Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T10:21:11.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The concept of ‘ageing well’ in ten Latin American and European countries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 December 2009

R. FERNÁNDEZ-BALLESTEROS ,
L F. GARCIA ,
D. ABARCA ,
E. BLANC ,
A. EFKLIDES ,
D. MORAITOU ,
R. KORNFELD ,
A. J. LERMA ,
V. M. MENDOZA-NUMEZ  and
N. M. MENDOZA-RUVALCABA
...Show all authors
R. FERNÁNDEZ-BALLESTEROS*
Affiliation:
Department of Biopsychology, Autonomous University of Madrid, Spain.
L F. GARCIA
Affiliation:
Department of Biopsychology, Autonomous University of Madrid, Spain.
D. ABARCA
Affiliation:
National Elderly Network, Vilcabamba, Ecuador.
E. BLANC
Affiliation:
Department of Social Sciences, Catholic University of Uruguay, La Plata, Uruguay.
A. EFKLIDES
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, Tessaloniki University, Greece.
D. MORAITOU
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, Tessaloniki University, Greece.
R. KORNFELD
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine Pontifical, Catholic University of Chile, Santiago.
A. J. LERMA
Affiliation:
Del Valle University, Cali, Colombia.
V. M. MENDOZA-NUMEZ
Affiliation:
Unit of Gerontology Research, Autonomous University of México, Mexico City.
N. M. MENDOZA-RUVALCABA
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Autonomous University of Guadalajara, Mexico.
T. OROSA
Affiliation:
Faculty of Psychology, National University, Havana, Cuba.
C. PAUL
Affiliation:
University of Porto, Portugal.
S. PATRICIA
Affiliation:
Air Force Gerontological Centre, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
*
Address for correspondence: Rocío Fernández-Ballesteros, Department of Biopsychology, Autonomous University of Madrid, 28049-Madrid, Spain. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A review of several studies examining the lay concept of successful ageing and related concepts leads to the conclusion that elders from different cultures appear to agree on most of the components identified in the literature. From the research emerges a multidimensional conceptualisation of ‘successful ageing’ that is described on the basis of physical, emotional, cognitive and social domains, and which coincides with most theoretical and empirical definitions. The main goal of the present research is to study similarities and differences between concepts of ‘successful ageing’ in several Latin American and European countries and in two different age groups, and also to examine whether a similar structure of the lay concept can be found across both continents. The results show minor differences at item levels among countries, continents and age groups, and a similar internal structure across them.

Keywords

ageing wellsuccessful ageingoptimal ageingimplicit conceptlay perceptions
Type
Articles
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , January 2010 , pp. 41 - 56
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bearon, L. B. 1996. Successful ageing: what does the ‘goodlife’ look like? The Forum, 3, 1–7.Google Scholar
Bowling, A. 2007. Aspiration for older age in the 21st century: what is successful ageing? International Journal of Ageing and Human Development, 64, 3, 263–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bull, V. L. 2005. Successful ageing and the Chinese-American elder. Dissertation Abstracts International, 65, 4434.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B. 1978. The Scientific Use of Factor Analysis in the Behavioral and Life Sciences. New York, Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernández-Ballesteros, R. 2008. Active Ageing: The Contribution of Psychology. Hogrefe and Huber, Gottingën, Germany.Google Scholar
Fernández-Ballesteros, R., García, L. F., Abarca, A., Blanc, L., Efklide, A., Kornfeld, R., Lerma, A. J., Mendoza-Nuñez, V., Mendoza-Ruvalcaba, N. M., Orosa, T., Paúl, C. and Patricia, S. 2008. Lay concept of ageing well: cross-cultural comparisons. Journal of American Geriatric Society, 56, 5, 950–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hambleton, R. K. 2001. The next generation of the ITC test translation and adaptation guidelines. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17, 3, 164–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, L. G. and JrMontanelli, R. G. 1975. An investigation of the parallel analysis criterion for determining the number of common factors. Multivariate Behavioural Research, 10, 2, 193–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsu, H. C. 2006. Exploring elderly people's perspectives on successful ageing in Taiwan. Ageing & Society, 27, 1, 87–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, A. R. 1998. The G Factor: The Science of Mental Ability. Praeger, Westport, Connecticut.Google Scholar
Knight, T. and Ricciardelli, L. A. 2003. Successful ageing: perceptions of adults aged between 70 and 101 years. International Journal of Ageing Human Development, 56, 3, 223–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Litwin, H. 2005. Correlates of successful ageing: are they universal? International Journal of Ageing and Human Development, 61, 4, 313–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loehlin, J. C. 1992. Latent Variable Models: An Introduction to Factor, Path, and Structural Analysis. Erlbaum, Mahwah, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Lorenzo-Seva, U. and Ferrando, P. J. 2006. FACTOR: A computer program to fit the exploratory factor analysis model. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 38, 1, 88–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matsubayashi, K., Ishine, M., Wada, T. and Okumiya, K. 2006. Older adults' view of ‘successful ageing’: comparison of older Japanese and Americans. Journal of American Geriatrics Society, 54, 1, 184–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McArdle, J. J. 1996. Current direction in structural factor analysis. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 5, 1, 11–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phelan, E. A., Anderson, L. A., Lacroix, A.-Z. and Larson, E. B. 2004. Older adults' views of ‘successful ageing’: how do they compare with researchers' definitions? Journal of American Geriatric Society, 52, 2, 211–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reichsadt, J., Depp, C. A., Palinkas, L. A., Folsom, D. P. and Jeste, D. V. 2007. Building blocks of successful ageing: a focus group study of older adults' perceived contributors to successful ageing. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 15, 3, 194–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryff, C. D. 1989. In the eye of the beholder: views of psychological well-being among middle-aged and older adults. Psychology and Ageing, 4, 2, 195–210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmid, J. and Leiman, J. M. 1957. The development of hierarchical factor solutions. Psychometrika, 22, 1, 53–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberbg, R. J. 1990. Methaphors of Mind. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Tate, R. B., Lah, L. and Cuddy, E. 2003. Definition of successful aging by elderly Canadian males: the Manitoba follow-up study. The Gerontologist, 43, 5, 735–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
United Nations Organisation 2002. International Plan of Action on Ageing. UNO, New York.Google Scholar
Von Faber, M., Van der Wield, A. B., Van Excel, E., Gussekloo, J., Lagaay, A. M., Van Dongen, E. V., Knook, D. L., Van der Ges, S. and Westendorf, R. G. J. 2001. Successful ageing in the oldest old. Archives of Internal Medicine, 161, 22, 2694–700.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organisation. 2002. Active Ageing. WHO, Geneva.Google Scholar