Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-31T14:44:30.994Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Construction and Deconstruction of Self in Alzheimer's Disease

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2008

Steve R. Sabat†  and
Rom Harré†
Steve R. Sabat†
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, Georgetown University, Washington DC 20057.
Rom Harré†
Affiliation:
Sub-Faculty of Philosophy, University of Oxford, 10 Merton Street, Oxford OX14JJ.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The loss of self in Aizeheimer's Disease is examined from a social constructionist view of the nature of the self. Empirical evidence derived from the structure of the discourse and behaviour of three Alzheimer's sufferers is presented to show that self1, the self of personal identity, persists far into the end stage of the disease. Self2, the multiple personae that are projected into the public arena, and which require the cooperation of others in order to come into being, can be lost, but only indirectly as a result of the disease. The primary cause of the loss of self2 is the ways in which others view and treat the Alzheimer's sufferer. Recommendations are made regarding interactions between Alzheimer's sufferers and caregivers.

Type
Research Article
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 12 , Issue 4 , December 1992 , pp. 443 - 461
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bleathman, C. and Morton, I. 1988. Validation therapy with the demented elderly. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 13, 511–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bowen, M. 1990. Family Therapy in Clinical Practice. Jason Aronson, Inc., Northvale, N.J.Google Scholar
Cohen, A. and Eisdorfer, C. 1986. The Loss of Self. Norton, New York.Google Scholar
Coulter, J. 1981. The Social Construction of Mind. Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Davies, B. and Harré, R. 1990. Positioning. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20, 43–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E. 1969. Stigma. Allen, Lane: The Penguin Press, London.Google Scholar
Harré, R. 1983. Personal Being. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Harré, é R. 1993. Is there still a problem about the self? (forthcoming). Communication Yearbook.Google Scholar
Hollway, W. 1984. Gender difference and the production of subjectivity. In Henriques, J.et al. (eds), Changing the Subject. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
Kitwood, T. and Bredin, K. 1992. Towards a theory of dementia care: personhood and well-being. Ageing and Society, 12 (3), 269–287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mead, G. H. 1934. Mind, Self and Society. Chicago University Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Shotter, J. 1963. Social Accountability and Selfhood. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Shotter, J. and Newson, J. 1974. How babies communicate. New Society, 29, 345–7.Google Scholar
Urban, G. 1989. The ‘I’ of discourse. In Lee, B. and Urban, G. (eds), Semiotics, Self and Society. Mouton de Guyter, Berlin and New York, 27–52.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. 1965. Thought and Language. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. 1953. Philosophical Investigations. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Wood, L. and Ryan, E. B. 1991. Talk to elders: social structures, attitudes and forms of address. Ageing and Society, 11, 167–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar