Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T00:08:20.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Inductive Approach to the Investigation of Elder Abuse

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2008

R. Todd Zdorkowski  and
Michael W. Galbraith
R. Todd Zdorkowski
Affiliation:
Research and Testing Specialist, State Department of Vocational and Technical Education, Stillwater, Oklahoma, USA, 74078.
Michael W. Galbraith
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor of Higher and Adult Education, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia Missouri, USA, 65211.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The findings of the elder abuse surveys conducted in the United States are not strictly comparable, although they may be combined to suggest a more organised approach to elder abuse research. This paper presents a model of elder abuse derived from those studies, and suggests that abuse is the predictable outcome of the interactions between and among elders' and abusers' characteristics. A list of the research hypotheses suggested by the model is presented, two forms of analysis that could be used to test them are described, and the implications of this model for scholars and practitioners are outlined.

Type
Research Article
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 5 , Issue 4 , December 1985 , pp. 413 - 429
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

1 U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee on Aging. Elder Abuse: An Examination of a Hidden Problem (Publication No. 97–277). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1981.Google Scholar

2 Lau, E. & Kosberg, J., Abuse of the elderly by informal care providers. Aging(09–10 1979), 10–15.Google Scholar

3 Block, M. & Sinnott, J. D. (eds.), The Battered Elder Syndrome: An Exploratory Study, University of Maryland Center on Aging, College Park, JD. 1979.Google Scholar

4 O'Malley, H., Bergman, J., Segars, H., Perex, R., Mitchel, V. and Kruepfel, G., Elder Abuse in Massachusetts: A Survey of Professionals and Paraprofessionals, Legal Research and Services for the Elderly, Boston, MA, 1979.Google Scholar

5 Douglass, R. L., Hickey, T. and Noel, C., A Study of Maltreatment of the Elderly and Other Vulnerable Adults. Final report to the United States Administration on Aging and the Michigan Department of Social Services. The Institute of Gerontology, the University of Michigan, 1980.Google Scholar

6 Kosberg, J. I. (ed.), Abuse and Maltreatment of the Elderly: Causes and Interventions, John Wright PSG, Littleton, MA, 1983.Google Scholar

7 Lau, E. and Kosberg, J.op. cit.Google Scholar

8 Block, M. and Sinnott, J.op. cit.Google Scholar

9 O'Malley, H. et al. , op. cit.Google Scholar

10 Douglass, R. et al. , op. cit.Google Scholar

11 Steinmetz, S. K., ‘Battered parents’, Society, 15 (1981), 54–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

12 Rathbone-McCuan, E., Intergenerational Family Violence and Neglect: The Aged as Victims of Reaction and Reverse Neglect, International Conference of Gerontology, Japan, 1978.Google Scholar

13 Rathbone-McCuan, E., ‘Elderly victims of family violence and neglect’, Social Casework (05 1980), 296–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

14 Crouse, J. S., Cobbs, D. C., Harris, B. B., Kopeckey, F. J. and Poertner, J., Abuse and Neglect of the Elderly in Illinois: Incidence and Characteristics, Legislation and Policy Recommendations. Springfield, Illinois, Department on Aging, 1981.Google Scholar

15 Walker, J. C., Protective services for the elderly: Connecticut's experience. In Kosberg, J. I. (ed.) Abuse and Maltreatment of the Elderly: Causes and Interventions. John Wright PSG, Littleton, MA, 1985, pp. 292–301.Google Scholar

16 U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee on Aging, op. cit.

17 Lau, E. and Kosberg, J., op. cit.Google Scholar

18 Block, M. and Sinnott, J., op. cit.Google Scholar

19 O'Malley, H. et al. , op. cit.Google Scholar

20 Douglass, R. et al. , op. cit.Google Scholar

21 Steinmetz, S., op. cit.Google Scholar

22 Rathbone-McCuan, E., op. cit.Google Scholar

24 U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee on Aging, op. cit.

25 Crouse, J. et al. , op. cit.Google Scholar

26 Walker, J. C., op. cit.Google Scholar

27 Bergman, J. A. Prepared statement. Abuse of Older Persons. Hearing before the subcommittee on Human Services of the Select Committee on Aging, House of Representatives. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1981.Google Scholar

28 Douglass, R. L. and Hickey, T., Domestic neglect and abuse of the elderly: research findings and a systems perspective for service delivery planning. In Kosberg, J. I. (ed.), Abuse and Maltreatment of the Elderly: Causes and Interventions, John Wright PSG, Littleton, MA, 1983, pp. 115–133.Google Scholar

29 Pedrick-Cornell, C. and Gelles, R., ‘Elder abuse: the status of current knowledge’, Family Relations, 31 (1983), 457–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

30 Renvoize, J., Web of Violence: A Study of Family Violence, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1978, p. 120.Google Scholar

31 Renvoize, J., op. cit., p. 121.Google Scholar

32 Ibid., p. 117.

33 Ibid., p. 116.

34 Ibid., p. 116.

35 McNabb, P., ‘Social structure’ in Newman, J. (ed.), The Limerick Rural Survey – 1958–1964, Muintir Na Tire Rural Publications, Tipperary, Ireland, 1964.Google Scholar

36 Strieb, G., ‘Old age in Ireland: demographic and sociological aspects’, in Cowgill, D. and Holmes, L. (eds.), Aging and Modernization, New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1972, p. 172.Google Scholar

37 de Beauvoir, S., The Coming of Age, New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons, 1972, pp. 208–209.Google Scholar

38 de Beauvoir, S., op. cit. p. 209.Google Scholar

39 Kendig, H., ‘Housing and living arrangements of the aged’, in Howe, A. (ed.), Towards an Older Australia, University of Queensland Press, St Lucia, 1981, p. 98.Google Scholar

40 Kendig, H., op. cit., pp. 98–99.Google Scholar

41 Swain, C., ‘Family roles and support’Google Scholar, in Howe, A. (ed.), op. cit., pp. 205–220.Google Scholar

42 Palmore, E., The Honorable Elders: A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Aging in Japan, Duke University Press, Durham, N.C., 1975.Google Scholar

43 Ishizuka, K., The Elder Japanese, Center on Aging, San Diego State University.Google Scholar

44 Galbraith, M. W. and Zdorkowski, R. T., ‘Teaching the investigation of elder abuse’, Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 10 (1984), 21–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

45 Galbraith, M. W. and Zdorkowski, R. T., ‘Heuristic models of elder abuse: implications for the practitioner’, Lifelong Learning: An Omnibus of Practice and Research, 7 (1984), 16–21.Google Scholar

46 Galbraith, M. W. and Zdorkowski, R. T., ‘A preliminary model of elder abuse’, Free Inquiry in Creative Sociology, 13 (1985), 10–14.Google Scholar

47 Block, M. and Sinnott, J., op. cit.Google Scholar

48 Hickey, T., Neglect and Abuse of the Elderly: Implications of a Developmental Model for Research and Intervention, unpublished paper, the University of Michigan, School of Public Health, 1979.Google Scholar

49 O'Malley, H. et al. , op. cit.Google Scholar

50 Steinmetz, S. K., ‘Dependency, stress, and violence between middle-aged caregivers and their elderly parents’, in Kosberg, J. I. (ed.), Abuse and Maltreatment of the Elderly: Causes and Interventions, John Wright PSG, Littleton, MA, 1983, pp. 134–149.Google Scholar

51 Viano, E. C., ‘Victimology: an overview’Google Scholar, in Kosberg, J. I. (ed.), op. cit., pp. 1–18.Google Scholar

52 Hickey, T. and Douglass, R. L., ‘Neglect and abuse of older family members: professionals' perspectives and case experiences’, The Gerontologist, 21 (1981), 171–176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed