Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T16:29:11.728Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The challenges of conducting focus-group research among Asian older adults

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 March 2011

KALYANI K. MEHTA
KALYANI K. MEHTA*
Affiliation:
Department of Social Work, University of Singapore, Singapore.
*
Address for correspondence: Kalyani Mehta, Department of Social Work, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, University of Singapore, Blk AS3 #04-08, 3 Arts Link, Singapore 117570. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The paper demonstrates the particular value of focus groups as a data collection method in studies of older people with particular reference to those living in large cities in Asia. The strengths and limitations of focus groups as a modality of qualitative research are discussed and a case study is presented. Some of the method's strengths derive from the synergy of the interactions among elders with a shared history and lived experiences. Focus-group exchanges have the potential for inter-personal learning and reminiscence benefits. One difficulty with the method, however, is that many Asian people are inhibited about sharing personal problems in a group context. Drawing from a number of empirical studies based in Singapore, the challenges of conducting focus groups with older participants are detailed and appropriate ways of addressing them considered. The article elaborates on the author's use of software such as NVivo to expedite the analysis of large volumes of transcribed data, and on the retrieval of relevant quotes. Software is useful in extracting themes from codes, as well as allowing the researcher to appreciate the links between codes. Ethical issues such as confidentiality, cultural sensitivities such as language and respect for religion and tradition, and lessons learnt from conducting research using the group setting are discussed. Culturally relevant responses to these challenges are offered which could be useful for future researchers conducting focus groups in Asia.

Keywords

focus groupsolder peopleAsiamethodologyelderly
Type
Articles
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 31 , Issue 3: Methodologies for Ageing Populations , April 2011 , pp. 408 - 421
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barbour, R. S. 2007. Doing Focus Groups. Sage, Los Angeles.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbour, R. S. and Kitzinger, J. (eds)2001. Developing Focus Group Research: Politics, Theory and Practice. Second edition, Sage, London.Google Scholar
Berg, B. L. 1998. Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences. Third edition, Allyn and Bacon, London.Google Scholar
Culley, L., Hudson, N. and Rapport, F. 2007. Using focus groups with minority ethnic communities: researching infertility in British South Asian communities. Qualitative Health Research, 17, 1, 102–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fern, E. F. 2001. Advanced Focus Group Research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, California.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goss, J. 1996. Focus groups as alternative research practice: experience with transmigrants in Indonesia. Area, 28, 2, 115–23.Google Scholar
Greenbaum, T. L. 1993. The Handbook for Focus Group Research. Lexington, Lexington, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Greenbaum, T. L. 2000. Moderating Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Group Facilitation. Sage, Thousand Oaks, California.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennink, M. M. 2008. Emergent issues in international focus-group discussions. In Hesse-Biber, S. N. and Leavy, P. (eds), Handbook of Emergent Methods. Guildford, New York, 207–20.Google Scholar
Ip, D., Lui, C. W. and Chui, W. C. 2007. Veiled entrapment: a study of social isolation of older Chinese migrants in Brisbane, Queensland. Ageing & Society, 27, 5, 719–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelle, U. (ed.)1995. Computer-aided Qualitative Data Analysis: Theory, Methods and Practice. Sage, London.Google Scholar
Knodel, J. 1995. Focus groups as a qualitative method for cross-cultural research in social gerontology. Journal of Cross-cultural Gerontology, 10, 1/2, 7–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreager, P. 2006. Migration, social structure and old-age support networks: a comparison of three Indonesian communities. Ageing & Society, 26, 1, 37–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kruger, R. A. and Casey, M. A. 2000. Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. Third edition, Sage, Thousand Oaks, California.Google Scholar
Lamb, S. 2009. Aging and the Indian Diaspora: Cosmopolitan Families in India and Abroad. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Indiana.Google Scholar
Mehta, K. K. 1997. The impact of religious beliefs and practice on aging: a cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Aging Studies, 11, 2, 101–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehta, K. K. 1999. Intergenerational exchanges: qualitative evidence from Singapore. Southeast Asian Journal of Social Science, 27, 2, 111–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehta, K. and Singh, A. 2008. Indian Disapora: Voices of the disaporic elders in five countries. Transgressions: Cultural Studies and Education Series Vol. 24. Sense Publishers, Rotterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehta, K. K., Lee, A. Y. and Osman, M. 1995. Living arrangements of the elderly in Singapore: cultural norms in transition. Journal of Cross-cultural Gerontology, 10, 1/2, 113–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moen, J., Antonov, K., Illson, J. L. G. and Ring, L. 2010. Interaction between participants in focus groups with older patients and general practitioners. Qualitative Health Research, 20, 5, 607–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morgan, D. L. 1988. Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. Qualitative Research Methods Series 16, Sage, Newbury Park, California.Google Scholar
Morgan, D. (ed.)1993. Successful Focus Groups: Advancing the State of the Art. Sage, Newbury Park, California.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, D. L. 1996. Focus groups. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 129–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, D. and Krueger, R. A. 1993. When to use focus groups and why. In Morgan, D. (ed.), Successful Focus Groups: Advancing the State of the Art. Sage, Newbury Park, California, 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, D. L., Krueger, R. A. and King, J. A. (eds)1998. Focus Group Kit. Sage, Thousand Oaks, California.Google Scholar
Naylor, P., Wharf-Higgins, J., Blair, L., Green, L. and O'Connor, B. 2002. Evaluating the participatory process in a community-based heart health project. Social Science and Medicine, 55, 7, 1173–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Landingham, M. J., Wassana, I. and Saengtienchai, C. 2005. Community reaction to persons with HIV/AIDS and their parents in Thailand. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 46, 4, 392–410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Willigen, J. and Lewis, D. C. 2006. The cultural context of aging. In Yoon, H. and Hendricks, J. (eds), Handbook of Asian Aging. Baywood, Amytiville, New York, 117–44.Google Scholar