Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T04:50:04.770Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Improving Support To Carers: A Considered Response To Parker's Critical Review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2008

David Challis
Affiliation:
Assistant Director, Reader in Social Work and Social Care, Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Canterbury, CT2 7NF, UK.
Bleddyn Davies
Affiliation:
Director, Professor of Social Policy, Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Canterbury, CT2 7NF, UK.

Extract

Parker's review in the last issue has provided us with a number of questions concerning the relationship between case management services and the needs ofcarers (Parker, 1990a). Essentially, she makes three main points; the first is to question whether there is evidence that some case management services can improve outcomes for carers, the second is about experimental studies, and the third is to raise the question of the financial costs experienced by carers.

Type
Review Section
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Challis, D. and Davies, B. 1986. Case Management in Community Care. Gower, Aldershot, Hampshire.Google Scholar
Challis, D., Chessum, R. and Luckett, R. 1983. A new life at home. Community Care (03) 24, 2123.Google Scholar
Challis, D., Chessum, R., Chesterman, J., Luckett, R. and Woods, R. (1988). Community care for the frail elderly: an urban experiment. British Journal of Social Work, 18, Supplement, 1342.Google Scholar
Challis, D., Darton, R., Johnson, L., Stone, M., Traske, K. and Wall, B. (1989). Supporting Frail Elderly People at Home: The Darlington Community Care Scheme. Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Canterbury.Google Scholar
Challis, D., Chessum, R., Chesteran, J., Luckett, R. and Traske, K. (1990). Case Management in Social and Health Care: The Gateshead Community Care Scheme. Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Canterbury.Google Scholar
Davies, B. and Challis, D. 1986. Matching Resources to Needs in Community Care. Gower, Aldershot, Hampshire.Google Scholar
Grad, de Alarcon J. 1971. Social causes and social consequences of mental illness in old age. In Kay, D. and Walk, A. (eds), Recent Developments in Psychogeriatrics. Headley Brothers, Ashford, Kent.Google Scholar
Netten, A. 1989. An approach to costing informal care. Discussion paper 637, Personal Social Services Research Unit,University of Kent,Canterbury.Google Scholar
Parker, G. 1990a. Whose care? Whose costs? Whose benefit? Ageing and Society, 10, 459467.Google Scholar
Parker, G. 1990b. With Due Care and Attention: A Review of Research on Informal Care. Family Policy Studies Centre, London.Google Scholar
Twigg, J., Atkin, K. and Perring, C. 1990. Carers and Services: A Review of Research. HMSO, Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar