Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T12:19:24.415Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Remitting ‘filial co-habitation’: ‘actual’ and ‘virtual’ co-residence between Korean professional migrant adult children couples in Singapore and their elderly parents

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2011

JEEHUN KIM
JEEHUN KIM*
Affiliation:
Department of Social Studies Education, Inha University, Incheon, Korea.
*
Address for correspondence: Jeehun Kim, Department of Social Studies Education, Inha University, Incheon, 402-751, Korea. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Based on in-depth interviews with middle-class Korean professional sojourner migrant married couples in Singapore and their elderly parents, this paper examines how the cultural meaning and social practice of filial co-habitation and support have been transformed in an international migration context. Transnational co-residence and visiting among these families are examined and a differentiated and patterned organisation of support by sons versus daughters for their own elderly parents is demonstrated. Although the immigration regulations and co-ethnic community environments for older Koreans in Singapore pose a challenge to elderly parents, the family remains the most important nexus of care and support. By adopting ‘virtual’ and ‘actual’ co-residence strategies and deploying multi-purpose long-term visits by wives and children in Singapore to their elderly parents in Korea, and by remitting regular financial contributions, these families are able to maintain the cultural ideal of filial co-residence and support. However, the gendered traditional co-habitation ideal differentiates between actual and virtual co-residence. The actual co-residence pattern was mainly adopted by first sons/daughters-in-law couples and the elderly parents of the first sons, whereas the virtual co-residence pattern was mainly adopted by sons-in-law/daughters couples and the elderly parents of daughters. These results show that patterned two-way transnational mobility for providing care and support is shaped by cultural norms and the practical negotiation of family obligations.

Keywords

Koreamigrationco-habitationintergenerational
Type
Articles
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 32 , Issue 8 , November 2012 , pp. 1337 - 1359
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arksey, H. and Knight, P. 1999. Interviewing for Social Scientists: An Introductory Resource with Examples. Sage, London.Google Scholar
Asis, M. M. B., Huang, S. and Yeoh, B. S. A. 2004. When the light of the home is abroad: unskilled female migration and the filipino family. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 25, 2, 198–215.Google Scholar
Baldassar, L. 2007. Transnational families and the provision of moral and emotional support: the relationship between truth and distance. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power, 14, 4, 385–409.Google Scholar
Baldassar, L., Baldock, C. V. and Wilding, R. 2007. Families Caring Across Borders: Migration, Ageing and Transnational Caregiving. Palgrave Macmillan, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charmaz, K. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory. Sage, London.Google Scholar
Chee, Y. K. and Levkoff, S. E. 2001. Culture and dementia: accounts by family caregivers and health professionals for dementia-affected elders in South Korea. Journal of Cross-cultural Gerontology, 16, 2, 111–25.Google Scholar
Choi, S.-J. 1996. The family and ageing in Korea: a new concern and challenge. Ageing & Society, 16, 1, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, Y. J. 2006. Transformations in economic security during old age in Korea: the implications for public-pension reform. Ageing & Society, 26, 4, 549–65.Google Scholar
Creswell, J. W. 2007. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Sage, London.Google Scholar
Finch, J. 2007. Displaying families. Sociology, 41, 1, 65–81.Google Scholar
Finch, J. and Mason, J. 1990. Filial obligations and kin support for elderly people. Ageing & Society, 10, 2, 151–75.Google Scholar
Hugo, G. 1995. International labor migration and the family: some observations from Indonesia. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal, 3, 2/3, 273–301.Google Scholar
Ip, D., Lui, C. W. and Chui, W. H. 2007. Veiled entrapment: a study of social isolation of older Chinese migrants in Brisbane, Queensland. Ageing & Society, 27, 5, 719–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyer, A., Devasahayam, T. W. and Yeoh, B. S. A. 2004. A clean bill of health: Filipinas as domestic workers in Singapore. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal, 13, 1, 11–38.Google Scholar
Karner, T. X. 1998. Professional caring: homecare workers as fictive kin. Journal of Aging Studies, 12, 1, 69–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauh, T.-O. 1997. Intergenerational relations: older Korean-Americans’ experiences. Journal of Cross-cultural Gerontology, 12, 3, 245–71.Google Scholar
Kauh, T.-O. 1999. Changing status and roles of older Korean immigrants in the United States. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 49, 3, 213–29.Google Scholar
Kim, J. 2010. ‘Downed’ and stuck in Singapore: lower/middle class South Korean Wild Geese (Kirogi) children in public school. Research in Sociology of Education, 17, 271–311.Google Scholar
Kim, J. 2011. Living as expatriate wives/mothers: balancing work and family issues among Korean working women in Singapore. The Southeast Asian Review 21, 1, 217–48.Google Scholar
Kim, K. C., Kim, S. and Hurh, W. M. 1991. Filial piety and intergenerational relationship in Korean immigrant families. International Journal of Aging & Human Development, 33, 3, 233–45.Google Scholar
Kweon, S.-I. 1998. The extended family in contemporary Korea: changing patterns of co-residence. Korea Journal, 38, 3, 178–209.Google Scholar
Kwon, H. J. 2005. Transforming the developmental welfare state in East Asia. Development and Change, 36, 3, 477–97.Google Scholar
Lan, P. C. 2002. Subcontracting filial piety: elder care in ethnic Chinese immigrant families in California. Journal of Family Issues, 23, 7, 812–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lunt, N. 2009. Older people within transnational families: the social policy implications. International Journal of Social Welfare, 18, 3, 243–51.Google Scholar
Marcus, G. E. 1995. Ethnography in/of the world system: the emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 95–117.Google Scholar
Mason, J. 2004. Managing kinship over long distances: the significance of ‘The Visit’. Social Policy & Society, 3, 4, 421–9.Google Scholar
Min, P. G. 1998. Changes and Conflicts: Korean Immigrant Families in New York. Allyn and Bacon, Boston.Google Scholar
Singapore Ministry of Manpower 2011. Employment Pass: Before you apply and Passes for Family Members (http://www.mom.gov.sg/foreign-manpower/passes-visas/employment-pass/before-you-apply/Pages/default.aspx, accessed on 1 November 2011).Google Scholar
Stevens, G. 1999. Age at immigration and second language proficiency among foreign-born adults. Language in Society, 28, 4, 555–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Townsend, P. 1957. The Family Life of Old People: An Inquiry in East London. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Treas, J. 2008. Transnational older adults and their families. Family Relations, 57, 4, 468–78.Google Scholar
Treas, J. and Mazumdar, S. 2002. Older people in America's immigrant families: dilemmas of dependence, integration, and isolation. Journal of Aging Studies, 16, 3, 243–58.Google Scholar
Treas, J. and Mazumdar, S. 2004. Kinkeeping and caregiving: contributions of older people in immigrant families. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 35, 1, 105–22.Google Scholar