Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T01:30:44.944Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Redefining agency in late life: the concept of ‘disponibility’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 August 2017

DIEGO ROMAIOLI  and
ALBERTA CONTARELLO
DIEGO ROMAIOLI*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Sociology, Education and Applied Psychology, University of Padua, Italy.
ALBERTA CONTARELLO
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Sociology, Education and Applied Psychology, University of Padua, Italy.
*
Address for correspondence: Diego Romaioli, Department of Philosophy, Sociology, Education and Applied Psychology, Via Venezia 08, 35131 Padua, Italy E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In light of an increased ageing population, policy makers are faced with the urgent problem of planning programmes that reflect active ageing or, in other words, the promotion of activities that help individuals to remain active in a societal context. The construct of agency, defined as the capacity to make decisions and to address situations depending on the individual's future plans, reflects a specific normative criterion: individuals are expected to live in an active and productive way, while those who are unable to live up to this expectation are considered dependent, passive, unproductive, weak. From a social constructionist perspective, the current study proposes a critical reflection on the qualities usually attributed to the construct of agency that are liable to appear reductive and oppressive when applied to an elderly population. Once the basic premises underlying agency, as it is commonly defined in the Western tradition, have been deconstructed, a different conceptualisation, based on interviews with older individuals, will be presented. The current work aims to produce a different conceptual framework that will permit examination of experiences and organisational modalities of agency typifying later life. The comments made by the interviewees in many cases resonate with ideas contained in Taoist philosophy and, more specifically, with the concept of disponibilité (or disponibility) outlined by the French sinologist François Jullien, which we discuss here.

Keywords

agencyageingdisponibilitysocial constructionqualitative research
Type
Article
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , January 2019 , pp. 194 - 216
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahearn, L. M. 2001. Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 109–37.Google Scholar
Andrews, M. 2004. Counter-narratives and the power to oppose. In Bamberg, M. and Andrews, M. (eds), Considering Counter-narratives: Narrative, Resisting, Making Sense. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Philadelphia, 1–6.Google Scholar
Baars, J. 1998. Concepts of time and narrative temporality in the study of aging. Journal of Aging Studies, 11, 4, 283–95.Google Scholar
Baars, J., Dohmen, J., Grenier, A. and Phillipson, C. (eds) 2014. Ageing, Meaning and Social Structure: Connecting Critical and Humanistic Gerontology. Policy Press, Bristol, UK.Google Scholar
Barnes, B. 2000. Understanding Agency: Social Theory and Responsible Action. Sage, London.Google Scholar
Bauman, Z. 2001. The Individualized Society. Polity, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Borel, H. 2015. Wu Wei: A Phantasy Based on the Philosophy of Lao-Tse. BiblioLife, Charleston, South Carolina.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Bowling, A. 2008. Enhancing later life: how older people perceive active ageing? Aging and Mental Health, 12, 3, 293–301.Google Scholar
Campbell, C. 2009. Distinguishing the power of agency from agentic power: a note on Weber and the ‘black box’ of personal agency. Sociological Theory, 27, 4, 407–18.Google Scholar
Cardona, B. 2008. ‘Healthy Ageing’ policies and anti-ageing ideologies and practices: on the exercise of responsibility. Medical Health Care and Philosophy, 11, 4, 475–83.Google Scholar
Charmaz, K. 2014. Constructing Grounded Theory. Sage, London.Google Scholar
Chirkov, V. I., Ryan, R. M. and Sheldon, K. M. (eds) 2010. Human Autonomy in Cross-cultural Context: Perspectives on the Psychology of Agency, Freedom, and Well-being. Volume 1, Springer Science and Business Media, New York.Google Scholar
Clarke, A. and Warren, L. 2007. Hopes, fears and expectations about the future: what do older people's stories tell us about active ageing? Ageing & Society, 27, 4, 465–88.Google Scholar
Contarello, A., Bonetto, R., Romaioli, D. and Wachelke, J. 2011. Invecchiamento e intercultura [Ageing and inter-culture]. In Leone, G. (eds), Vivere l'interculturalità. Ricerche sulla vita quotidiana contemporanea [Living the Inter-culture. Research on Contemporary Everyday Life]. Unicopli, Milan, Italy, 171–82.Google Scholar
Contarello, A., Camargo, B. V., Wachelke, J., Piccolo, C. and Xavier Morais, D. 2016. ‘Ageing Well’ in changing times and places: further notes on anchoring and stakes in a Brazilian and an Italian context. Papers on Social Representations, 25, 1, 11.1–11.31.Google Scholar
Contarello, A., Leone, G. and Wachelke, J. 2012. O envelhecimento em uma societade que envelhece [Ageing in an ageing society]. In Tura, L. F. R. and Oliveira Silva, A. (eds), Envelhecimento e Representacoes Sociais. Quartet Faperj, Rio de Janeiro, 139–68.Google Scholar
Dannefer, D. and Uhlenberg, P. 2004. Paths of the life course: a typology. In Nussbaum, J. F. and Coupland, J. (eds), Handbook of Communication and Aging Research. Routledge, London, 306–26.Google Scholar
Danziger, K. 1994. Constructing the Subject: Historical Origins of Psychological Research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Davey, J. 2002. Active ageing and education in mid and later life. Ageing & Society, 22, 1, 95–113.Google Scholar
Denzin, N. K. 2008. Symbolic Interactionism and Cultural Studies: The Politics of Interpretation. Wiley, Chichester, UK.Google Scholar
Department for Work and Pensions 2005. Opportunity Age: Opportunity and Security Throughout Life. Department for Work and Pensions, London.Google Scholar
Department of Health 2005. Independence, Well-being and Choice. Our Vision for the Future of Social Care in England. The Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Durkheim, É. and Mauss, M. 2009. Primitive Classification. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Edmondson, R. 2005. Wisdom in later life: ethnographic approaches. Ageing & Society, 25, 6, 339–56.Google Scholar
Elder, G. H. 1994. Time, human agency, and social change: perspectives on the life course. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57, 1, 4–15.Google Scholar
Emirbayer, M. and Mische, A. 1998. What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103, 4, 962–1023.Google Scholar
Flick, U. 2009. An Introduction to Qualitative Research. Sage, London.Google Scholar
Gergen, K. J. 1999. An Invitation to Social Construction. Sage, London.Google Scholar
Gergen, K. J. 2011. Relational Being: Beyond Self and Community. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Gergen, K. J. 2014. Pursuing excellence in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Psychology, 1, 1, 49–60.Google Scholar
Gergen, K. J., Josselson, R. and Freeman, M. 2015. The promises of qualitative inquiry. American Psychologist, 70, 1, 1–9.Google Scholar
Gergen, M. M. and Gergen, K. J. 2001. Positive aging: new images for a new age. Ageing International, 27, 1, 3–23.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. 1979. Agency, structure. In Central Problems in Social Theory. Macmillan, Basingstoke, UK, 49–95.Google Scholar
Gilleard, C. and Higgs, P. 2010. Aging without agency: theorizing the fourth age. Aging and Mental Health, 14, 2, 121–8.Google Scholar
Greiner, A. and Phillipson, C. 2014. Rethinking agency in late life: structural and interpretive. In Baars, J., Dohmen, J., Greiner, A. and Phillipson, C. (eds), Ageing, Meaning and Social Structure. Policy Press, Bristol, UK, 55–81.Google Scholar
Gubrium, J. F. and Holstein, J. A. 1995. Individual agency, the ordinary and postmodern life. The Sociological Quarterly, 36, 3, 555–70.Google Scholar
Gubrium, J. F. and Holstein, J. A. (eds) 2008. Ways of Aging. Wiley, Chichester, UK.Google Scholar
Gullette, M. M. 1997. Declining to Decline: Cultural Combat and the Politics of Midlife. University of Virginia Press, Charlottesville, Virginia.Google Scholar
Harré, R. 1984. Personal Being. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Heelas, P. 1981. The model applied: anthropology and indigenous psychologies. In Lock, A. and Heelas, P. (eds), Indigenous Psychologies: The Anthropology of Self. Academic Press, New York, 39–63.Google Scholar
Hershenson, D. B. 2016. Reconceptualizing retirement: A status-based approach. Journal of Aging Studies, 38, 1–5.Google Scholar
Hitlin, S. and Elder, G. H. 2007. Time, self, and the curiously abstract concept of agency. Sociological Theory, 25, 2, 170–91.Google Scholar
Holstein, M. B. and Minkler, M. 2007. Critical gerontology: reflections for the 21st century. In Bernard, M. and Scharf, T. (eds), Critical Perspectives on Ageing Societies. Policy Press, Bristol, UK, 13–26.Google Scholar
Howarth, G. 1998. ‘Just live for today’: living, caring, ageing and dying. Ageing & Society, 18, 6, 673–89.Google Scholar
Jesuino, J. C. 2014. Images of old age. Papers on Social Representations, 23, 2, 15.1–15.22.Google Scholar
Joas, H. 1996. The Creativity of Action. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Jolanki, O. H. 2009. Agency in talk about old age and health. Journal of Aging Studies, 23, 4, 215–26.Google Scholar
Jullien, F. 2004. A Treatise on Efficacy: Between Western and Chinese Thinking. University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu.Google Scholar
Jullien, F. 2011. The Silent Transformations. Seagull Books, Calcutta.Google Scholar
Jullien, F. 2012. Cinq concepts proposés à la psychanalyse [Five Concepts for Psychoanalysis]. Grasset, Paris.Google Scholar
Kaufman, S. R. 1994. The social construction of frailty: an anthropological perspective. Journal of Aging Studies, 8, 1, 45–58.Google Scholar
Kenyon, G., Bohlmeijer, E. and Randall, W. (eds) 2011. Storying Later Life: Issues, Investigations, and Interventions in Narrative Gerontology. Open University Press Buckingham, UK.Google Scholar
Kontos, P. 2004. Embodied selfhood: redefining agency in Alzheimer's disease. In Tulle, E. (ed.), Old Age and Agency. Nova Publisher, New York, 105–21.Google Scholar
Lao Tse, 2011. Tao te ching. Mauad Editora, Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
Lebrun, V. 1963. Devoto a Tolstoj [Devoted to Tolstoj]. Roma: Lerici.Google Scholar
Lloyd, L. 2015. The fourth age. In Twigg, J. and Martin, W. (eds), Routledge Handbook of Cultural Gerontology. Routledge, London, 261–68.Google Scholar
Lloyd, L., Calnan, M., Cameron, A., Seymour, J. and Smith, R. 2014. Identity in the fourth age: perseverance, adaptation and maintaining dignity. Ageing & Society, 34, 1, 1–19.Google Scholar
Lock, A. 1981. Universals in human conceptions. In Lock, A. and Heelas, P. (eds), Indigenous Psychologies: The Anthropology of Self. Academic Press, New York, 19–36.Google Scholar
Luria, A. R. 1976. Cognitive development: Its cultural and social foundations. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Marshall, V. W. 2005. Agency, events, and structure at the end of the life course. Advances in Life Course Research, 10, 57–91.Google Scholar
Mead, G. H. 1925. The genesis of the self and social control. International Journal of Ethics, 35, 3, 251–77.Google Scholar
Menon, T., Morris, M. W., Chiu, C. Y. and Hong, Y. Y. 1999. Culture and the construal of agency: attribution to individual versus group dispositions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 5, 701–17.Google Scholar
McVeigh, B. J. 1995. Society in the self: the anthropology of agency. Research Bulletin of Toyo Gauken University, 3, 33–48.Google Scholar
McVeigh, B. J. 2011. Il sé come relazioni sociali interiorizzate. L'applicazione della teoria jaynesiana ai problemi dell'agentività e della volizione [Self as interiorized social relations. The application of jaynesian theory to the problem of agency and volition]. In Salvini, A. and Bottini, R. (eds), Il nostro inquilino segreto [Our Secret Lodger]. Ponte alle Grazie, Florence, Italy, 286–324.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. 1984. Introduction: le domaine de la psychologie sociale [Introduction: the domain of social psychology]. In Moscovici, S. (ed.), Psychologie sociale [Social Psychology]. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, 5–22.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. 1931. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Volume I: Principles of Philosophy. Hartshorne, C. and Weiss, P. (eds). Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Phillipson, C. 1998. Reconstructing Old Age: New Agendas in Social Theory and Practice. Sage, London.Google Scholar
Phoenix, C., Smith, B. and Sparkes, A. C. 2010. Narrative analysis in aging studies: a typology for consideration. Journal of Aging Studies, 24, 1, 1–11.Google Scholar
Phoenix, C. and Sparkes, A. C. 2009. Being Fred: big stories, small stories and the accomplishment of a positive ageing identity. Qualitative Research, 9, 2, 83–99.Google Scholar
Randall, W. L. and McKim, A. E. 2008. Reading Our Lives: The Poetics of Growing Old. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Ratner, C. 2000. Agency and culture. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 30, 4, 413–34.Google Scholar
Romaioli, D., Faccio, E. and Salvini, A. 2008. On acting against one's best judgement: a social constructionist interpretation for the Akrasia problem. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 38, 2, 179–92.Google Scholar
Rosaldo, R. 1980. Ilongot Headhunting, 1883–1974: A Study in Society and History. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California.Google Scholar
Sahlins, M. 2004. Apologies to Thucydides: Understanding History as Culture and Vice Versa. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Salvini, A. and Bottini, R. (eds) 2011. Il nostro inquilino segreto [Our Secret Lodger]. Ponte alle Grazie, Florence, Italy.Google Scholar
Shotter, J. 1998. Agency and identity: a relational approach. In Campbell, A. and Muncer, S. (eds), The Social Child. Psychology Press, Hove, UK, 271–91.Google Scholar
Tornstam, L. 2005. Gerotranscendence: A Developmental Theory of Positive Aging. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
Tornstam, L. 2011. Maturing into gerotranscendence. Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 43, 2, 166–80.Google Scholar
Tulle, E. (ed.) 2004. Old Age and Agency. Nova Publishers, New York.Google Scholar
Tulle, E. and Dorrer, N. 2012. Back from the brink: ageing, exercise and health in a small gym. Ageing & Society, 32, 7, 1106–27.Google Scholar
Tura, L. F. R. and Oliveira Silva, A. (eds) 2012. Envelhecimento e Representacoes Sociais [Ageing and Social Representations]. Quartet Faperj, Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
Valsiner, J. 2003. Beyond social representations. A theory of enablement. Papers on Social Representations, 12, 7.1–7.16.Google Scholar
Vincent, J. A., Tulle, E. and Bond, J. 2008. The anti-ageing enterprise: science, knowledge, expertise, rhetoric and values. Journal of Aging Studies, 22, 4, 291–4.Google Scholar
Vygotskij, L. 1933. Il processo cognitivo [The Cognitive Process]. Bollati Boringhieri, Turin, Italy.Google Scholar
Walker, A. 2002. The evolving meaning of retirement. A strategy for active ageing. International Social Security Review, 55, 1, 121–39.Google Scholar
Wray, S. 2003. Women growing older: agency, ethnicity and culture. Sociology, 37, 3, 511–27.Google Scholar