¹ Sahlins, M., Culture and Practical Reason. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1976.Google Scholar

² Barthes, R., Elements of Semiology, Lavers, A. and Smith, C. (trans.), Hill and Wang, New York, 1967.Google ScholarBarthes, R., Mythologies, Lavers, A. (trans.), Jonathan Cape, London, 1972.Google ScholarBarthes, R., The Fashion System, Ward, M. and Howard, R. (trans.), Hill and Wang, New York, 1983.Google Scholar

³ Douglas, M. and Isherwood, B., The World of Goods: Towards an Anthropology of Consumption, W. W. Norton, New York, 1978.Google Scholar

⁴ McCracken, G., ‘Culture and consumption’, Journal of Consumer Research, 13 06 (1986), 71–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarMcCracken, G., Culture and Consumption: New Approaches to the Symbolism of Consumer Goods, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, 1988 (forthcoming).Google Scholar

⁵ Rodman, M. and Philibert, J., ‘Rethinking consumption: some problems concerning the practice of objects in the Third World’, paper presented at the Canadian Ethnological Society Meetings, University of Toronto, II May 1985. Appadurai, A. (ed.), The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective, University of Cambridge Press, Cambridge, 1986.Google Scholar

⁶ Belk, R., ‘Manifesto for a Consumer Behavior of Consumer behavior,’ in Anderson, P. F. and Ryan, M. J. (eds), American Marketing Association Winter Educators' Conference: Scientific Method in Marketing, American Marketing Association Proceedings Series, Chicago: 1984, pp. 163–167.Google Scholar

⁷ Belk, R., ‘Gift-Giving behavior’, in Sheth, J. N. (ed.), Research in Marketing, vol. 2, JAI Press, Greenwich, Conn., 1979, pp. 95–126.Google ScholarBelk, R., ‘Acquiring, possessing, and collecting: fundamental processes in consumer behavior’, in Bush, R. F. and Hunt, S. (eds), Marketing Theory: Philosophy of Science Perspectives, American Marketing Association, Chicago, 1982, pp. 185–190.Google ScholarBelk, R., Mayer, R. and Bahn, K., ‘The eye of the beholder: individual differences in perceptions of consumption symbolism’, in Mitchell, A. (ed.), Advances in Consumer Research, vol. 9, Association for Consumer Research, Ann Arbor, 1981, pp. 523–530.Google Scholar

⁸ Firat, A., ‘A macro theory in marketing: the social construction of consumption patterns’, Working Paper, Walker College of Business, Appalachian State University, Boone, NC 28608, USA, 1985.Google Scholar

⁹ Hirschman, E., ‘Comprehending symbolic consumption’, in Hirschman, E. and Holbrook, M. (eds), Symbolic Consumer behavior, Association for Consumer Research, Ann Arbor, 1980, pp. 4–6.Google ScholarHirschman, E., ‘Primitive aspects of consumption in modern American society’, Journal of Consumer Research, 12 09 (1985), 142–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹⁰ Holbrook, M. and Hirschman, E., ‘The experiential aspects of consumption: consumer fantasies, feelings and fun’, Journal of Consumer Research, 9 09 (1982), 132–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹¹ Holman, R., ‘Product use as communication: a fresh appraisal of a venerable topic’, in Enis, B. and Roering, K. (eds), Review of Marketing, American Marketing Association, Chicago, 1980, pp. 250–272.Google Scholar

¹² Levy, S., ‘Symbols for sale’, Harvard Business Review, 37, 07/08 (1959), pp. 117–124.Google ScholarLevy, S., ‘Hunger and work in a civilized tribe’, American Behavioral Scientist, 21, 03/04 (1978), pp. 557–570.CrossRefGoogle ScholarLevy, S., ‘Interpreting consumer mythology: a structural approach to consumer behavior’, Journal of Marketing, 45 Summer (1981), pp. 49–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹³ Pollay, R., ‘American advertising and societal values during the twentieth century’, in Tan, C. and Sheth, J. (eds), Historical Perspective in Consumer Research: National and International Perspectives, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 1985, pp. 60–71.Google Scholar

¹⁴ Rook, D., ‘Ritual behavior and consumer symbolism’, in Kinnear, T. (ed.), Advances in Consumer Research, vol. II, Association for Consumer Research, Provo, Utah, 1984, pp. 279–284.Google Scholar

¹⁵ Sherry, J., ‘Gift giving in anthropological perspective’, Journal of Consumer Research, 10 (1983), 157–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹⁶ Solomon, M., ‘The role of products as social stimuli: a symbolic interactionism perspective’, Journal of Consumer Research, 10 12 (1983), pp. 319–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹⁷ Wallendorf, M. and Reilly, M., ‘Ethnic migration, assimilation and consumption’, Journal of Consumer Research, 10, 12 (1983) 292–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹⁸ Veblen, T., The Theory of the Leisure Class, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, Middlesex, 1983.Google Scholar

¹⁹ Hirschman, A., Shifting Involvements, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1982.Google Scholar

²⁰ Scitovsky, T., The Joyless Economy, Oxford University Press, New York, 1976.Google Scholar

²¹ Davis, J., ‘Status symbols and the measurement of status perception’, Sociometry 19 09 (1956), 154–165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarDavis, J., ‘Cultural factors in the perception of status symbols’, The Midwest Sociologist, 21 12 (1958), 1–11.Google Scholar

²² Goffman, E., ‘Symbols of class status’, British Journal of Sociology, 2 12 (1951). 295–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

²³ Chinoy, E., ‘The tradition of opportunity and the aspirations of automobile workers’, American Journal of Sociology, 57, 5 (1952), 453–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

²⁴ Caplow, T., ‘Christmas gifts and kin networks’, American Sociological Review, 47, 3 (1982), 383–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

²⁵ Gans, H., Popular Culture and High Culture: An Analysis and Evaluation of Taste, Basic Books, New York, 1974.Google Scholar

²⁶ Laumann, E. and House, J., ‘Living room styles and social attributes: the patterning of material artifacts in a modern urban community’, Sociology and Social Research, 54, 04 (1970), 321–342.Google Scholar

²⁷ Mayer, R., ‘Exploring sociological theories by studying consumers’, American Behavioral Scientist, 21, 03/04 (1978), 600–613.CrossRefGoogle ScholarMayer, R., ‘Defining consumer science: a sociologist's view’, in Stampfl, R. (ed.), Proceedings of the Symposium in Consumer Science in Institutions of Higher Education, University of Wisconsin, Madison, 1982, 91–100.Google ScholarNicosia, F. and Mayer, R., ‘Toward a sociology of consumption’, Journal of Consumer Research, 3, 09 (1976), 65–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

²⁸ Moorhouse, H., ‘American automobiles and workers' dreams’, The Sociological Review, 31, 3 (1983), 403–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

²⁹ O'Neill, J., ‘The productive body: an essay on the work of consumption’, Queen's Quarterly, 85, 2 (1978), 221–230.Google Scholar

³⁰ Schudson, M., Advertising, The Uneasy Persuasion, Basic Books, New York, 1984.Google Scholar

³¹ Csikszentemihalyi, M. and Rochberg-Halton, E., The Meaning of Things: Domestic Symbols and the Self, Cambridge University Press, New York, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

³² Altman, I., ‘A cross-cultural and dialectic analysis of homes’, in Liben, L., Patterson, A. and Newcombe, N. (eds), Spatial Representation and Behavior Across the Life Span, Academic Press, New York, 1981, pp. 283–320.Google Scholar

³³ Duncan, J., ‘From container of women to status symbol: the impact of social structure on the meaning of the house’, in Duncan, J. (ed.), Housing and Identity, Cross-Cultural Perspectives, Croom Helm, London, 1981, pp. 36–59.Google Scholar

³⁴ Pratt, G., ‘The house as an expression of social worlds’, in Duncan, J. (ed.), Housing and identity: Cross-Cultural Perspectives, Croom Helm, London, 1981, pp. 135–180.Google Scholar

³⁵ Rapoport, A., Meaning of the Built Environment, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, 1982.Google Scholar

³⁶ Baran, S. and Blasko, V., ‘Social perceptions and the by-products of advertising’, Journal of Communications 34, 4 (1984), 12–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

³⁷ Churchill, S. and Wertz, F., ‘An introduction to phenomenological psychology for consumer research: historical, conceptual, and methodological foundations’, in Hirschman E. and Holbrook M. (eds), Advances in Consumer Research, 12, (1985), 550–555.Google Scholar

³⁸ Furby, L., ‘Possessions: toward a theory of their meaning and function throughout the life cycle’, in Baltes, P. (ed.), Lifespan Development and behavior. Academic Press, New York, 1978, pp. 297–336.Google Scholar

³⁹ Graumann, C., ‘Psychology and the World of Things’, Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 4, 1 (1974–1975), 389–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁴⁰ Braudel, F., Capitalism and Material Life: 1400–1800, Kochan, M. (trans.), Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London, 1973.Google Scholar

⁴¹ McKendrick, N., Brewer, J. and Plumb, J. H., The Birth of a Consumer Society: The Commercialization of Eighteenth-Century England, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, 1982.Google Scholar

⁴² Campbell, C., ‘Romanticism and the consumer ethic: intimations of a Weber-style thesis’, Sociological Analysis, 44, 4 (1983), 279–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁴³ Clark, C., The American Family Home: 1800–1360, North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, 1986.Google Scholar

⁴⁴ Ewen, S., Captains of Consciousness: Advertising and the Social Roots of the Consumer Culture, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1976.Google Scholar

⁴⁵ Forty, A., Objects of Desire, Pantheon, New York, 1986.Google Scholar

⁴⁶ Fox, R. and Jackson Lears, T. (eds), The Culture of Consumption: Critical Essays in American History, 1880–1980, Pantheon Books, New York, 1983.Google Scholar

⁴⁷ Horowitz, D., The Morality of Spending: Attitudes toward the Consumer Society in America, 1875–1940, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, 1985.Google Scholar

⁴⁸ Leach, W., ‘Transformations in a culture of consumption: women and department stores, 1890–1925’, Journal of American History, 71, 09 (1984), 319–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁴⁹ Marchand, R., Advertising the American Dream: Making Way for Modernity 1920–1940, University of California Press, Berkeley, 1985.Google Scholar

⁵⁰ McCracken, G., Culture and Consumption, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, 1988 (forthcoming)Google Scholar, McCracken, G., ‘Clio in the marketplace: theoretical and methodological issues in the history of consumption’, in Tan, C. and Sheth, J. (eds), Historical Perspective in Consumer Research: National and International Perspectives, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 1985, 151–154.Google ScholarMcCracken, G., ‘The history of consumption: a research and consumer guide’, Journal of Consumer Policy, 12, 1987.Google Scholar

⁵¹ Miller, M., The Bon Marche: Bourgeois Culture and the Department Store, 1869–1920, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁵² Mukerji, C., From Granen Images: Patterns of Modern Materialism, Columbia University Press, New York, 1983.Google Scholar

⁵³ Pollay, R., ‘American advertising and societal values during the twentieth century’, in Tan, C. and Sheth, J. (eds). Historical Perspective in Consumer Research: National and International Perspectives, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 1985. PP. 60–71.Google Scholar

⁵⁴ Williams, R., Dream Worlds: Mass Consumption in Late Nineteenth Century France, University of California Press, Berkeley, 1982.Google Scholar

⁵⁵ Ames, K., ‘Material culture as non-verbal communication: a historical case study’, Journal of American Culture, 3, Winter (1980), pp. 619–641.CrossRefGoogle ScholarAmes, K., ‘Meaning in Artifacts: Hall Furnishings in Victorian America’, in Schlereth, T. (ed.), Material Culture Studies in America, American Association for State and Local History, Nashville, 1982, pp. 206–221.Google Scholar

⁵⁶ Cohen, L., ‘Embellishing a life of labour: an interpretation of the material culture of American-class homes, 1885–1915’, in Schlereth, T. (ed.), Material Culture Studies in America, American Association for State and Local History, Nashville, 1982, pp. 289–305.Google Scholar

⁵⁷ Pocius, G., ‘Interior motives: rooms, objects, and meaning in Atlantic Canada homes’, Material History Bulletin, 15 (1982), 5–9.Google Scholar

⁵⁸ Prown, J., ‘Style as evidence’, Winterthur Portfolio, 15, autumn (1980), 197–210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPrown, J., ‘Mind in matter: an introduction to material culture theory and method’, Winterthur Portfolio, 17, Spring (1982), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁵⁹ Reynolds, B., ‘Material culture: a system of communication’, Margaret Shaw Lecture I, South African Museum, Cape Town, 1984.Google Scholar

⁶⁰ Schlereth, T., ‘Material Culture Studies in America, 1876–1976’, in Schlereth, T. (ed.), Material Culture Studies in America, American Association for State and Local History, Nashville, 1982 pp. 1–75.Google Scholar

⁶¹ Adams, M., ‘Structural aspects ofa village art’, American Anthropologist, 75 (1973), 265–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁶² McCracken, G., ‘Politics and ritual sotto voce: the use of demeanor as an instrument of politics in Elizabethan England, Canadian Journal of Anthropology, 3, Fall (1982), 85–100.Google ScholarMcCracken, G., ‘Clothing as language: an object lesson in the study of the expressive properties of material culture, in Reynolds, B. and Stott, M. (eds.), Material Anthropology: Contemporary Approaches to Material Culture, University Press of America, New York, 1987.Google Scholar

⁶³ Reynolds, B. and Stott, M. (eds.), Material Anthropology: Contemporary Approaches to Material Culture, University Press of America, New York, 1987.Google Scholar

⁶⁴ Leiss, W., The Limits of Satisfaction, University of Toronto Press. Toronto, 1976.Google ScholarLeiss, W., ‘Things come alive: economy and technology as modes of social representation in modern society’, paper presented at Table Ronde Internationale sur les Représentations. Montreal, October, 1983.Google Scholar

⁶⁵ Belk, R., ‘Acquiring, possessing, and collecting: fundamental processes in consumer behavior’, in Bush, R. and Hunt, S. (eds.), Marketing Theory: Philosophy of Science Perspectives, American Marketing Association, Chicago, 1982, 185–190, esp. p. 186.Google Scholar See also Olson, Clark, D. ‘Materialism in the home: the impact of artifacts on dyadic communication’Google Scholar, in Hirschman, E. and Holbrook, M. (eds.), Advances in Consumer Research, 12 (1985), 388–393.Google Scholar

⁶⁶ Csikszentimihalyi, M. and Rochberg-Halton, E., The Meaning of Things: Domestic Symbols and the Self, Cambridge University Press, New York, 1981, p. 96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁶⁷ Disman, M., ‘Domestic possessions as manifestations of elderly immigrants' identity’, paper presented at the 13th Annual Meeting of the Canadian Association on Gerontology, Vancouver, BC, 1984.Google Scholar

⁶⁸ Sherman, E. and Newman, E. S., ‘The meaning of cherished possessions for the elderly’, International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 8, 2 (1977–1978), 181–192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

⁶⁹ Ibid. p. 188.

⁷⁰ Solomon, M., ‘The role of products as social stimuli: a symbolic interactionism perspective’, Journal of Consumer Research, 10 12 (1983), 319–329, esp. p. 326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁷¹ Evans-Pritchard, E. E., ‘Nuer spear symbolism’, Anthropological Quarterly, 1 (1953), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarTurner, T., ‘Tchikrin, a central Brazilian tribe and its symbolic language of bodily adornment’, Natural History, 78, 10 (1969), 50–59, 80.Google ScholarTurner, V., ‘Betwixt and between: the liminal period in rites of passage’, in Turner, T. (ed.), The Forest of Symbols, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 1967, pp. 93–111.Google Scholar

⁷² Tambiah, S. J., ‘The cosmological and performative significance of a Thai Cult of healing through meditation’, Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry, 1 (1977), 97–132.Google ScholarPubMed

⁷³ Solomon, M., ‘The role of products as social stimuli: a symbolic interactionism perspective’, Journal of Consumer Research, 10 12 (1983), 319–329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarRook, D., ‘Ritual behavior and consumer symbolism’, in Kinnear, T. (ed.), Advances in Consumer Research, vol. II, Association for Consumer Research, Provo, Utah, 1984, pp. 279–284.Google Scholar

⁷⁴ Furby, L., ‘Possessions: toward a theory of their meaning and function throughout the life cycle’, in Bakes, P. (ed.), Lifespan Development and behavior, Academic Press, New York, 1978, pp. 297–336Google Scholar, Belk, R., ‘Gift-giving behavior’, in Sheth, J. (ed.) Research in Marketing, vol. 2, JAI Press, Greenwich, 1979, pp. 95–126.Google Scholar

⁷⁵ Levi-Strauss, C., The Elementary Structures of Kinship, Beacon Press, Boston, 1949.Google ScholarMauss, M., The Gift, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1970.Google ScholarMcCracken, G., ‘The Exchange of Tudor Children’, Journal of Family History, 8, Winter (1983), 303–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁷⁶ Schwartz, B., ‘The Social Psychology of the Gift’, American Journal of Sociology, 73, 07 (1967), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

⁷⁷ McCracken, G., ‘Politics and ritual sotto voce: the use of demeanor as an instrument of politics in Elizabethan England’, Canadian Journal of Anthropology, 3, fall (1982), 85–100.Google ScholarMcCracken, G., ‘Clothing as language: an object lesson in the study of the expressive properties of material culture’, in Reynolds, B. and Stott, M. (eds.), Material Anthropology: Contemporary Approaches to Material Culture, University Press of America, New York, 1985.Google Scholar

⁷⁸ Unruh, D., ‘Death and personal history: strategies of identity preservations’, Social Problems, 30, 02 (1983), 340–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁷⁹ Rosenfeld, J., The Legacy of Aging: Inheritance and Disinheritance in Social Perspective, Ablex, Norwood, New jersey, 1979.Google ScholarRosenfeld, J. ‘Old age, new beneficiaries: kin, friendship, and disinheritance’, Sociology and Social Research, 64, 1 (1980), 86–95.Google Scholar

⁸⁰ The following description summarizes a 61-page paper entitled ‘Lois Roget: curatorial consumer’, working paper 86–105, University of Guelph, Department of Consumer Studies, Working Paper Series.

⁸¹ Campbell, M., The English Yeoman Under Elizabeth and the Early Stuarts, Yale University Press, New Haven, 1942, p. 379.Google ScholarMorgan, E., The Puritan Family, Harper Torchbooks, New York, second edition, 1966.Google Scholar

⁸² Pocius, G., ‘Interior motives: rooms, objects, and meaning in Atlantic Canada Homes’, Material History Bulletin, 15 (1982), 5–9.Google Scholar

⁸³ Unruh, D., ‘Death and personal history: strategies of identity preservations’, Social Problems, 30, 02 (1983), 340–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar