Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:49:40.210Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Money and happiness: does age make a difference?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 February 2011

CHANG-MING HSIEH
CHANG-MING HSIEH*
Affiliation:
Jane Addams College of Social Work, University of Illinois at Chicago, USA.
*
Address for correspondence: Chang-Ming Hsieh, Jane Addams College of Social Work, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1040 West Harrison Street (MC 309), Chicago, IL 60607, USA. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although the factors that influence people's perception of happiness have long been a focus for scholars, research to date has not offered conclusive findings on the relationships between income, age and happiness. This study examined the relationship between money and happiness across age groups. Analysing data from United States General Social Surveys from 1972 to 2006, this study finds that even after controlling for all the major socio-demographic variables, income (whether household income or personal equivalised income) had a significant positive association with happiness for young and middle-age adults, but it was not the same case with older adults. After controlling for the major socio-demographic variables, there was no evidence of a significant relationship between income (whichever definition) and happiness for older adults. The results also showed that the effect of household income on happiness was significantly smaller for older adults than for young or middle-age adults in the model controlling for major socio-demographic variables. The relationship between household income and happiness no longer differed significantly across age groups after social comparison variables were included. The relationship between equivalised income and happiness did not vary significantly by age group after controlling for the major socio-demographic variables.

Keywords

subjective wellbeingageingincomequality of life
Type
Articles
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 31 , Issue 8 , November 2011 , pp. 1289 - 1306
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allison, P. D. 1999 a. Comparing logit and probit coefficients across groups. Sociological Methods and Research, 28, 2, 186–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, P. D. 1999 b. Logistic Regression Using the SAS System. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina.Google Scholar
Beatty, P. and Tuch, S. A. 1997. Race and life satisfaction in the middle class. Sociological Spectrum, 17, 1, 71–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, S. H. 1982. Adjustment to and satisfaction with retirement. Journal of Gerontology, 37, 5, 616–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burton, R. P. D., Rushing, B., Ritter, C. and Rakocy, A. 1993. Roles, race and subjective well-being: a longitudinal analysis of elderly men. Social Indicators Research, 28, 2, 137–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, A., Converse, P. E. and Rogers, W. L. 1976. The Quality of American Life: Perceptions, Evaluations, and Satisfactions. Russell Sage, New York.Google Scholar
Cutler, N. E. 1992. The emerging dynamics of financial gerontology: individual aging and population aging in the new century. In Cutler, N. E., Gregg, D. W. and Lawton, M. P. (eds), Aging, Money, and Life Satisfaction: Aspects of Financial Gerontology. Springer Publishing Company, New York, 1–21.Google Scholar
Davis, J. A., Smith, T. W. and Marsden, P. V. 2006. General Social Surveys, Cumulative Codebook 1972–2006. National Opinion Research Center, Chicago. Machine-readable data file distributed by the Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR), Ann Arbor, Michigan.Google Scholar
Di Tella, R., MacCulloch, R. and Oswald, A. 2003. The macro economics of happiness. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85, 4, 809–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diener, E. 1984. Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 3, 542–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diener, E., Diener, M. and Diener, C. 1995. Factors predicting the subjective well-being of nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 5, 851–864.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Donnenwerth, G. V. and Petersen, L. R. 1992. Institutionalization and well-being among the elderly. Sociological Inquiry, 62, 4, 437–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyle, D. and Forehand, M. J. 1984. Life satisfaction and old age: A reexamination. Research on Aging, 6, 3, 432–448.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elwell, F. and Maltbie-Crannell, A. D. 1981. The impact of role loss upon coping resources and life satisfaction of the elderly. Journal of Gerontology, 36, 2, 223–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feist, G. J., Bodner, T. E., Jacobs, J. F., Miles, M. and Tan, V. 1995. Integrating top-down and bottom-up structural models of subjective well-being: a longitudinal investigation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1, 138–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felton, B. J. 1987. Cohort variation in happiness: some hypotheses and exploratory analyses. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 25, 1, 27–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fengler, A. P. and Jensen, L. 1981. Perceived and objective conditions as predictors of the life satisfaction of urban and non urban elderly. Journal of Gerontology, 36, 6, 750–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. 2005. Income and well-being: an empirical analysis of the comparison income effect. Journal of Public Economics, 89, 6, 997–1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, J. A. V. 2009. Happiness and Age Cycles: Return to Start … On the Functional Relationship Between Subjective Well-being and Age. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Paper 99. Available online at http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/ [Accessed 8 November 2010].Google Scholar
Frey, B. S. and Stutzer, A. 2002. Happiness and Economics: How the Economy and Institutions Affect Well-being. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, L. K. 1992. Economic status and subjective well-being: a review of literature and an agenda for future research. In Cutler, N. E., Gregg, D. W. and Lawton, M. P. (eds), Aging, Money, and Life Satisfaction: Aspects of Financial Gerontology. Springer Publishing Company, New York, 66–99.Google Scholar
George, L. K. 1996. Perceived quality of life. In Binstock, R. H. and George, L. K. (eds), Handbook of Aging and the Social Sciences. Sixth edition, Elsevier, San Diego, California, 320–36.Google Scholar
George, L. K. and Bearon, L. B. 1980. Quality of Life in Older Persons: Meaning and Measurements. Human Sciences Press, New York.Google Scholar
Headey, B., Veenhoven, R. and Wearing, A. 1991. Top-down versus bottom-up theories of subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 24, 1, 81–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennon, C. B. and Burton, J. R. 1986. Financial satisfaction as a developmental task among the elderly. American Behavioral Scientist, 29, 4, 439–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsieh, C. M. 2001. Correlates of financial satisfaction. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 52, 2, 135–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hsieh, C. M. 2003. Age, income and financial satisfaction. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 56, 2, 89–112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
La Barbera, P. A. and Gürhan, Z. 1997. The role of materialism, religiosity, and demographics in subjective well-being. Psychology and Marketing, 14, 1, 71–97.3.0.CO;2-L>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Layard, R. 2005. Happiness: Lessons from a New Science. Penguin, New York.Google Scholar
Liang, J. 1982. Sex differences in life satisfaction among the elderly. Journal of Gerontology, 37, 1, 100–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liang, J. and Fairchild, T. J. 1979. Relative deprivation and perception of financial adequacy among the aged. Journal of Gerontology, 34, 5, 746–759.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ligon, E. 1989. The Development and Use of a Consistent Income Measure for the General Social Survey. GSS Methodological Report 64, National Opinion Research Center, Chicago.Google Scholar
Maddox, G. L. 1992. Aging and well-being. In Cutler, N. E., Gregg, D. W. and Lawton, M. P. (eds), Aging, Money, and Life Satisfaction: Aspects of Financial Gerontology. Springer Publishing Company, New York, 53–68.Google Scholar
Markides, K. S. and Martin, H. W. 1979. A causal model of life satisfaction among the elderly. Journal of Gerontology, 34, 1, 86–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKenzie, B. and Campbell, J. 1987. Race, socioeconomic status, and the subjective well-being of older Americans. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 25, 1, 43–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Michalos, A. C. 2004. Social indicators research and health-related quality of life research. Social Indicators Research, 65, 1, 27–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mookherjee, H. N. 1992. Perceptions of well-being by metropolitan and nonmetropolitan populations in the United States. Journal of Social Psychology, 132, 4, 513–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, D. G. and Diener, E. 1995. Who is happy? Psychological Science, 6, 1, 11–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) 2008. Growing Unequal? Income Distribution and Poverty in OECD Countries. OECD, Paris. Available online at www.oecd.org/els/social/inequality [Accessed 1 February 2009].Google Scholar
Robinson, J. P. and Martin, S. 2008. What do happy people do? Social Indicators Research, 89, 3, 565–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodgers, W. 1982. Trends in reported social inequalities in happiness within demographically defined subgroups, 1957–78. Social Forces, 60, 3, 826–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruffing-Rahal, M. A. and Anderson, J. 1994. Factors associated with qualitative well-being in older women. Journal of Women and Aging, 6, 3, 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shmotkin, D. 1990. Subjective well-being as a function of age and gender: a multivariate look for differentiated trends. Social Indicators Research, 23, 2, 201–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, E. S. 1993. Making sense of usefulness: an avenue toward satisfaction in later life. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 37, 4, 313–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stock, W. A., Okun, M. A., Haring, M. J. and Witter, R. A. 1983. Age differences in subjective well-being: a meta-analysis. In Light, R. J. (ed.), Evaluation Studies Review Annual. Volume 8, Sage, Beverly Hills, California, 279–302.Google Scholar
Tran, T. V. 1992. Subjective health and subjective well-being among minority elderly: measurement issues. Journal of Social Service Research, 16, 3/4, 133–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
US Bureau of Labor Statistics 2006. Consumer Price Index – All Urban Consumers. Statistics web pages, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Washington DC. Available online at http://stats.bls.gov/cgi-bin/surveymost [Accessed 30 January 2009].Google Scholar
Veenhoven, R. 1991. Questions on happiness: classical topics, modern answers, blind spots. In Strack, F., Argyle, M. and Schwarz, N. (eds), Subjective Well-being: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Pergamon, New York, 7–26.Google Scholar
Veenhoven, R. 1996. Happy life expectancy: a comparative measure of quality of life in nations. Social Indicators Research, 39, 1, 1–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Y. 2008. Social inequalities in happiness in the US 1972–2004: an age-period-cohort analysis. American Sociological Review, 73, 2, 204–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar