Article contents
Hospital Discharge of Frail Elderly People: Social and Ethical Considerations in the Discharge Decision-making Process
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 November 2008
Abstract
Using contributions from moral philosophy and sociology, this paper explores the decisions confronting care professionals when discharging frail elderly people from hospital. It is based on research into hospital discharge in South Glamorgan that has illuminated the nature of professional decision-making in multi-disciplinary ward meetings. Two key dilemmas are identified and examined in detail: first, the dilemma of discharging elderly people who, while thought by professionals to be incapable of looking after themselves and therefore ‘at risk’, nevertheless want to go home, and secondly, the dilemma of finding residential care for elderly people who are defined as being ‘partly sick and partly well’. Whilst the principle of autonomy may be used to support individual choice, it may also be interpreted as encouraging self-reliance, and as a way of denying a collective responsibility to elderly people's care needs. The dilemma of institutional care for the ‘partly sick and partly well’ is found to be a persisting problem, fraught with conceptual ambiguities and resource-boundary negotiations between ‘medical’ and ‘social’ care. An examination of both dilemmas serves to highlight the role of political ideology in discharge decisionmaking.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989
References
NOTES
1 Skeet, M., Home from Hospital: Providing Continuing Care for Elderly People. Kings Fund, London, 1985.Google Scholar
2 Adams, J., Coming Home: A Study of the Continuity of Care between Hospital and the Home in an Inner City Health District. Paddington and North Kensington Community Health Council, London. 1987Google Scholar. Continuing Care Project Organising Aftercare Centre for Policy on Ageing, London, 1979.Google Scholar
3 Royal College of Nursing and British Geriatrics Society, Improving Care of Elderly People in Hospital. Royal College of Nursing, British Geriatric Society and Royal College of Psychiatrists, London, 1988.Google Scholar
4 DHSS, Discharge of Patients from Hospital. Draft Circular, DHSS, London, 1988Google Scholar. Welsh Office, Discharge of Patients from Hospital, Draft Circular, Welsh Office, Cardiff, 1988.Google Scholar
5 Macintyre, S., ‘Old Age as a Social Problem’, in Dingwall, R., Heath, C., Reid, M. and Stacey, M. (eds), Health Care and Health Knowledge, London, Croom Helm, 1977, pp. 41–63Google Scholar. Jefferys, M., ‘An ageing Britain – what is its future?, Geriatric Nursing and Home Care, 07 (1987), pp. 19–24.Google ScholarPubMed
6 Armitage, S., ‘Negotiating the discharge of medical patients’, Journal of Advanced Nursing 6 (1981), pp. 385–389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7 Halper, T., quoted in Kleinig, J., Paternalism, Manchester University Press, Manchester, 1983.Google Scholar
8 Gillon, R., ‘Autonomy and consent’, in Lockwood, M. (ed.), Moral Problems in Modern Medicine. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1985, pp. 111–125.Google Scholar
9 Norman, A., ‘Risk’, in Gearing, B., Johnson, M. L. and Heller, T. (eds), Mental Health Problems in Old Age: A Reader. Wiley, Chichester, pp. 82–86, 1988.Google Scholar
10 Quoted from Hansard in Muir Gray, J. A., ‘The ethics of compulsory removal’Google Scholar, in Lockwood, M., op. cit. pp. 92–110.Google Scholar
11 Cole, T., ‘The “enlightened” view of ageing: victorian morality in a new key’, Hastings Center Report, 13, 3 (1983), pp. 34–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12 May, W. F., ‘Who cares for the elderly?’, Hastings Center Report 12, 6 (1982), pp. 31–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13 Mill, J. S., ‘On liberty’, in Three Essays. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1859.Google Scholar
14 Grimshaw, J., Feminist Philosophers: Women's Perspectives on Philosophical Traditions. Wheatsheaf, Brighton, 1986.Google Scholar
15 Griffiths, R., Community Care: An Agenda for Action. A Report to the Secretary of State for Social Services. HMSO, London, 1988.Google Scholar
16 Phillipson, C., Planning for Community Care: Facts and Fallacies in the Griffiths' Report. Centre for Social Gerontology, University of Keele, Keele, Staffs, 1989.Google Scholar
17 English, J., ‘What do grown children owe their parents?’ in O'Neill, O. and Ruddick, W. (eds), Having Children: Philosophical and Legal Reflections on Parenthood. Open University Press, New York, 1979, pp. 351–356.Google Scholar
18 A term used by Blenkinsop, Arthur, Parliamentary Secretary to the Ministry of Health in 1950Google Scholar, quoted in Means, R. and Smith, R., The Development of Welfare Services for Elderly People, Croom Helm, London, 1985.Google Scholar
19 Means, R. ‘The development of social services for elderly people: historical perspectives’, in Phillipson, C. and Walker, A., Ageing and Social Policy: A Critical Assessment. Gower, Aldershot, 1986, pp. 87–106.Google Scholar
20 Andrews, K. and Brocklehurst, J., British Geriatric Medicine in the 1980s. King Edward's Hospital Fund for London, London, 1987.Google Scholar
21 Dant, T. et al. , Dependency and Old Age: Theoretical Accounts and Practical Understandings. Project Paper No. 3. Care of Elderly People at Home project, Open University and Policy Studies Institute, 1987Google Scholar, quoted in Age Concern, Community Care and Elderly People, Age Concern's Response to ‘Community Care: An Agenda for Action’. Age Concern England, Information and Policy Department, London, 1988.Google Scholar
22 Armstrong, D., ‘Pathological life and death: medical spatialisation and geriatrics’, Social Science and Medicine, 15 A (1981), pp. 253–257.Google ScholarPubMed
23 Means, R. and Smith, R., op cit.Google Scholar
24 Glennerster, H. et al. , Planning for Priority Groups. Martin Robertson, Oxford, 1983.Google Scholar
25 Walker, A., Community Care: the Family, the State and Social Policy, Blackwell, London, 1982Google Scholar. Willcocks, D., ‘Residential care’Google Scholar, in Phillipson, C. and Walker, A., op. cit. pp. 147–162.Google Scholar
26 Hall, D. and Bytheway, B., ‘The blocked bed: definition of a problem’, Social Science and Medicine 16 (1982), 1985–1991CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed. Eley, R. and Middleton, L., Report of a pilot study of delayed discharges from hospital: Liverpool 1983–4, in Butler, A. (ed.), Ageing: Recent Advances and Creative Responses, Croom Helm, London, 1985, pp. 204–214.Google Scholar
27 Hall, D. and Bytheway, B., op. cit.Google Scholar
28 Wade, B., Sawyer, L. and Bell, J., Dependency with Dignity. Bedford Square Press, London, 1983.Google Scholar
29 Webb, A. and Wistow, G., Planning, Need and Scarcity. Allen and Unwin, Hemel Hempstead, 1986.Google Scholar
30 House of Commons Social Services Committee, Resourcing the NHS. Age Concern's Memorandum laid before the Committee, 264–IV. HMSO, 1988.Google Scholar
31 Harris, J., Qualifying the value of life, Journal of Medical Ethics, 13 (1987), 117–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32 Robinson, R. and Judge, K., Public Expenditure and the NHS: Trends and Prospects. Kings Fund Institute for Health Policy Analysis, London, 1987.Google Scholar
33 Audit Commission. Making a Reality of Community Care. HMSO, London, 1986.Google Scholar
34 Russell, J. and Brenton, M., ‘Bridging the gap between hospital and home: two models of discharge care for elderly people’, in Jefferys, M. (ed.), Growing Old in the 20th Century, Routledge, London (forthcoming)Google Scholar. House of Commons, NHS Convalescent Facilities, Hansard, 1301, 27 Feb to 2 Mar., Written Answers, cols. 71–72, 1984.Google Scholar
35 A phrase used to describe the geriatric units of the 1940s in ‘Infirm and old’, Lancet 6 June 1946, pp. 857–858, quoted in Means and Smith, , op cit.Google Scholar
- 15
- Cited by