Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:28:07.447Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

State care provision, societal opinion and children's care of older parents in 11 European countries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 October 2009

KLAUS HABERKERN  and
MARC SZYDLIK
KLAUS HABERKERN*
Affiliation:
Institute of Sociology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
MARC SZYDLIK
Affiliation:
Institute of Sociology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
*
Address for correspondence: Klaus Haberkern, Institute of Sociology, University of Zurich, Andreasst. 15, Zurich 8050, Switzerland. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Dependent older people are predominantly cared for by family members, mostly partners and children, but not every parent in need is cared for by a child, and intergenerational care varies widely across Europe. Previous studies have used care regimes to explain these differences, but because of the lack of large comparative surveys, the prevalence of intergenerational care has rarely been related directly to the institutional and cultural context, including state care provision, legal obligations between family members, and societal opinion about the role of the state in elderly care. This paper reports an analysis of variations in intergenerational care among European countries and the reasons for these differences using data from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe for Austria, Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, The Netherlands, Spain, Sweden and Switzerland. Results from logistic multilevel models show that care by children is influenced by the individual characteristics of both parents and children, and by family structures, welfare-state institutions and cultural norms. Intergenerational care is more prevalent in southern and central European countries, where children are legally obligated to support parents in need, and care is perceived as a responsibility of the family, whereas in northern Europe, the wider availability of formal care services enable adult children, particularly daughters, have more choice about their activities and use of time.

Keywords

careintergenerational solidaritycrowding outinternational comparisonsformal carelegal obligations
Type
Articles
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , February 2010 , pp. 299 - 323
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, R. 2004. Working carers in the European Union. In Harper, S. (ed.), Families in Ageing Societies: A Multi-disciplinary Approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 95–113.Google Scholar
Anttonen, A. and Sipiliä, J. 1996. European social care services: is it possible to identify models? Journal of European Social Policy, 6, 2, 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arber, S. and Ginn, J. 1995. Gender differences in the relationship between paid employment and informal care. Work, Employment and Society, 9, 3, 445–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arts, W. and Gelissen, J. 2002. Three worlds of welfare capitalism or more? A state-of-the-art report. Journal of European Social Policy, 12, 2, 137–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Attias-Donfut, C., Ogg, J. and Wolff, F.-C. 2005. European patterns of intergenerational financial and time transfers. European Journal of Ageing, 2, 3, 161–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Attias-Donfut, C. and Wolff, F.-C. 2000. Complementarity between private and public transfers. In Arber, S. and Attias-Donfut, C. (eds), The Myth of Generational Conflict: The Family and State in Ageing Societies. Routledge, London, 47–68.Google Scholar
Behning, U. 2005. Changing long-term care regimes: a six-country comparison of directions and effects. In Pfau-Effinger, B. and Geissler, B. (eds), Care and Social Integration in European Societies. Policy, Bristol, UK, 73–91.Google Scholar
Bender, D. 1994. Betreuung von hilfs- oder pflegebedürftigen Angehörigen in Mehrgenerationenfamilien [Care of dependent relatives in multi-generational families]. In Bien, W. (ed.), Eigeninteresse oder Solidarität: Beziehungen in modernen Mehrgenerationenfamilien [Self-interest and Solidarity: Relationships in Modern Multigenerational Families]. Leske and Budrich, Opladen, Germany, 223–48.Google Scholar
Berger-Schmitt, R. 2003. Betreuung und Pflege alter Menschen in den Ländern der Europäischen Union – Perspektiven zur Rolle familialer Netzwerke [Elderly support and care in European Union countries: perspectives on the role of family networks]. In Allmendinger, J. (ed.), Entstaatlichung und Soziale Sicherheit [Denationalisation and Social Security]. Proceedings of the 31st Congress of the German Sociological Association, Leipzig 2002, Leske and Budrich, Opladen, Germany. [CD-ROM].Google Scholar
Bettio, F. and Plantenga, J. 2004. Comparing care regimes in Europe. Feminist Economics, 10, 1, 85–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blinkert, B. and Klie, T. 2004. Gesellschaftlicher Wandel und demografische Veränderungen als Herausforderungen für die Sicherstellung der Versorgung pflegebedürftiger Menschen [Societal and demographic change as challenges for the provision of care services to people in need of care]. Sozialer Fortschritt, 53, 11/12, 319–25.Google Scholar
Börsch-Supan, A., Hank, K. and Jürges, H. 2005. A New Comprehensive and International View on Ageing: The Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe. Research Institute for the Economics of Ageing, Mannheim, Germany.Google ScholarPubMed
Börsch-Supan, A. and Jürges, H. (eds)2005. Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe: Methodology. Research Institute for the Economics of Ageing, Mannheim, Germany.Google Scholar
Brandt, M., Haberkern, K. and Szydlik, M. 2009. Intergenerational help and care in Europe. European Sociological Review, doi:10.1093/esr/jcn076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, M. and Szydlik, M. 2008. Soziale Dienste und Hilfe zwischen Generationen in Europa [Social services and help between generations]. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 37, 4, 301–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broese van Groenou, M., Glaser, K., Tomassini, C. and Jacobs, T. 2006. Socio-economic status differences in older people's use of informal and formal help: a comparison of four European countries. Ageing & Society, 26, 5, 745–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend 2006. Siebter Familienbericht. Familie zwischen Flexibilität und Verlässlichkeit – Perspektiven für eine lebenslaufbezogene Familienpolitik [Seventh Family Report. Families Between Flexibility and Dependability: Perspectives for a Life Cycle-related Family Policy]. Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend, Berlin.Google Scholar
Campbell, L. D. and Martin Matthews, A. 2003. The gendered nature of men's filial care. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 58B, 6, S350–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connidis, I. A. 2001. Family Ties and Aging. Sage, Thousand Oaks, California.Google Scholar
Da Roit, B. 2007. Changing intergenerational solidarities within families in a Mediterranean welfare state: elderly care in Italy. Current Sociology, 55, 2, 251–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daatland, S. O. 2001. Ageing, families and welfare systems: comparative perspectives. Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 34, 1, 16–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daatland, S. O. and Herlofson, K. 2003 a. Families and welfare states: substitution or complementarity. In Lowenstein, A. and Ogg, J. (eds), OASIS: Old Age and Autonomy: The Role of Service Systems and Intergenerational Family Solidarity. Final Report, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel, 281–305.Google Scholar
Daatland, S. O. and Herlofson, K. 2003 b. Norms and ideals about elder care in a European comparative perspective. In Lowenstein, A. and Ogg, J. (eds), OASIS: Old Age and Autonomy: The Role of Service Systems and Intergenerational Family Solidarity. Final Report, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel, 125–63.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Polity, Cambridge.Google Scholar
European Commission 2007. Health and Long-term Care in the European Union. Special Eurobarometer Report 283, European Commission, Brussels. Available online at http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_283_en.pdf [Accessed 4 June 2009].Google Scholar
Ferrara, M. 1998. The four ‘Social Europes’: between universalism and selectivism. In Rhodes, M. and Mény, Y. (eds), Future of European Welfare: A New Social Contract? Macmillan, London, 79–96.Google Scholar
Finch, J. and Mason, J. 1990. Filial obligations and kin support for elderly people. Ageing & Society, 10, 2, 151–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, M. and Glendinning, C. 2005. Dependence, independence or inter-dependence? Revisiting the concepts of ‘care’ and ‘dependency’. Ageing & Society, 25, 4, 601–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, S. K. 1994. Doing their share: comparing patterns of help given by older and younger adults. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56, 3, 567–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerstel, N. and Gallagher, S. K. 2001. Men's caregiving: gender and the contingent character of care. Gender and Society, 15, 2, 197–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gori, C. 2000. Solidarity in Italy's policies towards the frail elderly: a value at stake. International Journal of Social Welfare, 9, 4, 261–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, G. and Zhao, H. 2000. Multilevel modeling for binary data. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 441–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haberkern, K. 2009. Pflege in Europa – Familie und Wohlfahrtsstaat [Elderly Care in Europe: Family and Welfare State]. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, Germany.Google Scholar
Haberkern, K. and Szydlik, M. 2008. Pflege der Eltern – Ein europäischer Vergleich [Care of parents: a European comparison]. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 60, 1, 78–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höpflinger, F. 2005. Pflege und das Generationenproblem. Pflegesituationen und intergenerationelle Zusammenhänge [Care and the generation problem. Care arrangements and intergenerational connections]. In Schroeter, K. R. and Rosenthal, T. (eds), Soziologie der Pflege – Grundlagen, Wissensbestände und Perspektiven [Sociology of Care: Basics, Knowledge and Perspectives]. Juventa, Weinheim, Munich, Germany.Google Scholar
Hox, J. 1995. Applied Multilevel Analysis. TT-Publikaties, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Hugentobler, V. 2003. Intergenerationale Familienbeziehungen und Pflegebedürftigkeit im Alter [Intergenerational family relations and dependency on long-term care in old age]. In Schweiz, C. (ed.), Gesundheit – Eine soziale Frage [Intergenerational Family Ties and Dependency on Long-term Care in Later Life: A Social Issue]. Caritas, Lucerne, Switzerland, 151–65.Google Scholar
Igel, C., Brandt, M., Haberkern, K. and Szydlik, M. 2009. Specialisation between family and state: intergenerational time transfers in Western Europe. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 40, 2, 203–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Künemund, H. and Hollstein, B. 2005. Soziale Beziehungen und Unterstützungsnetzwerke [Social relations and support networks]. In Kohli, M. and Künemund, H. (eds), Die zweite Lebenshälfte – Gesellschaftliche Lage und Partizipation im Spiegel des Alters-Survey [The Second Half of Life: Societal Position and Participation in the German Ageing Survey]. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, Germany, 212–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leitner, S. 2003. Varieties of familism: the caring function of the family in comparative perspective. European Societies, 5, 4, 353–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, R. A. 1990. The adult child and older parents. In Brubaker, T. H. (ed.), Family Relationships in Later Life. Sage, Newbury Park, California, 68–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lingsom, S. 1997. The Substitution Issue: Care Policies and their Consequences for Family Care. Report 6/1997, Norwegian Social Research (NOVA), Oslo.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Litwak, E., Silverstein, M., Bengtson, V. L. and Wilson Hirst, Y. 2003. Theories about families, organizations and social supports. In Bengtson, V. L. and Lowenstein, A. (eds), Global Aging and Challenges to Families. Aldine de Gruyter, New York, 27–53.Google Scholar
Lowenstein, A. and Daatland, S. O. 2006. Filial norms and family support in a comparative cross-national context: evidence from the OASIS study. Ageing & Society, 26, 2, 203–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundsgaard, J. 2006. Choice and long-term care in OECD countries: care outcomes, employment and fiscal sustainability. European Societies, 8, 3, 361–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin-Matthews, A. and Campbell, L. D. 1995. Gender roles, employment and informal care. In Arber, S. and Ginn, J. (eds), Connecting Gender and Ageing: A Sociological Approach. Open University Press, Buckingham, UK, 129–43.Google Scholar
Mestheneos, E. and Triantafillou, J. 2006. Supporting Family Carers of Older People in Europe – The Pan-European Background Report. LIT Verlag, Münster, Germany.Google Scholar
Millar, J. and Warman, A. 1996. Family Obligations in Europe. Family Policy Studies Centre, London.Google Scholar
Motel-Klingebiel, A., Tesch-Römer, C. and Kondratowitz, H.-J. v. 2005. Welfare states do not crowd out the family: evidence for mixed responsibility from comparative analyses. Ageing & Society, 25, 6, 863–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, M., Martikainen, P. and Pennec, S. 2006. Demographic change and the supply of potential family supporters in Britain, Finland and France in the period 1911–2050. European Journal of Population, 22, 3, 219–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naldini, M. 2000. The Family in the Mediterranean Welfare State. Cass, London.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) 1999. Classifying Educational Programmes: Manual for ISCED-97 Implementation in OECD Countries. OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
Pfau-Effinger, B. 2005. Culture and welfare state policies: reflections on a complex interrelation. Journal of Social Policy, 34, 1, 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinnelli, A. 2001. Determinants of fertility in Europe: new family forms, context and individual characteristics. In Pinnelli, A., Hoffmann-Nowotny, H.-J. and Fux, B. (eds), Fertility and New Types of Households and Family Formation in Europe. Population Study 35, Council of Europe, Strasbourg, 47–101.Google Scholar
Qureshi, H. and Walker, A. 1989. The Caring Relationship: Elderly People and Their Families. Macmillan, Basingstoke, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossi, A. and Rossi, P. 1990. Of Human Bonding: Parent–Child Relations Across the Life Course. De Gruyter, New York.Google Scholar
Rostgaard, T. and Fridberg, T. 1998. Caring for Children and Older People: A Comparison of European Policies and Practices. Report 6, Danish National Institute of Social Research, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Schneider, N. F., Limmer, R. and Ruckdeschel, K. 2002. Mobil, flexibel, gebunden. Beruf und Familie in der mobilen Gesellschaft [Mobile, Flexible, Bound: Occupation and Family in the Mobile Society]. Campus, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.Google Scholar
Snijders, T. A. B. and Bosker, R. J. 2002. Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling. Sage, London.Google Scholar
Snijders, T. and Kenny, D. A. 1999. The social relations model for family data: a multilevel approach. Personal Relationships, 6, 4, 471–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szydlik, M. 2000. Lebenslange Solidarität? Generationenbeziehungen zwischen erwachsenen Kindern und Eltern [Lifelong Solidarity? Intergenerational Relations of Adult Children and Parents]. Leske and Budrich, Opladen, Germany.Google Scholar
Szydlik, M. 2004. Inheritance and inequality: theoretical reasoning and empirical evidence. European Sociological Review, 20, 1, 31–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szydlik, M. 2008. Intergenerational solidarity and conflict. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 39, 1, 97–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theobald, H. 2005. Social Exclusion and Care for the Elderly: Theoretical Concepts and Changing Realities in European Welfare States. Discussion Paper SP I 2005-301, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung [Social Science Research Centre Berlin], Berlin. Available online at http://www.wzb.eu/bal/ph/abstracts/2005/sp_i_2005-301.en.htm [Accessed 4 June 2009].Google Scholar
Twigg, J. and Grand, A. 1998. Contrasting legal conceptions of family obligations and financial reciprocity in the support of older people: France and England. Ageing & Society, 18, 2, 131–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, A. J., Pratt, C. C. and Eddy, L. 1995. Informal caregiving to aging family members: a critical review. Family Relations, 44, 4, 402–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar