Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T13:42:14.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Residential complexes in Queensland, Australia: a space of segregation and ageism?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 February 2011

MAREE PETERSEN  and
JENI WARBURTON
MAREE PETERSEN*
Affiliation:
School of Social Work and Human Services, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia.
JENI WARBURTON
Affiliation:
John Richards Initiative, Faculty of Health Sciences, La Trobe University, Victoria, Australia.
*
Address for correspondence: Maree Petersen, School of Social Work and Human Services, University of Queensland, St Lucia, 4072 Queensland, Australia. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In western countries, large residential complexes comprising retirement villages and care facilities have become synonymous with specialised housing for older people, but gerontology has tended to view retirement villages and care facilities as separate and different spaces. By researching these spaces separately, gerontology's examination of the development of residential complexes and older people's housing has been hindered. This paper explores the geographies of residential complexes in south-east Queensland, Australia, by employing data from a larger study that utilised Lefebvre's spatial framework, social space. Its specific focus is Lefebvre's concept of representations of space, part of the triad of social space. The paper outlines how the professional knowledge of designers, planners and policy makers shape and frame the place of older people in contemporary society. The findings indicate that professional knowledge is characterised by contradictions, and that business interests sustain stereotypes of older people as either ageless or dependent. Furthermore, spaces designed for older people reinforce historical legacies of separation from the community. This form of built environment can thus be seen as both a cause and effect of ageism. Generally, the lack of attention by gerontology to these spaces has hampered discussion of alternatives for older people's housing in Australia and, importantly, the development of responsive urban and social planning.

Keywords

older peopleresidential complexeshousing policyplanningageismLefebvre
Type
Articles
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 32 , Issue 1 , January 2012 , pp. 60 - 84
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Access, Economics 2009. Economic Evaluation of Capital Financing of High Care. Report for Anglicare Australia, Baptist Care Australia, Catholic Health Australia, Churches of Christ Living Care, Lutheran Aged Care Australia, Sir Moses Montefiore Jewish Home, National Presbyterian Aged Care Network, UnitingCare Australia Access Economics, Canberra. Available online at http://www.accesseconomics.com.au/publicationsreports/getreport.php?report=193andid=248 [Accessed 29 April 2010].Google Scholar
Alcock, C. 2005. Shades of grey. Australian Planner, 42, 2, 24–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, G. J., Cutchin, M., McCracken, K., Phillips, D. R. and Wiles, J. 2007. Geographical gerontology: the constitution of a discipline. Social Science and Medicine, 65, 151–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andrews, G. J. and Phillips, D. R. (eds)2005. Ageing and Place: Perspectives, Policy and Practice. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Beasley, R. and Danesi, M. 2002. Persuasive Signs: The Semiotics of Advertising. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaikie, A. 2004. Imagined landscapes of age and identity. In Andrews, G. J. and Phillips, D. R. (eds), Ageing and Place. Routledge, London, 164–75.Google Scholar
Blundell, L. 2009. Aged care: not a walk in the park. Property Australia, 23, 6, 46–9.Google Scholar
Borowski, A., Encel, S. and Ozanne, E. (eds)2007. Longevity and Social Change in Australia. University of New South Wales Press, Sydney.Google Scholar
Bridge, C. and Kendig, H. 2005. Housing and older people: environments, professionals and positive ageing. In Minichiello, V. and Coulson, I. (eds), Contemporary Issues in Gerontology. Allen and Unwin, Crows Nest, Australia, 144–59.Google Scholar
Evans, S. 2009. ‘That lot up there and us down here’: social interaction and a sense of community in a mixed tenure UK retirement village. Ageing & Society, 29, 2, 199–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, N. 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis: Papers in the Critical Study of Language. Longman, Harlow, UK.Google Scholar
Faulkner, D. 2007. The older population and changing house careers: implications for housing provision. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 26, 4, 152–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fook, J. 1996. The Reflective Researcher: Social Workers Theories of Practice Research. Allen and Unwin, St Leonards, Australia.Google Scholar
Gomm, R. 2004. Social Science Methodology. Palgrave Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
Grant, J. 2005. Planning responses to gated communities in Canada. Housing Studies, 20, 2, 273–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, J. 2001. From ‘special needs’ to ‘lifestyle choices’: articulating the demand for ‘third age’ housing. In Peace, S. M. and Holland, C. (eds), Inclusive Housing in an Ageing Society. Policy, Bristol, UK, 29–53.Google Scholar
Holdsworth, D. W. and Laws, G. 1994. Landscapes of old age in coastal British Columbia. Canadian Geographer, 38, 2, 174–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchby, I. and Wooffitt, R. 1998. Conversation Analysis. Polity, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Jaworski, A. and Coupland, N. (eds)2006. The Discourse Reader. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Jones, A. 2004. Integrating Housing, Support and Care for Older People: A National and International Analysis. Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute, Brisbane. Available online at http://www.ahuri.edu.au/publications/p20287 [Accessed 1 May 2010].Google Scholar
Kendig, H. 2008. Affordable housing. In Council on the Ageing Over 50s: Affordable Housing for Older Australians. Council of the Ageing Over 50s National Policy Council, National Press Club, Canberra. Available online at http://cotaover50s.org.au/Kendig_files/frame.htm [Accessed 24 April 2010].Google Scholar
Kendig, H. and McCallum, J. (eds)1990. Grey Policy. Allen and Unwin, Sydney.Google Scholar
Laws, G. 1993. ‘The land of old age’: society's changing attitudes toward urban built environments for elderly people. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 83, 4, 672–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laws, G. 1994. Aging, contested meanings, and the built environment. Environment and Planning A, 26, 11, 1787–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laws, G. 1995. Embodiment and emplacement: identities, representation and landscape in Sun City retirement communities. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 40, 4, 253–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laws, G. 1997. Spatiality and age relations. In Jamieson, A., Harper, S. and Victor, C. (eds), Critical Approaches to Ageing and Later life. Open University Press, Buckingham, UK, 90–100.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, H. 1991. The Production of Space. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, H. 2003. Preface to the study of l'habitat pavillonaire. In Elden, S., Lebas, E. and Kofman, E. (eds), Henri Lefebvre: Key Writings. Continuum, London, 121–35.Google Scholar
Locastro, V. 2003. An Introduction to Pragmatics. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, Michigan.Google Scholar
May, J. 1996. Globalization and the politics of place: place and identity in an inner London neighbourhood. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 21, 1, 194–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCann, E. J. 2002. The cultural politics of local economic development, meaning making, place making and the urban policy process. Geoforum, 33, 3, 385–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McHugh, K. E. 2003. Three faces of ageism: society, image and place. Ageing & Society, 23, 2, 165–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minichiello, V. and Coulson, I. (eds)2005. Contemporary Issues in Gerontology. Allen and Unwin, Crows Nest, Australia.Google Scholar
Minichiello, V., Somerville, M., McConaghy, C., McParlane, J. and Scott, A. 2005. The challenges of ageism. In Minichiello, V. and Coulson, I. (eds), Contemporary Issues in Gerontology. Allen and Unwin, Crows Nest, Australia, 1–33.Google Scholar
Mulholland, J. 1994. Handbook of Persuasive Tactics: A Practical Language Guide. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Padgett, D. K. 1998. Qualitative Methods in Social Work Research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, California.Google Scholar
Petersen, M. 2009. Spaces of ageing: the distinctive geographies of residential complexes. Unpublished PhD thesis, School of Social Work and Human Services, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia.Google Scholar
Phillips, J., Bernard, M., Biggs, S. and Kingston, P. 2001. Retirement communities in Britain: a ‘third way’ for the third age. In Peace, S. M. and Holland, C. (eds), Inclusive Housing in an Ageing Society. Policy, Bristol, UK, 189–213.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, A. and Fehr, B. J. 1997. Conversation analysis: an approach to the study of social action as sense making practices. In van Dijk, T. A. (ed.), Discourse as Social Interaction. Sage, London, 64–91.Google Scholar
Potter, J. and Wetherell, M. 1987. Discourse and Social Psychology. Sage, Newbury Park, California.Google Scholar
Potter, J. and Wetherell, M. 1994. Analyzing discourse. In Bryman, A. and Burgess, R. G. (eds), Analyzing Qualitative Data. Routledge, London, 47–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regnier, V. 2002. Design for Assisted Living: Guidelines for Housing the Physically and Mentally Frail. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Robinson, S. 2008. Cashing in on retirement. Property Australia, 22, 6, 60–4.Google Scholar
Rose, G. 2003. Family photographs and domestic spacings: a case study. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 28, 1, 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, G. 2007. Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to the Interpretation of Visual Materials. Sage, London.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, M. and Everitt, J. 2001. Planning for ageing populations: inside or outside the walls. Progess in Planning, 53, 3, 119–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharf, T., Phillipson, C. and Smith, A. 2007. Aging in a difficult place: assessing the impact of urban deprivation on older people. In Wahl, H.-W., Tesch-Romer, C. and Hoff, H. (eds), New Dynamics in Old Age: Individual, Environmental and Societal Perspectives. Baywood, Amityville, New York, 153–63.Google Scholar
Shields, R. 1999. Lefebvre, Love and Struggle: Spatial Dialectics. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Slembrouck, S. 2006. What is Meant by ‘Discourse Analysis’? English Department, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. Available online at http://www.english.ugent.be/da/ [Accessed 19 October 2010].Google Scholar
Stimson, R. (ed.)2002. The Retirement Village Industry in Australia: Evolution, Prospects and Challenges. Centre for Research into Sustainable Urban and Regional Futures, University of Queensland, Brisbane.Google Scholar
van Dijk, T. A. (ed.)1997. Discourse as Social Interaction. Sage, London.Google Scholar
van Dijk, T. A. 2001. Multidisciplinary CDA: a plea for diversity. In Wodak, R. and Meyer, M. (eds), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. Sage, London, 95–120.Google Scholar
Wetherell, M., Taylor, S. and Yates, S. J. (eds)2001. Discourse as Data: A Guide for Analysis. Sage, London.Google Scholar
Wood, L. A. and Kroger, R. O. 2000. Doing Discourse Analysis: Methods for Studying Action in Talk and Text. Sage, Thousand Oaks, California.CrossRefGoogle Scholar