Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T01:02:42.837Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Outcomes from a peer tutor model for teaching technology to older adults

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2012

AMANDA TOLER WOODWARD ,
PAUL P. FREDDOLINO ,
DONA J. WISHART ,
LOUANNE BAKK ,
RIE KOBAYASHI ,
CAITLIN TUPPER ,
JOHN PANCI  and
CHRISTINA M. BLASCHKE-THOMPSON
AMANDA TOLER WOODWARD*
Affiliation:
School of Social Work, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
PAUL P. FREDDOLINO
Affiliation:
School of Social Work, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
DONA J. WISHART
Affiliation:
Otsego County Commission on Aging, Gaylord, Michigan, USA.
LOUANNE BAKK
Affiliation:
Department of Social Work, Greater Rochester Collaborative Master of Social Work Program, College at Brockport State University of New York, Brockport, NY 14420, USA.
RIE KOBAYASHI
Affiliation:
School of Social Work, Eastern Washington University, Cheney, Washington, USA.
CAITLIN TUPPER
Affiliation:
School of Social Work, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
JOHN PANCI
Affiliation:
Otsego County Commission on Aging, Gaylord, Michigan, USA.
CHRISTINA M. BLASCHKE-THOMPSON
Affiliation:
School of Social Work, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
*
Address for correspondence: Amanda Toler Woodward, School of Social Work, Michigan State University, 655 Auditorium Road, East Lansing, Michigan, 48824, USA. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A key component of social work ethics is social justice and equitable access to resources. Increasingly, this includes access to technology. This study addresses issues related to the ‘digital divide’ by testing a peer tutor model (Technology and Aging Project, TAP2) to teach adults aged 60 and older how to use information and communication technologies (ICTs) such as email, the internet, online chat rooms and discussion groups, internet-based support groups, and voice technology and webcams. Participants from the control group of a previous programme, TAP1 (N=19) participated in a six-month computer training programme. Six participants who had successfully completed the TAP1 training were selected to be peer tutors. Data were collected from tutors and learners at baseline, three months, six months and nine months (three months after the end of training). The current study reports on learner outcomes only. Measures include computer, social support, and mental health-related outcomes. Learners reported a significant and consistent increase over time in their confidence completing certain computer-related tasks and their overall use of ICTs. Mental health and social support outcomes did not change. Overall, the peer tutor model appeared to be at least as effective as the previous staff-directed model.

Keywords

information and communication technologiesolder adultscomputer trainingvolunteer
Type
Articles
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 33 , Issue 8 , November 2013 , pp. 1315 - 1338
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, R. 2006. Older Americans, Broadband and the Future of the Net. Available online at http://www.seniornet.org/research/SeniorNetNNPaper060606.pdf [Accessed 30 August 2008].Google Scholar
Antonucci, T. C. 1986. Social support networks: hierarchical mapping technique. Generations, 10, Summer, 10–12.Google Scholar
Beckenhauser, J. I. and Armstrong, J. 2009. Exploring relationships between normative aging, technology, and communication. Marriage and Family Review, 45, 6–8, 825–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaschke, C. M., Freddolino, P. P. and Mullen, E. E. 2009. Ageing and technology: a review of the research literature. British Journal of Social Work, 39, 4, 641–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blit-Cohen, E. and Litwin, H. 2004. Elder participation in cyberspace: a qualitative analysis of Israeli retirees. Journal of Aging Studies, 18, 4, 385–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, N. and Poppen, W. 2003. Assistive technology, computers and Internet may decrease sense of isolation for homebound elderly and disabled persons. Technology and Disability, 15, 1, 19–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
British Association of Social Workers 2002. The Code of Ethics for Social Work. British Association of Social Workers, Birmingham, UK.Google Scholar
Campbell, R. J. 2004. Older women and the Internet. Journal of Women and Aging, 16, 1/2, 161–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carpenter, B. D. and Bunday, S. 2007. Computer use among older adults in a naturally occurring retirement community. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 6, 3012–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, W., Boase, J. and Wellman, B. 2008. The global villagers: comparing Internet users and uses around the world. In Wellman, B. and Haythornthwaite, C. (eds), The Internet in Everyday Life. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, pp. 74–113.Google Scholar
Clark, F. and Straka, S. M. 2000. Internet Access for Frail Seniors: The Connections Experience. McGill Centre for Studies in Aging, Verdun, Canada.Google Scholar
Czaja, S. J., Charness, N., Fisk, A. D., Hertzog, C., Nair, S. N., Rogers, W. A. and Sharit, J. 2006. Factors predicting the use of technology: findings from the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE). Psychology and Aging, 21, 2, 333–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czaja, S. J. and Lee, C. C. 2003. The impact of the Internet on older adults. In Charness, N. and Schaie, K. W. (eds), The Impact of Technology on Successful Aging. Springer, New York, pp. 113–33.Google Scholar
De Jong Gierveld, J. and Van Tilburg, T. 2006. A 6-item scale for overall, emotional, and social loneliness: confirmatory tests on survey data. Research on Aging, 28, 5, 582–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eastman, J. K. and Iyer, R. 2004. The elderly's use and attitude towards the Internet. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 21, 3, 208–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flanagan, J. C. 1978. A research approach to improving our quality of life. American Psychologist, 33, 2, 138–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, S. 2004. Older Americans and the Internet. Pew Research Center's Internet and American Life Project, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Fox, S. 2010. Four in Ten Seniors Go Online. Pew Research Center's Internet and American Life Project, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Gatto, S. L. and Tak, S. H. 2008. Computer, Internet, and e-mail use among older adults: benefits and barriers. Educational Gerontology, 34, 9, 800–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickman, J. M., Rogers, W. A. and Fisk, A. D. 2007. Training older adults to use new technology. Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 62B, Special Issue 1, 77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Federation of Social Workers 2005. Ethics in Social Work, Statement of Principles. Available online at http://www.ifsw.org/p38000324.html [Accessed 27 May 2011].Google Scholar
Irizarry, C., Downing, A. and West, D. 2002. Promoting modern technology and Internet access for under-represented older populations. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 19, 4, 13–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jung, Y., Peng, W., Moran, M., Jin, S.-A. A., McLaughlin, M., Cody, M., Jordan-Marsh, M., Albright, J. and Silverstein, M. 2010. Low-income minority seniors’ enrollment in a cybercafé: psychological barriers to crossing the digital divide. Educational Gerontology, 36, 3, 192–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laganá, L., Oliver, T., Ainsworth, A. and Edwards, M. 2011. Enhancing computer self-efficacy and attitudes in multi-ethnic older adults: a randomised controlled study. Ageing & Society, 31, 6, 911–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leveille, S. G., Wagner, E. H., Davis, C., Grothaus, L., Wallace, J., LoGerfo, M. and Kent, D. 1998. Preventing disability and managing chronic illness in frail older adults: a randomized trial of a community-based partnership with primary care. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 46, 10, 1191–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Madden, M. 2010. Older Adults and Social Media: Social Networking Use Among Those Ages 50 and Older Nearly Doubled Over the Past Year. Pew Research Center Internet and American Life Project, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Manna, W. C., Belchior, P., Tomita, M. R. and Kemp, B. J. 2005. Computer use by middle-aged and older adults with disabilities. Technology and Disability, 17, 1, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melenhorst, A. S. and Rogers, W. A. 2006. Older adults’ motivated choice for technological innovation: evidence for benefit-driven selectivity. Psychology and Aging, 21, 1, 190–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murphy, C. A., Coover, D. and Owens, S. V. 1989. Development and validation of the Computer Self-Efficacy Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49, 4, 893–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nair, S. N., Czaja, S. J. and Sharit, J. 2007. A multilevel modeling approach to examining individual differences in skill acquisition for a computer-based task. Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 62B, Special Issue 1, 85–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Namazi, K. H. and McClintic, M. 2003. Computer use among elderly persons in long-term care facilities. Educational Gerontology, 29, 6, 535–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Association of Social Workers (NASW) and Association of Social Work Boards (ASWB) 2005. Standards for Technology and Social Work Practice. NASW and ASWB, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Office for National Statistics 2011. Internet Access Quarterly Update 2011 Q3. Available online at http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/dcp171766_242415.pdf [Accessed 5 March 2012].Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) 2011. Understanding the Digital Divide. Paris: OECD. Available online at http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/38/57/1888451.pdf [Accessed 5 March 2012].Google Scholar
Osman, A., Poulson, D. and Nicolle, C. 2005. Introducing computers and the Internet to older users: findings from the Care OnLine project. University Access in the Information Society, 4, 1, 16–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pew Research Center 2010. Internet and American Life Project: 2010 Social Side of the Internet Survey. Available online at http://www.pewinternet.org/Static-Pages/Trend-Data/Whos-Online.aspx [Accessed 27 May 2011].Google Scholar
Pfeil, U., Zaphiris, P. and Wilson, S. 2009. Older adults’ perceptions and experiences of online social support. Interacting with Computers, 21, 3, 159–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Primrose, J. 2003. 2001 Census: Computer and Internet Use. Census Paper No. 03/03, Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra.Google Scholar
Rabe-Hesketh, S. and Skrondai, A. 2005. Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using Stata. Stata Press, College Station, Texas.Google Scholar
Redding, T. R., Eisenman, G. and Rugolo, J. 1998. Training in Technology for Late Adopters: Learning in Retirement, Computers for Seniors. R and R Advantage Educational Research and Marketing, Palm Beach, Florida. Available online at http://www.oltraining.com/redding/R&R/seniors.html [Accessed 27 May 2011].Google Scholar
Rose, M. 2007. Evaluation of a peer-education program on heart disease prevention with older adults. Public Health Nursing, 9, 4, 242–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, R. L. 2008. Older computer-literate women: their motivations, obstacles, and paths to success. Educational Gerontology, 34, 7, 610–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, E. J. 2004. Maximizing computer use among the elderly in rural senior centers. Educational Gerontology, 30, 7, 573–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selwyn, N. 2004. The information aged: a qualitative study of older adults’ use of information and communications technology. Journal of Aging Studies, 18, 4, 369–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selwyn, N., Gorard, S., Furlong, J. and Madden, L. 2003. Older adults’ use of information and communications technology in everyday life. Ageing & Society, 23, 5, 561–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slegers, K., van Boxtel, M. P. J. and Jolles, J. 2007. The effects of computer training and internet usage on the use of everyday technology by older adults: a randomized controlled study. Educational Gerontology, 33, 2, 91–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slegers, K., van Boxtel, M. P. J. and Jolles, J. 2008. Effects of computer training and Internet usage on the well-being and quality of life of older adults: a randomized, controlled study. Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 63B, 3, 176–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slegers, K., van Boxtel, M. P. J. and Jolles, J. 2009. The effects of computer training and Internet usage on cognitive abilities of older adults: a randomised controlled study. Ageing, Clinical and Experimental Research, 21, 1, 43–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations 2008. The Global Information Society: A Statistical View. United Nations, New York.Google Scholar
West, B., Welch, K. B. and Galecki, A. T. 2006. Linear Mixed Models: A Practical Guide Using Statistical Software. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, Florida.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, H., McConnell, E., Clipp, E., Branch, L. G., Sloane, R., Pieper, C. F. and Box, T. L. 2002. A randomized controlled trial of the psychosocial impact of providing Internet training and access to older adults. Aging and Mental Health, 6, 3, 213–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woodward, A., Freddolino, P., Blaschke-Thompson, C., Wishart, D., Bakk, L., Kobayashi, R. and Tupper, C. 2010. Technology and Aging Project: training outcomes and efficacy from a randomized field trial. Ageing International, 36, 1, 46–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xie, B. 2007. Information technology education for older adults as a continuing peer-learning process: a Chinese case study. Educational Gerontology, 33, 5, 429–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xie, B. and Bugg, J. M. 2009. Public library computer training for older adults to access high-quality Internet health information. Library and Information Science Research, 31, 155–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yesavage, J. A., Brink, T. L., Rose, T. L., Lum, O., Huang, V., Adey, M. and Leirer, V. O. 1982. Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 17, 1, 37–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimet, G. D., Dahlem, N. W., Zimet, S. G. and Farley, G. K. 1988. The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52, 1, 30–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar