Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T04:33:01.581Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Quality of urban life among older adults in the world major metropolises: a cross-cultural comparative study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2016

XI PAN ,
JASLEEN K. CHAHAL  and
ROSE MARIE WARD
XI PAN*
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, Texas State University, San Marcos, Texas, USA.
JASLEEN K. CHAHAL
Affiliation:
Scripps Gerontology Center, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio, USA.
ROSE MARIE WARD
Affiliation:
Department of Kinesiology and Health, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio, USA.
*
Address for correspondence: Xi Pan, Department of Sociology, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX 78666, USA E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The concept of quality of urban life (QoUL) can be interpreted quite differently across different cultures. Little evidence has shown that the measure of QoUL, which is based on Western culture, can be applied to populations cross-culturally. In the current study, we use data from the 2006 Assessing Happiness and Competitiveness of World Major Metropolises study to identify underlying factors associated with QoUL as well as assess the consistency of the QoUL measurement among adults, aged 60 and older, in ten world major metropolises (i.e. New York City, Toronto, London, Paris, Milan, Berlin, Stockholm, Beijing, Tokyo and Seoul). Exploratory factor analysis and multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) are used to analyse the data. Findings of the study suggest that the measure of QoUL is sensitive to socio-cultural differences. Community factor and intrapersonal factor are two underlying structures that are related to QoUL among older adults in ten metropolises cross-culturally. Results from the CFA indicate that Toronto is comparable with Beijing, New York City, Paris, Milan and Stockholm in QoUL, while other cities are not. The results provide insights into the development of current urban policy and promotion of quality of life among older residents in major metropolitan areas. Future researchers should continue to explore the relationship between QoUL and socio-cultural differences within international urban settings, while remaining cautious when making cross-cultural comparisons.

Keywords

quality of urban lifeolder populationcross-cultural comparisonstructural equation modelling
Type
Articles
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 38 , Issue 1 , January 2018 , pp. 108 - 128
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Borg, C., Hallberg, I. R. and Blomqvist, K. 2006. Life satisfaction among older people (65+) with reduced self-care capacity: the relationship to social, health and financial aspects. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 15, 5, 607–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borglin, G., Edberg, A.-K. and Hallberg, I. R. 2005. The experience of quality of life among older people. Journal of Aging Studies, 19, 2, 201–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, N. K. 2014. Requesting and Using Modifications Indices in Mplus. Available online at http://ssw.unc.edu/sswsig/sites/default/files/Modification%20Indices%20in%20Mplus%20%28NK%20Bowen%29.pdf. [Accessed on June 22, 2015].Google Scholar
Brown, T. 2006. Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. Guildford, New York.Google Scholar
Browning, C. and Cagney, K. A. 2002. Neighborhood structural disadvantage, collective efficacy, and self-rated physical health in an urban setting. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 43, 12, 383–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, B. M. 2011. Structural Equation Modeling with Mplus: Basic Concepts, Applications and Programming (Multivariate Application Series). Routledge Academic, New York.Google Scholar
Charles, S. T., Mather, M. and Carstensen, L. L. 2003. Aging and emotional memory: the forgettable nature of negative images of older adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 2, 310–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corless, I. B., Nicholas, P. K. and Nokes, K. M. 2001. Issues in cross-cultural quality-of-life research. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 33, 1, 15–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Silva, S. H. P., Jayasuriya, A. R., Rajapaksa, L. C., de Silva, A. P. and Barraclough, S. 2016. Development and validation of a measure of quality of life for the young elderly in Sri Lanka. Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health, 28, 1S, 115S–25S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finch, W. H. 2011. A comparison of factor rotation methods for dichotomous data. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 10, 2, 549–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franks, P., Gold, M. R. and Fiscella, K. 2003. Sociodemographics, self-rated health, and mortality in the US. Social Science and Medicine, 56, 12, 2505–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gadermann, A. M., Guhn, M. and Zumbo, B. D. 2012. Estimating ordinal reliability for Likert-type and ordinal item response data: a conceptual, empirical, and practical guide. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 17, 3, 1–13.Google Scholar
Geng, Y. and Doberstein, B. 2008. Developing the circular economy in China: challenges and opportunities for achieving ‘leapfrog development’. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 15, 3, 231–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregorich, S. E. 2006. Do self-report instruments allow meaningful comparisons across diverse population groups? Testing measurement invariance using the confirmatory factor analysis framework. Medical Care, 44, 11, supplement 3, S78–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoi, L. V., Chuc, N. T.-K. and Lindholm, L. 2010. Health-related quality of life, and its determinants, among older people in rural Vietnam. BMC Public Health, 10, 549, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horn, J. L., McArdle, J. and Mason, R. 1983. When is invariance not invariant: a practical scientist's look at the ethereal concept of factor invariance. The Southern Psychologist, 1, 4, 179–88.Google Scholar
Kemp, D., Manicaros, M., Mullins, P., Simpson, R., Stimson, R. and Wester, J. 1997. Urban Metabolism: A Framework for Evaluating the Viability, Livability and Sustainability of South East Queensland. The Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute, Brisbane.Google Scholar
Kim, H.-K., Hisata, M., Kai, I. and Lee, S.-K. 2000. Social support exchange and quality of life among the Korean elderly. Journal of Cross-cultural Gerontology, 15, 4, 331–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Latham, K. and Peek, C. W. 2013. Self-rated health and morbidity onset among late midlife U.S. adults. Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 68B, 1, 107–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, T. W., Ko, I. S. and Lee, K. J. 2006. Health promotion behaviors and quality of life among community-dwelling elderly in Korea: a cross-sectional survey. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 43, 3, 293–300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lynch, J., Smith, G., Hillemeier, M., Shaw, M., Raghunathan, T. and Kaplan, G. 2001. Income inequality, the psychosocial environment, and health: comparisons of wealthy nations. Lancet, 358, 9277, 194–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Magee, C. A., Caputi, P. and Iverson, D. C. 2011. Relationships between self-rated health, quality of life and sleep duration in middle aged and elderly Australians. Sleep Medicine, 12, 4, 346–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marans, R. W. 2003. Understanding environmental quality through quality of life studies: the 2001 DAS and its use of subjective and objective indicators. Landscape and Urban Planning, 65, 1/2, 73–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marans, R. W. 2012. Quality of urban life studies: an overview and implications for environment–behavior research. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 35, 9–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milfont, T. L. and Fischer, R. 2010. Testing measurement invariance across groups: applications in cross-cultural research. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3, 1, 111–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muthen, B. O., du Toit, S. H. C. and Spisic, D. 1997. Robust Inference Using Weighted Least Square and Quadratic Estimating Equations in Latent Variable Modeling with Categorical and Continuous Outcomes. Available online at http://pages.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/muthen/psychometrics.htm. [Accessed on June 22, 2015].Google Scholar
Neill, J. 2008. Writing up a factor analysis. Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 Australia, Center for Applied Psychology, University of Canberra, Canberra.Google Scholar
Oshio, T. and Urakawa, K. 2013. The association between perceived income inequality and subjective well-being: evidence from a social survey in Japan. Social Indicators Research, 116, 3, 755–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Østbye, T., Krause, K. M., Norton, M. C., Tschanz, J., Sanders, L., Hayden, K., Pieper, C., Welsh-Bohmer, K. A. and Cache County Investigators 2006. Ten dimensions of health and their relationships with overall self-reported health and survival in a predominately religiously active elderly population: the Cache County Memory Study. Journal of American Geriatric Society, 54, 2, 199–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pacione, M. 2003. Urban environmental quality and human wellbeing – a social geographical perspective. Landscape and Urban Planning, 65, 1/2, 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parra, D. C., Gomez, L. F., Sarmiento, O. L., Buchner, D., Brownson, R., Schimd, T., Gomez, V. and Lobelo, F. 2010. Perceived and objective neighborhood environment attributes and health related quality of life among the elderly in Bogotá, Colombia. Social Science and Medicine, 70, 7, 1070–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patterson, P. K. and Chapman, N. J. 2004. Urban form and older residents’ service use, walking, driving, quality of life, and neighborhood satisfaction. American Journal of Health Promotion, 19, 1, 45–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinquart, M. and Sörensen, S. 2000. Influence of socioeconomic status, social network, and competence on subjective well-being in later life: a meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 15, 2, 187–224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rappaport, J. 2009. The increasing importance of quality of life. Journal of Economic Geography, 9, 6, 779–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richard, L., Gauvin, L., Gosselin, C. and Laforest, S. 2008. Staying connected: neighborhood correlates of social participation among older adults living in an urban environment in Montreal, Quebec. Health Promotion International, 24, 1, 46–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richard, L., Laforest, S., Dufresne, F. and Sapinski, J. P. 2005. The quality of life of older adults living in an urban environment: professional and lay perspectives. Canadian Journal on Aging, 24, 1, 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sargent-Cox, K. A., Anstey, K. J. and Luszcz, M. A. 2008. Determinants of self-rated health items with different points of reference: implications for health measurement of older adults. Journal of Aging and Health, 20, 6, 739–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schalock, R. L., Verdugo, M. A., Jenaro, C., Wang, M., Wehmeyer, M., Xu, J. and Lachapelle, Y. 2005. Cross-cultural study of quality of life indicators. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 110, 4, 298–311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmitt, T. A. 2011. Current mythological consideration in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29, 4, 304–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smedley, B. D. and Syme, S. L. (eds) 2000. Promoting Health: Intervention Strategies from Social and Behavioral Research: A Report of the Institute of Medicine. National Academy Press, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M. and Baumgartner, H. 1998. Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 1, 78–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandenberg, R. J. and Lance, C. E. 2000. A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 1, 4–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widgery, R. N. 1982. Satisfaction with the quality of urban life: a predictive model. American Journal of Community Psychology, 10, 1, 37–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Health Organization (Quality of Life Group) 1998. Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychological Medicine, 28, 3, 551–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zack, M. M., Moriarty, D. G., Stroup, D. F., Ford, E. S. and Mokdad, A. H. 2004. Worsening trends in adult health-related quality of life and self-rated health, United States, 1993–2001. Public Health Reports, 119, 5, 493–505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhou, B., Chen, K., Wang, J. F., Wang, H., Zhang, S. S. and Zheng, W. J. 2011. Quality of life and related factors in the older rural and urban Chinese populations in Zhejiang province. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 30, 2, 199–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar