Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T10:40:12.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Whose Care? Whose Costs? Whose Benefit? A Critical Review of Research on Case Management and Informal Care

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2008

Gillian Parker
Affiliation:
Social Policy Research Unit, University of York, Heslington, York YO1 5DD, UK.

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baldwin, S. 1985. The Costs of Caring. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Baldwin, S. and Parker, G. 1989. The Griffiths report on community care. In Brenton, M. and Ungerson, C. (eds), Social Policy Review 1988–9 Longman, Harlow, Essex.Google Scholar
Callahan, J. 1989. Case management for the elderly: a panacea? Journal of Aging and Social Policy, 1, 1/2, 181–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Challis, D., Chessum, R., Chesterman, J., Luckett, R. and Woods, B. 1987. Community care for the frail elderly: an urban experiment. British Journal of Social Work, 18, supplement: 1342.Google Scholar
Challis, D. and Davies, B. 1985. Long term care for the elderly: the community care scheme. British Journal of Social Work, 15, 563–79.Google Scholar
Chesterman, J., Challis, D. and Davies, B. 1987. Long term care at home for the elderly: a four year follow up. British Journal of Social Work, 18 (supplement), 4354.Google Scholar
Department of Health 1989. Caring for People: Community Care in the Next Decade and Beyond, Cmd 849. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Glendinning, C. 1989. The financial Needs and Circumstances of Informal Carers: Final Report, Social Policy Research Unit, University of York, Working Paper DHSS 529 4/89 CG.Google Scholar
Griffiths, R. 1988. Community Care: An Agenda for Action. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
House of Commons Social Services Committee 1989/1990. Community Care: Carers, Fifth report. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Hyman, M. 1977. The Extra Costs of Disabled Living. DIG/ARC, London.Google Scholar
Joshi, H. 1987. The cost of caring. In Glendinning, C. and Millar, J. (eds), Women and Poverty. Wheatsheaf, Brighton, Sussex.Google Scholar
Lewis, J. and Meredith, B. 1988. Daughters Who Care: Daughters Caring for Mothers at Home, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, E. 1990. Social Security and Community Care: The Case of the Invalid Care Allowance, Department of Social Services Research Reports. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Nissel, M. and Bonnerjea, L. 1982. Family Care of the Handicapped Elderly: Who Pays? Policy Studies Institute, London.Google Scholar
Parker, G. 1989. A Study of Non-elderly Spouse Carers: Final Report, Social Policy Research Unit, University of York, Working Paper DHSS 501.Google Scholar
Parker, G. 1990a. Spouses carers: whose quality of life? In Baldwin, S., Godfrey, C. and Propper, C. (eds), Quality of Life: Perspectives and Policies. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Parker, G. 1990b. With Due Care and Attention: A Review of Research on Informal Care, second edition. Family Policy Studies Centre, London.Google Scholar
Smyth, M. and Robus, N. 1989. The Financial Circumstances of Families With Disabled Children Living in Private Households. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Twigg, J., Atkin, K. and Perring, C. (1990). Carers and Services: A Review of Research. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Ungerson, C. 1987. Policy is Personal: Sex, Gender and Informal Care. Tavistock, London.Google Scholar
Waring, M. 1989. If Women Counted: A New Feminist Economics. Macmillan, London.Google Scholar