Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T09:18:20.730Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Age norms for older adults among Koreans: perceptions and influencing factors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 April 2013

SOONDOOL CHUNG  and
YUNKYUNG JUNG
SOONDOOL CHUNG
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Social Welfare, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.
YUNKYUNG JUNG*
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Social Welfare, The University of Suwon, Hwaseong, Korea.
*
Address for correspondence: Yunkyung Jung, 17, Wauan-gil, Bongdam-eup, Hwaseong, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Despite rapid social change that has influenced the social status of older adults, expectations about their behaviour and whether such expectations differ across generations remain unexplored in Korea. Based on ageing theories of activity, disengagement and modernisation, this study investigated age norms among Koreans conceptualised as shared expectations of appropriate behaviours of older adults. Competing perspectives in intergenerational relations and prejudice toward older adults were examined to test if they influenced age norms and if such associations varied across different age groups. Data were analysed from a survey of 1,445 individuals aged 20 and above who resided in 16 administrative districts of Korea. Comparisons of age norms across age groups indicated that the older adult group (age 65+) held more restrictive attitudes about social participation and engagement in various behaviours in old age than the middle-aged adults (ages 45–64) and younger adults (ages 20–44). Respondents with more prejudice towards older adults tended to place more restrictions on the behaviour of older adults. A significant interaction indicated that respondents whose views were in line with a generational conflictive perspective, assessed as reporting more competitive perspectives between young and old people and being less supportive of intergenerational programmes, had a more restrictive view about older adults' behaviours among the middle-aged group but less restrictive attitudes in determining acceptable behaviour in later life among the older adult group.

Keywords

age normsintergenerational relationage-integrated society
Type
Articles
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 34 , Issue 8 , September 2014 , pp. 1335 - 1355
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aboderine, I. 2004. Modernisation and ageing theory revisited: current explanations of recent developing world and historical Western shifts in material family support for older adults. Ageing & Society, 24, 1, 29–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Achenbaum, A. W. and Bengtson, V. 1994. Re-engaging the disengagement theory of aging: on the history and assessment of theory development in gerontology. The Gerontologist, 34, 6, 756–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Byrd, M. and Bruess, T. 1992. Perceptions of sociological and psychological age norms by young, middle-aged, and elderly New Zealanders. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 34, 2, 145–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chang, K. 2003. The state and families in South Korea's compressed fertility transition: a time for policy reversal? Journal of Population and Social Security (Population) 1, supplement, 598–610. (In Korean)Google Scholar
Chee, Y. K. 2000. Elder care in Korea: the future is now. Ageing International, Summer/Fall, 25–37.Google Scholar
Choi, S. 1996. Aging and social policy in Korea. Korea Journal of Population and Development, 25, 1, 1–25.Google Scholar
Choi, S., Cheong, J., Cho, S. and Jin, S. 2009. The effects of voluntary activities, attitudes and contentment of university students toward the elderly on awareness of supporting, and the mediating effects of the attitude toward the elderly. Journal of Welfare for the Aged, 46, 239–62. (In Korean)Google Scholar
Choi, S. and Han, J. 2007. Effects of intergenerational service-learning programs: focusing on the youth and institutionalized elderly. Journal of the Korean Gerontological Society, 27, 1, 163–77. (In Korean)Google Scholar
Chung, K. 2004. Population aging and age-integrated society. Korean Social Research, 7, 11–26. (In Korean)Google Scholar
Chung, S., Choi, H., Bae, E. and Lee, K. 2011. Risk perception of an ageing society. Korean Journal of Gerontology, 31, 3, 813–30. (In Korean)Google Scholar
Cowgill, D. O. 1972. A theory of aging in cross-cultural perspective. In Cowgill, D. O. and Holms, L. D. (eds), Aging and Modernization. Appleton Century Crofts, New York, 1–14.Google Scholar
Cuddy, A. J. C., Norton, M. I. and Fiske, S. T. 2005. This old stereotype: the pervasiveness and persistence of the elderly stereotype. Journal of Social Issues, 61, 2, 265–83.Google Scholar
Cumming, E. and Henry, W. 1961. Growing Old: The Process of Disengagement. Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
Elder, G. 1975. Age differentiation and the life course. Annual Review of Sociology, 1, 165–90.Google Scholar
Eun, K. 2007. Lowest-low fertility in the Republic of Korea: causes, consequences and policy responses. Asia-Pacific Population Journal, 22, 2, 51–72.Google Scholar
Foner, A. 2000. Age integration or age conflict as society ages? The Gerontologist, 40, 3, 272–6.Google Scholar
Gee, E. M. 1990. Preferred timing of women's life events: a Canadian study. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 31, 4, 279–94.Google Scholar
Giles, H. and Reid, S. A. 2005. Ageism across the lifespan: towards a self-categorization model of aging. Journal of Social Issues, 61, 2, 389–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Government of the Republic of Korea 2010. Plan for Ageing Society and Population. Available online at http://www.korea.kr/archive/expDocView.do?docId=22496 [Accessed 13 July 2012].Google Scholar
Han, J. 2000. Undergraduate students’ attitudes toward elderly. Journal of the Korean Gerontological Society, 20, 3, 115–27.Google Scholar
Hori, S. 1994. Beginning of old age in Japan and age norms in adulthood. Educational Gerontology, 20, 5, 439–51.Google Scholar
Hummert, M. L. 1990. Multiple stereotypes of elderly and young adults: a comparison of structure and evaluation. Psychology and Aging, 5, 2, 182–93.Google Scholar
Katz, S. 2000. Busy bodies: activity, aging, and the management of everyday life. Journal of Aging Studies, 14, 2, 135–52.Google Scholar
Kim, J. 2006. Verification of the effectiveness of caregiving model on caregiving stress. The Korean Journal of Family Relations, 11, 1, 79–101. (In Korean)Google Scholar
Kim, J. 2009. The change in the status of older people in Korea in terms of ageism. Society and History, 82, 361–91. (In Korean)Google Scholar
Kim, W. 2002. Ageism as a form of oppression: social welfare response and implications. Social Welfare Policies, 14, 97–118. (In Korean)Google Scholar
Kite, M. E., Stockdale, G. D., Whitley, B. E. and Johnson, B. T. 2005. Attitudes toward younger and older adults: an updated meta-analytic review. Journal of Social Issues, 61, 2, 241–66.Google Scholar
Kwon, J. 2004. A study on the causal factors of elderly abuse. Journal of the Korean Gerontological Society, 24, 1, 1–19. (In Korean)Google Scholar
Lee, G. 2006. A study of age norms for later life in Korean society. Journal of the Korean Gerontological Society, 26, 1, 148–59.Google Scholar
Lee, S., Choi, I. and Kim, I. 2010. Generation Conflicts Experienced by Old Men and Women and Measures for Generation Cohesion in Korea. Korean Women's Development Institute, Seoul. (In Korean)Google Scholar
Lemon, B. W., Bengtson, V. L. and Peterson, J. A. 1972. An exploration of the activity theory of aging: activity types and life satisfaction among in-movers to a retirement community. Journal of Gerontology, 27, 511–23.Google Scholar
Levy, B. R. 2001. Eradication of ageism requires addressing the enemy within. The Gerontologist, 4, 5, 578–9.Google Scholar
Marini, M. M. 1984. Age sequencing norms in the transition to adulthood. Social Forces, 63, 1, 229–44.Google Scholar
Nam, S. 2004. Intergenerational conflict and integration in family. Korean Journal of Psychological and Social Issues, 10, 2, 1–15. (In Korean)Google Scholar
Neugarten, B. L., Moore, J. W. and Lowe, J. C. 1965. Age norms, age constraints, and adult socialization. American Journal of Sociology, 70, 6, 710–7.Google Scholar
Ng, S. H. 1998. Social psychology in an ageing world: ageism and intergenerational relations. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 99–116.Google Scholar
Paik, J. 2008. Differences of perceived successful aging according to traditional values for Korean elderly. Journal of Korean Gerontological Society, 28, 2, 227–49. (In Korean)Google Scholar
Paik, K. and Choi, H. 2007. Cross-cultural study of successful aging in Korean and Western society. Koran Journal of Home Management, 25, 2, 137–53. (In Korean)Google Scholar
Palmore, E. B. 1990. Ageism: Negative and Positive. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Park, G. 2011. Rethinking generational conflict in contemporary Korea: the search for economic dimensions. Korean Society, 12, 1, 3–25. (In Korean)Google Scholar
Park, J. 2009. Discourse on the generational labels and generational conflicts in Korea. Economy and Society, 81, 10–34. (In Korean)Google Scholar
Park, K. 2003. Diversity and structure of intergenerational relationship: elderly parents–adult children relations in Korea. Korean Journal of Sociology, 37, 2, 61–94. (In Korean)Google Scholar
Park, K. S., Phua, V., McNally, J. and Sun, R. 2005. Diversity and structure of intergenerational relationships: elderly parent–adult children relations in Korea. Journal of Cross-cultural Gerontology, 20, 4, 285–305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Park, K. and Yi, Y. 2001. Stereotypes of the elderly held by university students. Journal of the Korean Gerontological Society, 21, 2, 71–83. (In Korean)Google Scholar
Peterson, C. C. 1996. The ticking of the social clock: adults’ beliefs about the timing of transition events. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 42, 3, 189–203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phang, H., Shin, D., Kim, D. and Shin, H. 2004. Population Aging and the Labour Market. Korean Labour Institute, Seoul. (In Korean)Google Scholar
Riley, M. W. and Riley, J. W. 2000. Age integration: conceptual and historical background. The Gerontologist, 40, 3, 266–9.Google Scholar
Rook, K. S., Catalano, R. and Dooley, D. 1989. The timing of major life events: effects of departing from social clock. American Journal of Community Psychology, 17, 2, 233–57.Google Scholar
Rowe, J. W. and Kahn, R. L. 1997. Successful aging. The Gerontologist, 37, 4, 433–40.Google Scholar
Schmidt, D. F. and Boland, S. M. 1986. Structure of perceptions of older adults: evidence for multiple stereotypes. Psychology and Aging, 1, 3, 255–60.Google Scholar
Settersten, R. A. 2003. Age structuring and the rhythm of the life course. In Mortimer, J. T. and Shanahan, M. J. (eds), Handbook of the Life Course. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publisher, New York, 81–98.Google Scholar
Settersten, R. A. Jr. and Hagestad, G. O. 1996 a. What's the latest? Cultural deadlines for family transitions. The Gerontologist, 36, 2, 178–88.Google Scholar
Settersten, R. A. Jr. and Hagestad, G. O. 1996 b. What's the latest? II. Cultural deadlines for educational and work transitions. The Gerontologist, 36, 5, 602–13.Google Scholar
Settersten, R. A. and Mayer, K. U. 1997. The measurement of age, age structuring, and the life course. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 233–61.Google Scholar
Sherradan, M., Morrow-Howell, N., Hinterlong, J. and Rozario, P. 2001. Productive aging: theoretical choices and directions. In Morrow-Howell, N., Hinterlong, J. and Sherradan, M. (eds), Productive Aging: Concepts and Challenges. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, 260–84.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M., Burholt, V., Wenger, G. C. and Bengtson, V. L. 1998. Parent–child relations among very old parents in Wales and the United States: a test of modernization theory. Journal of Aging Studies, 12, 4, 387–409.Google Scholar
Sung, K. T. 1995. Measures and dimensions of filial piety in Korea. The Gerontologist, 35, 2, 240–7.Google Scholar
Sung, K. T. 1998. An exploration of actions of filial piety. Journal of Aging Studies, 12, 4, 369–86.Google Scholar
Sung, K. T. and Song, B. 2001. A new look at ideals and practices of filial piety: the case of exemplary filial persons. Global Economic Review, 30, 3, 35–49.Google Scholar
Tornstam, L. 1989. Gero-transcendence: a reformulation of the disengagement theory. Aging, 1, 55–63.Google Scholar
Turner, B. S. 1998. Ageing and generational conflicts: a reply to Sarah Irwin. British Journal of Sociology, 49, 2, 299–304.Google Scholar
Uhlenberg, P. 2000. Introduction: why study age integration? The Gerontologist, 40, 3, 261–5.Google Scholar
Won, Y. 2004. Factors affecting prejudice against older adults. Journal of the Korean Gerontological Society, 24, 1, 187–206.Google Scholar
Yang, S. 2004. A model of social role activities and its business plan for the rural elderly in Korea. Journal of Welfare for the Aged, 27, 119–45. (In Korean)Google Scholar
Yang, Y. 2012. Is adjustment to retirement an individual responsibility? Socio-contextual conditions and options available to retired persons: the Korean perspective. Ageing & Society, 32, 2, 177–95.Google Scholar