Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T13:16:09.145Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Social needs of older people: a systematic literature review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 April 2017

TINA TEN BRUGGENCATE ,
KATRIEN G. LUIJKX  and
JANIENKE STURM
TINA TEN BRUGGENCATE*
Affiliation:
Department of Tranzo, School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, The Netherlands. Institute for HRM and Psychology, Fontys University of Applied Science, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
KATRIEN G. LUIJKX
Affiliation:
Department of Tranzo, School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, The Netherlands.
JANIENKE STURM
Affiliation:
Institute for HRM and Psychology, Fontys University of Applied Science, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
*
Address for correspondence: Tina ten Bruggencate, Chair of People and Technology, Institute for HRM and Psychology, Fontys University of Applied Science, Emmasingel 28, 5611 AZ Eindhoven, The Netherlands E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Social needs are important basic human needs. When social needs are not satisfied, this can lead to mental and physical health problems. With a growing population of older adults and the need for them to stay healthy and community-dwelling, satisfying social needs is important. The aim of this review is to give more insight into the social needs of older people and subsequently into the characteristics of effective interventions for satisfying older people's social needs. A systematic review of the existing literature on quantitative, qualitative and mixed empirical studies on the social needs of older people was conducted. The themes that emerged were diversity, proximity, meaning of the relationship and reciprocity. These themes offered several intervention implications. Participation in hobbies and in volunteer work and being connected were among the main findings. The social needs of older people are diverse. They focus on both the intimate and the peripheral members of their networks. When satisfying social needs, reciprocity is important. The feeling of connectedness to others and to a community or neighbourhood contributes to wellbeing as well as a feeling of independence. Staying active by doing volunteer work or participating in (leisure) social activities satisfies social needs. Therefore, interventions should focus especially on the connectedness, participation and independence of the older adult.

Keywords

social needsinterventionsolder adultsSocial Production Function Theory of Successful Agingsocial convoy modelsocio-emotional selectivity theory
Type
Review
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 38 , Issue 9 , September 2018 , pp. 1745 - 1770
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adelmann, P. K. 1994. Multiple roles and psychological well-being in a national sample of older adults. Journal of Gerontology, 49, 6, S277–85.Google Scholar
Al-Kandari, Y. Y. and Crews, D. E. 2014. Social support and health among elderly Kuwaitis. Journal of Biosocial Science, 46, 4, 518–30.Google Scholar
Antonucci, T. C. 2001. Social relations: an examination of social networks, social support, and sense of control. In Birren, J. E. and Schaie, K. W. (eds), Handbook of the Psychology of Aging. Fifth edition, Academic Press, San Diego, California, 427–53.Google Scholar
Ashida, S. and Heaney, C. A. 2008. Differential associations of social support and social connectedness with structural features of social networks and the health status of older adults. Journal of Aging and Health, 20, 7, 872–93.Google Scholar
Avlund, K., Lund, R., Holstein, B. E. and Due, P. 2004. Social relations as determinant of onset of disability in aging. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 38, 1, 85–99.Google Scholar
Berkman, L. F. and Syme, S. L. 1979. Social networks, host resistance, and mortality: a nine-year follow-up study of Alameda County residents. American Journal of Epidemiology, 109, 2, 186–204.Google Scholar
Buettner, D. 2012. The Blue Zones: 9 Lessons for Living Longer from the People Who've Lived the Longest. National Geographic Books. Washington D.C.Google Scholar
Buys, L., Burton, L., Cuthill, M., Hogan, A., Wilson, B. and Baker, D. 2015. Establishing and maintaining social connectivity: an understanding of the lived experiences of older adults residing in regional and rural communities. Australian Journal of Rural Health, 23, 5, 291–4.Google Scholar
Buz, J., Sanchez, M., Levenson, M. R. and Aldwin, C. M. 2014. Aging and social networks in Spain: the importance of pubs and churches. International Journal of Aging & Human Development, 78, 1, 23–46.Google Scholar
Cacioppo, J. T., Hawkley, L. C. and Berntson, G. G. 2003. The anatomy of loneliness. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 3, 71–4.Google Scholar
Carstensen, L. L. 1993. Motivation for social contact across the life span: a theory of socioemotional selectivity. In Jacobs, J. (ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Volume 40, University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, Nebraska, 209–54.Google Scholar
Carstensen, L. L., Fung, H. H. and Charles, S. T. 2003. Socioemotional selectivity theory and the regulation of emotion in the second half of life. Motivation and Emotion, 27, 2, 103–23.Google Scholar
Cattan, M., White, M., Bond, J. and Learmouth, A. 2005. Preventing social isolation and loneliness among older people: a systematic review of health promotion interventions. Ageing & Society, 25, 1, 41–67.Google Scholar
Chen, Y.-J. and Chen, C.-Y. 2012. Living arrangement preferences of elderly people in Taiwan as affected by family resources and social participation. Journal of Family History, 37, 4, 381–94.Google Scholar
Cloutier-Fisher, D., Kobayashi, K. and Smith, A. 2011. The subjective dimension of social isolation: a qualitative investigation of older adults’ experiences in small social support networks. Journal of Aging Studies, 25, 4, 407–14.Google Scholar
Conway, F., Magai, C., Jones, S., Fiori, K. and Gillespie, M. 2013. A six-year follow-up study of social network changes among African-American, Caribbean, and U.S.-born Caucasian urban older adults. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 76, 1, 1–27.Google Scholar
De Jong Gierveld, J. and Van Tilburg, T. 2008. De ingekorte schaal voor algemene, emotionele en sociale eenzaamheid. Tijdschrift voor gerontologie en geriatrie, 39, 1, 4–15.Google Scholar
Diamond, J. 2012. The World Until Yesterday: What Can We Learn from Traditional Societies? Penguin, London.Google Scholar
Fiori, K. L., Consedine, N. S. and Merz, E.-M. 2011. Attachment, social network size, and patterns of social exchange in later life. Research on Aging, 33, 4, 465–93.Google Scholar
Fokkema, T. and van Tilburg, T. 2003. Een vergelijkend effectonderzoek naar interventies ter voorkoming en vermindering van eenzaamheid onder ouderen. Retrieved from http://home.fsw.vu.nl/TG.van.Tilburg/2003%20Fokkema%20vT%20Tussenrapportage%20vergelijkend%20effectonderzoek.pdfGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, C. 2012. Connectedness in the lives of older people in Ireland: a study of the communal participation of older people in two geographic localities. Irish Journal of Sociology, 20, 1, 84–102.Google Scholar
Gavrilov, L. A. and Heuveline, P. 2003. Aging of population. In The Encyclopedia of Population. Volume 1, 32–7. Macmillan Reference USA: New YorkGoogle Scholar
Golden, J., Conroy, R. M., Bruce, I., Denihan, A., Greene, E., Kirby, M. and Lawlor, B. A. 2009. Loneliness, social support networks, mood and wellbeing in community-dwelling elderly. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 24, 7, 694–700.Google Scholar
Harlow, R. E. and Cantor, N. 1996. Still participating after all these years: a study of life task participation in later life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 6, 1235–1249.Google Scholar
Iecovich, E., Jacobs, J. M. and Stessman, J. 2011. Loneliness, social networks, and mortality: 18 years of follow-up. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 72, 3, 243–63.Google Scholar
Krause, N. 2007. Longitudinal study of social support and meaning in life. Psychology and Aging, 22, 3, 456–69.Google Scholar
Maslow, A. H., Frager, R., Fadiman, J., McReynolds, C. and Cox, R. 1970. Motivation and Personality. Harper & Row, New York.Google Scholar
Michael, Y. L., Berkman, L. F., Colditz, G. A. and Kawachi, I. 2001. Living arrangements, social integration, and change in functional health status. American Journal of Epidemiology, 153, 2, 123–31.Google Scholar
Miura, M. and Agari, I. 2006. Relationship between received and provided social support, self-esteem and life fulfillment in the elderly. Japanese Journal of Counselling Science, 39, 1, 40–48.Google Scholar
Neville, S., Russell, J., Adams, J. and Jackson, D. 2016. Living in your own home and being socially connected at 95 years and beyond: a qualitative study. Contemporary Nurse, 52, 2/3, 258–68.Google Scholar
Pace, R., Pluye, P., Bartlett, G., Macaulay, A. C., Salsberg, J., Jagosh, J. and Seller, R. 2012. Testing the reliability and efficiency of the pilot Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) for systematic mixed studies review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 49, 1, 47–53.Google Scholar
Portero, C. F. and Oliva, A. 2007. Social support, psychological well-being, and health among the elderly. Educational Gerontology, 33, 12, 1053–68.Google Scholar
Register, M. E. and Herman, J. 2010. Quality of life revisited: the concept of connectedness in older adults. Advances in Nursing Science, 33, 1, 53–63.Google Scholar
Register, M. E. and Scharer, K. M. 2010. Connectedness in community-dwelling older adults. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 32, 4, 462–79.Google Scholar
Rowe, J. W. and Kahn, R. L. 1997. Successful aging. The Gerontologist, 37, 4, 433–40.Google Scholar
Seeman, T. E. 1996. Social ties and health: the benefits of social integration. Annals of Epidemiology, 6, 5, 442–51.Google Scholar
Steptoe, A., Shankar, A., Demakakos, P. and Wardle, J. 2013. Social isolation, loneliness, and all-cause mortality in older men and women. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110, 15, 5797–801.Google Scholar
Steverink, N. and Lindenberg, S. 2006. Which social needs are important for subjective well-being? What happens to them with aging? Psychology and Aging, 21, 2, 281–290.Google Scholar
Steverink, N., Lindenberg, S. and Ormel, J. 1998. Towards understanding successful ageing: patterned change in resources and goals. Ageing & Society, 18, 4, 441–67.Google Scholar
Toepoel, V. 2013. Ageing, leisure, and social connectedness: how could leisure help reduce social isolation of older people? Social Indicators Research, 113, 1, 355–72.Google Scholar
Von Faber, M., Bootsma-van der Wiel, A., van Exel, E., Gussekloo, J., Lagaay, A. M., van Dongen, E., Knook, D. L., van der Geest, S. and Westendorp, R. G. 2001. Successful aging in the oldest old: who can be characterized as successfully aged? Archives of Internal Medicine, 161, 22, 2694–700.Google Scholar
Walker, R. B. and Hiller, J. E. 2007. Places and health: a qualitative study to explore how older women living alone perceive the social and physical dimensions of their neighbourhoods. Social Science & Medicine, 65, 6, 1154–65.Google Scholar
Xie, B. 2007. Using the internet for offline relationship formation. Social Science Computer Review, 25, 3, 396–404.Google Scholar