Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T13:13:17.679Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Intergenerational inequity arguments and the implications for state-funded financial support of older people

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2015

KAREN HURLEY
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
MARY BREHENY*
Affiliation:
School of Public Health, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
KEITH TUFFIN
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
*
Address for correspondence: Mary Breheny, School of Public Health, Massey University, Private Bag 11 222, Palmerston North, New Zealand E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

As population demographics shift towards an older population structure in the Western world, concerns about the future costs of pensions are apparent in politics, media and everyday conversations. In New Zealand, the universal state-funded pension paid to all citizens over the age of 65 years is often considered to be unsustainable in the context of population ageing. To examine the arguments surrounding universal superannuation, rhetorical analysis was undertaken on two New Zealand newspaper articles that discussed the future cost of pensions, and the 233 public responses these articles generated. The cost of superannuation was used to emphasise the different characteristics of each generational cohort and the ways that this produced inequity across generations. Claims of intergenerational inequity generated antagonism and widened divisions between generational groups. Foregrounding generational inequity in the discussion of superannuation has profound implications for state-funded income support for older people which relies upon widespread public support. Intergenerational inequity ignores the significant inequity in health and social circumstances in retirement among older New Zealanders and overlooks the significant impact of universal superannuation on protecting older New Zealanders from poverty in later life.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abele, S. 2011. Social interaction in cyberspace: social construction with few constraints. In Birchmeier, Z., Dietz-Uhler, B. and Stasser, G. (eds), Strategic Uses of Social Technology: An Interactive Perspective of Social Psychology. Cambridge University Press, New York, 84107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaglehole, A. 1993. Benefiting Women: Income Support for Women, 1893–1993. Social Policy Agency, Department of Social Welfare, Wellington.Google Scholar
Bernard, M. and Phillips, J. 2000. The challenge of ageing in tomorrow's Britain. Ageing & Society, 20, 1, 3354.Google Scholar
Billig, M. 1991. Ideology and Opinions: Studies in Rhetorical Psychology. Sage, London.Google Scholar
Binstock, R. H. 2010. From compassionate ageism to intergenerational conflict? The Gerontologist, 50, 5, 574–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradshaw, J. and Holmes, J. 2013. An analysis of equity in redistribution to the retired and children over recent decades in the OECD and UK. Journal of Social Policy, 42, 1, 3956.Google Scholar
Breheny, M. and Stephens, C. 2010. Ageing in a material world. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 39, 2, 41–8.Google Scholar
Carter, K. and Imlach Gunasekara, F. 2012. Dynamics of Income and Deprivation in New Zealand, 2002–2009. A Descriptive Analysis of the Survey of Family, Income and Employment (SoFIE). Public Health Monograph Series Number 24, Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington. Available online at http://www.otago.ac.nz/wellington/otago032196.pdf [Accessed 31 August 2014].Google Scholar
Chester, A. and Gwynne, G. 1998. Online teaching: encouraging collaboration through anonymity. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 4, 2, 0. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.1998.tb00096.x.Google Scholar
Coburn, D. 2000. Income inequality, social cohesion and the health status of populations: the role of neo-liberalism. Social Science & Medicine, 51, 1, 135–46.Google Scholar
Dietz-Uhler, B. and Bishop-Clark, C. 2002. The psychology of computer-mediated communication: four classroom activities. Psychology Learning and Teaching, 2, 1, 2531.Google Scholar
Duncan, C. 2008. The dangers and limitations of equality agendas as means for tackling old-age prejudice. Ageing & Society, 28, 8, 1133–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, D. and Potter, J. 1992. Discursive Psychology. Sage, London.Google Scholar
Estes, C. L. and Phillipson, C. 2002. The globalization of capital, the welfare state, and old age policy. International Journal of Health Services, 32, 2, 279–97.Google Scholar
Fealy, G., McNamara, M., Treacy, M. P. and Lyons, I. 2012. Constructing ageing and age identities: a case study of newspaper discourses. Ageing & Society, 32, 1, 85102.Google Scholar
Fergusson, D., Hong, B., Horwood, J., Jensen, J. and Travers, P. 2001. Living Standards of Older New Zealanders: A Technical Account. Ministry of Social Policy, Wellington.Google Scholar
Fisher, J. D. M. and Gervaise, M. 2011. Why has home ownership fallen among the young? International Economic Review, 52, 3, 883912.Google Scholar
Foot, D. K. and Venne, R. A. 2005. Awakening to the intergenerational equity debate in Canada. Journal of Canadian Studies, 39, 1, 521.Google Scholar
Frewin, K., Pond, R. and Tuffin, K. 2009. Sexual abuse, counselling and compensation: discourses in New Zealand newspapers. Feminism & Psychology, 19, 1, 2947.Google Scholar
Gawith, A. 2010. Retirement age should move with the times. New Zealand Herald. Available online at http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10694103 [Accessed 22 June 2014].Google Scholar
Gergen, K. 1985. The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American Psychologist, 40, 3, 266–75.Google Scholar
Hamil-Luker, J. 2001. The prospects of age war: inequality between (and within) age groups. Social Science Research, 30, 3, 386400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatton-Yeo, A. 2012. We together. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 10, 4, 447–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HelpAge International 2014. Global Age Watch Index 2013. Available online at http://www.helpage.org/global-agewatch/data/global-rankings-table/ [Accessed 22 June 2014].Google Scholar
Hickey, B. 2011. Baby boomer burden starts. Herald on Sunday. Available online at http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=10698585 [Accessed 22 June 2014].Google Scholar
Higgs, P. and Gilleard, C. 2010. Generational conflict, consumption and the ageing welfare state in the United Kingdom. Ageing & Society, 30, 1439–51.Google Scholar
Hodgetts, D. and Chamberlain, K. 2006. Developing a critical media research agenda for health psychology. Journal of Health Psychology, 11, 2, 317–27.Google Scholar
HorizonPoll 2011. Fairfax Has Other New Zealand Media Sites Well Stuffed. Available online at http://www.horizonpoll.co.nz/page/145/fairfax-has-Hosking [Accessed 22 June 2014].Google Scholar
Irwin, S. 1996. Age related distributive justice and claims on resources. British Journal of Sociology, 47, 1, 6892.Google Scholar
Jowett, A. 2015. A case for using online discussion forums in critical psychological research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 12, 3, 287–97.Google Scholar
Key, J. 2008. Economic Plan: Superannuitants Get a Boost. Available online at http://www.johnkey.co.nz/index.php?url=archives/498-NEWS-Economic-plan-Superannuitants-get-a-boost.html [Accessed 22 June 2014].Google Scholar
Kohli, M. 2006. Ageing and justice. In Binstock, R. H., George, L. K., Cutler, S. J., Hendricks, J. and Schultz, J. H. (eds), Handbook of Ageing and Social Sciences. Academic Press, London, 456–78.Google Scholar
Kotlikoff, L. J. and Burns, S. (2004). The Coming Generational Storm: What You Need to Know about America's Economic Future. MIT Press, Boston.Google Scholar
Martin, R., Williams, C. and O'Neill, D. 2009. Retrospective analysis of attitudes to ageing in the Economist: apocalyptic demography for opinion formers? British Medical Journal, 339, b4914. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b4914.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McClure, M. 1998. A Civilised Community: A History of Social Security in New Zealand 1898–1998. Auckland University Press, Auckland, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Ministry for Culture and Heritage 2011. Old-age Pensions Act Passes into Law. Available online at http://www.nzhistory.net.nz/old-age-pensions-act-passes-into-law [Accessed 22 June 2014].Google Scholar
Newacheck, P. W. and Benjamin, A. E. 2004. Perspective: intergenerational equity and public spending. Health Affairs, 23, 5, 142–6.Google Scholar
Ng, S. H. and McCreanor, T. 1999. Patterns in discourse about elderly people in New Zealand. Journal of Aging Studies, 13, 4, 473–89.Google Scholar
North, M. S. and Fiske, S. T. 2012. An inconvenienced youth? Ageism and its potential intergenerational roots. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 5, 982–97.Google Scholar
Pool, I. 2007. The baby boom in New Zealand and other western developed countries. Journal of Population Research, 24, 2, 141–61.Google Scholar
Potter, J. and Edwards, D. 2001. Discursive social psychology. In Robinson, W. P. and Giles, H. (eds), The New Handbook of Language and Social Psychology. Wiley, Chichester, UK, 103–18.Google Scholar
Powell, J. L. 2006. Rethinking Social Theory and Later Life. Nova Science Publishers, New York.Google Scholar
Retirement Commission 2010. Review of Retirement Income Policy: A Summary. Commission for Financial Literacy and Retirement Income, Wellington.Google Scholar
Rozanova, J. 2010. Discourse of successful ageing in The Globe & Mail: insights from critical gerontology. Journal of Aging Studies, 24, 4, 213–22.Google Scholar
Sedick, S. and Roos, V. 2011. Older people's portrayal in the print media: implications for intergenerational relations. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 21, 4, 549–54.Google Scholar
Shotter, J. 1993. Cultural Politics of Everyday Life: Social Constructionism, Rhetoric and Knowing of the Third Kind. Open University Press, Buckingham, UK.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M., Parrott, T. M., Angelelli, J. J. and Cook, F. L. 2000. Solidarity and tension between age-groups in the United States: challenge for an ageing America in the 21st century. International Journal of Social Welfare, 9, 4, 270–84.Google Scholar
Tarrant, A. 2010. PM Key Says Conversation on Retirement Age OK, but Won't Budge Despite Retirement Commission Recommendation. Available online at http://www.interest.co.nz/news/51614/pm-key-says-conversation-retirement-age-ok-wont-budge-despite-retirement-commission-recommendation [Accessed 22 June 2014].Google Scholar
Thomson, D. 1989. The welfare state and generation conflict: winners and losers. In Johnson, P., Conrad, C. and Thomson, D. (eds), Workers Versus Pensioners: Intergenerational Conflict in an Ageing World. Manchester University Press, Manchester, UK, 3356.Google Scholar
Thomson, D. 1996. Selfish Generations? How Welfare States Grow Old. The White Horse Press, Cambridge UK.Google Scholar
Torrie, B. 2013. Exercise More and Live Longer, Elderly Urged. Available online at http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/8243478/Exercise-more-and-live-longer-elderly-urged [Accessed 22 June 2014].Google Scholar
Tuffin, K. 2005. Understanding Critical Social Psychology. Sage, London.Google Scholar
VanderVen, K. 2012. Intergenerational solidarity: strengthening economic and social ties by Cruz Saco, M. A. and Zelenev, S. B. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 10, 2, 195–9.Google Scholar
Wardle, P. 2010. Beware the silver tsunami. The Marlborough Express. Available online at http://www.stuff.co.nz/marlborough-express/features/focus/3604834/Beware-the-silver-tsunami [Accessed 22 June 2014].Google Scholar
Wilinska, M. and Cedersund, E. 2010. ‘Classic ageism’ or ‘brutal economy’? Old age and older people in the Polish media. Journal of Aging Studies, 24, 4, 335–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winton, S. 2013. Rhetorical analysis in critical policy research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26, 2, 158–77.Google Scholar