Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T15:10:30.431Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Productive engagement and ageing in productivist welfare regimes: questing for an age-friendly city in Hong Kong

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2021

Zhuoyi Wen Open the ORCID record for Zhuoyi Wen [Opens in a new window] ,
Ka Ho Mok Open the ORCID record for Ka Ho Mok [Opens in a new window]  and
Padmore Adusei Amoah Open the ORCID record for Padmore Adusei Amoah [Opens in a new window]
Zhuoyi Wen
Affiliation:
Institute of Policy Studies, Asia Pacific Institute of Aging Studies, Lingnan University, Hong Kong (SAR)
Ka Ho Mok
Affiliation:
Institute of Policy Studies, School of Graduate Studies, Department of Sociology and Social Policy, Lingnan University, Hong Kong (SAR)
Padmore Adusei Amoah*
Affiliation:
Institute of Policy Studies, Asia Pacific Institute of Aging Studies, Lingnan University, Hong Kong (SAR) School of Graduate Studies, Lingnan University, Hong Kong (SAR)
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected], [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The population aged 65 years and above in Hong Kong is projected to rise from 15 per cent in 2014 to 38.4 per cent in 2069. Therefore, the quest for creating age-friendly conditions and the promotion of active ageing has become a priority for the Hong Kong Government and stakeholders in the city. Using a cross-national comparative framework for productive engagement in later life, this article examines the predictors of productive engagement (perceived voluntary engagement) in two districts (the Islands and Tsuen Wan) of Hong Kong – a typical productivist welfare regime in Asia. Data were collected through a social survey to ascertain the perception of an age-friendly city and active ageing in 2016 and 2018 from 1,638 persons aged 60 years and older. The results indicate some differences in the perception of the key determinants in both districts, but the factors associated with productive engagement were consistent, namely social atmosphere, social provisions and the built environment. The findings are discussed within the broader discourse on social gerontology, age-friendly cities and productivist welfare regimes.

Keywords

productive ageingproductivist welfare regimeproductive engagementage-friendly cityHong Kongsustainable development
Type
Article
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 42 , Issue 11 , November 2022 , pp. 2510 - 2532
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amoah, PA (2018) Social participation, health literacy, and health and well-being: a cross-sectional study in Ghana. SSM – Population Health 4, 263–270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amoah, PA, Mok, KH, Wen, Z and Li, LW (2019) Achieving the age-friendly city agenda: an interventional study in Hong Kong's Islands District. Journal of Asian Public Policy 12, 1–20.Google Scholar
Aspalter, C (2006) The East Asian welfare model. International Journal of Social Welfare 15, 290–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Au, A, Lai, DWL, Yip, H-m, Chan, S, Lai, S, Chaudhury, H, Scharlach, A and Leeson, G (2020) Sense of community mediating between age-friendly characteristics and life satisfaction of community-dwelling older adults. Frontiers in Psychology 11, 86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bass, SA and Caro, FG (1996) Theoretical perspectives in productive aging. In Crown, WH (ed.), Handbook on Employment and the Elderly. Westport, CT: Greenwood, pp. 265–275.Google Scholar
Buffel, T and Phillipson, C (2016) Can global cities be ‘age-friendly cities’? Urban development and ageing populations. Cities 55, 94–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burr, JA, Caro, FG and Moorhead, J (2002) Productive aging and civic participation. Journal of Aging Studies 16, 87–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, RN and Gleason, HP (1985) Productive Aging: Enhancing Vitality in Later Life. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Census and Statistics Department (2017) Hong Kong Population Projections, 2017–2066. Hong Kong (SAR): Census and Statistics Department.Google Scholar
Census and Statistics Department (2020) Hong Kong Population Projections 2015–2069. Hong Kong (SAR): Census and Statistics Department.Google Scholar
Cheung, KC-K and Chou, K-L (2019) Poverty, deprivation and life satisfaction among Hong Kong older persons. Ageing & Society 39, 703–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheung, CK, Kam, PK and Ngan, RM-h (2011) Age discrimination in the labour market from the perspectives of employers and older workers. International Social Work 54, 118–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chong, AM-l (2010) Promoting volunteerism in later life in Hong Kong. China Journal of Social Work 3, 313–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chong, AML, Rochelle, TL and Liu, S (2013) Volunteerism and positive aging in Hong Kong: a cultural perspective. International Journal of Aging and Human Development 77, 211–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chou, K-L (2018) Social exclusion in old age: a validation study in Hong Kong. Aging and Mental Health 22, 1078–1085.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chou, K-L, Chow, NWS and Chi, I (2003) Volunteering aspirations of Hong Kong Chinese soon-to-be-old adults. Activities, Adaptation and Aging 27, 3/4, 79–96.Google Scholar
Chui, CHK, Tang, JYM, Kwan, CM, Fung Chan, O, Tse, M, Chiu, RLH, Lou, VWQ, Chau, PH, Leung, AYM and Lum, TYS (2019) Older adults’ perceptions of age-friendliness in Hong Kong. The Gerontologist 59, 549–558.Google ScholarPubMed
Consumer Search Hong Kong (2016) Age Discrimination in Employment: Report for Equal Opportunity Commission. Hong Kong (SAR): Consumer Search Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Elder Academy (2020) About Elder Academy. Available at https://www.elderacademy.org.hk/en/aboutea/index.html.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Food and Health Bureau (2019) District Health Centre. Available at https://www.dhc.gov.hk/en/index.html.Google Scholar
Galasso, V and Profeta, P (2014) Population ageing and the size of the welfare state. In Harper, S and Hamblin, K (eds), International Handbook on Ageing and Public Policy. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 74–83.Google Scholar
Hall, PA and Soskice, D (eds) (2001) Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: University of Oxford Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harper, S and Hamblin, K (eds) (2014) International Handbook on Ageing and Public Policy. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, AJ (2017) Introducing voluntary private health insurance in a mixed medical economy: are Hong Kong citizens willing to subscribe? BMC Health Services Research 17, 603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hills, P and Yeh, AGO (1983) New town developments in Hong Kong. Built Environment (1978–) 9, 266–277.Google Scholar
HKSAR Government (2019) Background of Elderly Health Care Voucher Scheme. Available at https://www.hcv.gov.hk/eng/pub_background.htm.Google Scholar
Holliday, I (2000) Productivist welfare capitalism: social policy in East Asia. Political Studies 48, 706–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Home Affairs Department (2018) Islands District. Available at https://www.gohk.gov.hk/eng/welcome/isl_intro.html.Google Scholar
Huang, NC, Chu, C, Kung, SF and Hu, SC (2019) Association of the built environments and health-related quality of life in community-dwelling older adults: a cross-sectional study. Quality of Life Research 28, 2393–2407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hudson, J and Hwang, GJ (2013) Pathways of welfare state development in East Asia. In Izuhara, M (ed.), Handbook on East Asian Social Policy: Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 15–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Izuhara, M (ed.) (2013) Handbook on East Asian Social Policy. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jockey Club Age-friendly City Project (2019 a) Jockey Club Age-friendly City. Available at https://www.jcafc.hk/en/about/background.Google Scholar
Jockey Club Age-friendly City Project (2019 b) Publications Under the Jockey Club Age-friendly City Project. Available at https://www.jcafc.hk/en/Resources-Centre/Publications.html.Google Scholar
Kahana, E, Lovegreen, L, Kahana, B and Kahana, M (2003) Person, environment, and person–environment fit as influences on residential satisfaction of elders. Environment and Behavior 35, 434–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, MMS (2015) Comparative Welfare Capitalism in East Asia: Productivist Models of Social Policy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koohsari, MJ, Nakaya, T, McCormack, GR, Shibata, A, Ishii, K, Yasunaga, A and Oka, K (2019) Cognitive function of elderly persons in japanese neighborhoods: the role of street layout. American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Other Dementias 34, 381–389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kühner, S, Lau, M, Jiang, J and Wen, Z (2019) Personal income, local communities and happiness in a rich global city: evidence from Hong Kong. Journal of Asian Public Policy. Available online doi:10.1080/17516234.2019.1652419.Google Scholar
Lain, D and Vickerstaff, S (2014) Working beyond retirement age: lessons for policy. In Harper, S and Hamblin, K (eds), International Handbook on Ageing and Public Policy. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 242–255.Google Scholar
Lau, KW and Gordon, D (2017) Poverty in a Rich Society: The Case of Hong Kong. Shatin, Hong Kong (SAR): CUHK Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, HY, Jang, S-N, Lee, S, Cho, S-I and Park, E-O (2008) The relationship between social participation and self-rated health by sex and age: a cross-sectional survey. International Journal of Nursing Studies 45, 1042–1054.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, S, Wen, Z, Su, J, Chong, AM-l, Kong, S and Jiang, Z (2020) Social trust, trust differential, and radius of trust on volunteering: evidence from the Hong Kong Chinese. Journal of Social Service Research. Available online doi:10.1080/01488376.2020.1758867.Google Scholar
Lue, J-D and Park, C-u (2013) Beyond productivist social policy – the East Asian welfare–work nexus in transition. Journal of Asian Public Policy 6, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKean, R and Abbott-Chapman, J (2012) Older people's perceived health and well-being: the contribution of peer-run community-based organisations. Health Sociology Review 21, 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinson, M and Minkler, M (2006) Civic engagement and older adults: a critical perspective. The Gerontologist 46, 318–324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mok, KH and Qian, J (2019) A new welfare regime in the making? Paternalistic welfare pragmatism in China. Journal of European Social Policy 29, 100–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mok, KH, Ku, Y-W and Yuda, TK (2020) Managing the COVID-19 pandemic crisis and changing welfare regimes. Journal of Asian Public Policy. Available online doi:10.1080/17516234.2020.1861722.Google Scholar
Morrow-Howell, N and Wang, Y (2013) Productive engagement of older adults: elements of a cross-cultural research agenda. Ageing International 38, 159–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oriental Daily (2014) Elder abuse cases have increased in five consecutive years, emblezzlement of parents’ property becomes more common. Oriental Daily. Available at https://hk.on.cc/hk/bkn/cnt/news/20140209/bkn-20140209212914326-0209_00822_001.html.Google Scholar
Phillips, DR, Woo, J, Cheung, F, Wong, M and Chau, PH (2018) Exploring the age-friendliness of Hong Kong: opportunities, initiatives and challenges in an ageing Asian city. In Buffel, T, Handler, S and Phillipson, C (eds), Age-friendly Communities: A Global Perspective. Bristol, UK: Policy Press, pp. 119–142.Google Scholar
Qian, QK, Ho, WKO, Ochoa, JJ and Chan, EHW (2019) Does aging-friendly enhance sustainability? Evidence from Hong Kong. Sustainable Development 27, 657–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramachandran, M and Dsouza, SA (2018) Older adults’ experiences of community mobility in an Indian metropolis: a qualitative study. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics 36, 315–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherraden, M and Morrow-Howell, N (2001) Productive aging: theoretical choices and directions. In Morrow-Howell, N, Hinterlong, J and Sherraden, M (eds), Productive Aging: Concepts and Challenges. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Shizume, M, Kato, M and Matsuda, R (2020) A corporate-centred conservative welfare regime: three-layered protection in Japan. Journal of Asian Public Policy 14, 110–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, MW, Cloutier, D and Andrews, GJ (2014) Geographies of ageing: progress and possibilities after two decades of change. Progress in Human Geography 39, 776–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
South China Morning Post (2015) Hong Kong struggles to cope with its rapidly ageing population. South China Morning Post. Available at https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/article/1712397/hong-kong-struggles-cope-its-rapidly-ageing-population.Google Scholar
Steel, D (2011) Repeated cross-sectional design. In Lavrakas, P (ed.), Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 715–716.Google Scholar
Strauss, S and Trommer, K (2018) Productive ageing regimes in Europe: welfare state typologies explaining elderly Europeans’ participation in paid and unpaid work. Journal of Population Ageing 11, 311–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, Y, Phillips, DR and Wong, M (2018) A study of housing typology and perceived age-friendliness in an established Hong Kong new town: a person–environment perspective. Geoforum 88, 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webber, SC, Porter, MM and Menec, VH (2010) Mobility in older adults: a comprehensive framework. The Gerontologist 50, 443–450.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilding, P (2008) Is the East Asian Welfare Model still productive? Journal of Asian Public Policy 1, 18–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, M, Chau, PH, Cheung, F, Phillips, DR and Woo, J (2015) Comparing the age-friendliness of different neighbourhoods using district surveys: an example from Hong Kong. PLOS ONE 10, e0131526.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization (WHO) (2002) Active Ageing: A Policy Framework. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (WHO) (2007) Global Age-friendly Cities: A Guide. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (WHO) (2020) Tsuen Wan District Hong Kong: Age-friendly Community Scheme. Geneva: WHO. Available at https://extranet.who.int/agefriendlyworld/network/tsuen-wan-district-hong-kong/.Google Scholar
Yang, N and Kühner, S (2020) Beyond the limits of the productivist regime: capturing three decades of East Asian welfare development with fuzzy sets. Social Policy and Society 19, 613–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaidi, A (2014) Enabling environments for active and healthy ageing in EU countries. Gerontechnology 12, 201–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhong, X and Li, B (2017) New intergenerational contracts in the making? – The experience of urban China. Journal of Asian Public Policy 10, 167–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar