Official Reports], Stockholm.Google Scholar
Rice, C. 2009. The Emergence of the Interior Architecture, Modernity, Domesticity. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Rowles, G. 2000. Habituation and being in place. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 20, (suppl. 1), 52–67.Google Scholar
Rustad, R. 2009. ‘Hvad er tidsmessig arkitektur’. En undersoekelse av arkitekturens diskursive rammer gjennom tre arkitektkonkurranser og tre tidssnitt [Define Contemporary Architecture: An Inquiry into the Discursive Framework of Architecture as Reflected Through Three Architectural Competitions and Three Epoques]. Norges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige Universitet, Trondheim, Norway.Google Scholar
Sandström, U. 1989. Arkitektur och social ingenjörskonst. Studier i svensk arkitektur- och bostadsforskning [Architecture and Social Engineering. Studies on Swedish Research on Architecture and Housing]. Tema teknik och social förändring [Studies in Arts and Science], Linköpongs Universitet, Linköping, Sweden.Google Scholar
Schwarz, B. 1997. Nursing home design: a misguided architectural model. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 14, 4, 343–59.Google Scholar
Selander, M. 2001. Mångfaldens problematik, om mötet mellan Ädelreformen och sjukhemmets verksamhet [Problems of Plurality, on the Meeting Between the Swedish Ädel Reform and the Activities of the Nursing Home]. Göteborgs University, Gothenburg, Sweden.Google Scholar
SAA 2012. Juryutlåtande arkitekttävling: bebyggelse av bostäder för äldre vid Kronetorps gård i Burlövs kommun [Jury assessment report of the architectural competition: Development of new housing for older people at the Kronotorp Manor in the municipality of Burlöv], Sveriges Arkitekter [Swedish Association of Architects, SAA], Stockholm.Google Scholar
Sjögren, M. 1997. Fattigvård och folkuppfostran [Poor Relief Aid and the Upbringing of Common People]. Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.Google Scholar
Sjukvårdens Planerings- och Rationaliseringsinstitut (SPRI) 1968. 9 ålderdomshem – en sammanställning [Nine Old People's Homes – A Survey]. SPRI, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Sjukvårdens Planerings- och Rationaliseringsinstitut (SPRI) 1971. Ålderdomshem och dagcentraler – lokalprogram med kommentarer [Old people's homes and day care centres, commented spatial requirements]. Råd 5.3 November, SPRI, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Sjukvårdens Planerings- och Rationaliseringsinstitut (SPRI) 1976. Sjukvårdshuvudmännens planer till 1985 – sammanställning i siffror [The Authorities for Medical Care: The Planning for 1985 in numbers]. SPRI, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Sjukvårdens Planerings- och Rationaliseringsinstitut (SPRI) 1979 a. Lokala sjukhem. Program för allmän idétävling [Local Nursing Homes. Programme for an Open Architectural Competition on New Ideas]. SPRI, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Sjukvårdens Planerings- och Rationaliseringsinstitut (SPRI) 1979 b. Lokala sjukhem. Underlag för planering och projektering [Local Nursing Homes. Requirements for Planning and Realisation]. SPRI, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Sjukvårdens Planerings- och Rationaliseringsinstitut (SPRI) 1980. Lokala sjukhem. Åtta förslag till en bättre vård- och arbetsmiljö inom långtidssjukvården. Spris arkitekttävling 1979/80 – inköpta och bearbetade förslag [Local Nursing Homes. Eight Proposals for an Improved Care and Work Environment for Buildings Intended for Long-term Care. The SPRI Architectural Competition in 1979/80: Purchased and Revised Proposals]. SPRI, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Social Allowance Committee (SAC) 1946. Utredning och förslag angående Ålderdomshem mm [Report and Suggestions Concerning the Old People's Home, and Other Matters]. Statens Offentliga Utredningar [Swedish Government Official Reports], Stockholm.Google Scholar
Socialstyrelsen 1970. Planering av ålderdomshem [Planning Recommendations for Old People's Homes]. Socialstyrelsen, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Socialutredningen 1977. Socialtjänstlagen och socialförsäkringstillägg. Lagar och motiv [The Social Services Law and Additional Social Insurances. Legal Background and Motives]. Statens Offentliga Utredningar [Swedish Government Official Reports], Stockholm.Google Scholar
Stake, R. E. 1995. The Art of Case Study Research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, California.Google Scholar
Statistics Sweden 2013. Folkmängd den 1 november efter region, ålder och kön. År 2002–2012 [Swedish Population by 1 November, Distributed According to Region, Age and Gender. Period 2002–2012]. Statistics Sweden, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Svenska Fattigvårdsförbundet 1907. Svenska Fattigvårdsförbundets pristäfling [The architectural competition of the Swedish Association for Poor Relief Aid]. Svenska Fattigvårdsförbundets tidskrift, 1, 3, 108–14.Google Scholar
Svenska Kommunförbundet 1968. Ålderdomshem: samband mellan storlek och driftskostnader [The Old People's Home, on the Relationship Between Surface and Maintenance Costs]. Svenska Kommunförbundet, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Szebehely, M. 1995. Vardagens organisering. Om vårdbiträden och gamla i hemtjänsten [The Organization of Everyday Living. Older People, Nursing staff and Elder-care]. School of Social Work, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.Google Scholar
Tostrup, E. 1999. Architecture and Rhetoric. Text and Design in Architectural Competitions, Oslo 1939–1997. Andreas Papadakis Publisher, London.Google Scholar
Virke, T. 1950. Reflexioner över två tävlingar om ålderdomshem [Reflections on two architectural competitions concerning old people's homes]. Byggmästaren [The Master Builder], 18, 356–76.Google Scholar
Wånell, S. and Schön, P. 2005. [Home sweet home. A study on the characteristics of a service housing and housing for senior residents and how the conversion process has been implemented in the city of Stockholm]. Stiftelsen Stockholms Läns Äldrecentrum, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Wassing, Å. 1961. Slottet i dalen [The Palace in the Valley]. Alb. Bonniers förlag, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Wilde, B., Larsson, G., Larsson, M. and Starrin, B. 1995. Quality of care from the elderly person's perspective: subjective importance and perceived reality. Aging: Clinical and Experimental Research, 7, 140–9.Google ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization 2002. Active Ageing: A Policy Framework. World Health Organization, Geneva. Available online at http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2002/WHO_NMH_NPH_02.8.pdf (accessed online 15 March 2008).Google Scholar
Yin, R. K. 2003. Case Study Research, Design and Methods. Sage, Thousands Oaks, California.Google Scholar