Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T14:26:42.724Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gender inequality from beyond the grave: intra-household distribution and wellbeing after spousal loss

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2012

BJÖRN HALLERÖD
BJÖRN HALLERÖD*
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
*
Address for correspondence: Björn Halleröd, Department of Sociology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present article integrates research on spousal loss among older people and research on intra-household income distribution and relates pre-loss intra-household distribution of incomes to post-loss wellbeing. Data are drawn from the Swedish Panel Survey of Ageing and the Elderly (PSAE) and consist of couples that were married in the mid-1990s (N=1,503) and that were either still married (N=1,262) or who had experienced spousal loss (N=241) in 2002–03. The results showed that large intra-household pre-loss income differences increased the occurrence of psycho-social problems among both widows and widowers. Hence, unequal intra-household distribution of resources makes the coping process harder for both men and women. It was also shown that unequal pre-loss distribution of incomes affected a measure of global wellbeing among widowers. Widows suffered to a greater degree from economic difficulties, but these difficulties were not related to pre-loss distribution of incomes. Thus, the overall results showed that a gendered labour market that generates an unequal intra-household distribution of incomes has repercussions not only for gender equality among intact households, but also for the coping process of both widows and widowers.

Keywords

bereavementgenderinequalityintra-householdlongitudinalwellbeingwidowwidower
Type
Articles
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 33 , Issue 5 , July 2013 , pp. 783 - 803
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abakoumkin, G., Stroebe, W. and Stroebe, M. 2010. Does relationship quality moderate the impact of marital bereavement on depressive symptoms? Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 29, 5, 510–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, G. 1981. A Treatise on the Family. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Bennett, K. M. 2010. How to achieve resilience as an older widower: turning points or gradual change? Ageing & Society, 30, 3, 369–82.Google Scholar
Bennett, K. M., Stenhoff, A., Pattinson, J. and Woods, F. 2010. ‘Well if he could see me now’: the facilitators and barriers to the promotion of instrumental independence following spousal bereavement. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 53, 3, 215–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blood, R. O. and Wolfe, D. M. 1960. Husbands and Wives. The Free Press, Glencoe, Illinois.Google Scholar
Bonanno, G. A., Wortman, C. B. and Nesse, R. M. 2004. Prospective patterns of resilience and maladjustment during widowhood. Psychology and Aging, 19, 2, 260–71.Google Scholar
Boyle, P. J., Feng, Z. Q. and Raab, G. M. 2011. Does widowhood increase mortality risk? Testing for selection effects by comparing causes of spousal death. Epidemiology, 22, 1, 1–5.Google Scholar
Brines, J. 1993. The exchange value of housework. Rationality and Society, 5, 3, 302–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brines, J. 1994. Economic dependency, gender, and the division of labor at home. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 3, 652–88.Google Scholar
Brook, A. T., Garcia, J. and Fleming, M. 2008. The effects of multiple identities on psychological wellbeing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 12, 1588–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, D. 2004. Gender, preloss marital dependence, and older adults’ adjustment to widowhood. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 66, 1, 220–35.Google Scholar
Carr, D., House, J. S., Kessler, R. C., Nesse, R. M., Sonnega, J. and Wortman, C. 2000. Marital quality and psychological adjustment to widowhood among older adults: a longitudinal analysis. Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 55B, 4, S197–207.Google Scholar
Evertsson, L. and Nyman, C. 2008. Myten om den förhandlande familjen [The myth of the negotiating family]. In Grönlund, A. and Halleröd, B. (eds), Jämstäldhetens pris. Boréa, Umeå, Sweden, 45–82.Google Scholar
Ha, J. H. 2008. Changes in support from confidants, children, and friends following widowhood. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 70, 2, 306–18.Google Scholar
Halleröd, B. 2005. Sharing of housework and money among Swedish couples: do they behave rationally? European Sociological Review, 21, 3, 273–88.Google Scholar
Halleröd, B. 2009. Ill, worried or worried sick? Inter-relationships among indicators of wellbeing among older people in Sweden. Ageing & Society, 29, 4, 563–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halleröd, B. and Nyman, C. 2008. Dela rätt är inte lätt [It is hard to share fair]. In Grönlund, A. and Halleröd, B. (eds), Jämstäldhetens pris. Boréa, Umeå, Sweden, 175–93.Google Scholar
Keene, J. R. and Prokos, A. H. 2008. Widowhood and the end of spousal care-giving: relief or wear and tear? Ageing & Society, 28, 4, 551–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, G. R. and DeMaris, A. 2007. Widowhood, gender, and depression – a longitudinal analysis. Research on Aging, 29, 1, 56–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martikainen, P. and Valkonen, T. 1996. Mortality after the death of a spouse: rates and causes of death in a large Finnish cohort. American Journal of Public Health, 86, 8, 1087–93.Google Scholar
Nordenmark, M. 1999. Unemployment, Employment Commitment and Wellbeing. Department of Sociology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.Google Scholar
Nordenmark, M. 2004. Balancing work and family demands – do increasing demands increase strain? A longitudinal study. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 32, 6, 450–5.Google Scholar
Nyman, C. 2002. Mine, Yours or Ours. Department of Sociology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.Google Scholar
Ong, A. D., Fuller-Rowell, T. E. and Bonanno, G. A. 2010. Prospective predictors of positive emotions following spousal loss. Psychology and Aging, 25, 3, 653–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Onrust, S., Cuijpers, P., Smit, F. and Bohlmeijer, E. 2007. Predictors of psychological adjustment after bereavement. International Psychogeriatrics, 19, 5, 921–34.Google Scholar
Ott, C. H., Lueger, R. J., Kelber, S. T. and Prigerson, H. G. 2007. Spousal bereavement in older adults – common, resilient, and chronic grief with defining characteristics. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 195, 4, 332–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pahl, J. 1989. Money and Marriage. Macmillan Education, London.Google Scholar
Pai, M. and Barrett, A. E. 2007. Long-term payoffs of work? Women's past involvement in paid work and mental health in widowhood. Research on Aging, 29, 5, 436–56.Google Scholar
Pruchno, R. A., Cartwright, F. P. and Wilson-Genderson, M. 2009. Effects of marital closeness on the transition from caregiving to widowhood. Aging & Mental Health, 13, 6, 808–17.Google Scholar
Ray, R., Gornick, J. C. and Schmitt, J. 2010. Who cares? Assessing generosity and gender equality in parental leave policy designs in 21 countries. Journal of European Social Policy, 20, 3, 196–216.Google Scholar
Roman, C. and Vogler, C. 1999. Managing money in British and Swedish households. European Societies, 1, 3, 419–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, B. 2010. The reproduction of gender inequality in Sweden: a causal mechanism approach. Gender, Work & Organization. Article first published online: 11 APR 2010, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0432.2010.00517.xGoogle Scholar
Saarni, S. I., Suvisaari, J., Sintonen, H., Koskinen, S., Harkanen, T. and Lönnqvist, J. 2007. The health-related quality-of-life impact of chronic conditions varied with age in general population. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60, 12, 1288–97.Google Scholar
Sørensen, A. and McLanahan, S. 1987. Married women's economic dependency, 1940–1980. American Journal of Sociology, 93, 3, 659–87.Google Scholar
Stocks, J., Díaz Martinez, C. and Halleröd, B. 2007. Modern Couples Sharing Money, Sharing Life. Palgrave Macmillan, Eastbourne, UK.Google Scholar
Stroebe, M., Stroebe, W. and Schut, H. 2001. Gender differences in adjustment to bereavement: an empirical and theoretical review. Review of General Psychology, 5, 1, 62–83.Google Scholar
Sullivan, C. J., McGloin, J. M. and Piquero, A. R. 2008. Modeling the deviant Y in criminology: an examination of the assumptions of censored normal regression and potential alternatives. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 24, 4, 399–421.Google Scholar
Tweed, R. G. and Tweed, C. J. 2011. Positive emotion following spousal bereavement: desirable or pathological? Journal of Positive Psychology, 6, 2, 131–41.Google Scholar
van der Houwen, K., Stroebe, M., Schut, H., Stioebe, W. and van den Bout, J. 2010. Mediating processes in bereavement: the role of rumination, threatening grief interpretations, and deliberate grief avoidance. Social Science & Medicine, 71, 9, 1669–76.Google Scholar
Vogel, J. and Häll, L. 2006 Äldres levnadsförhållanden: arbete, ekonomi, hälsa och sociala nätverk 1980–2003 [Older Peoples Living Conditions: Work, Economy, Health, and Social Networks 1980–2003]. Umeå University and Statistics Sweden, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Vogler, C. 1998. Money in the household: some underlying issues of power. The Sociological Review, 46, 4, 687–713.Google Scholar
Vogler, C. 2005. Cohabiting couples: rethinking money in the household at the beginning of the twenty first century. Sociological Review, 53, 1, 1–29.Google Scholar
Vogler, C. and Pahl, J. 1994. Money, power and inequality within marriage. The Sociological Review, 42, 2, 263–88.Google Scholar